What do you call the part of a quantity that isn't the unit (e.g. the “5” in “5 inches”)?
I am thinking "value" is close, but I also want to use the word "value" for the whole thing.
A value of 5 inches...
in which case the "value" should be broken into the "___" and the "unit".
An example sentence:
In my software, to represent the different distances unambiguously, I store the unit along with the ___.
single-word-requests measuring-units
add a comment |
I am thinking "value" is close, but I also want to use the word "value" for the whole thing.
A value of 5 inches...
in which case the "value" should be broken into the "___" and the "unit".
An example sentence:
In my software, to represent the different distances unambiguously, I store the unit along with the ___.
single-word-requests measuring-units
Quite. …store the unit along with the quantity.
– Robbie Goodwin
Jul 23 '17 at 0:28
add a comment |
I am thinking "value" is close, but I also want to use the word "value" for the whole thing.
A value of 5 inches...
in which case the "value" should be broken into the "___" and the "unit".
An example sentence:
In my software, to represent the different distances unambiguously, I store the unit along with the ___.
single-word-requests measuring-units
I am thinking "value" is close, but I also want to use the word "value" for the whole thing.
A value of 5 inches...
in which case the "value" should be broken into the "___" and the "unit".
An example sentence:
In my software, to represent the different distances unambiguously, I store the unit along with the ___.
single-word-requests measuring-units
single-word-requests measuring-units
asked Jul 22 '17 at 20:32
tscizzletscizzle
1063
1063
Quite. …store the unit along with the quantity.
– Robbie Goodwin
Jul 23 '17 at 0:28
add a comment |
Quite. …store the unit along with the quantity.
– Robbie Goodwin
Jul 23 '17 at 0:28
Quite. …store the unit along with the quantity.
– Robbie Goodwin
Jul 23 '17 at 0:28
Quite. …store the unit along with the quantity.
– Robbie Goodwin
Jul 23 '17 at 0:28
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
According to "What is the difference between quantity and unit", in math and science the word is "quantity". So in 450kg, the 450 is the quantity and unit is kg.
However, the National Institute of Standard and Technology seems to use "numerical value".
New contributor
Peter Grill is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
Value or amount are both fine. Mathematically, coefficient is also acceptable.
1
Uh… to me, that seems to add only confusion. Value and amount are both fine but neither is in any way necessary, nor in any way better that quantity. If coefficient were acceptable how would that work? Would it be a coefficient of length or what, please?
– Robbie Goodwin
Jul 23 '17 at 0:18
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "97"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f402313%2fwhat-do-you-call-the-part-of-a-quantity-that-isnt-the-unit-e-g-the-5-in-5%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
According to "What is the difference between quantity and unit", in math and science the word is "quantity". So in 450kg, the 450 is the quantity and unit is kg.
However, the National Institute of Standard and Technology seems to use "numerical value".
New contributor
Peter Grill is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
According to "What is the difference between quantity and unit", in math and science the word is "quantity". So in 450kg, the 450 is the quantity and unit is kg.
However, the National Institute of Standard and Technology seems to use "numerical value".
New contributor
Peter Grill is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
According to "What is the difference between quantity and unit", in math and science the word is "quantity". So in 450kg, the 450 is the quantity and unit is kg.
However, the National Institute of Standard and Technology seems to use "numerical value".
New contributor
Peter Grill is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
According to "What is the difference between quantity and unit", in math and science the word is "quantity". So in 450kg, the 450 is the quantity and unit is kg.
However, the National Institute of Standard and Technology seems to use "numerical value".
New contributor
Peter Grill is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Peter Grill is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
answered 9 mins ago
Peter GrillPeter Grill
1011
1011
New contributor
Peter Grill is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Peter Grill is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Peter Grill is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
add a comment |
Value or amount are both fine. Mathematically, coefficient is also acceptable.
1
Uh… to me, that seems to add only confusion. Value and amount are both fine but neither is in any way necessary, nor in any way better that quantity. If coefficient were acceptable how would that work? Would it be a coefficient of length or what, please?
– Robbie Goodwin
Jul 23 '17 at 0:18
add a comment |
Value or amount are both fine. Mathematically, coefficient is also acceptable.
1
Uh… to me, that seems to add only confusion. Value and amount are both fine but neither is in any way necessary, nor in any way better that quantity. If coefficient were acceptable how would that work? Would it be a coefficient of length or what, please?
– Robbie Goodwin
Jul 23 '17 at 0:18
add a comment |
Value or amount are both fine. Mathematically, coefficient is also acceptable.
Value or amount are both fine. Mathematically, coefficient is also acceptable.
answered Jul 22 '17 at 20:42
borealboreal
561
561
1
Uh… to me, that seems to add only confusion. Value and amount are both fine but neither is in any way necessary, nor in any way better that quantity. If coefficient were acceptable how would that work? Would it be a coefficient of length or what, please?
– Robbie Goodwin
Jul 23 '17 at 0:18
add a comment |
1
Uh… to me, that seems to add only confusion. Value and amount are both fine but neither is in any way necessary, nor in any way better that quantity. If coefficient were acceptable how would that work? Would it be a coefficient of length or what, please?
– Robbie Goodwin
Jul 23 '17 at 0:18
1
1
Uh… to me, that seems to add only confusion. Value and amount are both fine but neither is in any way necessary, nor in any way better that quantity. If coefficient were acceptable how would that work? Would it be a coefficient of length or what, please?
– Robbie Goodwin
Jul 23 '17 at 0:18
Uh… to me, that seems to add only confusion. Value and amount are both fine but neither is in any way necessary, nor in any way better that quantity. If coefficient were acceptable how would that work? Would it be a coefficient of length or what, please?
– Robbie Goodwin
Jul 23 '17 at 0:18
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language & Usage Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f402313%2fwhat-do-you-call-the-part-of-a-quantity-that-isnt-the-unit-e-g-the-5-in-5%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Quite. …store the unit along with the quantity.
– Robbie Goodwin
Jul 23 '17 at 0:28