Investigators unknowingly destroy evidence – coincidence or irony?
In my English class we're reading the book Lamb to the Slaughter. The class is required to make five annotations about events in the book; I want to label an event as ironic, but I'm stuck as to whether it is coincidental or ironic.
The event which happens is a man is killed with a lamb leg, and when the police come to investigate the criminal has cooked the lamb and offers it to the police as they have been hard at work. Is it irony or coincidental that the police ate the exact murder weapon they were searching for?
word-choice meaning-in-context irony
add a comment |
In my English class we're reading the book Lamb to the Slaughter. The class is required to make five annotations about events in the book; I want to label an event as ironic, but I'm stuck as to whether it is coincidental or ironic.
The event which happens is a man is killed with a lamb leg, and when the police come to investigate the criminal has cooked the lamb and offers it to the police as they have been hard at work. Is it irony or coincidental that the police ate the exact murder weapon they were searching for?
word-choice meaning-in-context irony
It certainly was not a coincidence. And it was not ironic. As far as I recall this story the murder weapon was a frozen leg of lamb, and the murderer intended the evidence to be eaten.
– Weather Vane
Oct 24 '18 at 22:15
I appreciate the help :)
– Jay S.
Oct 24 '18 at 22:38
1
It's what we call delicious irony <gd&r>
– Toby Speight
Oct 25 '18 at 8:03
add a comment |
In my English class we're reading the book Lamb to the Slaughter. The class is required to make five annotations about events in the book; I want to label an event as ironic, but I'm stuck as to whether it is coincidental or ironic.
The event which happens is a man is killed with a lamb leg, and when the police come to investigate the criminal has cooked the lamb and offers it to the police as they have been hard at work. Is it irony or coincidental that the police ate the exact murder weapon they were searching for?
word-choice meaning-in-context irony
In my English class we're reading the book Lamb to the Slaughter. The class is required to make five annotations about events in the book; I want to label an event as ironic, but I'm stuck as to whether it is coincidental or ironic.
The event which happens is a man is killed with a lamb leg, and when the police come to investigate the criminal has cooked the lamb and offers it to the police as they have been hard at work. Is it irony or coincidental that the police ate the exact murder weapon they were searching for?
word-choice meaning-in-context irony
word-choice meaning-in-context irony
edited yesterday
Mari-Lou A
62.4k56222462
62.4k56222462
asked Oct 24 '18 at 22:13
Jay S.Jay S.
6
6
It certainly was not a coincidence. And it was not ironic. As far as I recall this story the murder weapon was a frozen leg of lamb, and the murderer intended the evidence to be eaten.
– Weather Vane
Oct 24 '18 at 22:15
I appreciate the help :)
– Jay S.
Oct 24 '18 at 22:38
1
It's what we call delicious irony <gd&r>
– Toby Speight
Oct 25 '18 at 8:03
add a comment |
It certainly was not a coincidence. And it was not ironic. As far as I recall this story the murder weapon was a frozen leg of lamb, and the murderer intended the evidence to be eaten.
– Weather Vane
Oct 24 '18 at 22:15
I appreciate the help :)
– Jay S.
Oct 24 '18 at 22:38
1
It's what we call delicious irony <gd&r>
– Toby Speight
Oct 25 '18 at 8:03
It certainly was not a coincidence. And it was not ironic. As far as I recall this story the murder weapon was a frozen leg of lamb, and the murderer intended the evidence to be eaten.
– Weather Vane
Oct 24 '18 at 22:15
It certainly was not a coincidence. And it was not ironic. As far as I recall this story the murder weapon was a frozen leg of lamb, and the murderer intended the evidence to be eaten.
– Weather Vane
Oct 24 '18 at 22:15
I appreciate the help :)
– Jay S.
Oct 24 '18 at 22:38
I appreciate the help :)
– Jay S.
Oct 24 '18 at 22:38
1
1
It's what we call delicious irony <gd&r>
– Toby Speight
Oct 25 '18 at 8:03
It's what we call delicious irony <gd&r>
– Toby Speight
Oct 25 '18 at 8:03
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
Jay,
This is not coincidental, as coincidence is defined as "events that happen at the same time by accident," or "without a causal connection." In this case, there is a clear causal connection.
This could be considered a specific type of irony: Dramatic irony. Dramatic irony is a type of irony where the audience of a play, or the reader of a story, "understand the implications of a situation," but a character or characters do not understand.
In the story, you as a reader understand that the police are eating the murder weapon, consuming a key piece of evidence they are trying to collect, the police (characters) do not. In this case, I would argue, and I think you could argue, that it does not necessarily matter that one of the characters (the murderer) knows and has caused the situation.
This event is ironic.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "97"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f469979%2finvestigators-unknowingly-destroy-evidence-coincidence-or-irony%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Jay,
This is not coincidental, as coincidence is defined as "events that happen at the same time by accident," or "without a causal connection." In this case, there is a clear causal connection.
This could be considered a specific type of irony: Dramatic irony. Dramatic irony is a type of irony where the audience of a play, or the reader of a story, "understand the implications of a situation," but a character or characters do not understand.
In the story, you as a reader understand that the police are eating the murder weapon, consuming a key piece of evidence they are trying to collect, the police (characters) do not. In this case, I would argue, and I think you could argue, that it does not necessarily matter that one of the characters (the murderer) knows and has caused the situation.
This event is ironic.
add a comment |
Jay,
This is not coincidental, as coincidence is defined as "events that happen at the same time by accident," or "without a causal connection." In this case, there is a clear causal connection.
This could be considered a specific type of irony: Dramatic irony. Dramatic irony is a type of irony where the audience of a play, or the reader of a story, "understand the implications of a situation," but a character or characters do not understand.
In the story, you as a reader understand that the police are eating the murder weapon, consuming a key piece of evidence they are trying to collect, the police (characters) do not. In this case, I would argue, and I think you could argue, that it does not necessarily matter that one of the characters (the murderer) knows and has caused the situation.
This event is ironic.
add a comment |
Jay,
This is not coincidental, as coincidence is defined as "events that happen at the same time by accident," or "without a causal connection." In this case, there is a clear causal connection.
This could be considered a specific type of irony: Dramatic irony. Dramatic irony is a type of irony where the audience of a play, or the reader of a story, "understand the implications of a situation," but a character or characters do not understand.
In the story, you as a reader understand that the police are eating the murder weapon, consuming a key piece of evidence they are trying to collect, the police (characters) do not. In this case, I would argue, and I think you could argue, that it does not necessarily matter that one of the characters (the murderer) knows and has caused the situation.
This event is ironic.
Jay,
This is not coincidental, as coincidence is defined as "events that happen at the same time by accident," or "without a causal connection." In this case, there is a clear causal connection.
This could be considered a specific type of irony: Dramatic irony. Dramatic irony is a type of irony where the audience of a play, or the reader of a story, "understand the implications of a situation," but a character or characters do not understand.
In the story, you as a reader understand that the police are eating the murder weapon, consuming a key piece of evidence they are trying to collect, the police (characters) do not. In this case, I would argue, and I think you could argue, that it does not necessarily matter that one of the characters (the murderer) knows and has caused the situation.
This event is ironic.
answered Oct 24 '18 at 22:29
SpencerWinterSpencerWinter
543
543
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language & Usage Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f469979%2finvestigators-unknowingly-destroy-evidence-coincidence-or-irony%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
It certainly was not a coincidence. And it was not ironic. As far as I recall this story the murder weapon was a frozen leg of lamb, and the murderer intended the evidence to be eaten.
– Weather Vane
Oct 24 '18 at 22:15
I appreciate the help :)
– Jay S.
Oct 24 '18 at 22:38
1
It's what we call delicious irony <gd&r>
– Toby Speight
Oct 25 '18 at 8:03