executable icon is missing for Ubuntu 18.04
I recently updated my Ubuntu from 16.04 to 18.04, and one problem is the icon for the executable is the same as the one for a text file. (ArucoDetect is an executable, and others are usual text files)
In Ubuntu 16.04, the executable have it's own icon like
How can I configure Ubuntu 18.04 so the executable can have it's own special icon?
gnome nautilus icons 18.04 executable
asked May 16 '18 at 23:46
user3667089user3667089
241210
add a comment |
I recently updated my Ubuntu from 16.04 to 18.04, and one problem is the icon for the executable is the same as the one for a text file. (ArucoDetect is an executable, and others are usual text files)
In Ubuntu 16.04, the executable have it's own icon like
How can I configure Ubuntu 18.04 so the executable can have it's own special icon?
gnome nautilus icons 18.04 executable
asked May 16 '18 at 23:46
user3667089user3667089
241210
add a comment |
I recently updated my Ubuntu from 16.04 to 18.04, and one problem is the icon for the executable is the same as the one for a text file. (ArucoDetect is an executable, and others are usual text files)
In Ubuntu 16.04, the executable have it's own icon like
How can I configure Ubuntu 18.04 so the executable can have it's own special icon?
gnome nautilus icons 18.04 executable
asked May 16 '18 at 23:46
user3667089user3667089
241210
I recently updated my Ubuntu from 16.04 to 18.04, and one problem is the icon for the executable is the same as the one for a text file. (ArucoDetect is an executable, and others are usual text files)
In Ubuntu 16.04, the executable have it's own icon like
How can I configure Ubuntu 18.04 so the executable can have it's own special icon?
gnome nautilus icons 18.04 executable
gnome nautilus icons 18.04 executable
asked May 16 '18 at 23:46
user3667089user3667089
241210
asked May 16 '18 at 23:46
user3667089user3667089
241210
asked May 16 '18 at 23:46
user3667089user3667089
241210
asked May 16 '18 at 23:46
user3667089user3667089
241210
asked May 16 '18 at 23:46
user3667089user3667089
241210
241210
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
If you have problem than you can find gcc and add line -no-pie It is default executable because Ubuntu 18.04 has problem with Wayland that is why position independent executable. Just no pie! Than it works fine for me.
answered 2 days ago
Jens EckervogtJens Eckervogt
415
I tried compiled with-no-pie(only one dash in the front) and it solves it. Do you know whether there's any downside for compiling with this flag?
– user3667089
2 days ago
Check makefile! You can find "gcc" with end of compilation like gcc main.c -o executable-no-piethan you see an executable and you can click executable. or ./executable in terminal. // UPDATED i.imgur.com/SFoD5uB.png
– Jens Eckervogt
2 days ago
add a comment |
Change your application's name to ArucoDetect.appimage
answered Jun 7 '18 at 15:33
TimTim
11
It does changes the icon by adding.appimagebut shouldn't it work without having to add that extension?
– user3667089
Jun 7 '18 at 18:37
Is this the same Problem? stackoverflow.com/questions/50412577/…
– Tim
Jun 7 '18 at 19:18
No this file is an executable. Even if I dochmod a+xagain on the file the icon still doesn't change.
– user3667089
Jun 7 '18 at 21:25
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "89"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f1037171%2fexecutable-icon-is-missing-for-ubuntu-18-04%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
If you have problem than you can find gcc and add line -no-pie It is default executable because Ubuntu 18.04 has problem with Wayland that is why position independent executable. Just no pie! Than it works fine for me.
answered 2 days ago
Jens EckervogtJens Eckervogt
415
I tried compiled with-no-pie(only one dash in the front) and it solves it. Do you know whether there's any downside for compiling with this flag?
– user3667089
2 days ago
Check makefile! You can find "gcc" with end of compilation like gcc main.c -o executable-no-piethan you see an executable and you can click executable. or ./executable in terminal. // UPDATED i.imgur.com/SFoD5uB.png
– Jens Eckervogt
2 days ago
add a comment |
If you have problem than you can find gcc and add line -no-pie It is default executable because Ubuntu 18.04 has problem with Wayland that is why position independent executable. Just no pie! Than it works fine for me.
answered 2 days ago
Jens EckervogtJens Eckervogt
415
I tried compiled with-no-pie(only one dash in the front) and it solves it. Do you know whether there's any downside for compiling with this flag?
– user3667089
2 days ago
Check makefile! You can find "gcc" with end of compilation like gcc main.c -o executable-no-piethan you see an executable and you can click executable. or ./executable in terminal. // UPDATED i.imgur.com/SFoD5uB.png
– Jens Eckervogt
2 days ago
add a comment |
If you have problem than you can find gcc and add line -no-pie It is default executable because Ubuntu 18.04 has problem with Wayland that is why position independent executable. Just no pie! Than it works fine for me.
answered 2 days ago
Jens EckervogtJens Eckervogt
415
If you have problem than you can find gcc and add line -no-pie It is default executable because Ubuntu 18.04 has problem with Wayland that is why position independent executable. Just no pie! Than it works fine for me.
answered 2 days ago
Jens EckervogtJens Eckervogt
415
edited 2 days ago
answered 2 days ago
Jens EckervogtJens Eckervogt
415
answered 2 days ago
Jens EckervogtJens Eckervogt
415
answered 2 days ago
Jens EckervogtJens Eckervogt
415
415
I tried compiled with-no-pie(only one dash in the front) and it solves it. Do you know whether there's any downside for compiling with this flag?
