New 16GB of RAM installed yet I see 15.3 on my system. Why?
Just switched 4GBs to 16GBs of RAM. However, when I look at how much memory I have, it says 15.3. I'm just wondering why did my memory drop down when I just installed 16 GBs of RAM.
ram
add a comment |
Just switched 4GBs to 16GBs of RAM. However, when I look at how much memory I have, it says 15.3. I'm just wondering why did my memory drop down when I just installed 16 GBs of RAM.
ram
Possible duplicate of Why will Ubuntu no longer measure file size unit as byte, megabyte, gigabyte, etc?
– dadexix86
Mar 8 '16 at 23:04
1
This is not a duplicate of that question. RAM size is reported in base 2 by both manufacturers and Ubuntu. The difference is due to something else.
– TheSchwa
Mar 8 '16 at 23:57
The other forum does not answer my question as to why I went from 16GB to 15.3. It's not about the changes of the file, I just want to know what happened to the rest of my memory? Is it something that Linux does. Take up a portion, or something in that matter.
– Geri Sati
Mar 9 '16 at 0:09
That screen show 15.6 for me. But free in terminal shows 16308044 . Is video excluded in one and not other?
– oldfred
Mar 9 '16 at 0:32
If you claim that all sizes are on base 2, please use a consistent notation. Seeman units
for a convenient reference. To add to the confusion, also note in your screenshot that GiB is used for memory, and GB for disk space
– XavierStuvw
Jun 8 '17 at 17:57
add a comment |
Just switched 4GBs to 16GBs of RAM. However, when I look at how much memory I have, it says 15.3. I'm just wondering why did my memory drop down when I just installed 16 GBs of RAM.
ram
Just switched 4GBs to 16GBs of RAM. However, when I look at how much memory I have, it says 15.3. I'm just wondering why did my memory drop down when I just installed 16 GBs of RAM.
ram
ram
edited Jun 8 '17 at 13:29
Melebius
4,38251838
4,38251838
asked Mar 8 '16 at 23:00
Geri Sati
435
435
Possible duplicate of Why will Ubuntu no longer measure file size unit as byte, megabyte, gigabyte, etc?
– dadexix86
Mar 8 '16 at 23:04
1
This is not a duplicate of that question. RAM size is reported in base 2 by both manufacturers and Ubuntu. The difference is due to something else.
– TheSchwa
Mar 8 '16 at 23:57
The other forum does not answer my question as to why I went from 16GB to 15.3. It's not about the changes of the file, I just want to know what happened to the rest of my memory? Is it something that Linux does. Take up a portion, or something in that matter.
– Geri Sati
Mar 9 '16 at 0:09
That screen show 15.6 for me. But free in terminal shows 16308044 . Is video excluded in one and not other?
– oldfred
Mar 9 '16 at 0:32
If you claim that all sizes are on base 2, please use a consistent notation. Seeman units
for a convenient reference. To add to the confusion, also note in your screenshot that GiB is used for memory, and GB for disk space
– XavierStuvw
Jun 8 '17 at 17:57
add a comment |
Possible duplicate of Why will Ubuntu no longer measure file size unit as byte, megabyte, gigabyte, etc?
– dadexix86
Mar 8 '16 at 23:04
1
This is not a duplicate of that question. RAM size is reported in base 2 by both manufacturers and Ubuntu. The difference is due to something else.
– TheSchwa
Mar 8 '16 at 23:57
The other forum does not answer my question as to why I went from 16GB to 15.3. It's not about the changes of the file, I just want to know what happened to the rest of my memory? Is it something that Linux does. Take up a portion, or something in that matter.
– Geri Sati
Mar 9 '16 at 0:09
That screen show 15.6 for me. But free in terminal shows 16308044 . Is video excluded in one and not other?
– oldfred
Mar 9 '16 at 0:32
If you claim that all sizes are on base 2, please use a consistent notation. Seeman units
for a convenient reference. To add to the confusion, also note in your screenshot that GiB is used for memory, and GB for disk space
– XavierStuvw
Jun 8 '17 at 17:57
Possible duplicate of Why will Ubuntu no longer measure file size unit as byte, megabyte, gigabyte, etc?
– dadexix86
Mar 8 '16 at 23:04
Possible duplicate of Why will Ubuntu no longer measure file size unit as byte, megabyte, gigabyte, etc?
– dadexix86
Mar 8 '16 at 23:04
1
1
This is not a duplicate of that question. RAM size is reported in base 2 by both manufacturers and Ubuntu. The difference is due to something else.
– TheSchwa
Mar 8 '16 at 23:57
This is not a duplicate of that question. RAM size is reported in base 2 by both manufacturers and Ubuntu. The difference is due to something else.
– TheSchwa
Mar 8 '16 at 23:57
The other forum does not answer my question as to why I went from 16GB to 15.3. It's not about the changes of the file, I just want to know what happened to the rest of my memory? Is it something that Linux does. Take up a portion, or something in that matter.
– Geri Sati
Mar 9 '16 at 0:09
The other forum does not answer my question as to why I went from 16GB to 15.3. It's not about the changes of the file, I just want to know what happened to the rest of my memory? Is it something that Linux does. Take up a portion, or something in that matter.
– Geri Sati
Mar 9 '16 at 0:09
That screen show 15.6 for me. But free in terminal shows 16308044 . Is video excluded in one and not other?
– oldfred
Mar 9 '16 at 0:32
That screen show 15.6 for me. But free in terminal shows 16308044 . Is video excluded in one and not other?
– oldfred
Mar 9 '16 at 0:32
If you claim that all sizes are on base 2, please use a consistent notation. See
man units
for a convenient reference. To add to the confusion, also note in your screenshot that GiB is used for memory, and GB for disk space– XavierStuvw
Jun 8 '17 at 17:57
If you claim that all sizes are on base 2, please use a consistent notation. See
man units
for a convenient reference. To add to the confusion, also note in your screenshot that GiB is used for memory, and GB for disk space– XavierStuvw
Jun 8 '17 at 17:57
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
Short Answer
It's probably just the kernel using memory. Instead of reporting kernel memory usage, Ubuntu instead subtracts form the total available. This is simply to let you know that the kernel memory cannot be freed in most cases. That memory is being used for things that are absolutely necessary, and so it will never be available.
Diagnostic Commands
I don't expect you to run all of these, but I've included them here for reference and completeness. Most relevant are commands 3 and 4. Also please note that all sizes are going to be in base 2 (e.g. GiB
) and not in base 10 (e.g. GB
) despite what the unit abbreviations might be.
You can check how big your RAM sticks are claiming to be with:
sudo dmidecode | grep Size | grep MB
You can check how much RAM is available for general use with (look for
Mem
andtotal
):
free -h
You can estimate how much memory the kernel is using with:
cat /proc/meminfo | grep Slab
You can check for "stolen" graphics card memory with:
dmesg | grep stolen
You can look for specific hardware reserved memory by looking through:
dmesg | grep e820
You can test to make certain all of your memory works by running memtest
Explanation
The most likely explanation is simply that the extra space is being used by either your graphics card or the kernel itself. If you're not familiar, the kernel is the lowest-level part of the operating system, and any memory that it's using will not be available to you and so is not reported as free. The memory might be used for any number of reasons, such as the virtual memory tables, memory-mapped I/O, kernel processes, certain caches, shared graphics memory, etc.
Example: Looking at My Laptop
It is very likely that adding the output of command 3 to your 15.3GiB
will result in almost exactly 16GiB
. This was the case in my system:
- Installed RAM:
6GiB
- Reported in System Settings > Details:
5.6GiB
- Output of
cat /proc/meminfo | grep Slab
:316652 kB
- Converted to
GiB
:316652/2^20 = 0.3GiB
- Output of
dmesg | grep stolen
:32768K
- Converted to
GiB
:32768/2^20 = 0.03GiB
- Adding them together:
5.6 + 0.3 + 0.03 = 5.93GiB
Since the Slab
memory is not comprehensive, we can assume that the kernel is using the remaining 0.07GiB
in places we can't see, and so this is a very satisfying result.
