Cfxtrjtrk

I'm trying to review some old concepts, and thus far, there was one that I couldn't really understand: impedance of circuits involving op-amps. Assuming an ideal op-amp, it has infinite input impedance and no output impedance, but that's only for the op-amp itself. I'm having trouble understanding how to find the input/output impedance of some op-amp circuits as a whole.

Take the standard non-inverting amplifier for instance:

^{simulate this circuit – Schematic created using CircuitLab}

Using the ideal op-amp rules, since the non-inverting input is connected to the input voltage through Z1, the input impedance would be infinite as no current can flow through the op-amp terminals. However, when you look at the output impedance, you remove the input source by shorting it to ground, making the non-inverting input equal to ground (as well as the inverting input). My book says that the output impedance would be 0, but I don't understand how this is the case. Replacing the load resistor with a current source, you just see an internal op-amp 'output' resistance of 0 ohms in parallel with Z2 to ground, so is that set of parallel impedances the cause of the 0 ohm output impedance? Is this logic correct?

It feels that because of the nature of the ideal op-amp having 0 output resistance, all op-amp circuits would have 0 output resistance. Is this always the case, or are there some exceptions? I'm trying to develop some methodologies for measuring such impedances in circuit problems as it's hard for me to wrap my head around.

The op-amps themselves don't have zero output impedance but when configured with negative feedback they do.

Using the ideal op-amp rules, since the non-inverting input is connected to the input voltage through Z1, the input impedance would be infinite as no current can flow through the op-amp terminals.

That's OK.

However, when you look at the output impedance, you remove the input source by shorting it to ground, making the non-inverting input equal to ground (as well as the inverting input). My book says that the output impedance would be 0, but I don't understand how this is the case.

I find that the 0 V input case is less helpful than, say a 1 V input case as it is too easy to balance out circuits with 0s everywhere. Let's use 1 V. And lets add some external R_out to make the output obviously non-ideal.

^{simulate this circuit – Schematic created using CircuitLab}

Figure 1. R_out is the output impedance of the op-amp.

With R_out in circuit, ask yourself what does the output of OA1 have to do to get 1 V at the inverting input? Answer: it has to get the voltage at OUT = $ frac {Z_3}{Z_2+Z_3} V_{IN} $. That means that the output of the op-amp actually has to go some distance beyond V_out
to compensate for the voltage drop across the output resistance.

It feels that because of the nature of the ideal op-amp having 0 output resistance, all op-amp circuits would have 0 output resistance.

Again, it's not the op-amp itself but rather the feedback that gives the circuit this nature.

Does that help?

Just to add a little more to Transistor's answer (a mathematical approach).

You can look at it this way. This is the circuit model of the op amp (with intrinsic output impedance) plus the external resistors:

^{simulate this circuit – Schematic created using CircuitLab}

Obviously from the circuit, $V^+=0$. You can try to find and expression for $dfrac{V_{text{test}}}{I_{text{test}}}$.

Also $V^-=V_{text{test}}dfrac{R_1}{R_1+R_2}$, $I_o=dfrac{V_{text{test}}+AV^-}{R_o}$, and $I_f=dfrac{V_{text{test}}}{R_F+R_1}$.

You combine those, and obtain:

$$ dfrac{V_{text{test}}}{I_{text{test}}}=dfrac{R_o(R_1+R_F)}{R_1+R_F+AR_1+R_o}$$

Given the fact that $A$ is a really large number (the op amp open-loop gain), the $AR_1$ term dominates in the denominator.

So,

$$ dfrac{V_{text{test}}}{I_{text{test}}} approx dfrac{R_o(R_1+R_F)}{AR_1}$$

Remember that $G=dfrac{R_1+R_F}{R_1}=1+dfrac{R_F}{R_1}$ is the closed loop gain. Which allows to further re-write this as:

$$ dfrac{V_{text{test}}}{I_{text{test}}} approx dfrac{R_oG}{A}to 0$$

And that approaches zero or a very low value. As you can see the output impedance under negative feedback is even smaller than the intrinsic output impedance of the op amp given the fact that $A$ is large and $G$ is no doubt much smaller. If you were to just ignore $R_o$ this would be ideally zero.