– user3667089
2 days ago
Check makefile! You can find "gcc" with end of compilation like gcc main.c -o executable-no-piethan you see an executable and you can click executable. or ./executable in terminal. // UPDATED i.imgur.com/SFoD5uB.png
– Jens Eckervogt
2 days ago
add a comment |
I tried compiled with-no-pie(only one dash in the front) and it solves it. Do you know whether there's any downside for compiling with this flag?
– user3667089
2 days ago
Check makefile! You can find "gcc" with end of compilation like gcc main.c -o executable-no-piethan you see an executable and you can click executable. or ./executable in terminal. // UPDATED i.imgur.com/SFoD5uB.png
– Jens Eckervogt
2 days ago
I tried compiled with
-no-pie (only one dash in the front) and it solves it. Do you know whether there's any downside for compiling with this flag?– user3667089
2 days ago
I tried compiled with
-no-pie (only one dash in the front) and it solves it. Do you know whether there's any downside for compiling with this flag?– user3667089
2 days ago
Check makefile! You can find "gcc" with end of compilation like gcc main.c -o executable
-no-pie than you see an executable and you can click executable. or ./executable in terminal. // UPDATED i.imgur.com/SFoD5uB.png– Jens Eckervogt
2 days ago
Check makefile! You can find "gcc" with end of compilation like gcc main.c -o executable
-no-pie than you see an executable and you can click executable. or ./executable in terminal. // UPDATED i.imgur.com/SFoD5uB.png– Jens Eckervogt
2 days ago
add a comment |
Change your application's name to ArucoDetect.appimage
answered Jun 7 '18 at 15:33
TimTim
11
It does changes the icon by adding.appimagebut shouldn't it work without having to add that extension?
– user3667089
Jun 7 '18 at 18:37
Is this the same Problem? stackoverflow.com/questions/50412577/…
– Tim
Jun 7 '18 at 19:18
No this file is an executable. Even if I dochmod a+xagain on the file the icon still doesn't change.
– user3667089
Jun 7 '18 at 21:25
add a comment |
Change your application's name to ArucoDetect.appimage
answered Jun 7 '18 at 15:33
TimTim
11
It does changes the icon by adding.appimagebut shouldn't it work without having to add that extension?
– user3667089
Jun 7 '18 at 18:37
Is this the same Problem? stackoverflow.com/questions/50412577/…
– Tim
Jun 7 '18 at 19:18
No this file is an executable. Even if I dochmod a+xagain on the file the icon still doesn't change.
– user3667089
Jun 7 '18 at 21:25
add a comment |
Change your application's name to ArucoDetect.appimage
answered Jun 7 '18 at 15:33
TimTim
11
Change your application's name to ArucoDetect.appimage
answered Jun 7 '18 at 15:33
TimTim
11
answered Jun 7 '18 at 15:33
TimTim
11
answered Jun 7 '18 at 15:33
TimTim
11
answered Jun 7 '18 at 15:33
TimTim
11
11
It does changes the icon by adding.appimagebut shouldn't it work without having to add that extension?
– user3667089
Jun 7 '18 at 18:37
Is this the same Problem? stackoverflow.com/questions/50412577/…
– Tim
Jun 7 '18 at 19:18
No this file is an executable. Even if I dochmod a+xagain on the file the icon still doesn't change.
– user3667089
Jun 7 '18 at 21:25
add a comment |
It does changes the icon by adding.appimagebut shouldn't it work without having to add that extension?
– user3667089
Jun 7 '18 at 18:37
Is this the same Problem? stackoverflow.com/questions/50412577/…
– Tim
Jun 7 '18 at 19:18
No this file is an executable. Even if I dochmod a+xagain on the file the icon still doesn't change.
– user3667089
Jun 7 '18 at 21:25
It does changes the icon by adding
.appimage but shouldn't it work without having to add that extension?– user3667089
Jun 7 '18 at 18:37
It does changes the icon by adding
.appimage but shouldn't it work without having to add that extension?– user3667089
Jun 7 '18 at 18:37
Is this the same Problem? stackoverflow.com/questions/50412577/…
– Tim
Jun 7 '18 at 19:18
Is this the same Problem? stackoverflow.com/questions/50412577/…
– Tim
Jun 7 '18 at 19:18
No this file is an executable. Even if I do
chmod a+x again on the file the icon still doesn't change.– user3667089
Jun 7 '18 at 21:25
No this file is an executable. Even if I do
chmod a+x again on the file the icon still doesn't change.– user3667089
Jun 7 '18 at 21:25
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Ask Ubuntu!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f1037171%2fexecutable-icon-is-missing-for-ubuntu-18-04%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
