Japanese Temple Problem From 1844
up vote
36
down vote
favorite
I recently learnt a Japanese geometry temple problem.
The problem is the following:
Five squares are arranged as the image shows. Prove that the area of triangle T and the area of square S are equal.
This is problem 6 in this article.
I am thinking about law of cosines, but I have not been able to prove the theorem. Any hints would be appreciated.
geometry sangaku
add a comment |
up vote
36
down vote
favorite
I recently learnt a Japanese geometry temple problem.
The problem is the following:
Five squares are arranged as the image shows. Prove that the area of triangle T and the area of square S are equal.
This is problem 6 in this article.
I am thinking about law of cosines, but I have not been able to prove the theorem. Any hints would be appreciated.
geometry sangaku
add a comment |
up vote
36
down vote
favorite
up vote
36
down vote
favorite
I recently learnt a Japanese geometry temple problem.
The problem is the following:
Five squares are arranged as the image shows. Prove that the area of triangle T and the area of square S are equal.
This is problem 6 in this article.
I am thinking about law of cosines, but I have not been able to prove the theorem. Any hints would be appreciated.
geometry sangaku
I recently learnt a Japanese geometry temple problem.
The problem is the following:
Five squares are arranged as the image shows. Prove that the area of triangle T and the area of square S are equal.
This is problem 6 in this article.
I am thinking about law of cosines, but I have not been able to prove the theorem. Any hints would be appreciated.
geometry sangaku
geometry sangaku
edited yesterday
Jean-Claude Arbaut
14.6k63362
14.6k63362
asked yesterday
Larry
1,0241522
1,0241522
add a comment |
add a comment |
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
up vote
28
down vote
accepted
We will, first of all, prove a very interesting property
$mathbf{Lemma;1}$
Given two squares PQRS and PTUV (as shown on the picture), the triangles $Delta STP$ and $Delta PVQ$ have equal area.
$mathbf {Proof}$
Denote by $alpha$ the angle SPT and by $[...]$ the area of the polygon "...". Hence
$$[Delta STP]=frac{overline {PS}cdotoverline {PT}cdot sin(alpha)}{2}$$ $$[Delta PVQ]=frac{overline {QP}*overline {PV}cdotsinBigl(360°-(90°+90+alpha)Bigr)}{2}=frac{overline {QP}cdotoverline {PV}cdotsinBigl(180°-alphaBigr)}{2}=frac{overline {QP}cdotoverline {PV}cdotsin(alpha)}{2}$$
Since $overline {PS}=overline {PQ}$ and $overline {PT}=overline {PV}$ $$[Delta STP]=[Delta PVQ]$$
Now, back to the problem
Let $overline {AB}=a$ and $overline {IJ}=b$. Note first of all that $$Delta BEC cong Delta EIF$$
See why? $mathbf {Hint:}$
It is obvious that $overline {CE}=overline {EF}$. Use the properties of right triangles in order to show that all angles are equal.
Thus $${(overline{CE})^2}={a^2}+{b^2}=S$$
Note furthermore that $$[Delta BEC]=[Delta EIF]=frac{ab}{2}$$
By Lemma 1:
$$[Delta DCG]=[Delta BEC]=frac{ab}{2}=[Delta EIF]=[Delta GFK]$$
The area of the polygon AJKGD is thus
$$[AJKGD]=[ABCD]+[CEFG]+[FIJK]+4[Delta DCG]=2Bigl({a^2}+{b^2}Bigr)+2ab$$
The area of the trapezoid AJKD is moreover
$$[AJKD]=frac{(a+b)(2a+2b)}{2}={a^2}+2ab+{b^2}$$
Finally
$$T=[Delta DKG]=[AJKGD]-[AJKD]={a^2}+{b^2}=S Rightarrow S=T$$
3
Nice. Maybe one can simplify the proof of the Lemma. Rotate $QPV$ by $pi/2$ clokwise around $P$; you get a triangle with the same basis and same heigth as $PST$.
– D. Thomine
yesterday
@Dr. Mathva: Thank you so much for your answer!
