Is there a limit to the number of subdirectories I can create?
I am using Ubuntu 18.04.2 LTS Release: 18.04 and I want to know if there's a maximum of directories that I can't go beyond?
directory
add a comment |
I am using Ubuntu 18.04.2 LTS Release: 18.04 and I want to know if there's a maximum of directories that I can't go beyond?
directory
add a comment |
I am using Ubuntu 18.04.2 LTS Release: 18.04 and I want to know if there's a maximum of directories that I can't go beyond?
directory
I am using Ubuntu 18.04.2 LTS Release: 18.04 and I want to know if there's a maximum of directories that I can't go beyond?
directory
directory
asked 16 hours ago
Sergio D. CaplanSergio D. Caplan
1118
1118
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
Yes, for ext4 systems every file or directory uses an inode, of which a limited amount are pre-allocated when the disk is first formatted. You can see what percentage of this is used by running this command:
df -hi
Look at the IUse% column. For most situations this never be exhausted, but it's possible this can lead to problems if you start out on a small disk (and therefor not many inodes) and later resize to a larger disk since inodes are not re-allocated when growing a partition. In those cases you would want to copy the file system from a small disk to a larger disk in a special way.
Outside of the inode limit, there's also the path length limit, so while you might be able to create a 1000 directories, you might not be able to do/1/2/3/.../1000.
– Olorin
15 hours ago
2
There isn't a "strict" limit on total path length, only each individual file name itself. A program that uses relative paths can address paths of infinite length, see serverfault.com/a/9553/46631
– Kristopher Ives
15 hours ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "89"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f1123141%2fis-there-a-limit-to-the-number-of-subdirectories-i-can-create%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Yes, for ext4 systems every file or directory uses an inode, of which a limited amount are pre-allocated when the disk is first formatted. You can see what percentage of this is used by running this command:
df -hi
Look at the IUse% column. For most situations this never be exhausted, but it's possible this can lead to problems if you start out on a small disk (and therefor not many inodes) and later resize to a larger disk since inodes are not re-allocated when growing a partition. In those cases you would want to copy the file system from a small disk to a larger disk in a special way.
Outside of the inode limit, there's also the path length limit, so while you might be able to create a 1000 directories, you might not be able to do/1/2/3/.../1000.
– Olorin
15 hours ago
2
There isn't a "strict" limit on total path length, only each individual file name itself. A program that uses relative paths can address paths of infinite length, see serverfault.com/a/9553/46631
– Kristopher Ives
15 hours ago
add a comment |
Yes, for ext4 systems every file or directory uses an inode, of which a limited amount are pre-allocated when the disk is first formatted. You can see what percentage of this is used by running this command:
df -hi
Look at the IUse% column. For most situations this never be exhausted, but it's possible this can lead to problems if you start out on a small disk (and therefor not many inodes) and later resize to a larger disk since inodes are not re-allocated when growing a partition. In those cases you would want to copy the file system from a small disk to a larger disk in a special way.
Outside of the inode limit, there's also the path length limit, so while you might be able to create a 1000 directories, you might not be able to do/1/2/3/.../1000.
– Olorin
15 hours ago
2
There isn't a "strict" limit on total path length, only each individual file name itself. A program that uses relative paths can address paths of infinite length, see serverfault.com/a/9553/46631
– Kristopher Ives
15 hours ago
add a comment |
Yes, for ext4 systems every file or directory uses an inode, of which a limited amount are pre-allocated when the disk is first formatted. You can see what percentage of this is used by running this command:
df -hi
Look at the IUse% column. For most situations this never be exhausted, but it's possible this can lead to problems if you start out on a small disk (and therefor not many inodes) and later resize to a larger disk since inodes are not re-allocated when growing a partition. In those cases you would want to copy the file system from a small disk to a larger disk in a special way.
Yes, for ext4 systems every file or directory uses an inode, of which a limited amount are pre-allocated when the disk is first formatted. You can see what percentage of this is used by running this command:
df -hi
Look at the IUse% column. For most situations this never be exhausted, but it's possible this can lead to problems if you start out on a small disk (and therefor not many inodes) and later resize to a larger disk since inodes are not re-allocated when growing a partition. In those cases you would want to copy the file system from a small disk to a larger disk in a special way.
answered 15 hours ago
Kristopher IvesKristopher Ives
2,86211525
2,86211525
Outside of the inode limit, there's also the path length limit, so while you might be able to create a 1000 directories, you might not be able to do/1/2/3/.../1000.
– Olorin
15 hours ago
2
There isn't a "strict" limit on total path length, only each individual file name itself. A program that uses relative paths can address paths of infinite length, see serverfault.com/a/9553/46631
– Kristopher Ives
15 hours ago
add a comment |
Outside of the inode limit, there's also the path length limit, so while you might be able to create a 1000 directories, you might not be able to do/1/2/3/.../1000.
– Olorin
15 hours ago
2
There isn't a "strict" limit on total path length, only each individual file name itself. A program that uses relative paths can address paths of infinite length, see serverfault.com/a/9553/46631
– Kristopher Ives
15 hours ago
Outside of the inode limit, there's also the path length limit, so while you might be able to create a 1000 directories, you might not be able to do
/1/2/3/.../1000.– Olorin
15 hours ago
Outside of the inode limit, there's also the path length limit, so while you might be able to create a 1000 directories, you might not be able to do
/1/2/3/.../1000.– Olorin
15 hours ago
2
2
There isn't a "strict" limit on total path length, only each individual file name itself. A program that uses relative paths can address paths of infinite length, see serverfault.com/a/9553/46631
– Kristopher Ives
15 hours ago
There isn't a "strict" limit on total path length, only each individual file name itself. A program that uses relative paths can address paths of infinite length, see serverfault.com/a/9553/46631
– Kristopher Ives
15 hours ago
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Ask Ubuntu!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f1123141%2fis-there-a-limit-to-the-number-of-subdirectories-i-can-create%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown