How to make new file with date in it?
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
I can create a new file and put the date in it.
touch example.txt
date >> example.txt
But I must create the file with the date in it the moment I created the new file.
How do I do that with only one command?
command-line date
edited Dec 7 at 16:54
PerlDuck
5,07911230
asked Dec 7 at 16:43
Nonkocka
91
New contributor
Nonkocka is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
I can create a new file and put the date in it.
touch example.txt
date >> example.txt
But I must create the file with the date in it the moment I created the new file.
How do I do that with only one command?
command-line date
edited Dec 7 at 16:54
PerlDuck
5,07911230
asked Dec 7 at 16:43
Nonkocka
91
New contributor
Nonkocka is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
3
touchupdates the modification time of a file, or creates the file if it does not exist. Since the file would be created with the redirection>>or>anyway, this command is unnecessary here.
– rexkogitans
Dec 7 at 19:18
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
I can create a new file and put the date in it.
touch example.txt
date >> example.txt
But I must create the file with the date in it the moment I created the new file.
How do I do that with only one command?
command-line date
edited Dec 7 at 16:54
PerlDuck
5,07911230
asked Dec 7 at 16:43
Nonkocka
91
New contributor
Nonkocka is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
I can create a new file and put the date in it.
touch example.txt
date >> example.txt
But I must create the file with the date in it the moment I created the new file.
How do I do that with only one command?
command-line date
command-line date
edited Dec 7 at 16:54
PerlDuck
5,07911230
asked Dec 7 at 16:43
Nonkocka
91
New contributor
Nonkocka is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
edited Dec 7 at 16:54
PerlDuck
5,07911230
asked Dec 7 at 16:43
Nonkocka
91
New contributor
Nonkocka is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
edited Dec 7 at 16:54
PerlDuck
5,07911230
edited Dec 7 at 16:54
PerlDuck
5,07911230
edited Dec 7 at 16:54
PerlDuck
5,07911230
5,07911230
asked Dec 7 at 16:43
Nonkocka
91
New contributor
Nonkocka is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked Dec 7 at 16:43
Nonkocka
91
asked Dec 7 at 16:43
Nonkocka
91
91
New contributor
Nonkocka is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Nonkocka is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Nonkocka is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
3
touchupdates the modification time of a file, or creates the file if it does not exist. Since the file would be created with the redirection>>or>anyway, this command is unnecessary here.
– rexkogitans
Dec 7 at 19:18
add a comment |
3
touchupdates the modification time of a file, or creates the file if it does not exist. Since the file would be created with the redirection>>or>anyway, this command is unnecessary here.
– rexkogitans
Dec 7 at 19:18
3
3
touch updates the modification time of a file, or creates the file if it does not exist. Since the file would be created with the redirection >> or > anyway, this command is unnecessary here.– rexkogitans
Dec 7 at 19:18
touch updates the modification time of a file, or creates the file if it does not exist. Since the file would be created with the redirection >> or > anyway, this command is unnecessary here.– rexkogitans
Dec 7 at 19:18
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
up vote
15
down vote
Simply use the date command to redirect into file and it will be created:
date > example.txt
A prefered way would using the >> append operator:
date >> example.txt
Both the redirection operator (>) and the append operator (>>) will create the target file if it doesn't exist. You never need to create it first and write to it later.
answered Dec 7 at 16:55
George Udosen
19.1k94266
7
Note that>will clear the file if it does exist, whereas>>as in the OP's original sequence will add the date to the end of the file if it already exists.
– Random832
Dec 7 at 17:42
I know that and the edit by terdon has clearly stated this!
– George Udosen
Dec 7 at 17:44
5
The edit does not seem clear in that aspect to me. I just thought it's worth mentioning because even though the OP asks about creating a new file, their existing sequence will not destroy the data in an existing file if something goes wrong.
– Random832
Dec 7 at 17:45
1
Note that OP said "create file at the same time" so it's a new file that needs a date entry before use so>should be enough!
– George Udosen
Dec 7 at 17:53
@GeorgeUdosen I prefer>>when I know the file is not supposed to exist. It's easier to recover from a mistaken use of>>than to recover from a mistaken use of>.
– kasperd
Dec 8 at 0:10
|
show 1 more comment
up vote
0
down vote
It's worth noting that, if the problem with
I must create the file with the date in it the moment I created the new file
is due to race conditions (e.g. there's a process periodically scanning for a file with that name, and expects to find a date in there), even doing
date > example.txt
isn't correct, as there's still a very small window between when the shell opens the file and when date actually writes its stuff (which may also be written non-atomically as well).
In that case, the solution is to write to a separate file and then perform a mv to the correct file name:
date > example.txt.tmp
mv example.txt.tmp example.txt
A move on the same file system is guaranteed to be atomic, so when example.txt appears, it already contains the expected content.
If instead the question is just about typing a single command, the original solution is of course the correct and most straightforward one.
answered Dec 7 at 22:18
Matteo Italia
153118
Thedate > ...still isn't atomic, so that additionalmvstep still doesn't help the race condition. Example:date +%Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S.%N > foo && stat foo && cat foo.
– ckujau
Dec 11 at 0:13
@ckujau: I don't see what's your point... of coursedate > ...isn't atomic - I even said that ("which may also be written non-atomically as well"). The rename of course is effective only if the other program looks specifically for the final filename, not just any file in the directory.
– Matteo Italia
Dec 11 at 0:23
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "89"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Nonkocka is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f1099220%2fhow-to-make-new-file-with-date-in-it%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
15
down vote
Simply use the date command to redirect into file and it will be created:
date > example.txt
A prefered way would using the >> append operator:
date >> example.txt
Both the redirection operator (>) and the append operator (>>) will create the target file if it doesn't exist. You never need to create it first and write to it later.
answered Dec 7 at 16:55
George Udosen
19.1k94266
7
Note that>will clear the file if it does exist, whereas>>as in the OP's original sequence will add the date to the end of the file if it already exists.
– Random832
Dec 7 at 17:42
I know that and the edit by terdon has clearly stated this!
– George Udosen
Dec 7 at 17:44
5
The edit does not seem clear in that aspect to me. I just thought it's worth mentioning because even though the OP asks about creating a new file, their existing sequence will not destroy the data in an existing file if something goes wrong.
– Random832
Dec 7 at 17:45
1
Note that OP said "create file at the same time" so it's a new file that needs a date entry before use so>should be enough!
– George Udosen
Dec 7 at 17:53
@GeorgeUdosen I prefer>>when I know the file is not supposed to exist. It's easier to recover from a mistaken use of>>than to recover from a mistaken use of>.
– kasperd
Dec 8 at 0:10
|
show 1 more comment
up vote
15
down vote
Simply use the date command to redirect into file and it will be created:
date > example.txt
A prefered way would using the >> append operator:
date >> example.txt
Both the redirection operator (>) and the append operator (>>) will create the target file if it doesn't exist. You never need to create it first and write to it later.
answered Dec 7 at 16:55
George Udosen
19.1k94266
7
Note that>will clear the file if it does exist, whereas>>as in the OP's original sequence will add the date to the end of the file if it already exists.
– Random832
Dec 7 at 17:42
I know that and the edit by terdon has clearly stated this!
– George Udosen
Dec 7 at 17:44
5
The edit does not seem clear in that aspect to me. I just thought it's worth mentioning because even though the OP asks about creating a new file, their existing sequence will not destroy the data in an existing file if something goes wrong.
– Random832
Dec 7 at 17:45
1
Note that OP said "create file at the same time" so it's a new file that needs a date entry before use so>should be enough!
– George Udosen
Dec 7 at 17:53
@GeorgeUdosen I prefer>>when I know the file is not supposed to exist. It's easier to recover from a mistaken use of>>than to recover from a mistaken use of>.
– kasperd
Dec 8 at 0:10
|
show 1 more comment
up vote
15
down vote
up vote
15
down vote
Simply use the date command to redirect into file and it will be created:
date > example.txt
A prefered way would using the >> append operator:
date >> example.txt
Both the redirection operator (>) and the append operator (>>) will create the target file if it doesn't exist. You never need to create it first and write to it later.
answered Dec 7 at 16:55
George Udosen
19.1k94266
Simply use the date command to redirect into file and it will be created:
date > example.txt
A prefered way would using the >> append operator:
date >> example.txt
Both the redirection operator (>) and the append operator (>>) will create the target file if it doesn't exist. You never need to create it first and write to it later.
answered Dec 7 at 16:55
George Udosen
19.1k94266
edited Dec 8 at 5:41
answered Dec 7 at 16:55
George Udosen
19.1k94266
answered Dec 7 at 16:55
George Udosen
19.1k94266
answered Dec 7 at 16:55
George Udosen
19.1k94266
19.1k94266
7
Note that>will clear the file if it does exist, whereas>>as in the OP's original sequence will add the date to the end of the file if it already exists.
– Random832
Dec 7 at 17:42
I know that and the edit by terdon has clearly stated this!
– George Udosen
Dec 7 at 17:44
5
The edit does not seem clear in that aspect to me. I just thought it's worth mentioning because even though the OP asks about creating a new file, their existing sequence will not destroy the data in an existing file if something goes wrong.
– Random832
Dec 7 at 17:45
1
Note that OP said "create file at the same time" so it's a new file that needs a date entry before use so>should be enough!
– George Udosen
Dec 7 at 17:53
@GeorgeUdosen I prefer>>when I know the file is not supposed to exist. It's easier to recover from a mistaken use of>>than to recover from a mistaken use of>.
– kasperd
Dec 8 at 0:10
|
show 1 more comment
7
Note that>will clear the file if it does exist, whereas>>as in the OP's original sequence will add the date to the end of the file if it already exists.
– Random832
Dec 7 at 17:42
I know that and the edit by terdon has clearly stated this!
– George Udosen
Dec 7 at 17:44
5
The edit does not seem clear in that aspect to me. I just thought it's worth mentioning because even though the OP asks about creating a new file, their existing sequence will not destroy the data in an existing file if something goes wrong.
– Random832
Dec 7 at 17:45
1
Note that OP said "create file at the same time" so it's a new file that needs a date entry before use so>should be enough!
– George Udosen
Dec 7 at 17:53
@GeorgeUdosen I prefer>>when I know the file is not supposed to exist. It's easier to recover from a mistaken use of>>than to recover from a mistaken use of>.
– kasperd
Dec 8 at 0:10
7
7
Note that
> will clear the file if it does exist, whereas >> as in the OP's original sequence will add the date to the end of the file if it already exists.– Random832
Dec 7 at 17:42
Note that
> will clear the file if it does exist, whereas >> as in the OP's original sequence will add the date to the end of the file if it already exists.– Random832
Dec 7 at 17:42
I know that and the edit by terdon has clearly stated this!
– George Udosen
Dec 7 at 17:44
I know that and the edit by terdon has clearly stated this!
– George Udosen
Dec 7 at 17:44
5
5
The edit does not seem clear in that aspect to me. I just thought it's worth mentioning because even though the OP asks about creating a new file, their existing sequence will not destroy the data in an existing file if something goes wrong.
– Random832
Dec 7 at 17:45
The edit does not seem clear in that aspect to me. I just thought it's worth mentioning because even though the OP asks about creating a new file, their existing sequence will not destroy the data in an existing file if something goes wrong.
– Random832
Dec 7 at 17:45
1
1
Note that OP said "create file at the same time" so it's a new file that needs a date entry before use so
> should be enough!– George Udosen
Dec 7 at 17:53
Note that OP said "create file at the same time" so it's a new file that needs a date entry before use so
> should be enough!– George Udosen
Dec 7 at 17:53
@GeorgeUdosen I prefer
>> when I know the file is not supposed to exist. It's easier to recover from a mistaken use of >> than to recover from a mistaken use of >.– kasperd
Dec 8 at 0:10
@GeorgeUdosen I prefer
>> when I know the file is not supposed to exist. It's easier to recover from a mistaken use of >> than to recover from a mistaken use of >.– kasperd
Dec 8 at 0:10
|
show 1 more comment
up vote
0
down vote
It's worth noting that, if the problem with
I must create the file with the date in it the moment I created the new file
is due to race conditions (e.g. there's a process periodically scanning for a file with that name, and expects to find a date in there), even doing
date > example.txt
isn't correct, as there's still a very small window between when the shell opens the file and when date actually writes its stuff (which may also be written non-atomically as well).
In that case, the solution is to write to a separate file and then perform a mv to the correct file name:
date > example.txt.tmp
mv example.txt.tmp example.txt
A move on the same file system is guaranteed to be atomic, so when example.txt appears, it already contains the expected content.
If instead the question is just about typing a single command, the original solution is of course the correct and most straightforward one.
answered Dec 7 at 22:18
Matteo Italia
153118
Thedate > ...still isn't atomic, so that additionalmvstep still doesn't help the race condition. Example:date +%Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S.%N > foo && stat foo && cat foo.
– ckujau
Dec 11 at 0:13
@ckujau: I don't see what's your point... of coursedate > ...isn't atomic - I even said that ("which may also be written non-atomically as well"). The rename of course is effective only if the other program looks specifically for the final filename, not just any file in the directory.
– Matteo Italia
Dec 11 at 0:23
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
It's worth noting that, if the problem with
I must create the file with the date in it the moment I created the new file
is due to race conditions (e.g. there's a process periodically scanning for a file with that name, and expects to find a date in there), even doing
date > example.txt
isn't correct, as there's still a very small window between when the shell opens the file and when date actually writes its stuff (which may also be written non-atomically as well).
In that case, the solution is to write to a separate file and then perform a mv to the correct file name:
date > example.txt.tmp
mv example.txt.tmp example.txt
A move on the same file system is guaranteed to be atomic, so when example.txt appears, it already contains the expected content.
If instead the question is just about typing a single command, the original solution is of course the correct and most straightforward one.
answered Dec 7 at 22:18
Matteo Italia
153118
Thedate > ...still isn't atomic, so that additionalmvstep still doesn't help the race condition. Example:date +%Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S.%N > foo && stat foo && cat foo.
– ckujau
Dec 11 at 0:13
@ckujau: I don't see what's your point... of coursedate > ...isn't atomic - I even said that ("which may also be written non-atomically as well"). The rename of course is effective only if the other program looks specifically for the final filename, not just any file in the directory.
– Matteo Italia
Dec 11 at 0:23
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
It's worth noting that, if the problem with
I must create the file with the date in it the moment I created the new file
is due to race conditions (e.g. there's a process periodically scanning for a file with that name, and expects to find a date in there), even doing
date > example.txt
isn't correct, as there's still a very small window between when the shell opens the file and when date actually writes its stuff (which may also be written non-atomically as well).
In that case, the solution is to write to a separate file and then perform a mv to the correct file name:
date > example.txt.tmp
mv example.txt.tmp example.txt
A move on the same file system is guaranteed to be atomic, so when example.txt appears, it already contains the expected content.
If instead the question is just about typing a single command, the original solution is of course the correct and most straightforward one.
answered Dec 7 at 22:18
Matteo Italia
153118
It's worth noting that, if the problem with
I must create the file with the date in it the moment I created the new file
is due to race conditions (e.g. there's a process periodically scanning for a file with that name, and expects to find a date in there), even doing
date > example.txt
isn't correct, as there's still a very small window between when the shell opens the file and when date actually writes its stuff (which may also be written non-atomically as well).
In that case, the solution is to write to a separate file and then perform a mv to the correct file name:
date > example.txt.tmp
mv example.txt.tmp example.txt
A move on the same file system is guaranteed to be atomic, so when example.txt appears, it already contains the expected content.
If instead the question is just about typing a single command, the original solution is of course the correct and most straightforward one.
answered Dec 7 at 22:18
Matteo Italia
153118
answered Dec 7 at 22:18
Matteo Italia
153118
answered Dec 7 at 22:18
Matteo Italia
153118
answered Dec 7 at 22:18
Matteo Italia
153118
153118
Thedate > ...still isn't atomic, so that additionalmvstep still doesn't help the race condition. Example:date +%Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S.%N > foo && stat foo && cat foo.
– ckujau
Dec 11 at 0:13
@ckujau: I don't see what's your point... of coursedate > ...isn't atomic - I even said that ("which may also be written non-atomically as well"). The rename of course is effective only if the other program looks specifically for the final filename, not just any file in the directory.
– Matteo Italia
Dec 11 at 0:23
add a comment |
Thedate > ...still isn't atomic, so that additionalmvstep still doesn't help the race condition. Example:date +%Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S.%N > foo && stat foo && cat foo.
– ckujau
Dec 11 at 0:13
@ckujau: I don't see what's your point... of coursedate > ...isn't atomic - I even said that ("which may also be written non-atomically as well"). The rename of course is effective only if the other program looks specifically for the final filename, not just any file in the directory.
– Matteo Italia
Dec 11 at 0:23
The
date > ... still isn't atomic, so that additional mv step still doesn't help the race condition. Example: date +%Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S.%N > foo && stat foo && cat foo.– ckujau
Dec 11 at 0:13
The
date > ... still isn't atomic, so that additional mv step still doesn't help the race condition. Example: date +%Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S.%N > foo && stat foo && cat foo.– ckujau
Dec 11 at 0:13
@ckujau: I don't see what's your point... of course
date > ... isn't atomic - I even said that ("which may also be written non-atomically as well"). The rename of course is effective only if the other program looks specifically for the final filename, not just any file in the directory.– Matteo Italia
Dec 11 at 0:23
@ckujau: I don't see what's your point... of course
date > ... isn't atomic - I even said that ("which may also be written non-atomically as well"). The rename of course is effective only if the other program looks specifically for the final filename, not just any file in the directory.– Matteo Italia
Dec 11 at 0:23
add a comment |
Nonkocka is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Nonkocka is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Nonkocka is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Nonkocka is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Ask Ubuntu!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f1099220%2fhow-to-make-new-file-with-date-in-it%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
3
touchupdates the modification time of a file, or creates the file if it does not exist. Since the file would be created with the redirection>>or>anyway, this command is unnecessary here.– rexkogitans
Dec 7 at 19:18