What do you call someone who gives you the wrong advice?
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}
up vote
5
down vote
favorite
I have a co-worker at work who I have figured has given me the wrong advice or wrong impression more than once (like "oh its ok to come by this time" while I found out later it was not permitted by company policy).
What do you call such a person?
EDIT:
Thanks to everyone for the answers. I was looking for someone doing this deliberately.In my opinion the word I would use would be a "deceiver" or a "misleader", as they convey the sense of deliberately giving a false impression or leading in the wrong direction.
single-word-requests
add a comment |
up vote
5
down vote
favorite
I have a co-worker at work who I have figured has given me the wrong advice or wrong impression more than once (like "oh its ok to come by this time" while I found out later it was not permitted by company policy).
What do you call such a person?
EDIT:
Thanks to everyone for the answers. I was looking for someone doing this deliberately.In my opinion the word I would use would be a "deceiver" or a "misleader", as they convey the sense of deliberately giving a false impression or leading in the wrong direction.
single-word-requests
3
May I charitably suggest calling them infrequently? :)
– tchrist♦
Jan 23 '14 at 1:05
2
"Misleading" is common, "misleader" appears rare.
– Elliott Frisch
Jan 23 '14 at 5:46
@ElliottFrisch Your right. Misleader is not a word I hear often. Thanks!
– umair
Jan 23 '14 at 5:49
add a comment |
up vote
5
down vote
favorite
up vote
5
down vote
favorite
I have a co-worker at work who I have figured has given me the wrong advice or wrong impression more than once (like "oh its ok to come by this time" while I found out later it was not permitted by company policy).
What do you call such a person?
EDIT:
Thanks to everyone for the answers. I was looking for someone doing this deliberately.In my opinion the word I would use would be a "deceiver" or a "misleader", as they convey the sense of deliberately giving a false impression or leading in the wrong direction.
single-word-requests
I have a co-worker at work who I have figured has given me the wrong advice or wrong impression more than once (like "oh its ok to come by this time" while I found out later it was not permitted by company policy).
What do you call such a person?
EDIT:
Thanks to everyone for the answers. I was looking for someone doing this deliberately.In my opinion the word I would use would be a "deceiver" or a "misleader", as they convey the sense of deliberately giving a false impression or leading in the wrong direction.
single-word-requests
single-word-requests
edited Jan 23 '14 at 5:48
asked Jan 22 '14 at 10:45
umair
2816
2816
3
May I charitably suggest calling them infrequently? :)
– tchrist♦
Jan 23 '14 at 1:05
2
"Misleading" is common, "misleader" appears rare.
– Elliott Frisch
Jan 23 '14 at 5:46
@ElliottFrisch Your right. Misleader is not a word I hear often. Thanks!
– umair
Jan 23 '14 at 5:49
add a comment |
3
May I charitably suggest calling them infrequently? :)
– tchrist♦
Jan 23 '14 at 1:05
2
"Misleading" is common, "misleader" appears rare.
– Elliott Frisch
Jan 23 '14 at 5:46
@ElliottFrisch Your right. Misleader is not a word I hear often. Thanks!
– umair
Jan 23 '14 at 5:49
3
3
May I charitably suggest calling them infrequently? :)
– tchrist♦
Jan 23 '14 at 1:05
May I charitably suggest calling them infrequently? :)
– tchrist♦
Jan 23 '14 at 1:05
2
2
"Misleading" is common, "misleader" appears rare.
– Elliott Frisch
Jan 23 '14 at 5:46
"Misleading" is common, "misleader" appears rare.
– Elliott Frisch
Jan 23 '14 at 5:46
@ElliottFrisch Your right. Misleader is not a word I hear often. Thanks!
– umair
Jan 23 '14 at 5:49
@ElliottFrisch Your right. Misleader is not a word I hear often. Thanks!
