Deferring a noun belonging to a preposition until after a conjunction
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
Is it grammatically correct to defer the use of a noun (belonging to preposition) until after a conjunction?
- In order to scale to (deferred noun: multi-objective optimisation) and study multi-objective optimisation, ...
- We demonstrate how one can help out with (deferred noun: poverty) and mitigate poverty in Africa.
- ... so that the community can open up to (deferred noun: migrant populations) and accept the cultures of migrant populations.
syntax
asked Jun 24 at 14:15
allsey87
294
bumped to the homepage by Community♦ yesterday
This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
Is it grammatically correct to defer the use of a noun (belonging to preposition) until after a conjunction?
- In order to scale to (deferred noun: multi-objective optimisation) and study multi-objective optimisation, ...
- We demonstrate how one can help out with (deferred noun: poverty) and mitigate poverty in Africa.
- ... so that the community can open up to (deferred noun: migrant populations) and accept the cultures of migrant populations.
syntax
asked Jun 24 at 14:15
allsey87
294
bumped to the homepage by Community♦ yesterday
This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
See a related Q about omission of subject from ELL: ell.stackexchange.com/questions/148269/…
– aesking
Jun 24 at 18:49
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
Is it grammatically correct to defer the use of a noun (belonging to preposition) until after a conjunction?
- In order to scale to (deferred noun: multi-objective optimisation) and study multi-objective optimisation, ...
- We demonstrate how one can help out with (deferred noun: poverty) and mitigate poverty in Africa.
- ... so that the community can open up to (deferred noun: migrant populations) and accept the cultures of migrant populations.
syntax
asked Jun 24 at 14:15
allsey87
294
Is it grammatically correct to defer the use of a noun (belonging to preposition) until after a conjunction?
- In order to scale to (deferred noun: multi-objective optimisation) and study multi-objective optimisation, ...
- We demonstrate how one can help out with (deferred noun: poverty) and mitigate poverty in Africa.
- ... so that the community can open up to (deferred noun: migrant populations) and accept the cultures of migrant populations.
syntax
syntax
asked Jun 24 at 14:15
allsey87
294
asked Jun 24 at 14:15
allsey87
294
edited Jun 25 at 14:50
asked Jun 24 at 14:15
allsey87
294
asked Jun 24 at 14:15
allsey87
294
asked Jun 24 at 14:15
allsey87
294
294
bumped to the homepage by Community♦ yesterday
This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
bumped to the homepage by Community♦ yesterday
This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
See a related Q about omission of subject from ELL: ell.stackexchange.com/questions/148269/…
– aesking
Jun 24 at 18:49
add a comment |
See a related Q about omission of subject from ELL: ell.stackexchange.com/questions/148269/…
– aesking
Jun 24 at 18:49
See a related Q about omission of subject from ELL: ell.stackexchange.com/questions/148269/…
– aesking
Jun 24 at 18:49
See a related Q about omission of subject from ELL: ell.stackexchange.com/questions/148269/…
– aesking
Jun 24 at 18:49
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
These formulations are correct:
We demonstrate how one can help out and mitigate poverty in Africa.
... so that the community can open up and accept the cultures of migrant populations.
Your question is not clear to me, but I can tell you that all three of your sentences/formulations are bad when what you refer to as the deferred noun is missing.
These are no good:
In order to scale to and study multi-objective optimisation, ...
We demonstrate how one can help out with and mitigate poverty in Africa.
... so that the community can open up to and accept the cultures of migrant populations.
In addition, multi-objective optimisation sounds a bit wordy and hollow.
The deferred nouns are not missing in any of the sentences. They follow immediately after the second verbs.
– Jason Bassford
Jun 24 at 15:36
@ Jason Bassford Read what I said. I did not say they are missing. This is getting a little ridiculous. It is very clear to me that this website is not being properly monitored.
– user280597
Jun 24 at 15:48
@ Jason Bassford: This site is unfriendly and poorly managed. I shall not be here long. I just wanted to send you an unambiguous message and register my displeasure.
– user280597
Jun 24 at 16:00
@JasonBassford Patriot is completely correct. You've misatributed your own idea to them. It doesn't appear anywhere in their post
– Araucaria
Jun 25 at 0:03
I have updated the question to make what I am asking clearer, I meant to ask whether it is ok to move a otherwise repeated noun to after a conjunction such as "and"
– allsey87
Jun 25 at 14:53
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
These formulations are correct:
We demonstrate how one can help out and mitigate poverty in Africa.
... so that the community can open up and accept the cultures of migrant populations.
Your question is not clear to me, but I can tell you that all three of your sentences/formulations are bad when what you refer to as the deferred noun is missing.
These are no good:
In order to scale to and study multi-objective optimisation, ...
We demonstrate how one can help out with and mitigate poverty in Africa.
... so that the community can open up to and accept the cultures of migrant populations.
In addition, multi-objective optimisation sounds a bit wordy and hollow.
The deferred nouns are not missing in any of the sentences. They follow immediately after the second verbs.
– Jason Bassford
Jun 24 at 15:36
@ Jason Bassford Read what I said. I did not say they are missing. This is getting a little ridiculous. It is very clear to me that this website is not being properly monitored.
– user280597
Jun 24 at 15:48
@ Jason Bassford: This site is unfriendly and poorly managed. I shall not be here long. I just wanted to send you an unambiguous message and register my displeasure.
– user280597
Jun 24 at 16:00
@JasonBassford Patriot is completely correct. You've misatributed your own idea to them. It doesn't appear anywhere in their post
– Araucaria
Jun 25 at 0:03
I have updated the question to make what I am asking clearer, I meant to ask whether it is ok to move a otherwise repeated noun to after a conjunction such as "and"
– allsey87
Jun 25 at 14:53
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
These formulations are correct:
We demonstrate how one can help out and mitigate poverty in Africa.
... so that the community can open up and accept the cultures of migrant populations.
Your question is not clear to me, but I can tell you that all three of your sentences/formulations are bad when what you refer to as the deferred noun is missing.
These are no good:
In order to scale to and study multi-objective optimisation, ...
We demonstrate how one can help out with and mitigate poverty in Africa.
... so that the community can open up to and accept the cultures of migrant populations.
In addition, multi-objective optimisation sounds a bit wordy and hollow.
The deferred nouns are not missing in any of the sentences. They follow immediately after the second verbs.
– Jason Bassford
Jun 24 at 15:36
@ Jason Bassford Read what I said. I did not say they are missing. This is getting a little ridiculous. It is very clear to me that this website is not being properly monitored.
– user280597
Jun 24 at 15:48
@ Jason Bassford: This site is unfriendly and poorly managed. I shall not be here long. I just wanted to send you an unambiguous message and register my displeasure.
– user280597
Jun 24 at 16:00
@JasonBassford Patriot is completely correct. You've misatributed your own idea to them. It doesn't appear anywhere in their post
– Araucaria
Jun 25 at 0:03
I have updated the question to make what I am asking clearer, I meant to ask whether it is ok to move a otherwise repeated noun to after a conjunction such as "and"
– allsey87
Jun 25 at 14:53
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
These formulations are correct:
We demonstrate how one can help out and mitigate poverty in Africa.
... so that the community can open up and accept the cultures of migrant populations.
Your question is not clear to me, but I can tell you that all three of your sentences/formulations are bad when what you refer to as the deferred noun is missing.
These are no good:
In order to scale to and study multi-objective optimisation, ...
We demonstrate how one can help out with and mitigate poverty in Africa.
... so that the community can open up to and accept the cultures of migrant populations.
In addition, multi-objective optimisation sounds a bit wordy and hollow.
These formulations are correct:
We demonstrate how one can help out and mitigate poverty in Africa.
... so that the community can open up and accept the cultures of migrant populations.
Your question is not clear to me, but I can tell you that all three of your sentences/formulations are bad when what you refer to as the deferred noun is missing.
These are no good:
In order to scale to and study multi-objective optimisation, ...
We demonstrate how one can help out with and mitigate poverty in Africa.
... so that the community can open up to and accept the cultures of migrant populations.
In addition, multi-objective optimisation sounds a bit wordy and hollow.
answered Jun 24 at 14:26
user280597
The deferred nouns are not missing in any of the sentences. They follow immediately after the second verbs.
– Jason Bassford
Jun 24 at 15:36
@ Jason Bassford Read what I said. I did not say they are missing. This is getting a little ridiculous. It is very clear to me that this website is not being properly monitored.
– user280597
Jun 24 at 15:48
@ Jason Bassford: This site is unfriendly and poorly managed. I shall not be here long. I just wanted to send you an unambiguous message and register my displeasure.
– user280597
Jun 24 at 16:00
@JasonBassford Patriot is completely correct. You've misatributed your own idea to them. It doesn't appear anywhere in their post
– Araucaria
Jun 25 at 0:03
I have updated the question to make what I am asking clearer, I meant to ask whether it is ok to move a otherwise repeated noun to after a conjunction such as "and"
– allsey87
Jun 25 at 14:53
add a comment |
The deferred nouns are not missing in any of the sentences. They follow immediately after the second verbs.
– Jason Bassford
Jun 24 at 15:36
@ Jason Bassford Read what I said. I did not say they are missing. This is getting a little ridiculous. It is very clear to me that this website is not being properly monitored.
– user280597
Jun 24 at 15:48
@ Jason Bassford: This site is unfriendly and poorly managed. I shall not be here long. I just wanted to send you an unambiguous message and register my displeasure.
– user280597
Jun 24 at 16:00
@JasonBassford Patriot is completely correct. You've misatributed your own idea to them. It doesn't appear anywhere in their post
– Araucaria
Jun 25 at 0:03
I have updated the question to make what I am asking clearer, I meant to ask whether it is ok to move a otherwise repeated noun to after a conjunction such as "and"
– allsey87
Jun 25 at 14:53
The deferred nouns are not missing in any of the sentences. They follow immediately after the second verbs.
– Jason Bassford
Jun 24 at 15:36
The deferred nouns are not missing in any of the sentences. They follow immediately after the second verbs.
– Jason Bassford
Jun 24 at 15:36
@ Jason Bassford Read what I said. I did not say they are missing. This is getting a little ridiculous. It is very clear to me that this website is not being properly monitored.
– user280597
Jun 24 at 15:48
@ Jason Bassford Read what I said. I did not say they are missing. This is getting a little ridiculous. It is very clear to me that this website is not being properly monitored.
– user280597
Jun 24 at 15:48
@ Jason Bassford: This site is unfriendly and poorly managed. I shall not be here long. I just wanted to send you an unambiguous message and register my displeasure.
– user280597
Jun 24 at 16:00
@ Jason Bassford: This site is unfriendly and poorly managed. I shall not be here long. I just wanted to send you an unambiguous message and register my displeasure.
– user280597
Jun 24 at 16:00
@JasonBassford Patriot is completely correct. You've misatributed your own idea to them. It doesn't appear anywhere in their post
– Araucaria
Jun 25 at 0:03
@JasonBassford Patriot is completely correct. You've misatributed your own idea to them. It doesn't appear anywhere in their post
– Araucaria
Jun 25 at 0:03
I have updated the question to make what I am asking clearer, I meant to ask whether it is ok to move a otherwise repeated noun to after a conjunction such as "and"
– allsey87
Jun 25 at 14:53
I have updated the question to make what I am asking clearer, I meant to ask whether it is ok to move a otherwise repeated noun to after a conjunction such as "and"
– allsey87
Jun 25 at 14:53
add a comment |
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f451766%2fdeferring-a-noun-belonging-to-a-preposition-until-after-a-conjunction%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
See a related Q about omission of subject from ELL: ell.stackexchange.com/questions/148269/…
– aesking
Jun 24 at 18:49