“of their being” vs “of there being”
I am reading a BBC article on "Why pressing ‘upload’ means losing your rights". On page 2 of that article there is a paragraph that reads:
Meanwhile, legal thinking on digital rights is slowly catching up with the absurdity of their being almost no current recourse for loss, deletion or the whims of a service provider; but its pace is massively exceeded by the rate at which material is flowing online, into the hands of businesses whose profitability rests on owning and exploiting everything you give them.
My question is what is the difference between "of their being" and "of there being", and are both acceptable and when? Both have millions of results on Google. I know their is used for possession but I don't understand how that fits in here.
Thank you
grammar
add a comment |
I am reading a BBC article on "Why pressing ‘upload’ means losing your rights". On page 2 of that article there is a paragraph that reads:
Meanwhile, legal thinking on digital rights is slowly catching up with the absurdity of their being almost no current recourse for loss, deletion or the whims of a service provider; but its pace is massively exceeded by the rate at which material is flowing online, into the hands of businesses whose profitability rests on owning and exploiting everything you give them.
My question is what is the difference between "of their being" and "of there being", and are both acceptable and when? Both have millions of results on Google. I know their is used for possession but I don't understand how that fits in here.
Thank you
grammar
2
It's just sloppy editing. It happens frequently with there/their/they're and your/you're, even to the best of us. Homophones become hard to spot, especially by the author, because as you read it back to yourself, you don't hear a difference and often substitute the correct word for the incorrect one in your head without noticing. Of their being would reference someone's existence. There is the correct choice, which is why it didn't make sense to you.
– Giambattista
Nov 23 '13 at 22:25
add a comment |
I am reading a BBC article on "Why pressing ‘upload’ means losing your rights". On page 2 of that article there is a paragraph that reads:
Meanwhile, legal thinking on digital rights is slowly catching up with the absurdity of their being almost no current recourse for loss, deletion or the whims of a service provider; but its pace is massively exceeded by the rate at which material is flowing online, into the hands of businesses whose profitability rests on owning and exploiting everything you give them.
My question is what is the difference between "of their being" and "of there being", and are both acceptable and when? Both have millions of results on Google. I know their is used for possession but I don't understand how that fits in here.
Thank you
grammar
I am reading a BBC article on "Why pressing ‘upload’ means losing your rights". On page 2 of that article there is a paragraph that reads:
Meanwhile, legal thinking on digital rights is slowly catching up with the absurdity of their being almost no current recourse for loss, deletion or the whims of a service provider; but its pace is massively exceeded by the rate at which material is flowing online, into the hands of businesses whose profitability rests on owning and exploiting everything you give them.
My question is what is the difference between "of their being" and "of there being", and are both acceptable and when? Both have millions of results on Google. I know their is used for possession but I don't understand how that fits in here.
Thank you
grammar
grammar
asked Nov 23 '13 at 22:03
testtest
118114
118114
2
It's just sloppy editing. It happens frequently with there/their/they're and your/you're, even to the best of us. Homophones become hard to spot, especially by the author, because as you read it back to yourself, you don't hear a difference and often substitute the correct word for the incorrect one in your head without noticing. Of their being would reference someone's existence. There is the correct choice, which is why it didn't make sense to you.
– Giambattista
Nov 23 '13 at 22:25
add a comment |
2
It's just sloppy editing. It happens frequently with there/their/they're and your/you're, even to the best of us. Homophones become hard to spot, especially by the author, because as you read it back to yourself, you don't hear a difference and often substitute the correct word for the incorrect one in your head without noticing. Of their being would reference someone's existence. There is the correct choice, which is why it didn't make sense to you.
– Giambattista
Nov 23 '13 at 22:25
2
2
It's just sloppy editing. It happens frequently with there/their/they're and your/you're, even to the best of us. Homophones become hard to spot, especially by the author, because as you read it back to yourself, you don't hear a difference and often substitute the correct word for the incorrect one in your head without noticing. Of their being would reference someone's existence. There is the correct choice, which is why it didn't make sense to you.
– Giambattista
Nov 23 '13 at 22:25
It's just sloppy editing. It happens frequently with there/their/they're and your/you're, even to the best of us. Homophones become hard to spot, especially by the author, because as you read it back to yourself, you don't hear a difference and often substitute the correct word for the incorrect one in your head without noticing. Of their being would reference someone's existence. There is the correct choice, which is why it didn't make sense to you.
– Giambattista
Nov 23 '13 at 22:25
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
It should definitely be "of there being" in the referenced paragraph.
Let us illustrate by providing possible alternative wordings:
- A consequence of their being is ...
- A consequence of their being available is ...
- A consequence of there being a solution is ...
These can be rephrased as:
- A consequence of their existence is ...
- A consequence of their availability is ...
- A consequence of the existence of a solution is ...
So what is going on?
"Their being", and "their being [adjective]" refer to the existence, respectively the property expressed by the adjective, of the subject referenced by "their".
"There being", on the other hand, indicates a general state of affairs.
I hope that clarifies the matter for you.
add a comment |
"... what is the difference between "of their being" and "of there being"..."
"Their being" relates to the question, "Whose being?"
"There being" introduces an explanation of something. This is what the hurried BBC writer meant. You could replace his "of their being" with "of the fact that".
This headline popped up on a Google search: "There is not much hope of their being alive".
add a comment |
Good question, I agree that it's an error.
Possessive adjectives are used before gerunds (My coming surprised everyone) and not object pronouns (Me coming surprised everyone). This latter is heard more and more and thus represents a change in progress. But there is no possessive adjective for "there" and in the sentence their is no logical reference for the "their," so it seems to be an oversight in the editing.
