Using bm with eulervm gives inconsistent ‘’ characters












7














I prefer to use bm package to bold math. However, I noticed that when used with eulervm, this gives inconsistent results for ‘<’ and ‘>’ characters.



I wonder what causes it and can the usage bm be fixed to get proper ‘<’.



documentclass{article}



usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}

usepackage[T1]{fontenc}



%usepackage{amsmath}



usepackage[euler-digits,euler-hat-accent]{eulervm}



usepackage{bm}



begin{document}



    texttt{hphantom{mathbold}llap{bm}}: quad $ 1 + 1 < 3; quad bm{1 + 1 < 3} $



    texttt{mathbold}: quad $ 1 + 1 < 3; quad mathbold{1 + 1 < 3} $



end{document}


MWE






math-mode bold bm eulervm







share|improve this question






















  • Exciting problem!
    – Jonas Schwarz
    Dec 22 at 22:03
















7














I prefer to use bm package to bold math. However, I noticed that when used with eulervm, this gives inconsistent results for ‘<’ and ‘>’ characters.



I wonder what causes it and can the usage bm be fixed to get proper ‘<’.



documentclass{article}



usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}

usepackage[T1]{fontenc}



%usepackage{amsmath}



usepackage[euler-digits,euler-hat-accent]{eulervm}



usepackage{bm}



begin{document}



    texttt{hphantom{mathbold}llap{bm}}: quad $ 1 + 1 < 3; quad bm{1 + 1 < 3} $



    texttt{mathbold}: quad $ 1 + 1 < 3; quad mathbold{1 + 1 < 3} $



end{document}


MWE






math-mode bold bm eulervm







share|improve this question






















  • Exciting problem!
    – Jonas Schwarz
    Dec 22 at 22:03














7












7








7


1





I prefer to use bm package to bold math. However, I noticed that when used with eulervm, this gives inconsistent results for ‘<’ and ‘>’ characters.



I wonder what causes it and can the usage bm be fixed to get proper ‘<’.



documentclass{article}



usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}

usepackage[T1]{fontenc}



%usepackage{amsmath}



usepackage[euler-digits,euler-hat-accent]{eulervm}



usepackage{bm}



begin{document}



    texttt{hphantom{mathbold}llap{bm}}: quad $ 1 + 1 < 3; quad bm{1 + 1 < 3} $



    texttt{mathbold}: quad $ 1 + 1 < 3; quad mathbold{1 + 1 < 3} $



end{document}


MWE






math-mode bold bm eulervm







share|improve this question













I prefer to use bm package to bold math. However, I noticed that when used with eulervm, this gives inconsistent results for ‘<’ and ‘>’ characters.



I wonder what causes it and can the usage bm be fixed to get proper ‘<’.



documentclass{article}



usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}

usepackage[T1]{fontenc}



%usepackage{amsmath}



usepackage[euler-digits,euler-hat-accent]{eulervm}



usepackage{bm}



begin{document}



    texttt{hphantom{mathbold}llap{bm}}: quad $ 1 + 1 < 3; quad bm{1 + 1 < 3} $



    texttt{mathbold}: quad $ 1 + 1 < 3; quad mathbold{1 + 1 < 3} $



end{document}


MWE






math-mode bold bm eulervm




math-mode bold bm eulervm






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Dec 22 at 17:14









Peter

395110




395110












  • Exciting problem!
    – Jonas Schwarz
    Dec 22 at 22:03


















  • Exciting problem!
    – Jonas Schwarz
    Dec 22 at 22:03
















Exciting problem!
– Jonas Schwarz
Dec 22 at 22:03




Exciting problem!
– Jonas Schwarz
Dec 22 at 22:03










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















8














There is an inconsistency in the shape of < and > in the zeurm10 and zeurb10 fonts used for the symbols with eulervm active:



documentclass{article}



usepackage{amsmath}

usepackage[euler-digits,euler-hat-accent]{eulervm}

usepackage{bm}



begin{document}



begin{tabular}{@{}ll@{}}

bm: & $1 + 1 < 3$; $bm{1 + 1 < 3}$ \

mathbold: & $1 + 1 < 3$; $mathbold{1 + 1 < 3}$

end{tabular}



{usefont{U}{zeur}{m}{n}symbol{"3C}}



{usefont{U}{zeur}{b}{n}symbol{"3C}}



end{document}


enter image description here



With mathbold, which is a math alphabet selection, only letters and numbers become bold, but not other symbols.



