Limit on bad sectors in USB drive?












0















I recently ran on a USB drive the f3write, f3read, and f3probe tests. The size of the drive is legitimate, but there are some corrupted sectors indicated in f3read:



Data OK: 7.49 GB (15697680 sectors)   
Data LOST: 124.00 KB (248 sectors)
Corrupted: 124.00 KB (248 sectors)
Slightly changed: 0.00 Byte (0 sectors)
Overwritten: 0.00 Byte (0 sectors)


The f3probe run shows the proper size of the drive:



Device geometry:  
*Usable* size: 7.50 GB (15728640 blocks)
Announced size: 7.50 GB (15728640 blocks)
Module: 8.00 GB (2^33 Bytes)
Approximate cache size: 0.00 Byte (0 blocks), need-reset=no
Physical block size: 512.00 Byte (2^9 Bytes)


Am I correct in thinking that any bad sectors mean return this drive to the seller? Or do all USBs have a certain number of bad sectors?










share|improve this question

























  • I returned the USB drive to the seller, who exchanged it. I did take evidence of the bad sectors, which may have smoothed things. New USB tests fine.

    – JWNWSA
    Sep 15 '18 at 18:33
















0















I recently ran on a USB drive the f3write, f3read, and f3probe tests. The size of the drive is legitimate, but there are some corrupted sectors indicated in f3read:



Data OK: 7.49 GB (15697680 sectors)   
Data LOST: 124.00 KB (248 sectors)
Corrupted: 124.00 KB (248 sectors)
Slightly changed: 0.00 Byte (0 sectors)
Overwritten: 0.00 Byte (0 sectors)


The f3probe run shows the proper size of the drive:



Device geometry:  
*Usable* size: 7.50 GB (15728640 blocks)
Announced size: 7.50 GB (15728640 blocks)
Module: 8.00 GB (2^33 Bytes)
Approximate cache size: 0.00 Byte (0 blocks), need-reset=no
Physical block size: 512.00 Byte (2^9 Bytes)


Am I correct in thinking that any bad sectors mean return this drive to the seller? Or do all USBs have a certain number of bad sectors?










share|improve this question

























  • I returned the USB drive to the seller, who exchanged it. I did take evidence of the bad sectors, which may have smoothed things. New USB tests fine.

    – JWNWSA
    Sep 15 '18 at 18:33














0












0








0








I recently ran on a USB drive the f3write, f3read, and f3probe tests. The size of the drive is legitimate, but there are some corrupted sectors indicated in f3read:



Data OK: 7.49 GB (15697680 sectors)   
Data LOST: 124.00 KB (248 sectors)
Corrupted: 124.00 KB (248 sectors)
Slightly changed: 0.00 Byte (0 sectors)
Overwritten: 0.00 Byte (0 sectors)


The f3probe run shows the proper size of the drive:



Device geometry:  
*Usable* size: 7.50 GB (15728640 blocks)
Announced size: 7.50 GB (15728640 blocks)
Module: 8.00 GB (2^33 Bytes)
Approximate cache size: 0.00 Byte (0 blocks), need-reset=no
Physical block size: 512.00 Byte (2^9 Bytes)


Am I correct in thinking that any bad sectors mean return this drive to the seller? Or do all USBs have a certain number of bad sectors?










share|improve this question
















I recently ran on a USB drive the f3write, f3read, and f3probe tests. The size of the drive is legitimate, but there are some corrupted sectors indicated in f3read:



Data OK: 7.49 GB (15697680 sectors)   
Data LOST: 124.00 KB (248 sectors)
Corrupted: 124.00 KB (248 sectors)
Slightly changed: 0.00 Byte (0 sectors)
Overwritten: 0.00 Byte (0 sectors)


The f3probe run shows the proper size of the drive:



Device geometry:  
*Usable* size: 7.50 GB (15728640 blocks)
Announced size: 7.50 GB (15728640 blocks)
Module: 8.00 GB (2^33 Bytes)
Approximate cache size: 0.00 Byte (0 blocks), need-reset=no
Physical block size: 512.00 Byte (2^9 Bytes)


Am I correct in thinking that any bad sectors mean return this drive to the seller? Or do all USBs have a certain number of bad sectors?







usb-drive hardware-test






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Sep 15 '18 at 13:36







JWNWSA

















asked Sep 14 '18 at 23:55









JWNWSAJWNWSA

689




689













  • I returned the USB drive to the seller, who exchanged it. I did take evidence of the bad sectors, which may have smoothed things. New USB tests fine.

    – JWNWSA
    Sep 15 '18 at 18:33



















  • I returned the USB drive to the seller, who exchanged it. I did take evidence of the bad sectors, which may have smoothed things. New USB tests fine.

    – JWNWSA
    Sep 15 '18 at 18:33

















I returned the USB drive to the seller, who exchanged it. I did take evidence of the bad sectors, which may have smoothed things. New USB tests fine.

– JWNWSA
Sep 15 '18 at 18:33





I returned the USB drive to the seller, who exchanged it. I did take evidence of the bad sectors, which may have smoothed things. New USB tests fine.

– JWNWSA
Sep 15 '18 at 18:33










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















0














No, it's not normal, it shouldn't have any bad sectors.



If the drive is new then returning it to the seller makes sense.



If the drive has been around awhile then repairing it is worth a try using fsck.






share|improve this answer


























  • See also this an this posts for more tools to check integrity of the drive.

    – Pablo Bianchi
    Mar 18 at 23:38












Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "89"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f1075403%2flimit-on-bad-sectors-in-usb-drive%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









0














No, it's not normal, it shouldn't have any bad sectors.



If the drive is new then returning it to the seller makes sense.



If the drive has been around awhile then repairing it is worth a try using fsck.






share|improve this answer


























  • See also this an this posts for more tools to check integrity of the drive.

    – Pablo Bianchi
    Mar 18 at 23:38
















0














No, it's not normal, it shouldn't have any bad sectors.



If the drive is new then returning it to the seller makes sense.



If the drive has been around awhile then repairing it is worth a try using fsck.






share|improve this answer


























  • See also this an this posts for more tools to check integrity of the drive.

    – Pablo Bianchi
    Mar 18 at 23:38














0












0








0







No, it's not normal, it shouldn't have any bad sectors.



If the drive is new then returning it to the seller makes sense.



If the drive has been around awhile then repairing it is worth a try using fsck.






share|improve this answer















No, it's not normal, it shouldn't have any bad sectors.



If the drive is new then returning it to the seller makes sense.



If the drive has been around awhile then repairing it is worth a try using fsck.







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited Mar 18 at 23:36









Pablo Bianchi

3,03521536




3,03521536










answered Sep 18 '18 at 12:37









JWNWSAJWNWSA

689




689













  • See also this an this posts for more tools to check integrity of the drive.

    – Pablo Bianchi
    Mar 18 at 23:38



















  • See also this an this posts for more tools to check integrity of the drive.

    – Pablo Bianchi
    Mar 18 at 23:38

















See also this an this posts for more tools to check integrity of the drive.

– Pablo Bianchi
Mar 18 at 23:38





See also this an this posts for more tools to check integrity of the drive.

– Pablo Bianchi
Mar 18 at 23:38


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Ask Ubuntu!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f1075403%2flimit-on-bad-sectors-in-usb-drive%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

數位音樂下載

格利澤436b

When can things happen in Etherscan, such as the picture below?