– Larry
yesterday
7
"+1, and I almost never +1 a rival answer" - that's a bit unpleasant
– Mitch Wheat
23 hours ago
How do you know that BEC and EIF are right triangles?
– Cooper Buckingham
11 hours ago
@Cooper Buckingham: It is one of the given conditions.
– Larry
11 hours ago
|
show 1 more comment
up vote
13
down vote
$$|square P_1 P_2 P_3 P_4| = (a+b)^2 = frac12(a+b)(2a+2b) = |square Q_1 Q_2 Q_3 Q_4|quad=:R$$
$$S ;=; R - 4cdotfrac12ab ;=; T$$
(This space intentionally left blank.)
1
I wonder what tools you use to create awesome graphs like this
– Larry
14 hours ago
2
@Larry: I use GeoGebra.
– Blue
9 hours ago
I see, thank you.
– Larry
9 hours ago
add a comment |
up vote
8
down vote
While the other solutions are obviously correct, they are also unnecessarily complicated.
Since the angle of the squares is not specified, it must be true for all angles, so why not pick one which is simple to work with and results in a degenerate case.
4
That's a beautiful drawing, but I'm not sure if "Since the angle of the squares is not specified, it must be true for all angles" is logically sound here. It seems to be assuming the truth of the answer.
– Owen
5 hours ago
add a comment |
up vote
7
down vote
Because there are so many squares, coordinates are easy to compute.
The area of the shaded square is clearly $u^2+v^2$.
The area of the shaded triangle is one-half of the absolute value of the determinant of the array
$$left[ begin{array}{c}
1 & 1 & 1 \
2u-v & 3u & 2u \
3u+v & u+3v & u+v
end{array} right]$$
which is also $u^2+v^2$.
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
This is a long comment.
The shapes $S,,T$ share a vertex $A$ where six angles meet, three of them right angles. The other three angles therefore sum to a right angle. Let $theta$ be the angle in $T$, so the two other acute angles, and the right angle between them from $S$, sum to $pi-theta$. Since $sintheta=sin(pi-theta)$, $T$ has the same area as $triangle ABC$, where $BA,,AC$ are sides of the upper squares.
The challenge, then, is to show $S$ has that much area too. Let $D$ denote the vertex of $S$ opposite $A$. I suspect we can show the quadrilateral $BACD$ has twice the area of $S$, and also twice the area of $triangle ABC$.
I don't think that $BACD$ has twice the area of $ABC$. If you try to move $ABC$ by shearing to get a triangle with side $BC$ and something on the bottom line, the third point isn't $D$.
– D. Thomine
yesterday
$BACD$ is a rhombus because its opposite sides are parallel. So it does have twice the area of $ABC$.
– I like Serena
yesterday
$BACD$ is not a rhombus.
– D. Thomine
yesterday
Sorry, I meant parallellogram @D.Thomine.
– I like Serena
yesterday
1
@Servaes It's too long. "Long comment" is something people often say when their contribution has to be an "answer" because of software limitations, but is far from a complete answer.
– J.G.
18 hours ago
|
show 3 more comments
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
28
down vote
accepted
We will, first of all, prove a very interesting property
$mathbf{Lemma;1}$
Given two squares PQRS and PTUV (as shown on the picture), the triangles $Delta STP$ and $Delta PVQ$ have equal area.
$mathbf {Proof}$
Denote by $alpha$ the angle SPT and by $[...]$ the area of the polygon "...". Hence
$$[Delta STP]=frac{overline {PS}cdotoverline {PT}cdot sin(alpha)}{2}$$ $$[Delta PVQ]=frac{overline {QP}*overline {PV}cdotsinBigl(360°-(90°+90+alpha)Bigr)}{2}=frac{overline {QP}cdotoverline {PV}cdotsinBigl(180°-alphaBigr)}{2}=frac{overline {QP}cdotoverline {PV}cdotsin(alpha)}{2}$$
Since $overline {PS}=overline {PQ}$ and $overline {PT}=overline {PV}$ $$[Delta STP]=[Delta PVQ]$$
Now, back to the problem
Let $overline {AB}=a$ and $overline {IJ}=b$. Note first of all that $$Delta BEC cong Delta EIF$$
See why? $mathbf {Hint:}$
It is obvious that $overline {CE}=overline {EF}$. Use the properties of right triangles in order to show that all angles are equal.
Thus $${(overline{CE})^2}={a^2}+{b^2}=S$$
Note furthermore that $$[Delta BEC]=[Delta EIF]=frac{ab}{2}$$
By Lemma 1:
$$[Delta DCG]=[Delta BEC]=frac{ab}{2}=[Delta EIF]=[Delta GFK]$$
The area of the polygon AJKGD is thus
$$[AJKGD]=[ABCD]+[CEFG]+[FIJK]+4[Delta DCG]=2Bigl({a^2}+{b^2}Bigr)+2ab$$
The area of the trapezoid AJKD is moreover
$$[AJKD]=frac{(a+b)(2a+2b)}{2}={a^2}+2ab+{b^2}$$
Finally
$$T=[Delta DKG]=[AJKGD]-[AJKD]={a^2}+{b^2}=S Rightarrow S=T$$
3
Nice. Maybe one can simplify the proof of the Lemma. Rotate $QPV$ by $pi/2$ clokwise around $P$; you get a triangle with the same basis and same heigth as $PST$.
– D. Thomine
yesterday
@Dr. Mathva: Thank you so much for your answer!
– Larry
yesterday
7
"+1, and I almost never +1 a rival answer" - that's a bit unpleasant
– Mitch Wheat
23 hours ago
How do you know that BEC and EIF are right triangles?
– Cooper Buckingham
11 hours ago
@Cooper Buckingham: It is one of the given conditions.
– Larry
11 hours ago
|
show 1 more comment
up vote
28
down vote
accepted
We will, first of all, prove a very interesting property
$mathbf{Lemma;1}$
Given two squares PQRS and PTUV (as shown on the picture), the triangles $Delta STP$ and $Delta PVQ$ have equal area.
$mathbf {Proof}$
Denote by $alpha$ the angle SPT and by $[...]$ the area of the polygon "...". Hence
$$[Delta STP]=frac{overline {PS}cdotoverline {PT}cdot sin(alpha)}{2}$$ $$[Delta PVQ]=frac{overline {QP}*overline {PV}cdotsinBigl(360°-(90°+90+alpha)Bigr)}{2}=frac{overline {QP}cdotoverline {PV}cdotsinBigl(180°-alphaBigr)}{2}=frac{overline {QP}cdotoverline {PV}cdotsin(alpha)}{2}$$
Since $overline {PS}=overline {PQ}$ and $overline {PT}=overline {PV}$ $$[Delta STP]=[Delta PVQ]$$
Now, back to the problem
Let $overline {AB}=a$ and $overline {IJ}=b$. Note first of all that $$Delta BEC cong Delta EIF$$
See why? $mathbf {Hint:}$
It is obvious that $overline {CE}=overline {EF}$. Use the properties of right triangles in order to show that all angles are equal.
Thus $${(overline{CE})^2}={a^2}+{b^2}=S$$
Note furthermore that $$[Delta BEC]=[Delta EIF]=frac{ab}{2}$$
By Lemma 1:
$$[Delta DCG]=[Delta BEC]=frac{ab}{2}=[Delta EIF]=[Delta GFK]$$
The area of the polygon AJKGD is thus
$$[AJKGD]=[ABCD]+[CEFG]+[FIJK]+4[Delta DCG]=2Bigl({a^2}+{b^2}Bigr)+2ab$$
The area of the trapezoid AJKD is moreover
$$[AJKD]=frac{(a+b)(2a+2b)}{2}={a^2}+2ab+{b^2}$$
Finally
$$T=[Delta DKG]=[AJKGD]-[AJKD]={a^2}+{b^2}=S Rightarrow S=T$$
3
Nice. Maybe one can simplify the proof of the Lemma. Rotate $QPV$ by $pi/2$ clokwise around $P$; you get a triangle with the same basis and same heigth as $PST$.
– D. Thomine
yesterday
@Dr. Mathva: Thank you so much for your answer!
– Larry
yesterday
7
"+1, and I almost never +1 a rival answer" - that's a bit unpleasant
– Mitch Wheat
23 hours ago
How do you know that BEC and EIF are right triangles?
– Cooper Buckingham
11 hours ago
@Cooper Buckingham: It is one of the given conditions.
– Larry
11 hours ago
|
show 1 more comment
up vote
28
down vote
accepted
up vote
28
down vote
accepted
We will, first of all, prove a very interesting property
$mathbf{Lemma;1}$
Given two squares PQRS and PTUV (as shown on the picture), the triangles $Delta STP$ and $Delta PVQ$ have equal area.
$mathbf {Proof}$
Denote by $alpha$ the angle SPT and by $[...]$ the area of the polygon "...". Hence
$$[Delta STP]=frac{overline {PS}cdotoverline {PT}cdot sin(alpha)}{2}$$ $$[Delta PVQ]=frac{overline {QP}*overline {PV}cdotsinBigl(360°-(90°+90+alpha)Bigr)}{2}=frac{overline {QP}cdotoverline {PV}cdotsinBigl(180°-alphaBigr)}{2}=frac{overline {QP}cdotoverline {PV}cdotsin(alpha)}{2}$$
Since $overline {PS}=overline {PQ}$ and $overline {PT}=overline {PV}$ $$[Delta STP]=[Delta PVQ]$$
Now, back to the problem
Let $overline {AB}=a$ and $overline {IJ}=b$. Note first of all that $$Delta BEC cong Delta EIF$$
See why? $mathbf {Hint:}$
It is obvious that $overline {CE}=overline {EF}$. Use the properties of right triangles in order to show that all angles are equal.
Thus $${(overline{CE})^2}={a^2}+{b^2}=S$$
Note furthermore that $$[Delta BEC]=[Delta EIF]=frac{ab}{2}$$
By Lemma 1:
$$[Delta DCG]=[Delta BEC]=frac{ab}{2}=[Delta EIF]=[Delta GFK]$$
The area of the polygon AJKGD is thus
$$[AJKGD]=[ABCD]+[CEFG]+[FIJK]+4[Delta DCG]=2Bigl({a^2}+{b^2}Bigr)+2ab$$
The area of the trapezoid AJKD is moreover
$$[AJKD]=frac{(a+b)(2a+2b)}{2}={a^2}+2ab+{b^2}$$
Finally
$$T=[Delta DKG]=[AJKGD]-[AJKD]={a^2}+{b^2}=S Rightarrow S=T$$
We will, first of all, prove a very interesting property
$mathbf{Lemma;1}$
Given two squares PQRS and PTUV (as shown on the picture), the triangles $Delta STP$ and $Delta PVQ$ have equal area.
$mathbf {Proof}$
Denote by $alpha$ the angle SPT and by $[...]$ the area of the polygon "...". Hence
$$[Delta STP]=frac{overline {PS}cdotoverline {PT}cdot sin(alpha)}{2}$$ $$[Delta PVQ]=frac{overline {QP}*overline {PV}cdotsinBigl(360°-(90°+90+alpha)Bigr)}{2}=frac{overline {QP}cdotoverline {PV}cdotsinBigl(180°-alphaBigr)}{2}=frac{overline {QP}cdotoverline {PV}cdotsin(alpha)}{2}$$
Since $overline {PS}=overline {PQ}$ and $overline {PT}=overline {PV}$ $$[Delta STP]=[Delta PVQ]$$
Now, back to the problem
Let $overline {AB}=a$ and $overline {IJ}=b$. Note first of all that $$Delta BEC cong Delta EIF$$
See why? $mathbf {Hint:}$
It is obvious that $overline {CE}=overline {EF}$. Use the properties of right triangles in order to show that all angles are equal.
Thus $${(overline{CE})^2}={a^2}+{b^2}=S$$
Note furthermore that $$[Delta BEC]=[Delta EIF]=frac{ab}{2}$$
By Lemma 1:
$$[Delta DCG]=[Delta BEC]=frac{ab}{2}=[Delta EIF]=[Delta GFK]$$
The area of the polygon AJKGD is thus
$$[AJKGD]=[ABCD]+[CEFG]+[FIJK]+4[Delta DCG]=2Bigl({a^2}+{b^2}Bigr)+2ab$$
The area of the trapezoid AJKD is moreover
$$[AJKD]=frac{(a+b)(2a+2b)}{2}={a^2}+2ab+{b^2}$$
Finally
$$T=[Delta DKG]=[AJKGD]-[AJKD]={a^2}+{b^2}=S Rightarrow S=T$$
edited 21 hours ago
Mutantoe
542411
542411
answered yesterday
Dr. Mathva
36517
36517
3
Nice. Maybe one can simplify the proof of the Lemma. Rotate $QPV$ by $pi/2$ clokwise around $P$; you get a triangle with the same basis and same heigth as $PST$.
– D. Thomine
yesterday
@Dr. Mathva: Thank you so much for your answer!
– Larry
yesterday
7
"+1, and I almost never +1 a rival answer" - that's a bit unpleasant
– Mitch Wheat
23 hours ago
How do you know that BEC and EIF are right triangles?
– Cooper Buckingham
11 hours ago
@Cooper Buckingham: It is one of the given conditions.
– Larry
11 hours ago
|
show 1 more comment
3
Nice. Maybe one can simplify the proof of the Lemma. Rotate $QPV$ by $pi/2$ clokwise around $P$; you get a triangle with the same basis and same heigth as $PST$.
– D. Thomine
yesterday
@Dr. Mathva: Thank you so much for your answer!
– Larry
yesterday
7
"+1, and I almost never +1 a rival answer" - that's a bit unpleasant
– Mitch Wheat
23 hours ago
How do you know that BEC and EIF are right triangles?
– Cooper Buckingham
11 hours ago
@Cooper Buckingham: It is one of the given conditions.
– Larry
11 hours ago
3
3
Nice. Maybe one can simplify the proof of the Lemma. Rotate $QPV$ by $pi/2$ clokwise around $P$; you get a triangle with the same basis and same heigth as $PST$.
– D. Thomine
yesterday
Nice. Maybe one can simplify the proof of the Lemma. Rotate $QPV$ by $pi/2$ clokwise around $P$; you get a triangle with the same basis and same heigth as $PST$.
– D. Thomine
yesterday
@Dr. Mathva: Thank you so much for your answer!
– Larry
yesterday
@Dr. Mathva: Thank you so much for your answer!
– Larry
yesterday
7
7
"+1, and I almost never +1 a rival answer" - that's a bit unpleasant
– Mitch Wheat
23 hours ago
"+1, and I almost never +1 a rival answer" - that's a bit unpleasant
– Mitch Wheat
23 hours ago
How do you know that BEC and EIF are right triangles?
– Cooper Buckingham
11 hours ago
How do you know that BEC and EIF are right triangles?
– Cooper Buckingham
11 hours ago
@Cooper Buckingham: It is one of the given conditions.
– Larry
11 hours ago
@Cooper Buckingham: It is one of the given conditions.
– Larry
11 hours ago
|
show 1 more comment
up vote
13
down vote
$$|square P_1 P_2 P_3 P_4| = (a+b)^2 = frac12(a+b)(2a+2b) = |square Q_1 Q_2 Q_3 Q_4|quad=:R$$
$$S ;=; R - 4cdotfrac12ab ;=; T$$
(This space intentionally left blank.)
1
I wonder what tools you use to create awesome graphs like this
– Larry
14 hours ago
2
@Larry: I use GeoGebra.
– Blue
9 hours ago
I see, thank you.
– Larry
9 hours ago
add a comment |
up vote
13
down vote
$$|square P_1 P_2 P_3 P_4| = (a+b)^2 = frac12(a+b)(2a+2b) = |square Q_1 Q_2 Q_3 Q_4|quad=:R$$
$$S ;=; R - 4cdotfrac12ab ;=; T$$
(This space intentionally left blank.)
1
I wonder what tools you use to create awesome graphs like this
– Larry
14 hours ago
2
@Larry: I use GeoGebra.
– Blue
9 hours ago
I see, thank you.