New contributor
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "97"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f138934%2fof-their-being-vs-of-there-being%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
It should definitely be "of there being" in the referenced paragraph.
Let us illustrate by providing possible alternative wordings:
- A consequence of their being is ...
- A consequence of their being available is ...
- A consequence of there being a solution is ...
These can be rephrased as:
- A consequence of their existence is ...
- A consequence of their availability is ...
- A consequence of the existence of a solution is ...
So what is going on?
"Their being", and "their being [adjective]" refer to the existence, respectively the property expressed by the adjective, of the subject referenced by "their".
"There being", on the other hand, indicates a general state of affairs.
I hope that clarifies the matter for you.
add a comment |
It should definitely be "of there being" in the referenced paragraph.
Let us illustrate by providing possible alternative wordings:
- A consequence of their being is ...
- A consequence of their being available is ...
- A consequence of there being a solution is ...
These can be rephrased as:
- A consequence of their existence is ...
- A consequence of their availability is ...
- A consequence of the existence of a solution is ...
So what is going on?
"Their being", and "their being [adjective]" refer to the existence, respectively the property expressed by the adjective, of the subject referenced by "their".
"There being", on the other hand, indicates a general state of affairs.
I hope that clarifies the matter for you.
add a comment |
It should definitely be "of there being" in the referenced paragraph.
Let us illustrate by providing possible alternative wordings:
- A consequence of their being is ...
- A consequence of their being available is ...
- A consequence of there being a solution is ...
These can be rephrased as:
- A consequence of their existence is ...
- A consequence of their availability is ...
- A consequence of the existence of a solution is ...
So what is going on?
"Their being", and "their being [adjective]" refer to the existence, respectively the property expressed by the adjective, of the subject referenced by "their".
"There being", on the other hand, indicates a general state of affairs.
I hope that clarifies the matter for you.
It should definitely be "of there being" in the referenced paragraph.
Let us illustrate by providing possible alternative wordings:
- A consequence of their being is ...
- A consequence of their being available is ...
- A consequence of there being a solution is ...
These can be rephrased as:
- A consequence of their existence is ...
- A consequence of their availability is ...
- A consequence of the existence of a solution is ...
So what is going on?
"Their being", and "their being [adjective]" refer to the existence, respectively the property expressed by the adjective, of the subject referenced by "their".
"There being", on the other hand, indicates a general state of affairs.
I hope that clarifies the matter for you.
answered Nov 23 '13 at 22:14
Lord_FarinLord_Farin
1663
1663
add a comment |
add a comment |
"... what is the difference between "of their being" and "of there being"..."
"Their being" relates to the question, "Whose being?"
"There being" introduces an explanation of something. This is what the hurried BBC writer meant. You could replace his "of their being" with "of the fact that".
This headline popped up on a Google search: "There is not much hope of their being alive".
add a comment |
"... what is the difference between "of their being" and "of there being"..."
"Their being" relates to the question, "Whose being?"
"There being" introduces an explanation of something. This is what the hurried BBC writer meant. You could replace his "of their being" with "of the fact that".
This headline popped up on a Google search: "There is not much hope of their being alive".
add a comment |
"... what is the difference between "of their being" and "of there being"..."
"Their being" relates to the question, "Whose being?"
"There being" introduces an explanation of something. This is what the hurried BBC writer meant. You could replace his "of their being" with "of the fact that".
This headline popped up on a Google search: "There is not much hope of their being alive".
"... what is the difference between "of their being" and "of there being"..."
"Their being" relates to the question, "Whose being?"
"There being" introduces an explanation of something. This is what the hurried BBC writer meant. You could replace his "of their being" with "of the fact that".
This headline popped up on a Google search: "There is not much hope of their being alive".
answered Nov 24 '13 at 4:14
ZZMikeZZMike
1,18755
1,18755
add a comment |
add a comment |
Good question, I agree that it's an error.
Possessive adjectives are used before gerunds (My coming surprised everyone) and not object pronouns (Me coming surprised everyone). This latter is heard more and more and thus represents a change in progress. But there is no possessive adjective for "there" and in the sentence their is no logical reference for the "their," so it seems to be an oversight in the editing.
New contributor
add a comment |
Good question, I agree that it's an error.
Possessive adjectives are used before gerunds (My coming surprised everyone) and not object pronouns (Me coming surprised everyone). This latter is heard more and more and thus represents a change in progress. But there is no possessive adjective for "there" and in the sentence their is no logical reference for the "their," so it seems to be an oversight in the editing.
New contributor
add a comment |
Good question, I agree that it's an error.
Possessive adjectives are used before gerunds (My coming surprised everyone) and not object pronouns (Me coming surprised everyone). This latter is heard more and more and thus represents a change in progress. But there is no possessive adjective for "there" and in the sentence their is no logical reference for the "their," so it seems to be an oversight in the editing.
New contributor
Good question, I agree that it's an error.
Possessive adjectives are used before gerunds (My coming surprised everyone) and not object pronouns (Me coming surprised everyone). This latter is heard more and more and thus represents a change in progress. But there is no possessive adjective for "there" and in the sentence their is no logical reference for the "their," so it seems to be an oversight in the editing.
New contributor
edited 4 mins ago
New contributor
answered 24 mins ago
user338477user338477
11
11
New contributor
New contributor
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language & Usage Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f138934%2fof-their-being-vs-of-there-being%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
2
It's just sloppy editing. It happens frequently with there/their/they're and your/you're, even to the best of us. Homophones become hard to spot, especially by the author, because as you read it back to yourself, you don't hear a difference and often substitute the correct word for the incorrect one in your head without noticing. Of their being would reference someone's existence. There is the correct choice, which is why it didn't make sense to you.
– Giambattista
Nov 23 '13 at 22:25