– umair
Jan 23 '14 at 5:49
add a comment |
8 Answers
8
active
oldest
votes
up vote
7
down vote
accepted
There are several possible answers;
If this behavior is intentional - they may be a "saboteur" (one who sabotages), they may be "deceitful" (deceiving or misleading others), "suborning" (inducing (someone) to commit an unlawful act) or "malicious" (intending or intended to do harm).
If it is unintentional - then they are "mistaken" (wrong in one's opinion or judgment), "incorrect" (not in accordance with fact; wrong) or possibly "out-of-date" (no longer useful or acceptable) or even "out of touch" (not keeping informed of the developments relating to someone or something).
add a comment |
up vote
7
down vote
If on purpose -
- deceiver
informally
Weasel
Snake-in-the-grass
if not on purpose
- Unreliable
informally
- flake
The first three are all slang. Whilst the question didn't exclude slang from the answer, I would suggest that a good answer should make it clear if it is making informal/slang suggestions. I also disagree about double-crossing. I don't think that you're double-crossing someone if you give them bad advice, even if intentionally. Double-crossing implies that there was a "single-crossing" to begin with, like the person being given the advice thought that their colleague was deceiving management when in fact they were deceiving them.
– starsplusplus
Jan 22 '14 at 11:35
1
Indeed, unreliable was the first word to come to my mind. Works for deliberate or unintentional both.
– Bradd Szonye
Jan 23 '14 at 5:49
@mplungjan your right. I've chosen deceiver to be the appropriate word. Unfortunately I cant get the accepted answer checkbox ticked as I already accepted another answer before this.
– umair
Jan 23 '14 at 5:50
Sure you can. Just click on another checkmark
– mplungjan
Jan 23 '14 at 6:38
add a comment |
up vote
4
down vote
It depends how strong you want to be- for example if you are calling them out, you might say they are a liar, but that is quite strong.
On the whole you would probably want to be careful about calling someone something, when perhaps what you intend to do is describe them.
So aside from "liar" you don't have many names you would call someone, but you might describe them instead "he is deceitful", "she is untrustworthy," "he is unreliable," "I would not count on her advice."
If you wanted to cushion it slightly in the situation you described you might say "he was a bit confused about when I should drop by" - this suggests that they didn't realise they gave you bad advice, but also implies that they don't really know how to do their job so it still has an edge to it.
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
your ill-wisher or
your worst friend
or
competition!
Well,
Iago is the best answer.(That's Othello, Shakespeare and he does exactly that to his supposed best friend Othello)
This might not be too clear to someone who hasn't read or seen Othello! :)
– Ronan
Mar 24 '14 at 9:45
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
Bullshitter. Understand this of course is slang.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
For purposes of discussing this with your boss, or HR, or others, I'd advise against calling the person a name, however objective it might be. At best it suggests that this is a personality clash and at worst it makes you look like the problem person.
I think you'd be much better advised to describe the behaviour, preferably in objective, diplomatic terms, and let others come to their own conclusions. I would go with "they've steered me wrong on several things" or "they've given me some odd advice". In the extreme: "I've learnt I can't always trust what they tell me." And then be very prepared to document some good examples.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
If you would prefer a classic reference, in Ancient Greece this would be a cacodaemon, an evil spirit whispering bad advice in your ear.
New contributor
add a comment |
up vote
-1
down vote
Maladvisor makes the point. If only it were a real word.
add a comment |
8 Answers
8
active
oldest
votes
8 Answers
8
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
7
down vote
accepted
There are several possible answers;
If this behavior is intentional - they may be a "saboteur" (one who sabotages), they may be "deceitful" (deceiving or misleading others), "suborning" (inducing (someone) to commit an unlawful act) or "malicious" (intending or intended to do harm).
If it is unintentional - then they are "mistaken" (wrong in one's opinion or judgment), "incorrect" (not in accordance with fact; wrong) or possibly "out-of-date" (no longer useful or acceptable) or even "out of touch" (not keeping informed of the developments relating to someone or something).
add a comment |
up vote
7
down vote
accepted
There are several possible answers;
If this behavior is intentional - they may be a "saboteur" (one who sabotages), they may be "deceitful" (deceiving or misleading others), "suborning" (inducing (someone) to commit an unlawful act) or "malicious" (intending or intended to do harm).
If it is unintentional - then they are "mistaken" (wrong in one's opinion or judgment), "incorrect" (not in accordance with fact; wrong) or possibly "out-of-date" (no longer useful or acceptable) or even "out of touch" (not keeping informed of the developments relating to someone or something).
add a comment |
up vote
7
down vote
accepted
up vote
7
down vote
accepted
There are several possible answers;
If this behavior is intentional - they may be a "saboteur" (one who sabotages), they may be "deceitful" (deceiving or misleading others), "suborning" (inducing (someone) to commit an unlawful act) or "malicious" (intending or intended to do harm).
If it is unintentional - then they are "mistaken" (wrong in one's opinion or judgment), "incorrect" (not in accordance with fact; wrong) or possibly "out-of-date" (no longer useful or acceptable) or even "out of touch" (not keeping informed of the developments relating to someone or something).
There are several possible answers;
If this behavior is intentional - they may be a "saboteur" (one who sabotages), they may be "deceitful" (deceiving or misleading others), "suborning" (inducing (someone) to commit an unlawful act) or "malicious" (intending or intended to do harm).
If it is unintentional - then they are "mistaken" (wrong in one's opinion or judgment), "incorrect" (not in accordance with fact; wrong) or possibly "out-of-date" (no longer useful or acceptable) or even "out of touch" (not keeping informed of the developments relating to someone or something).
answered Jan 22 '14 at 14:21
Elliott Frisch
6,62111838
6,62111838
add a comment |
add a comment |
up vote
7
down vote
If on purpose -
- deceiver
informally
Weasel
Snake-in-the-grass
if not on purpose
- Unreliable
informally
- flake
The first three are all slang. Whilst the question didn't exclude slang from the answer, I would suggest that a good answer should make it clear if it is making informal/slang suggestions. I also disagree about double-crossing. I don't think that you're double-crossing someone if you give them bad advice, even if intentionally. Double-crossing implies that there was a "single-crossing" to begin with, like the person being given the advice thought that their colleague was deceiving management when in fact they were deceiving them.
– starsplusplus
Jan 22 '14 at 11:35
1
Indeed, unreliable was the first word to come to my mind. Works for deliberate or unintentional both.
– Bradd Szonye
Jan 23 '14 at 5:49
@mplungjan your right. I've chosen deceiver to be the appropriate word. Unfortunately I cant get the accepted answer checkbox ticked as I already accepted another answer before this.
– umair
Jan 23 '14 at 5:50
Sure you can. Just click on another checkmark
– mplungjan
Jan 23 '14 at 6:38
add a comment |
up vote
7
down vote
If on purpose -
- deceiver
informally
Weasel
Snake-in-the-grass
if not on purpose
- Unreliable
informally
- flake
The first three are all slang. Whilst the question didn't exclude slang from the answer, I would suggest that a good answer should make it clear if it is making informal/slang suggestions. I also disagree about double-crossing. I don't think that you're double-crossing someone if you give them bad advice, even if intentionally. Double-crossing implies that there was a "single-crossing" to begin with, like the person being given the advice thought that their colleague was deceiving management when in fact they were deceiving them.
– starsplusplus
Jan 22 '14 at 11:35
1
Indeed, unreliable was the first word to come to my mind. Works for deliberate or unintentional both.
– Bradd Szonye
Jan 23 '14 at 5:49
@mplungjan your right. I've chosen deceiver to be the appropriate word. Unfortunately I cant get the accepted answer checkbox ticked as I already accepted another answer before this.
– umair
Jan 23 '14 at 5:50
Sure you can. Just click on another checkmark
– mplungjan
Jan 23 '14 at 6:38
add a comment |
up vote
7
down vote
up vote
7
down vote
If on purpose -
- deceiver
informally
Weasel
Snake-in-the-grass
if not on purpose
- Unreliable
informally
- flake
If on purpose -
- deceiver
informally
Weasel
Snake-in-the-grass
if not on purpose
- Unreliable
informally
- flake
edited Jan 22 '14 at 12:13
answered Jan 22 '14 at 10:56
mplungjan
27.4k371108
27.4k371108
The first three are all slang. Whilst the question didn't exclude slang from the answer, I would suggest that a good answer should make it clear if it is making informal/slang suggestions. I also disagree about double-crossing. I don't think that you're double-crossing someone if you give them bad advice, even if intentionally. Double-crossing implies that there was a "single-crossing" to begin with, like the person being given the advice thought that their colleague was deceiving management when in fact they were deceiving them.
– starsplusplus
Jan 22 '14 at 11:35
1
Indeed, unreliable was the first word to come to my mind. Works for deliberate or unintentional both.
– Bradd Szonye
Jan 23 '14 at 5:49
@mplungjan your right. I've chosen deceiver to be the appropriate word. Unfortunately I cant get the accepted answer checkbox ticked as I already accepted another answer before this.
– umair
Jan 23 '14 at 5:50
Sure you can. Just click on another checkmark
– mplungjan
Jan 23 '14 at 6:38
add a comment |
The first three are all slang. Whilst the question didn't exclude slang from the answer, I would suggest that a good answer should make it clear if it is making informal/slang suggestions. I also disagree about double-crossing. I don't think that you're double-crossing someone if you give them bad advice, even if intentionally. Double-crossing implies that there was a "single-crossing" to begin with, like the person being given the advice thought that their colleague was deceiving management when in fact they were deceiving them.
– starsplusplus
Jan 22 '14 at 11:35
1
Indeed, unreliable was the first word to come to my mind. Works for deliberate or unintentional both.
– Bradd Szonye
Jan 23 '14 at 5:49
@mplungjan your right. I've chosen deceiver to be the appropriate word. Unfortunately I cant get the accepted answer checkbox ticked as I already accepted another answer before this.
– umair
Jan 23 '14 at 5:50
Sure you can. Just click on another checkmark
– mplungjan
Jan 23 '14 at 6:38
The first three are all slang. Whilst the question didn't exclude slang from the answer, I would suggest that a good answer should make it clear if it is making informal/slang suggestions. I also disagree about double-crossing. I don't think that you're double-crossing someone if you give them bad advice, even if intentionally. Double-crossing implies that there was a "single-crossing" to begin with, like the person being given the advice thought that their colleague was deceiving management when in fact they were deceiving them.
– starsplusplus
Jan 22 '14 at 11:35
The first three are all slang. Whilst the question didn't exclude slang from the answer, I would suggest that a good answer should make it clear if it is making informal/slang suggestions. I also disagree about double-crossing. I don't think that you're double-crossing someone if you give them bad advice, even if intentionally. Double-crossing implies that there was a "single-crossing" to begin with, like the person being given the advice thought that their colleague was deceiving management when in fact they were deceiving them.
– starsplusplus
Jan 22 '14 at 11:35
1
1
Indeed, unreliable was the first word to come to my mind. Works for deliberate or unintentional both.
– Bradd Szonye
Jan 23 '14 at 5:49
Indeed, unreliable was the first word to come to my mind. Works for deliberate or unintentional both.
– Bradd Szonye
Jan 23 '14 at 5:49
@mplungjan your right. I've chosen deceiver to be the appropriate word. Unfortunately I cant get the accepted answer checkbox ticked as I already accepted another answer before this.
– umair
Jan 23 '14 at 5:50
@mplungjan your right. I've chosen deceiver to be the appropriate word. Unfortunately I cant get the accepted answer checkbox ticked as I already accepted another answer before this.
– umair
Jan 23 '14 at 5:50
Sure you can. Just click on another checkmark
– mplungjan
Jan 23 '14 at 6:38
Sure you can. Just click on another checkmark
– mplungjan
Jan 23 '14 at 6:38
add a comment |
up vote
4
down vote
It depends how strong you want to be- for example if you are calling them out, you might say they are a liar, but that is quite strong.