– Larry
9 hours ago
add a comment |
up vote
13
down vote
up vote
13
down vote
$$|square P_1 P_2 P_3 P_4| = (a+b)^2 = frac12(a+b)(2a+2b) = |square Q_1 Q_2 Q_3 Q_4|quad=:R$$
$$S ;=; R - 4cdotfrac12ab ;=; T$$
(This space intentionally left blank.)
$$|square P_1 P_2 P_3 P_4| = (a+b)^2 = frac12(a+b)(2a+2b) = |square Q_1 Q_2 Q_3 Q_4|quad=:R$$
$$S ;=; R - 4cdotfrac12ab ;=; T$$
(This space intentionally left blank.)
edited 22 hours ago
answered yesterday
Blue
46.4k869147
46.4k869147
1
I wonder what tools you use to create awesome graphs like this
– Larry
14 hours ago
2
@Larry: I use GeoGebra.
– Blue
9 hours ago
I see, thank you.
– Larry
9 hours ago
add a comment |
1
I wonder what tools you use to create awesome graphs like this
– Larry
14 hours ago
2
@Larry: I use GeoGebra.
– Blue
9 hours ago
I see, thank you.
– Larry
9 hours ago
1
1
I wonder what tools you use to create awesome graphs like this
– Larry
14 hours ago
I wonder what tools you use to create awesome graphs like this
– Larry
14 hours ago
2
2
@Larry: I use GeoGebra.
– Blue
9 hours ago
@Larry: I use GeoGebra.
– Blue
9 hours ago
I see, thank you.
– Larry
9 hours ago
I see, thank you.
– Larry
9 hours ago
add a comment |
up vote
8
down vote
While the other solutions are obviously correct, they are also unnecessarily complicated.
Since the angle of the squares is not specified, it must be true for all angles, so why not pick one which is simple to work with and results in a degenerate case.
4
That's a beautiful drawing, but I'm not sure if "Since the angle of the squares is not specified, it must be true for all angles" is logically sound here. It seems to be assuming the truth of the answer.
– Owen
5 hours ago
add a comment |
up vote
8
down vote
While the other solutions are obviously correct, they are also unnecessarily complicated.
Since the angle of the squares is not specified, it must be true for all angles, so why not pick one which is simple to work with and results in a degenerate case.
4
That's a beautiful drawing, but I'm not sure if "Since the angle of the squares is not specified, it must be true for all angles" is logically sound here. It seems to be assuming the truth of the answer.
– Owen
5 hours ago
add a comment |
up vote
8
down vote
up vote
8
down vote
While the other solutions are obviously correct, they are also unnecessarily complicated.
Since the angle of the squares is not specified, it must be true for all angles, so why not pick one which is simple to work with and results in a degenerate case.
While the other solutions are obviously correct, they are also unnecessarily complicated.
Since the angle of the squares is not specified, it must be true for all angles, so why not pick one which is simple to work with and results in a degenerate case.
answered 9 hours ago
DenDenDo
50348
50348
4
That's a beautiful drawing, but I'm not sure if "Since the angle of the squares is not specified, it must be true for all angles" is logically sound here. It seems to be assuming the truth of the answer.
– Owen
5 hours ago
add a comment |
4
That's a beautiful drawing, but I'm not sure if "Since the angle of the squares is not specified, it must be true for all angles" is logically sound here. It seems to be assuming the truth of the answer.
– Owen
5 hours ago
4
4
That's a beautiful drawing, but I'm not sure if "Since the angle of the squares is not specified, it must be true for all angles" is logically sound here. It seems to be assuming the truth of the answer.
– Owen
5 hours ago
That's a beautiful drawing, but I'm not sure if "Since the angle of the squares is not specified, it must be true for all angles" is logically sound here. It seems to be assuming the truth of the answer.
– Owen
5 hours ago
add a comment |
up vote
7
down vote
Because there are so many squares, coordinates are easy to compute.
The area of the shaded square is clearly $u^2+v^2$.
The area of the shaded triangle is one-half of the absolute value of the determinant of the array
$$left[ begin{array}{c}
1 & 1 & 1 \
2u-v & 3u & 2u \
3u+v & u+3v & u+v
end{array} right]$$
which is also $u^2+v^2$.
add a comment |
up vote
7
down vote
Because there are so many squares, coordinates are easy to compute.
The area of the shaded square is clearly $u^2+v^2$.
The area of the shaded triangle is one-half of the absolute value of the determinant of the array
$$left[ begin{array}{c}
1 & 1 & 1 \
2u-v & 3u & 2u \
3u+v & u+3v & u+v
end{array} right]$$
which is also $u^2+v^2$.
add a comment |
up vote
7
down vote
up vote
7
down vote
Because there are so many squares, coordinates are easy to compute.
The area of the shaded square is clearly $u^2+v^2$.
The area of the shaded triangle is one-half of the absolute value of the determinant of the array
$$left[ begin{array}{c}
1 & 1 & 1 \
2u-v & 3u & 2u \
3u+v & u+3v & u+v
end{array} right]$$
which is also $u^2+v^2$.
Because there are so many squares, coordinates are easy to compute.
The area of the shaded square is clearly $u^2+v^2$.
The area of the shaded triangle is one-half of the absolute value of the determinant of the array
$$left[ begin{array}{c}
1 & 1 & 1 \
2u-v & 3u & 2u \
3u+v & u+3v & u+v
end{array} right]$$
which is also $u^2+v^2$.
answered 14 hours ago
steven gregory
17.4k22256
17.4k22256
add a comment |
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
This is a long comment.
The shapes $S,,T$ share a vertex $A$ where six angles meet, three of them right angles. The other three angles therefore sum to a right angle. Let $theta$ be the angle in $T$, so the two other acute angles, and the right angle between them from $S$, sum to $pi-theta$. Since $sintheta=sin(pi-theta)$, $T$ has the same area as $triangle ABC$, where $BA,,AC$ are sides of the upper squares.
The challenge, then, is to show $S$ has that much area too. Let $D$ denote the vertex of $S$ opposite $A$. I suspect we can show the quadrilateral $BACD$ has twice the area of $S$, and also twice the area of $triangle ABC$.
I don't think that $BACD$ has twice the area of $ABC$. If you try to move $ABC$ by shearing to get a triangle with side $BC$ and something on the bottom line, the third point isn't $D$.
– D. Thomine
yesterday
$BACD$ is a rhombus because its opposite sides are parallel. So it does have twice the area of $ABC$.
– I like Serena
yesterday
$BACD$ is not a rhombus.
– D. Thomine
yesterday
Sorry, I meant parallellogram @D.Thomine.
– I like Serena
yesterday
1
@Servaes It's too long. "Long comment" is something people often say when their contribution has to be an "answer" because of software limitations, but is far from a complete answer.
– J.G.
18 hours ago
|
show 3 more comments
up vote
1
down vote
This is a long comment.
The shapes $S,,T$ share a vertex $A$ where six angles meet, three of them right angles. The other three angles therefore sum to a right angle. Let $theta$ be the angle in $T$, so the two other acute angles, and the right angle between them from $S$, sum to $pi-theta$. Since $sintheta=sin(pi-theta)$, $T$ has the same area as $triangle ABC$, where $BA,,AC$ are sides of the upper squares.
The challenge, then, is to show $S$ has that much area too. Let $D$ denote the vertex of $S$ opposite $A$. I suspect we can show the quadrilateral $BACD$ has twice the area of $S$, and also twice the area of $triangle ABC$.
I don't think that $BACD$ has twice the area of $ABC$. If you try to move $ABC$ by shearing to get a triangle with side $BC$ and something on the bottom line, the third point isn't $D$.
– D. Thomine
yesterday
$BACD$ is a rhombus because its opposite sides are parallel. So it does have twice the area of $ABC$.
– I like Serena
yesterday
$BACD$ is not a rhombus.
– D. Thomine
yesterday
Sorry, I meant parallellogram @D.Thomine.
– I like Serena
yesterday
1
@Servaes It's too long. "Long comment" is something people often say when their contribution has to be an "answer" because of software limitations, but is far from a complete answer.
– J.G.
18 hours ago
|
show 3 more comments
up vote
1
down vote
up vote
1
down vote
This is a long comment.
