How do we refer to “whoose absence” when it's an object instead of a person?












0















Explanation of what I'm trying to communicate:



Suppose that there is an object, Vinegar (say).



And we're marinating chicken before roasting it. If vinegar was added to the marinade then the roast turns out to be good. If it wasn't, then it's going to be smelly and "rubbery".



Now let's say that I didn't know this and some person X found out about the requirement of vinegar and informed me.



My sentence:



"Today, I added a new ingredient, Vinegar, in the marinade, whoose absence causes chicken to be smelly, found by person X".



Is the above sentence correct? It feels somewhat off. I have 2 queries regarding this:



1) Is the phrase "whoose absence" correct? If not then what other phrase can we use in its place?



2) Is there a better way to frame this whole sentence rather than breaking it into smaller sentences (for the sake of improving grammar)?









share







New contributor




Mugen is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

























    0















    Explanation of what I'm trying to communicate:



    Suppose that there is an object, Vinegar (say).



    And we're marinating chicken before roasting it. If vinegar was added to the marinade then the roast turns out to be good. If it wasn't, then it's going to be smelly and "rubbery".



    Now let's say that I didn't know this and some person X found out about the requirement of vinegar and informed me.



    My sentence:



    "Today, I added a new ingredient, Vinegar, in the marinade, whoose absence causes chicken to be smelly, found by person X".



    Is the above sentence correct? It feels somewhat off. I have 2 queries regarding this:



    1) Is the phrase "whoose absence" correct? If not then what other phrase can we use in its place?



    2) Is there a better way to frame this whole sentence rather than breaking it into smaller sentences (for the sake of improving grammar)?









    share







    New contributor




    Mugen is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.























      0












      0








      0








      Explanation of what I'm trying to communicate:



      Suppose that there is an object, Vinegar (say).



      And we're marinating chicken before roasting it. If vinegar was added to the marinade then the roast turns out to be good. If it wasn't, then it's going to be smelly and "rubbery".



      Now let's say that I didn't know this and some person X found out about the requirement of vinegar and informed me.



      My sentence:



      "Today, I added a new ingredient, Vinegar, in the marinade, whoose absence causes chicken to be smelly, found by person X".



      Is the above sentence correct? It feels somewhat off. I have 2 queries regarding this:



      1) Is the phrase "whoose absence" correct? If not then what other phrase can we use in its place?



      2) Is there a better way to frame this whole sentence rather than breaking it into smaller sentences (for the sake of improving grammar)?









      share







      New contributor




      Mugen is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.












      Explanation of what I'm trying to communicate:



      Suppose that there is an object, Vinegar (say).



      And we're marinating chicken before roasting it. If vinegar was added to the marinade then the roast turns out to be good. If it wasn't, then it's going to be smelly and "rubbery".



      Now let's say that I didn't know this and some person X found out about the requirement of vinegar and informed me.



      My sentence:



      "Today, I added a new ingredient, Vinegar, in the marinade, whoose absence causes chicken to be smelly, found by person X".



      Is the above sentence correct? It feels somewhat off. I have 2 queries regarding this:



      1) Is the phrase "whoose absence" correct? If not then what other phrase can we use in its place?



      2) Is there a better way to frame this whole sentence rather than breaking it into smaller sentences (for the sake of improving grammar)?







      grammar





      share







      New contributor




      Mugen is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.










      share







      New contributor




      Mugen is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.








      share



      share






      New contributor




      Mugen is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      asked 4 mins ago









      MugenMugen

      1011




      1011




      New contributor




      Mugen is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.





      New contributor





      Mugen is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






      Mugen is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






















          0






          active

          oldest

          votes











          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "97"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });






          Mugen is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f484474%2fhow-do-we-refer-to-whoose-absence-when-its-an-object-instead-of-a-person%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          0






          active

          oldest

          votes








          0






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes








          Mugen is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          Mugen is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













          Mugen is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












          Mugen is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
















          Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language & Usage Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f484474%2fhow-do-we-refer-to-whoose-absence-when-its-an-object-instead-of-a-person%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          數位音樂下載

          When can things happen in Etherscan, such as the picture below?

          格利澤436b