On the whole you would probably want to be careful about calling someone something, when perhaps what you intend to do is describe them.
So aside from "liar" you don't have many names you would call someone, but you might describe them instead "he is deceitful", "she is untrustworthy," "he is unreliable," "I would not count on her advice."
If you wanted to cushion it slightly in the situation you described you might say "he was a bit confused about when I should drop by" - this suggests that they didn't realise they gave you bad advice, but also implies that they don't really know how to do their job so it still has an edge to it.
add a comment |
up vote
4
down vote
It depends how strong you want to be- for example if you are calling them out, you might say they are a liar, but that is quite strong.
On the whole you would probably want to be careful about calling someone something, when perhaps what you intend to do is describe them.
So aside from "liar" you don't have many names you would call someone, but you might describe them instead "he is deceitful", "she is untrustworthy," "he is unreliable," "I would not count on her advice."
If you wanted to cushion it slightly in the situation you described you might say "he was a bit confused about when I should drop by" - this suggests that they didn't realise they gave you bad advice, but also implies that they don't really know how to do their job so it still has an edge to it.
add a comment |
up vote
4
down vote
up vote
4
down vote
It depends how strong you want to be- for example if you are calling them out, you might say they are a liar, but that is quite strong.
On the whole you would probably want to be careful about calling someone something, when perhaps what you intend to do is describe them.
So aside from "liar" you don't have many names you would call someone, but you might describe them instead "he is deceitful", "she is untrustworthy," "he is unreliable," "I would not count on her advice."
If you wanted to cushion it slightly in the situation you described you might say "he was a bit confused about when I should drop by" - this suggests that they didn't realise they gave you bad advice, but also implies that they don't really know how to do their job so it still has an edge to it.
It depends how strong you want to be- for example if you are calling them out, you might say they are a liar, but that is quite strong.
On the whole you would probably want to be careful about calling someone something, when perhaps what you intend to do is describe them.
So aside from "liar" you don't have many names you would call someone, but you might describe them instead "he is deceitful", "she is untrustworthy," "he is unreliable," "I would not count on her advice."
If you wanted to cushion it slightly in the situation you described you might say "he was a bit confused about when I should drop by" - this suggests that they didn't realise they gave you bad advice, but also implies that they don't really know how to do their job so it still has an edge to it.
answered Jan 22 '14 at 12:58
glenatron
1,47831116
1,47831116
add a comment |
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
your ill-wisher or
your worst friend
or
competition!
Well,
Iago is the best answer.(That's Othello, Shakespeare and he does exactly that to his supposed best friend Othello)
This might not be too clear to someone who hasn't read or seen Othello! :)
– Ronan
Mar 24 '14 at 9:45
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
your ill-wisher or
your worst friend
or
competition!
Well,
Iago is the best answer.(That's Othello, Shakespeare and he does exactly that to his supposed best friend Othello)
This might not be too clear to someone who hasn't read or seen Othello! :)
– Ronan
Mar 24 '14 at 9:45
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
up vote
1
down vote
your ill-wisher or
your worst friend
or
competition!
Well,
Iago is the best answer.(That's Othello, Shakespeare and he does exactly that to his supposed best friend Othello)
your ill-wisher or
your worst friend
or
competition!
Well,
Iago is the best answer.(That's Othello, Shakespeare and he does exactly that to his supposed best friend Othello)
answered Mar 23 '14 at 23:09
user69781
1072
1072
This might not be too clear to someone who hasn't read or seen Othello! :)
– Ronan
Mar 24 '14 at 9:45
add a comment |
This might not be too clear to someone who hasn't read or seen Othello! :)
– Ronan
Mar 24 '14 at 9:45
This might not be too clear to someone who hasn't read or seen Othello! :)
– Ronan
Mar 24 '14 at 9:45
This might not be too clear to someone who hasn't read or seen Othello! :)
– Ronan
Mar 24 '14 at 9:45
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
Bullshitter. Understand this of course is slang.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
Bullshitter. Understand this of course is slang.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
Bullshitter. Understand this of course is slang.