See Also
- How much RAM does the kernel use? (Unix & Linux)
- Reducing reserved RAM (Arch forums)
- Why is some RAM marked as hardware reserved in Windows 7? (Superuser)
- Why does my system show 3.2GiB of RAM? (Unix & Linux)
- Ubuntu units policy (Ubuntu wiki)
1
Kernel slab memory is counted as part of "used memory" and does not reduce the "total" memory. You can see that quite easily by checking the system when it has a lot of slab in use, and again when it is little.
– psusi
Jun 8 '17 at 13:40
1
cat | grep
is a useless use ofcat
:grep
itself accepts filenames as parameters.
– Ruslan
Jun 8 '17 at 16:44
@Ruslan Lol, thanks. I still haven't trained myself out of that one. Albeit it's less "correct" in some sense, I still like it for readability and it flows better with the other commands in the post.
– TheSchwa
Jun 8 '17 at 19:00
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "89"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f743649%2fnew-16gb-of-ram-installed-yet-i-see-15-3-on-my-system-why%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Short Answer
It's probably just the kernel using memory. Instead of reporting kernel memory usage, Ubuntu instead subtracts form the total available. This is simply to let you know that the kernel memory cannot be freed in most cases. That memory is being used for things that are absolutely necessary, and so it will never be available.
Diagnostic Commands
I don't expect you to run all of these, but I've included them here for reference and completeness. Most relevant are commands 3 and 4. Also please note that all sizes are going to be in base 2 (e.g. GiB
) and not in base 10 (e.g. GB
) despite what the unit abbreviations might be.
You can check how big your RAM sticks are claiming to be with:
sudo dmidecode | grep Size | grep MB
You can check how much RAM is available for general use with (look for
Mem
andtotal
):
free -h
You can estimate how much memory the kernel is using with:
cat /proc/meminfo | grep Slab
You can check for "stolen" graphics card memory with:
dmesg | grep stolen
You can look for specific hardware reserved memory by looking through:
dmesg | grep e820
You can test to make certain all of your memory works by running memtest
Explanation
The most likely explanation is simply that the extra space is being used by either your graphics card or the kernel itself. If you're not familiar, the kernel is the lowest-level part of the operating system, and any memory that it's using will not be available to you and so is not reported as free. The memory might be used for any number of reasons, such as the virtual memory tables, memory-mapped I/O, kernel processes, certain caches, shared graphics memory, etc.
Example: Looking at My Laptop
It is very likely that adding the output of command 3 to your 15.3GiB
will result in almost exactly 16GiB
. This was the case in my system:
- Installed RAM:
6GiB
- Reported in System Settings > Details:
5.6GiB
- Output of
cat /proc/meminfo | grep Slab
:316652 kB
- Converted to
GiB
:316652/2^20 = 0.3GiB
- Output of
dmesg | grep stolen
:32768K
- Converted to
GiB
:32768/2^20 = 0.03GiB
- Adding them together:
5.6 + 0.3 + 0.03 = 5.93GiB
Since the Slab
memory is not comprehensive, we can assume that the kernel is using the remaining 0.07GiB
in places we can't see, and so this is a very satisfying result.
See Also
- How much RAM does the kernel use? (Unix & Linux)
- Reducing reserved RAM (Arch forums)
- Why is some RAM marked as hardware reserved in Windows 7? (Superuser)
- Why does my system show 3.2GiB of RAM? (Unix & Linux)
- Ubuntu units policy (Ubuntu wiki)
1
Kernel slab memory is counted as part of "used memory" and does not reduce the "total" memory. You can see that quite easily by checking the system when it has a lot of slab in use, and again when it is little.
– psusi
Jun 8 '17 at 13:40
1
cat | grep
is a useless use ofcat
:grep
itself accepts filenames as parameters.
– Ruslan
Jun 8 '17 at 16:44
@Ruslan Lol, thanks. I still haven't trained myself out of that one. Albeit it's less "correct" in some sense, I still like it for readability and it flows better with the other commands in the post.
– TheSchwa
Jun 8 '17 at 19:00
add a comment |
Short Answer
It's probably just the kernel using memory. Instead of reporting kernel memory usage, Ubuntu instead subtracts form the total available. This is simply to let you know that the kernel memory cannot be freed in most cases. That memory is being used for things that are absolutely necessary, and so it will never be available.
Diagnostic Commands
I don't expect you to run all of these, but I've included them here for reference and completeness. Most relevant are commands 3 and 4. Also please note that all sizes are going to be in base 2 (e.g. GiB
) and not in base 10 (e.g. GB
) despite what the unit abbreviations might be.
You can check how big your RAM sticks are claiming to be with:
sudo dmidecode | grep Size | grep MB
You can check how much RAM is available for general use with (look for
Mem
andtotal
):
free -h
You can estimate how much memory the kernel is using with:
cat /proc/meminfo | grep Slab
You can check for "stolen" graphics card memory with:
dmesg | grep stolen
You can look for specific hardware reserved memory by looking through:
dmesg | grep e820
You can test to make certain all of your memory works by running memtest
Explanation
The most likely explanation is simply that the extra space is being used by either your graphics card or the kernel itself. If you're not familiar, the kernel is the lowest-level part of the operating system, and any memory that it's using will not be available to you and so is not reported as free. The memory might be used for any number of reasons, such as the virtual memory tables, memory-mapped I/O, kernel processes, certain caches, shared graphics memory, etc.
Example: Looking at My Laptop
It is very likely that adding the output of command 3 to your 15.3GiB
will result in almost exactly 16GiB
. This was the case in my system:
- Installed RAM:
6GiB
- Reported in System Settings > Details:
5.6GiB
- Output of
cat /proc/meminfo | grep Slab
:316652 kB
- Converted to
GiB
:316652/2^20 = 0.3GiB
- Output of
dmesg | grep stolen
:32768K
- Converted to
GiB
:32768/2^20 = 0.03GiB
- Adding them together:
5.6 + 0.3 + 0.03 = 5.93GiB
Since the Slab
memory is not comprehensive, we can assume that the kernel is using the remaining 0.07GiB
in places we can't see, and so this is a very satisfying result.
See Also
- How much RAM does the kernel use? (Unix & Linux)
- Reducing reserved RAM (Arch forums)
- Why is some RAM marked as hardware reserved in Windows 7? (Superuser)
- Why does my system show 3.2GiB of RAM? (Unix & Linux)
- Ubuntu units policy (Ubuntu wiki)
1
Kernel slab memory is counted as part of "used memory" and does not reduce the "total" memory. You can see that quite easily by checking the system when it has a lot of slab in use, and again when it is little.
– psusi
Jun 8 '17 at 13:40
1
cat | grep
is a useless use ofcat
:grep
itself accepts filenames as parameters.
– Ruslan
Jun 8 '17 at 16:44
@Ruslan Lol, thanks. I still haven't trained myself out of that one. Albeit it's less "correct" in some sense, I still like it for readability and it flows better with the other commands in the post.
– TheSchwa
Jun 8 '17 at 19:00
add a comment |
Short Answer
It's probably just the kernel using memory. Instead of reporting kernel memory usage, Ubuntu instead subtracts form the total available. This is simply to let you know that the kernel memory cannot be freed in most cases. That memory is being used for things that are absolutely necessary, and so it will never be available.
Diagnostic Commands
I don't expect you to run all of these, but I've included them here for reference and completeness. Most relevant are commands 3 and 4. Also please note that all sizes are going to be in base 2 (e.g. GiB
) and not in base 10 (e.g. GB
) despite what the unit abbreviations might be.
You can check how big your RAM sticks are claiming to be with:
sudo dmidecode | grep Size | grep MB
You can check how much RAM is available for general use with (look for
Mem
andtotal
):
free -h
You can estimate how much memory the kernel is using with:
cat /proc/meminfo | grep Slab
You can check for "stolen" graphics card memory with:
dmesg | grep stolen
You can look for specific hardware reserved memory by looking through:
dmesg | grep e820
You can test to make certain all of your memory works by running memtest
Explanation
The most likely explanation is simply that the extra space is being used by either your graphics card or the kernel itself. If you're not familiar, the kernel is the lowest-level part of the operating system, and any memory that it's using will not be available to you and so is not reported as free. The memory might be used for any number of reasons, such as the virtual memory tables, memory-mapped I/O, kernel processes, certain caches, shared graphics memory, etc.
Example: Looking at My Laptop
It is very likely that adding the output of command 3 to your 15.3GiB
will result in almost exactly 16GiB
. This was the case in my system:
- Installed RAM:
6GiB
- Reported in System Settings > Details:
5.6GiB
- Output of
cat /proc/meminfo | grep Slab
:316652 kB
- Converted to
GiB
:316652/2^20 = 0.3GiB
- Output of
dmesg | grep stolen
:32768K
- Converted to
GiB
:32768/2^20 = 0.03GiB
- Adding them together:
5.6 + 0.3 + 0.03 = 5.93GiB
Since the Slab
memory is not comprehensive, we can assume that the kernel is using the remaining 0.07GiB
in places we can't see, and so this is a very satisfying result.
See Also
- How much RAM does the kernel use? (Unix & Linux)
- Reducing reserved RAM (Arch forums)
- Why is some RAM marked as hardware reserved in Windows 7? (Superuser)
- Why does my system show 3.2GiB of RAM? (Unix & Linux)
- Ubuntu units policy (Ubuntu wiki)
Short Answer
It's probably just the kernel using memory. Instead of reporting kernel memory usage, Ubuntu instead subtracts form the total available. This is simply to let you know that the kernel memory cannot be freed in most cases. That memory is being used for things that are absolutely necessary, and so it will never be available.
Diagnostic Commands
I don't expect you to run all of these, but I've included them here for reference and completeness. Most relevant are commands 3 and 4. Also please note that all sizes are going to be in base 2 (e.g. GiB
) and not in base 10 (e.g. GB
) despite what the unit abbreviations might be.
You can check how big your RAM sticks are claiming to be with:
sudo dmidecode | grep Size | grep MB
You can check how much RAM is available for general use with (look for
Mem
andtotal
):
free -h
You can estimate how much memory the kernel is using with:
cat /proc/meminfo | grep Slab
You can check for "stolen" graphics card memory with:
dmesg | grep stolen
You can look for specific hardware reserved memory by looking through:
dmesg | grep e820
You can test to make certain all of your memory works by running memtest
Explanation
The most likely explanation is simply that the extra space is being used by either your graphics card or the kernel itself. If you're not familiar, the kernel is the lowest-level part of the operating system, and any memory that it's using will not be available to you and so is not reported as free. The memory might be used for any number of reasons, such as the virtual memory tables, memory-mapped I/O, kernel processes, certain caches, shared graphics memory, etc.
Example: Looking at My Laptop
It is very likely that adding the output of command 3 to your 15.3GiB
will result in almost exactly 16GiB
. This was the case in my system:
- Installed RAM:
6GiB
- Reported in System Settings > Details:
5.6GiB
- Output of
cat /proc/meminfo | grep Slab
:316652 kB
- Converted to
GiB
:316652/2^20 = 0.3GiB
- Output of
dmesg | grep stolen
:32768K
- Converted to
GiB
:32768/2^20 = 0.03GiB
- Adding them together:
5.6 + 0.3 + 0.03 = 5.93GiB
Since the Slab
memory is not comprehensive, we can assume that the kernel is using the remaining 0.07GiB
in places we can't see, and so this is a very satisfying result.
See Also
- How much RAM does the kernel use? (Unix & Linux)
- Reducing reserved RAM (Arch forums)
- Why is some RAM marked as hardware reserved in Windows 7? (Superuser)
- Why does my system show 3.2GiB of RAM? (Unix & Linux)
- Ubuntu units policy (Ubuntu wiki)
edited Apr 13 '17 at 12:37
Community♦
1
1
answered Mar 9 '16 at 0:53
TheSchwa
3,12711735
3,12711735
1
Kernel slab memory is counted as part of "used memory" and does not reduce the "total" memory. You can see that quite easily by checking the system when it has a lot of slab in use, and again when it is little.
– psusi
Jun 8 '17 at 13:40
1
cat | grep
is a useless use ofcat
:grep
itself accepts filenames as parameters.
– Ruslan
Jun 8 '17 at 16:44
@Ruslan Lol, thanks. I still haven't trained myself out of that one. Albeit it's less "correct" in some sense, I still like it for readability and it flows better with the other commands in the post.
– TheSchwa
Jun 8 '17 at 19:00
add a comment |
1
Kernel slab memory is counted as part of "used memory" and does not reduce the "total" memory. You can see that quite easily by checking the system when it has a lot of slab in use, and again when it is little.
– psusi
Jun 8 '17 at 13:40
1
cat | grep
is a useless use ofcat
:grep
itself accepts filenames as parameters.
– Ruslan
Jun 8 '17 at 16:44
@Ruslan Lol, thanks. I still haven't trained myself out of that one. Albeit it's less "correct" in some sense, I still like it for readability and it flows better with the other commands in the post.
– TheSchwa
Jun 8 '17 at 19:00
1
1
Kernel slab memory is counted as part of "used memory" and does not reduce the "total" memory. You can see that quite easily by checking the system when it has a lot of slab in use, and again when it is little.
– psusi
Jun 8 '17 at 13:40
Kernel slab memory is counted as part of "used memory" and does not reduce the "total" memory. You can see that quite easily by checking the system when it has a lot of slab in use, and again when it is little.
– psusi
Jun 8 '17 at 13:40
1
1
cat | grep
is a useless use of cat
: grep
itself accepts filenames as parameters.– Ruslan
Jun 8 '17 at 16:44
cat | grep
is a useless use of cat
: grep
itself accepts filenames as parameters.– Ruslan
Jun 8 '17 at 16:44
@Ruslan Lol, thanks. I still haven't trained myself out of that one. Albeit it's less "correct" in some sense, I still like it for readability and it flows better with the other commands in the post.
– TheSchwa
Jun 8 '17 at 19:00
@Ruslan Lol, thanks. I still haven't trained myself out of that one. Albeit it's less "correct" in some sense, I still like it for readability and it flows better with the other commands in the post.
– TheSchwa
Jun 8 '17 at 19:00
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Ask Ubuntu!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f743649%2fnew-16gb-of-ram-installed-yet-i-see-15-3-on-my-system-why%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Possible duplicate of Why will Ubuntu no longer measure file size unit as byte, megabyte, gigabyte, etc?
– dadexix86
Mar 8 '16 at 23:04
1
This is not a duplicate of that question. RAM size is reported in base 2 by both manufacturers and Ubuntu. The difference is due to something else.
– TheSchwa
Mar 8 '16 at 23:57
The other forum does not answer my question as to why I went from 16GB to 15.3. It's not about the changes of the file, I just want to know what happened to the rest of my memory? Is it something that Linux does. Take up a portion, or something in that matter.
– Geri Sati
Mar 9 '16 at 0:09
That screen show 15.6 for me. But free in terminal shows 16308044 . Is video excluded in one and not other?
– oldfred
Mar 9 '16 at 0:32
If you claim that all sizes are on base 2, please use a consistent notation. See
man units
for a convenient reference. To add to the confusion, also note in your screenshot that GiB is used for memory, and GB for disk space– XavierStuvw
Jun 8 '17 at 17:57