You can work around the inconsistency by using Computer Modern for the < and > symbols.



documentclass{article}



usepackage{amsmath}

usepackage[euler-digits,euler-hat-accent]{eulervm}

usepackage{bm}



DeclareSymbolFont{cmletters}{OML}{cmm}{m}{it}

SetSymbolFont{cmletters}{bold}{OML}{cmm}{b}{it}

DeclareMathSymbol{<}{mathrel}{cmletters}{"3C}

DeclareMathSymbol{>}{mathrel}{cmletters}{"3E}



begin{document}



begin{tabular}{@{}ll@{}}

bm: & $1 + 1 < 3$; $bm{1 + 1 < 3}$ \

mathbold: & $1 + 1 < 3$; $mathbold{1 + 1 < 3}$

end{tabular}



end{document}


enter image description here






share|improve this answer

















  • 7




    the important point being: It's not my fault
    – David Carlisle
    Dec 22 at 18:22










  • please take a closer look -- the result in the last example still isn't the same with bm and mathbold.
    – barbara beeton
    Dec 23 at 1:41






  • 1




    @barbarabeeton Of course they aren't the same: mathbold is a math alphabet switch, which doesn't act on symbols such as <.
    – egreg
    Dec 23 at 10:01



















7














mathbold is math alphabet command (like mathbf, mathit etc) so it has no effect on < . bm though does affect < and you get the character that the package sets up for boldmath, If you add



boldmath



 $ 1 + 1 < 3showlists$


You will see that bm is selecting (in normal math) the fonts used in boldname.



In this case that is



....U/zeur/b/n/10 <


But as you show the bold font's < is a rather different shape to the medium weight font



So this appears to be a font issue.






share|improve this answer





















    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "85"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f467004%2fusing-bm-with-eulervm-gives-inconsistent-and-characters%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    8














    There is an inconsistency in the shape of < and > in the zeurm10 and zeurb10 fonts used for the symbols with eulervm active:



    documentclass{article}
    

    
usepackage{amsmath}
    
usepackage[euler-digits,euler-hat-accent]{eulervm}
    
usepackage{bm}
    

    
begin{document}
    

    
begin{tabular}{@{}ll@{}}
    
bm: & $1 + 1 < 3$; $bm{1 + 1 < 3}$ \
    
mathbold: & $1 + 1 < 3$; $mathbold{1 + 1 < 3}$
    
end{tabular}
    

    
{usefont{U}{zeur}{m}{n}symbol{"3C}}
    

    
{usefont{U}{zeur}{b}{n}symbol{"3C}}
    

    
end{document}


    enter image description here



    With mathbold, which is a math alphabet selection, only letters and numbers become bold, but not other symbols.



    You can work around the inconsistency by using Computer Modern for the < and > symbols.



    documentclass{article}
    

    
usepackage{amsmath}
    
usepackage[euler-digits,euler-hat-accent]{eulervm}
    
usepackage{bm}
    

    
DeclareSymbolFont{cmletters}{OML}{cmm}{m}{it}
    
SetSymbolFont{cmletters}{bold}{OML}{cmm}{b}{it}
    
DeclareMathSymbol{<}{mathrel}{cmletters}{"3C}
    
DeclareMathSymbol{>}{mathrel}{cmletters}{"3E}
    

    
begin{document}
    

    
begin{tabular}{@{}ll@{}}
    
bm: & $1 + 1 < 3$; $bm{1 + 1 < 3}$ \
    
mathbold: & $1 + 1 < 3$; $mathbold{1 + 1 < 3}$
    
end{tabular}
    

    
end{document}


    enter image description here






    share|improve this answer

















    • 7




      the important point being: It's not my fault
      – David Carlisle
      Dec 22 at 18:22










    • please take a closer look -- the result in the last example still isn't the same with bm and mathbold.
      – barbara beeton
      Dec 23 at 1:41






    • 1




      @barbarabeeton Of course they aren't the same: mathbold is a math alphabet switch, which doesn't act on symbols such as <.
      – egreg
      Dec 23 at 10:01
















    8














    There is an inconsistency in the shape of < and > in the zeurm10 and zeurb10 fonts used for the symbols with eulervm active:



    documentclass{article}
    

    
usepackage{amsmath}
    
usepackage[euler-digits,euler-hat-accent]{eulervm}
    
usepackage{bm}
    

    
begin{document}
    

    
begin{tabular}{@{}ll@{}}
    
bm: & $1 + 1 < 3$; $bm{1 + 1 < 3}$ \
    
mathbold: & $1 + 1 < 3$; $mathbold{1 + 1 < 3}$
    
end{tabular}
    

    
{usefont{U}{zeur}{m}{n}symbol{"3C}}
    

    
{usefont{U}{zeur}{b}{n}symbol{"3C}}
    

    
end{document}


    enter image description here



    With mathbold, which is a math alphabet selection, only letters and numbers become bold, but not other symbols.



    You can work around the inconsistency by using Computer Modern for the < and > symbols.



    documentclass{article}
    

    
usepackage{amsmath}
    
usepackage[euler-digits,euler-hat-accent]{eulervm}
    
usepackage{bm}
    

    
DeclareSymbolFont{cmletters}{OML}{cmm}{m}{it}
    
SetSymbolFont{cmletters}{bold}{OML}{cmm}{b}{it}
    
DeclareMathSymbol{<}{mathrel}{cmletters}{"3C}
    
DeclareMathSymbol{>}{mathrel}{cmletters}{"3E}
    

    
begin{document}
    

    
begin{tabular}{@{}ll@{}}
    
bm: & $1 + 1 < 3$; $bm{1 + 1 < 3}$ \
    
mathbold: & $1 + 1 < 3$; $mathbold{1 + 1 < 3}$
    
end{tabular}
    

    
end{document}


    enter image description here






    share|improve this answer

















    • 7




      the important point being: It's not my fault
      – David Carlisle
      Dec 22 at 18:22










    • please take a closer look -- the result in the last example still isn't the same with bm and mathbold.
      – barbara beeton
      Dec 23 at 1:41






    • 1




      @barbarabeeton Of course they aren't the same: mathbold is a math alphabet switch, which doesn't act on symbols such as <.
      – egreg
      Dec 23 at 10:01














    8












    8








    8






    There is an inconsistency in the shape of < and > in the zeurm10 and zeurb10 fonts used for the symbols with eulervm active:



    documentclass{article}
    

    
usepackage{amsmath}
    
usepackage[euler-digits,euler-hat-accent]{eulervm}
    
usepackage{bm}
    

    
begin{document}
    

    
begin{tabular}{@{}ll@{}}
    
bm: & $1 + 1 < 3$; $bm{1 + 1 < 3}$ \
    
mathbold: & $1 + 1 < 3$; $mathbold{1 + 1 < 3}$
    
end{tabular}
    

    
{usefont{U}{zeur}{m}{n}symbol{"3C}}
    

    
{usefont{U}{zeur}{b}{n}symbol{"3C}}
    

    
end{document}


    enter image description here



    With mathbold, which is a math alphabet selection, only letters and numbers become bold, but not other symbols.



    You can work around the inconsistency by using Computer Modern for the < and > symbols.



    documentclass{article}
    

    
usepackage{amsmath}
    
usepackage[euler-digits,euler-hat-accent]{eulervm}
    
usepackage{bm}
    

    
DeclareSymbolFont{cmletters}{OML}{cmm}{m}{it}
    
SetSymbolFont{cmletters}{bold}{OML}{cmm}{b}{it}
    
DeclareMathSymbol{<}{mathrel}{cmletters}{"3C}
    
DeclareMathSymbol{>}{mathrel}{cmletters}{"3E}
    

    
begin{document}
    

    
begin{tabular}{@{}ll@{}}
    
bm: & $1 + 1 < 3$; $bm{1 + 1 < 3}$ \
    
mathbold: & $1 + 1 < 3$; $mathbold{1 + 1 < 3}$
    
end{tabular}
    

    
end{document}


    enter image description here






    share|improve this answer












    There is an inconsistency in the shape of < and > in the zeurm10 and zeurb10 fonts used for the symbols with eulervm active:



    documentclass{article}
    

    
usepackage{amsmath}
    
usepackage[euler-digits,euler-hat-accent]{eulervm}
    
usepackage{bm}
    

    
begin{document}
    

    
begin{tabular}{@{}ll@{}}
    
bm: & $1 + 1 < 3$; $bm{1 + 1 < 3}$ \
    
mathbold: & $1 + 1 < 3$; $mathbold{1 + 1 < 3}$
    
end{tabular}
    

    
{usefont{U}{zeur}{m}{n}symbol{"3C}}
    

    
{usefont{U}{zeur}{b}{n}symbol{"3C}}
    

    
end{document}


    enter image description here



    With mathbold, which is a math alphabet selection, only letters and numbers become bold, but not other symbols.



    You can work around the inconsistency by using Computer Modern for the < and > symbols.



    documentclass{article}
    

    
usepackage{amsmath}
    
usepackage[euler-digits,euler-hat-accent]{eulervm}
    
usepackage{bm}
    

    
DeclareSymbolFont{cmletters}{OML}{cmm}{m}{it}
    
SetSymbolFont{cmletters}{bold}{OML}{cmm}{b}{it}
    
DeclareMathSymbol{<}{mathrel}{cmletters}{"3C}
    
DeclareMathSymbol{>}{mathrel}{cmletters}{"3E}
    

    
begin{document}
    

    
begin{tabular}{@{}ll@{}}
    
bm: & $1 + 1 < 3$; $bm{1 + 1 < 3}$ \
    
mathbold: & $1 + 1 < 3$; $mathbold{1 + 1 < 3}$
    
end{tabular}
    

    
end{document}


    enter image description here







    share|improve this answer












    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer










    answered Dec 22 at 18:20









    egreg

    708k8618813162




    708k8618813162








    • 7




      the important point being: It's not my fault
      – David Carlisle
      Dec 22 at 18:22










    • please take a closer look -- the result in the last example still isn't the same with bm and mathbold.
      – barbara beeton
      Dec 23 at 1:41






    • 1




      @barbarabeeton Of course they aren't the same: mathbold is a math alphabet switch, which doesn't act on symbols such as <.
      – egreg
      Dec 23 at 10:01














    • 7




      the important point being: It's not my fault
      – David Carlisle
      Dec 22 at 18:22










    • please take a closer look -- the result in the last example still isn't the same with bm and mathbold.
      – barbara beeton
      Dec 23 at 1:41






    • 1




      @barbarabeeton Of course they aren't the same: mathbold is a math alphabet switch, which doesn't act on symbols such as <.
      – egreg
      Dec 23 at 10:01








    7




    7




    the important point being: It's not my fault
    – David Carlisle
    Dec 22 at 18:22




    the important point being: It's not my fault
    – David Carlisle
    Dec 22 at 18:22












    please take a closer look -- the result in the last example still isn't the same with bm and mathbold.
    – barbara beeton
    Dec 23 at 1:41




    please take a closer look -- the result in the last example still isn't the same with bm and mathbold.
    – barbara beeton
    Dec 23 at 1:41




    1




    1




    @barbarabeeton Of course they aren't the same: mathbold is a math alphabet switch, which doesn't act on symbols such as <.
    – egreg
    Dec 23 at 10:01




    @barbarabeeton Of course they aren't the same: mathbold is a math alphabet switch, which doesn't act on symbols such as <.
    – egreg
    Dec 23 at 10:01











    7














    mathbold is math alphabet command (like mathbf, mathit etc) so it has no effect on < . bm though does affect < and you get the character that the package sets up for boldmath, If you add



    boldmath
    

    
 $ 1 + 1 < 3showlists$


    You will see that bm is selecting (in normal math) the fonts used in boldname.



    In this case that is



    ....U/zeur/b/n/10 <


    But as you show the bold font's < is a rather different shape to the medium weight font



    So this appears to be a font issue.






    share|improve this answer


























      7














      mathbold is math alphabet command (like mathbf, mathit etc) so it has no effect on < . bm though does affect < and you get the character that the package sets up for boldmath, If you add



      boldmath
      

      
 $ 1 + 1 < 3showlists$


      You will see that bm is selecting (in normal math) the fonts used in boldname.



      In this case that is



      ....U/zeur/b/n/10 <


      But as you show the bold font's < is a rather different shape to the medium weight font



      So this appears to be a font issue.






      share|improve this answer
























        7












        7








        7






        mathbold is math alphabet command (like mathbf, mathit etc) so it has no effect on < . bm though does affect < and you get the character that the package sets up for boldmath, If you add



        boldmath
        

        
 $ 1 + 1 < 3showlists$


        You will see that bm is selecting (in normal math) the fonts used in boldname.



        In this case that is



        ....U/zeur/b/n/10 <


        But as you show the bold font's < is a rather different shape to the medium weight font



        So this appears to be a font issue.






        share|improve this answer












        mathbold is math alphabet command (like mathbf, mathit etc) so it has no effect on < . bm though does affect < and you get the character that the package sets up for boldmath, If you add



        boldmath
        

        
 $ 1 + 1 < 3showlists$


        You will see that bm is selecting (in normal math) the fonts used in boldname.



        In this case that is



        ....U/zeur/b/n/10 <


        But as you show the bold font's < is a rather different shape to the medium weight font



        So this appears to be a font issue.







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered Dec 22 at 18:21









        David Carlisle

        482k3811131851




        482k3811131851






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid …



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





            Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


            Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid …



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f467004%2fusing-bm-with-eulervm-gives-inconsistent-and-characters%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            -

            Popular posts from this blog

            數位音樂下載

            Image
            數位音樂下載 為非以「實體」方式來販賣音樂的相關產品，而使用數位格式如mp3、AAC等文件格式來進行銷售販賣的一种音乐产业形式。著名的數位音樂下載服務商有iTunes Store、RecoChoku、Google Play音乐和微软Zune等。数字音乐下载在二十一世纪初一度风靡全球， [1] [2] 使得传统唱片产业走向衰落，但其自身也在2010年代流媒体音乐服务如Apple Music、Spotify等的挤压下迅速失去市场份额。 [3] [4] 数字音乐下载有便于携带、传播迅速、制作简单成本低等优点，与流媒体音乐相比也能更好保障音乐人权益； [5] 但它同时很可能带来侵犯版权和滥用的情形， [6] 也给音乐产业带来了诸多不利影响。数字音乐下载为音乐人和乐迷提供了更加便捷直接的交流渠道，也一定程度上推动了网络音乐人的出现和独立音乐的迅速发展。 [7] 目录 1 历史 1.1 技术积淀（1987-2000） 1.2 出现与兴起（2000-2004） 1.3 唱片市场的颠覆者（2004-2007） 1.4 巅峰和衰落（2005-2013） 1.5 摇摇欲坠的现状与不可预知的明天（2014至今） 2 主要文件格式 2.1 PCM编码格式 2.1.1 WAV 2.1.2 APE 2.1.3 FLAC 2.2 苹果推出的无损文件格式 2.2.1 AIFF 2.2.2 ALAC 2.3 有损压缩格式 2.3.1 MP3 2.3.2 AAC 3 主要市场 3.1 iTunes Store 3.2 Google Play音乐商店 3.3 亚马逊音乐商店 3.4 部分其他音乐商店 4 影响与评价 4.1 对音乐产业的影响 4.2 对科技行业的影响 4.3 正面评价 4.4 负面评价 4.4.1 侵权问题 4.4.2 经营模式不明晰 4.4.3 不适应移动时代 4.5 文化现象 5 延伸阅读 6 参考资料 历史 苹果iTunes+iPod的软硬件搭配让数字音...
            Read more

            When can things happen in Etherscan, such as the picture below?

            Image
            2 I don't know why balance of the address is 0. when can this situation? etherscan balances share | improve this question asked yesterday Ru Hi Ru Hi 11 1 New contributor Ru Hi is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering. Check out our Code of Conduct. add a comment  |  ...
            Read more

            格利澤436b

            Image
            格利泽436b 太陽系外行星 太陽系外行星列表 艺术家笔下的格利泽436b 母恆星 母恆星 Gliese 436 星座 獅子座 赤經 ( α ) 11 h  42 m  11.0941 s [1] 赤緯 ( δ ) +26° 42′ 23.652″ [1] 距離 33.4 ly (10.2 pc) 光譜類型 M2.5 V [1] 軌道參數 半长轴 ( a ) 0.0291±0.0004 [2] AU 軌道離心率 ( e ) 0.150±0.012 [2] 公轉週期 ( P ) 2.643904±0.000005 [3] d (0.00723849 y) 軌道傾角 ( i ) 85.8 +0.21 −0.25 [3] ° 角距 ( θ ) 2.794 mas 近星點時間 ( T 0 ) 2,451,551.716 ±0.01 JD 半振幅 ( K ) 18.68±0.8 m/s 物理性质 质量 ( m ) 22.2±1.0 [2] M ⊕ 半徑 ( r ) 4.327±0.183 [2] [4] R ⊕ 密度 ( ρ ) 1.51 g cm -3 表面重力 ( g ) 1.18 g 溫度 ( T ) 712±36 [2] K 發現 發現時間 2004 發現者 巴特勒、沃格特、 馬西 et al. 發現方法 徑向速度、凌日法 發現地點 美國加利福尼亞州 發表論文 出版 其他名稱 Ross 905 b, GJ 436 b, [5] LTT 13213 b, GCTP 2704.10 b, LHS 310, AC+27:28217 b, Vyssotsky 616 b, HIP 57087 b, GEN# +9.80120068 b, LP 319-75 b, G 121-7 b, LSPM J1142+2642 b, 1RXS J114211.9+264328 b, ASCC 683818 b, G 147-68 b, UCAC2 41198281 b, BP...
            Read more