Bullshitter. Understand this of course is slang.
edited May 22 '14 at 22:42
tchrist♦
108k28290459
108k28290459
answered May 22 '14 at 16:37
Joe Lee
11
11
add a comment |
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
For purposes of discussing this with your boss, or HR, or others, I'd advise against calling the person a name, however objective it might be. At best it suggests that this is a personality clash and at worst it makes you look like the problem person.
I think you'd be much better advised to describe the behaviour, preferably in objective, diplomatic terms, and let others come to their own conclusions. I would go with "they've steered me wrong on several things" or "they've given me some odd advice". In the extreme: "I've learnt I can't always trust what they tell me." And then be very prepared to document some good examples.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
For purposes of discussing this with your boss, or HR, or others, I'd advise against calling the person a name, however objective it might be. At best it suggests that this is a personality clash and at worst it makes you look like the problem person.
I think you'd be much better advised to describe the behaviour, preferably in objective, diplomatic terms, and let others come to their own conclusions. I would go with "they've steered me wrong on several things" or "they've given me some odd advice". In the extreme: "I've learnt I can't always trust what they tell me." And then be very prepared to document some good examples.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
For purposes of discussing this with your boss, or HR, or others, I'd advise against calling the person a name, however objective it might be. At best it suggests that this is a personality clash and at worst it makes you look like the problem person.
I think you'd be much better advised to describe the behaviour, preferably in objective, diplomatic terms, and let others come to their own conclusions. I would go with "they've steered me wrong on several things" or "they've given me some odd advice". In the extreme: "I've learnt I can't always trust what they tell me." And then be very prepared to document some good examples.
For purposes of discussing this with your boss, or HR, or others, I'd advise against calling the person a name, however objective it might be. At best it suggests that this is a personality clash and at worst it makes you look like the problem person.
I think you'd be much better advised to describe the behaviour, preferably in objective, diplomatic terms, and let others come to their own conclusions. I would go with "they've steered me wrong on several things" or "they've given me some odd advice". In the extreme: "I've learnt I can't always trust what they tell me." And then be very prepared to document some good examples.
answered Jul 24 '17 at 17:06
CCTO
45513
45513
add a comment |
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
If you would prefer a classic reference, in Ancient Greece this would be a cacodaemon, an evil spirit whispering bad advice in your ear.
New contributor
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
If you would prefer a classic reference, in Ancient Greece this would be a cacodaemon, an evil spirit whispering bad advice in your ear.
New contributor
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
If you would prefer a classic reference, in Ancient Greece this would be a cacodaemon, an evil spirit whispering bad advice in your ear.
New contributor
If you would prefer a classic reference, in Ancient Greece this would be a cacodaemon, an evil spirit whispering bad advice in your ear.
New contributor
New contributor
answered yesterday
djs
1314
1314
New contributor
New contributor
add a comment |
add a comment |
up vote
-1
down vote
Maladvisor makes the point. If only it were a real word.
add a comment |
up vote
-1
down vote
Maladvisor makes the point. If only it were a real word.
add a comment |
up vote
-1
down vote
up vote
-1
down vote
Maladvisor makes the point. If only it were a real word.
Maladvisor makes the point. If only it were a real word.
answered Jan 22 '16 at 13:34
Kathys
311
311
add a comment |
add a comment |
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f147329%2fwhat-do-you-call-someone-who-gives-you-the-wrong-advice%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
3
May I charitably suggest calling them infrequently? :)
– tchrist♦
Jan 23 '14 at 1:05
2
"Misleading" is common, "misleader" appears rare.
– Elliott Frisch
Jan 23 '14 at 5:46
@ElliottFrisch Your right. Misleader is not a word I hear often. Thanks!
– umair
Jan 23 '14 at 5:49