What does this complex statement of grammar components mean?
The following, from John Barth's "The End of the Road", provides a complex grammatical formulation and what I presume is an example sentence that satisfies the requirements of that formulation:
" ... it gives a man a great sense of lucidity and well-being, if not
downright formidability, to be able not only to say, but to understand
perfectly, that predicate complements of infinitives of copulative
verbs without expressed subjects go into the nominative case, whereas
predicate complements of infinitives of copulative verbs with
expressed subjects go into the objective case. I made this
observation to my assemblage of young scholars and concluded
triumphantly, "I was thought to be he, but I thought John to be
him."
I've searched websites, written to Mr. Barth and William Safire, scanned bookstore shelves, and buttonholed likely prospects in search of a grammar text that would explain this, but to no avail. Note, I'm not looking for an analysis of the text (i.e. literary criticism), but rather, an explanation of the rule of grammar that Barth expresses.
What does this complex prescription of grammar mean in simple terms, and how does the triumphant observation satisfy it?
prescriptive-grammar
New contributor
add a comment |
The following, from John Barth's "The End of the Road", provides a complex grammatical formulation and what I presume is an example sentence that satisfies the requirements of that formulation:
" ... it gives a man a great sense of lucidity and well-being, if not
downright formidability, to be able not only to say, but to understand
perfectly, that predicate complements of infinitives of copulative
verbs without expressed subjects go into the nominative case, whereas
predicate complements of infinitives of copulative verbs with
expressed subjects go into the objective case. I made this
observation to my assemblage of young scholars and concluded
triumphantly, "I was thought to be he, but I thought John to be
him."
I've searched websites, written to Mr. Barth and William Safire, scanned bookstore shelves, and buttonholed likely prospects in search of a grammar text that would explain this, but to no avail. Note, I'm not looking for an analysis of the text (i.e. literary criticism), but rather, an explanation of the rule of grammar that Barth expresses.
What does this complex prescription of grammar mean in simple terms, and how does the triumphant observation satisfy it?
prescriptive-grammar
New contributor
Hi Rabbit, welcome to EL&U. Asking for a recommendation on grammar resources is off-topic, but look here for options. To avoid the closure of a genuinely interesting question, I've taken the liberty of editing it; if you disagree with my changes, you can roll them back. However, I recommend you add your own edit to explain exactly what you find most confusing. See also How to Ask for further guidance. :-)
– Chappo
3 mins ago
add a comment |
The following, from John Barth's "The End of the Road", provides a complex grammatical formulation and what I presume is an example sentence that satisfies the requirements of that formulation:
" ... it gives a man a great sense of lucidity and well-being, if not
downright formidability, to be able not only to say, but to understand
perfectly, that predicate complements of infinitives of copulative
verbs without expressed subjects go into the nominative case, whereas
predicate complements of infinitives of copulative verbs with
expressed subjects go into the objective case. I made this
observation to my assemblage of young scholars and concluded
triumphantly, "I was thought to be he, but I thought John to be
him."
I've searched websites, written to Mr. Barth and William Safire, scanned bookstore shelves, and buttonholed likely prospects in search of a grammar text that would explain this, but to no avail. Note, I'm not looking for an analysis of the text (i.e. literary criticism), but rather, an explanation of the rule of grammar that Barth expresses.
What does this complex prescription of grammar mean in simple terms, and how does the triumphant observation satisfy it?
prescriptive-grammar
New contributor
The following, from John Barth's "The End of the Road", provides a complex grammatical formulation and what I presume is an example sentence that satisfies the requirements of that formulation:
" ... it gives a man a great sense of lucidity and well-being, if not
downright formidability, to be able not only to say, but to understand
perfectly, that predicate complements of infinitives of copulative
verbs without expressed subjects go into the nominative case, whereas
predicate complements of infinitives of copulative verbs with
expressed subjects go into the objective case. I made this
observation to my assemblage of young scholars and concluded
triumphantly, "I was thought to be he, but I thought John to be
him."
I've searched websites, written to Mr. Barth and William Safire, scanned bookstore shelves, and buttonholed likely prospects in search of a grammar text that would explain this, but to no avail. Note, I'm not looking for an analysis of the text (i.e. literary criticism), but rather, an explanation of the rule of grammar that Barth expresses.
What does this complex prescription of grammar mean in simple terms, and how does the triumphant observation satisfy it?
prescriptive-grammar
prescriptive-grammar
New contributor
New contributor
edited 4 mins ago
Chappo
2,72851225
2,72851225
New contributor
asked 3 hours ago
RabbitRabbit
1012
1012
New contributor
New contributor
Hi Rabbit, welcome to EL&U. Asking for a recommendation on grammar resources is off-topic, but look here for options. To avoid the closure of a genuinely interesting question, I've taken the liberty of editing it; if you disagree with my changes, you can roll them back. However, I recommend you add your own edit to explain exactly what you find most confusing. See also How to Ask for further guidance. :-)
– Chappo
3 mins ago
add a comment |
Hi Rabbit, welcome to EL&U. Asking for a recommendation on grammar resources is off-topic, but look here for options. To avoid the closure of a genuinely interesting question, I've taken the liberty of editing it; if you disagree with my changes, you can roll them back. However, I recommend you add your own edit to explain exactly what you find most confusing. See also How to Ask for further guidance. :-)
– Chappo
3 mins ago
Hi Rabbit, welcome to EL&U. Asking for a recommendation on grammar resources is off-topic, but look here for options. To avoid the closure of a genuinely interesting question, I've taken the liberty of editing it; if you disagree with my changes, you can roll them back. However, I recommend you add your own edit to explain exactly what you find most confusing. See also How to Ask for further guidance. :-)
– Chappo
3 mins ago
Hi Rabbit, welcome to EL&U. Asking for a recommendation on grammar resources is off-topic, but look here for options. To avoid the closure of a genuinely interesting question, I've taken the liberty of editing it; if you disagree with my changes, you can roll them back. However, I recommend you add your own edit to explain exactly what you find most confusing. See also How to Ask for further guidance. :-)
– Chappo
3 mins ago
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "97"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Rabbit is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f482754%2fwhat-does-this-complex-statement-of-grammar-components-mean%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Rabbit is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Rabbit is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Rabbit is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Rabbit is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language & Usage Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f482754%2fwhat-does-this-complex-statement-of-grammar-components-mean%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Hi Rabbit, welcome to EL&U. Asking for a recommendation on grammar resources is off-topic, but look here for options. To avoid the closure of a genuinely interesting question, I've taken the liberty of editing it; if you disagree with my changes, you can roll them back. However, I recommend you add your own edit to explain exactly what you find most confusing. See also How to Ask for further guidance. :-)
– Chappo
3 mins ago