The shapes $S,,T$ share a vertex $A$ where six angles meet, three of them right angles. The other three angles therefore sum to a right angle. Let $theta$ be the angle in $T$, so the two other acute angles, and the right angle between them from $S$, sum to $pi-theta$. Since $sintheta=sin(pi-theta)$, $T$ has the same area as $triangle ABC$, where $BA,,AC$ are sides of the upper squares.
The challenge, then, is to show $S$ has that much area too. Let $D$ denote the vertex of $S$ opposite $A$. I suspect we can show the quadrilateral $BACD$ has twice the area of $S$, and also twice the area of $triangle ABC$.
This is a long comment.
The shapes $S,,T$ share a vertex $A$ where six angles meet, three of them right angles. The other three angles therefore sum to a right angle. Let $theta$ be the angle in $T$, so the two other acute angles, and the right angle between them from $S$, sum to $pi-theta$. Since $sintheta=sin(pi-theta)$, $T$ has the same area as $triangle ABC$, where $BA,,AC$ are sides of the upper squares.
The challenge, then, is to show $S$ has that much area too. Let $D$ denote the vertex of $S$ opposite $A$. I suspect we can show the quadrilateral $BACD$ has twice the area of $S$, and also twice the area of $triangle ABC$.
answered yesterday
J.G.
18.6k21932
18.6k21932
I don't think that $BACD$ has twice the area of $ABC$. If you try to move $ABC$ by shearing to get a triangle with side $BC$ and something on the bottom line, the third point isn't $D$.
– D. Thomine
yesterday
$BACD$ is a rhombus because its opposite sides are parallel. So it does have twice the area of $ABC$.
– I like Serena
yesterday
$BACD$ is not a rhombus.
– D. Thomine
yesterday
Sorry, I meant parallellogram @D.Thomine.
– I like Serena
yesterday
1
@Servaes It's too long. "Long comment" is something people often say when their contribution has to be an "answer" because of software limitations, but is far from a complete answer.
– J.G.
18 hours ago
|
show 3 more comments
I don't think that $BACD$ has twice the area of $ABC$. If you try to move $ABC$ by shearing to get a triangle with side $BC$ and something on the bottom line, the third point isn't $D$.
– D. Thomine
yesterday
$BACD$ is a rhombus because its opposite sides are parallel. So it does have twice the area of $ABC$.
– I like Serena
yesterday
$BACD$ is not a rhombus.
– D. Thomine
yesterday
Sorry, I meant parallellogram @D.Thomine.
– I like Serena
yesterday
1
@Servaes It's too long. "Long comment" is something people often say when their contribution has to be an "answer" because of software limitations, but is far from a complete answer.
– J.G.
18 hours ago
I don't think that $BACD$ has twice the area of $ABC$. If you try to move $ABC$ by shearing to get a triangle with side $BC$ and something on the bottom line, the third point isn't $D$.
– D. Thomine
yesterday
I don't think that $BACD$ has twice the area of $ABC$. If you try to move $ABC$ by shearing to get a triangle with side $BC$ and something on the bottom line, the third point isn't $D$.
– D. Thomine
yesterday
$BACD$ is a rhombus because its opposite sides are parallel. So it does have twice the area of $ABC$.
– I like Serena
yesterday
$BACD$ is a rhombus because its opposite sides are parallel. So it does have twice the area of $ABC$.
– I like Serena
yesterday
$BACD$ is not a rhombus.
– D. Thomine
yesterday
$BACD$ is not a rhombus.
– D. Thomine
yesterday
Sorry, I meant parallellogram @D.Thomine.
– I like Serena
yesterday
Sorry, I meant parallellogram @D.Thomine.
– I like Serena
yesterday
1
1
@Servaes It's too long. "Long comment" is something people often say when their contribution has to be an "answer" because of software limitations, but is far from a complete answer.
– J.G.
18 hours ago
@Servaes It's too long. "Long comment" is something people often say when their contribution has to be an "answer" because of software limitations, but is far from a complete answer.
– J.G.
18 hours ago
|
show 3 more comments
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3009635%2fjapanese-temple-problem-from-1844%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown