Is there a keyboard-centric desktop/WM available?
I know of the awesome window manager, which after some customization may suit my desires, but I was wondering if there is a keyboard-centric desktop environment that doesn't require too much tweaking to make it really useful. Of course gnome and I'm sure KDE have nice shortcuts, and the ability to set them up how you want, but that becomes a problem because in a lot of cases the keyboard ends out conflicting with built-in program behavior.
Any suggestions?
software-recommendation keyboard
add a comment |
I know of the awesome window manager, which after some customization may suit my desires, but I was wondering if there is a keyboard-centric desktop environment that doesn't require too much tweaking to make it really useful. Of course gnome and I'm sure KDE have nice shortcuts, and the ability to set them up how you want, but that becomes a problem because in a lot of cases the keyboard ends out conflicting with built-in program behavior.
Any suggestions?
software-recommendation keyboard
add a comment |
I know of the awesome window manager, which after some customization may suit my desires, but I was wondering if there is a keyboard-centric desktop environment that doesn't require too much tweaking to make it really useful. Of course gnome and I'm sure KDE have nice shortcuts, and the ability to set them up how you want, but that becomes a problem because in a lot of cases the keyboard ends out conflicting with built-in program behavior.
Any suggestions?
software-recommendation keyboard
I know of the awesome window manager, which after some customization may suit my desires, but I was wondering if there is a keyboard-centric desktop environment that doesn't require too much tweaking to make it really useful. Of course gnome and I'm sure KDE have nice shortcuts, and the ability to set them up how you want, but that becomes a problem because in a lot of cases the keyboard ends out conflicting with built-in program behavior.
Any suggestions?
software-recommendation keyboard
software-recommendation keyboard
edited Nov 21 '12 at 21:22
Jorge Castro
36.9k106422617
36.9k106422617
asked Aug 10 '10 at 13:07
Wayne WernerWayne Werner
2,74972034
2,74972034
add a comment |
add a comment |
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
There are plenty! (However, all the ones that I know of are also tiling window managers.)
XMonad is likely the one with the largest user
community. It has extensive documentation and works well with
GNOME/EWMH extensions (albeit you have to activate them in the
configuration file). The configuration file has Haskell syntax, but
it's certainly possible to edit it without knowing much about
Haskell, by just copying+pasting examples from the documentation.
Default keybindings arevim
-inspired, though they can all be
remapped (including using chained keybindings like Emacs'C-a C-b
). It's available in Ubuntu as package
C-cxmonad
.Bluetile is an offspring of XMonad: it
supports a simplified configuration file, and integrates well with
the GNOME desktop by default. Unfortunately, it's not available in
Ubuntu 10.04, so you have to install from source.DWM is the "inspiring father" of XMonad
and Awesome. It's very lean and fast, and available as package
dwm
in Ubuntu 10.04. However, by design, to change the
configuration you have to edit a header file in the sources and
recompile; most documentation about the available options is only
available as mailing list posts. It does not support GNOME/EWMH by
default, you will have to patch it; the Echinus fork of DWM
started this way. Mostdwm
users will frown upon a "desktop
environment" so it's probably not the right choice if you like GNOME
gimmicks. Default key bindings arevim
-like; they can be remapped,
but there's no option for chained key-combos.Awesome started off as a fork of DWM.
Ion is a tiling window manager fully
programmable in Lua: also the "configuration file" is a Lua script,
so you can map any key to any action (provided you know enough Lua
for the task). No support for GNOME or EWMH extensions, as far as I
know. Available in Ubuntu 10.04 as packageion3
.wmii is the predecessor of DWM (same
author). It can be fully controlled by the keyboard, but has a
smaller selection of layouts, and the configuration format is
based on a "virtual filesystem", which makes very complex things
possible but (IMHO) also simple things rather complicated.
Available in Ubuntu 10.04 as packagewmii
.larswm can configure a key binding for
all the operations it supports. Documentation comes in the form of
a man page, clear and complete. The user community is now very
small, and the mailing list used to be silent for months. No
support for EWMH/desktop extensions. Available as packagelarswm
.ratpoison, as the name says,
forces you not to use the mouse. Every action is accomplished by
a key stroke. Default keybindings are inspired by GNUscreen
and
Emacs; they can be rebound, subject to the constraint that there is
always a global "prefix key" to initiate the action.
StumpWM is a rewrite of
ratpoison
in Common Lisp, which adds the nice option to hack the
WM while you're running it. No support for EWMH/desktop extensions
(by design, I'd say). Both are available in Ubuntu 10.04 (packages
ratpoison
andstumpwm
).
awesome is no longer a tiling wm, although it is still supporting tiling
– bandi
Dec 8 '10 at 19:36
The Bluetile author refers toXMonad
as a library for writing window managers. I think this is an accurate description.
– isomorphismes
Nov 13 '13 at 23:46
add a comment |
Use Meta or Ctrl-Alt modifiers for desktop shortcuts.
Most programs use Ctrl or Alt modifiers for their shortcuts (or use the function keys with no modifiers).
Most programs don't use Ctrl-Alt shortcuts and almost never use Meta shortcuts, so you should be safe using these without conflict.
2
On standard keyboards<Meta>
is the Windows-key.
– LassePoulsen
Aug 10 '10 at 14:02
add a comment |
You might want to check out the keyboard shortcut community wiki on here for more information on default keyboard shortcuts :)
add a comment |
Apart from awesome, other choices are DWM & WMii. I don't know much about WMii but DWM is extremely simple and slick and has all customization contained in the source code itself. However, this means it requires you to recompile it everytime you change a shortcut. This is what gives dwm its power and performance.
My choice would be awesome - it can be easily installed from official ubuntu repositories.
sudo apt-get install awesome awesome-extras
HOWTO: Setup AwesomeWM - Ignore the build from src instructions if u use above install command
I couldn't post these links in my answer as I lack enough reputation to submit more than 1 hyperlink. Trying to post via comments. BTW, here are some awesome ubuntuforums threads about using awesome in ubuntu ;-). Awesome Window Manager 3.0 : ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=948361 Awesome - A brief introduction : ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=675292 Wireless in awesome with wicd/nm : ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1260250
– koushik
Aug 10 '10 at 15:32
add a comment |
I would argue that Emacs has crossed the boundary of being a text editor and is now a full blown OS, and at least for me, is my prefered keyboard centric user interface. I mean the above statement as a compliment and a strong recommendation of the program rather than the tired joke some people imply with the same statement.
I usually invoke it in a terminal window with:
emacs -nw
Of course install it with:
sudo apt install emacs
I am still surprised that Ubuntu and Canonical choose not to install it by default.
It does have a somewhat steep learning curve, but will reward you with a rich working environment and editor. Start your exploration by using it's built in tutorial, which you can invoke with:
ctrl-h t
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "89"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f1844%2fis-there-a-keyboard-centric-desktop-wm-available%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
There are plenty! (However, all the ones that I know of are also tiling window managers.)
XMonad is likely the one with the largest user
community. It has extensive documentation and works well with
GNOME/EWMH extensions (albeit you have to activate them in the
configuration file). The configuration file has Haskell syntax, but
it's certainly possible to edit it without knowing much about
Haskell, by just copying+pasting examples from the documentation.
Default keybindings arevim
-inspired, though they can all be
remapped (including using chained keybindings like Emacs'C-a C-b
). It's available in Ubuntu as package
C-cxmonad
.Bluetile is an offspring of XMonad: it
supports a simplified configuration file, and integrates well with
the GNOME desktop by default. Unfortunately, it's not available in
Ubuntu 10.04, so you have to install from source.DWM is the "inspiring father" of XMonad
and Awesome. It's very lean and fast, and available as package
dwm
in Ubuntu 10.04. However, by design, to change the
configuration you have to edit a header file in the sources and
recompile; most documentation about the available options is only
available as mailing list posts. It does not support GNOME/EWMH by
default, you will have to patch it; the Echinus fork of DWM
started this way. Mostdwm
users will frown upon a "desktop
environment" so it's probably not the right choice if you like GNOME
gimmicks. Default key bindings arevim
-like; they can be remapped,
but there's no option for chained key-combos.Awesome started off as a fork of DWM.
Ion is a tiling window manager fully
programmable in Lua: also the "configuration file" is a Lua script,
so you can map any key to any action (provided you know enough Lua
for the task). No support for GNOME or EWMH extensions, as far as I
know. Available in Ubuntu 10.04 as packageion3
.wmii is the predecessor of DWM (same
author). It can be fully controlled by the keyboard, but has a
smaller selection of layouts, and the configuration format is
based on a "virtual filesystem", which makes very complex things
possible but (IMHO) also simple things rather complicated.
Available in Ubuntu 10.04 as packagewmii
.larswm can configure a key binding for
all the operations it supports. Documentation comes in the form of
a man page, clear and complete. The user community is now very
small, and the mailing list used to be silent for months. No
support for EWMH/desktop extensions. Available as packagelarswm
.ratpoison, as the name says,
forces you not to use the mouse. Every action is accomplished by
a key stroke. Default keybindings are inspired by GNUscreen
and
Emacs; they can be rebound, subject to the constraint that there is
always a global "prefix key" to initiate the action.
StumpWM is a rewrite of
ratpoison
in Common Lisp, which adds the nice option to hack the
WM while you're running it. No support for EWMH/desktop extensions
(by design, I'd say). Both are available in Ubuntu 10.04 (packages
ratpoison
andstumpwm
).
awesome is no longer a tiling wm, although it is still supporting tiling
– bandi
Dec 8 '10 at 19:36
The Bluetile author refers toXMonad
as a library for writing window managers. I think this is an accurate description.
– isomorphismes
Nov 13 '13 at 23:46
add a comment |
There are plenty! (However, all the ones that I know of are also tiling window managers.)
XMonad is likely the one with the largest user
community. It has extensive documentation and works well with
GNOME/EWMH extensions (albeit you have to activate them in the
configuration file). The configuration file has Haskell syntax, but
it's certainly possible to edit it without knowing much about
Haskell, by just copying+pasting examples from the documentation.
Default keybindings arevim
-inspired, though they can all be
remapped (including using chained keybindings like Emacs'C-a C-b
). It's available in Ubuntu as package
C-cxmonad
.Bluetile is an offspring of XMonad: it
supports a simplified configuration file, and integrates well with
the GNOME desktop by default. Unfortunately, it's not available in
Ubuntu 10.04, so you have to install from source.DWM is the "inspiring father" of XMonad
and Awesome. It's very lean and fast, and available as package
dwm
in Ubuntu 10.04. However, by design, to change the
configuration you have to edit a header file in the sources and
recompile; most documentation about the available options is only
available as mailing list posts. It does not support GNOME/EWMH by
default, you will have to patch it; the Echinus fork of DWM
started this way. Mostdwm
users will frown upon a "desktop
environment" so it's probably not the right choice if you like GNOME
gimmicks. Default key bindings arevim
-like; they can be remapped,
but there's no option for chained key-combos.Awesome started off as a fork of DWM.
Ion is a tiling window manager fully
programmable in Lua: also the "configuration file" is a Lua script,
so you can map any key to any action (provided you know enough Lua
for the task). No support for GNOME or EWMH extensions, as far as I
know. Available in Ubuntu 10.04 as packageion3
.wmii is the predecessor of DWM (same
author). It can be fully controlled by the keyboard, but has a
smaller selection of layouts, and the configuration format is
based on a "virtual filesystem", which makes very complex things
possible but (IMHO) also simple things rather complicated.
Available in Ubuntu 10.04 as packagewmii
.larswm can configure a key binding for
all the operations it supports. Documentation comes in the form of
a man page, clear and complete. The user community is now very
small, and the mailing list used to be silent for months. No
support for EWMH/desktop extensions. Available as packagelarswm
.ratpoison, as the name says,
forces you not to use the mouse. Every action is accomplished by
a key stroke. Default keybindings are inspired by GNUscreen
and
Emacs; they can be rebound, subject to the constraint that there is
always a global "prefix key" to initiate the action.
StumpWM is a rewrite of
ratpoison
in Common Lisp, which adds the nice option to hack the
WM while you're running it. No support for EWMH/desktop extensions
(by design, I'd say). Both are available in Ubuntu 10.04 (packages
ratpoison
andstumpwm
).
awesome is no longer a tiling wm, although it is still supporting tiling
– bandi
Dec 8 '10 at 19:36
The Bluetile author refers toXMonad
as a library for writing window managers. I think this is an accurate description.
– isomorphismes
Nov 13 '13 at 23:46
add a comment |
There are plenty! (However, all the ones that I know of are also tiling window managers.)
XMonad is likely the one with the largest user
community. It has extensive documentation and works well with
GNOME/EWMH extensions (albeit you have to activate them in the
configuration file). The configuration file has Haskell syntax, but
it's certainly possible to edit it without knowing much about
Haskell, by just copying+pasting examples from the documentation.
Default keybindings arevim
-inspired, though they can all be
remapped (including using chained keybindings like Emacs'C-a C-b
). It's available in Ubuntu as package
C-cxmonad
.Bluetile is an offspring of XMonad: it
supports a simplified configuration file, and integrates well with
the GNOME desktop by default. Unfortunately, it's not available in
Ubuntu 10.04, so you have to install from source.DWM is the "inspiring father" of XMonad
and Awesome. It's very lean and fast, and available as package
dwm
in Ubuntu 10.04. However, by design, to change the
configuration you have to edit a header file in the sources and
recompile; most documentation about the available options is only
available as mailing list posts. It does not support GNOME/EWMH by
default, you will have to patch it; the Echinus fork of DWM
started this way. Mostdwm
users will frown upon a "desktop
environment" so it's probably not the right choice if you like GNOME
gimmicks. Default key bindings arevim
-like; they can be remapped,
but there's no option for chained key-combos.Awesome started off as a fork of DWM.
Ion is a tiling window manager fully
programmable in Lua: also the "configuration file" is a Lua script,
so you can map any key to any action (provided you know enough Lua
for the task). No support for GNOME or EWMH extensions, as far as I
know. Available in Ubuntu 10.04 as packageion3
.wmii is the predecessor of DWM (same
author). It can be fully controlled by the keyboard, but has a
smaller selection of layouts, and the configuration format is
based on a "virtual filesystem", which makes very complex things
possible but (IMHO) also simple things rather complicated.
Available in Ubuntu 10.04 as packagewmii
.larswm can configure a key binding for
all the operations it supports. Documentation comes in the form of
a man page, clear and complete. The user community is now very
small, and the mailing list used to be silent for months. No
support for EWMH/desktop extensions. Available as packagelarswm
.ratpoison, as the name says,
forces you not to use the mouse. Every action is accomplished by
a key stroke. Default keybindings are inspired by GNUscreen
and
Emacs; they can be rebound, subject to the constraint that there is
always a global "prefix key" to initiate the action.
StumpWM is a rewrite of
ratpoison
in Common Lisp, which adds the nice option to hack the
WM while you're running it. No support for EWMH/desktop extensions
(by design, I'd say). Both are available in Ubuntu 10.04 (packages
ratpoison
andstumpwm
).
There are plenty! (However, all the ones that I know of are also tiling window managers.)
XMonad is likely the one with the largest user
community. It has extensive documentation and works well with
GNOME/EWMH extensions (albeit you have to activate them in the
configuration file). The configuration file has Haskell syntax, but
it's certainly possible to edit it without knowing much about
Haskell, by just copying+pasting examples from the documentation.
Default keybindings arevim
-inspired, though they can all be
remapped (including using chained keybindings like Emacs'C-a C-b
). It's available in Ubuntu as package
C-cxmonad
.Bluetile is an offspring of XMonad: it
supports a simplified configuration file, and integrates well with
the GNOME desktop by default. Unfortunately, it's not available in
Ubuntu 10.04, so you have to install from source.DWM is the "inspiring father" of XMonad
and Awesome. It's very lean and fast, and available as package
dwm
in Ubuntu 10.04. However, by design, to change the
configuration you have to edit a header file in the sources and
recompile; most documentation about the available options is only
available as mailing list posts. It does not support GNOME/EWMH by
default, you will have to patch it; the Echinus fork of DWM
started this way. Mostdwm
users will frown upon a "desktop
environment" so it's probably not the right choice if you like GNOME
gimmicks. Default key bindings arevim
-like; they can be remapped,
but there's no option for chained key-combos.Awesome started off as a fork of DWM.
Ion is a tiling window manager fully
programmable in Lua: also the "configuration file" is a Lua script,
so you can map any key to any action (provided you know enough Lua
for the task). No support for GNOME or EWMH extensions, as far as I
know. Available in Ubuntu 10.04 as packageion3
.wmii is the predecessor of DWM (same
author). It can be fully controlled by the keyboard, but has a
smaller selection of layouts, and the configuration format is
based on a "virtual filesystem", which makes very complex things
possible but (IMHO) also simple things rather complicated.
Available in Ubuntu 10.04 as packagewmii
.larswm can configure a key binding for
all the operations it supports. Documentation comes in the form of
a man page, clear and complete. The user community is now very
small, and the mailing list used to be silent for months. No
support for EWMH/desktop extensions. Available as packagelarswm
.ratpoison, as the name says,
forces you not to use the mouse. Every action is accomplished by
a key stroke. Default keybindings are inspired by GNUscreen
and
Emacs; they can be rebound, subject to the constraint that there is
always a global "prefix key" to initiate the action.
StumpWM is a rewrite of
ratpoison
in Common Lisp, which adds the nice option to hack the
WM while you're running it. No support for EWMH/desktop extensions
(by design, I'd say). Both are available in Ubuntu 10.04 (packages
ratpoison
andstumpwm
).
edited Sep 5 '13 at 8:59
Takkat
108k37250377
108k37250377
answered Aug 10 '10 at 16:20
Riccardo MurriRiccardo Murri
13.7k54449
13.7k54449
awesome is no longer a tiling wm, although it is still supporting tiling
– bandi
Dec 8 '10 at 19:36
The Bluetile author refers toXMonad
as a library for writing window managers. I think this is an accurate description.
– isomorphismes
Nov 13 '13 at 23:46
add a comment |
awesome is no longer a tiling wm, although it is still supporting tiling
– bandi
Dec 8 '10 at 19:36
The Bluetile author refers toXMonad
as a library for writing window managers. I think this is an accurate description.
– isomorphismes
Nov 13 '13 at 23:46
awesome is no longer a tiling wm, although it is still supporting tiling
– bandi
Dec 8 '10 at 19:36
awesome is no longer a tiling wm, although it is still supporting tiling
– bandi
Dec 8 '10 at 19:36
The Bluetile author refers to
XMonad
as a library for writing window managers. I think this is an accurate description.– isomorphismes
Nov 13 '13 at 23:46
The Bluetile author refers to
XMonad
as a library for writing window managers. I think this is an accurate description.– isomorphismes
Nov 13 '13 at 23:46
add a comment |
Use Meta or Ctrl-Alt modifiers for desktop shortcuts.
Most programs use Ctrl or Alt modifiers for their shortcuts (or use the function keys with no modifiers).
Most programs don't use Ctrl-Alt shortcuts and almost never use Meta shortcuts, so you should be safe using these without conflict.
2
On standard keyboards<Meta>
is the Windows-key.
– LassePoulsen
Aug 10 '10 at 14:02
add a comment |
Use Meta or Ctrl-Alt modifiers for desktop shortcuts.
Most programs use Ctrl or Alt modifiers for their shortcuts (or use the function keys with no modifiers).
Most programs don't use Ctrl-Alt shortcuts and almost never use Meta shortcuts, so you should be safe using these without conflict.
2
On standard keyboards<Meta>
is the Windows-key.
– LassePoulsen
Aug 10 '10 at 14:02
add a comment |
Use Meta or Ctrl-Alt modifiers for desktop shortcuts.
Most programs use Ctrl or Alt modifiers for their shortcuts (or use the function keys with no modifiers).
Most programs don't use Ctrl-Alt shortcuts and almost never use Meta shortcuts, so you should be safe using these without conflict.
Use Meta or Ctrl-Alt modifiers for desktop shortcuts.
Most programs use Ctrl or Alt modifiers for their shortcuts (or use the function keys with no modifiers).
Most programs don't use Ctrl-Alt shortcuts and almost never use Meta shortcuts, so you should be safe using these without conflict.
answered Aug 10 '10 at 13:49
dv3500eadv3500ea
29k1290144
29k1290144
2
On standard keyboards<Meta>
is the Windows-key.
– LassePoulsen
Aug 10 '10 at 14:02
add a comment |
2
On standard keyboards<Meta>
is the Windows-key.
– LassePoulsen
Aug 10 '10 at 14:02
2
2
On standard keyboards
<Meta>
is the Windows-key.– LassePoulsen
Aug 10 '10 at 14:02
On standard keyboards
<Meta>
is the Windows-key.– LassePoulsen
Aug 10 '10 at 14:02
add a comment |
You might want to check out the keyboard shortcut community wiki on here for more information on default keyboard shortcuts :)
add a comment |
You might want to check out the keyboard shortcut community wiki on here for more information on default keyboard shortcuts :)
add a comment |
You might want to check out the keyboard shortcut community wiki on here for more information on default keyboard shortcuts :)
You might want to check out the keyboard shortcut community wiki on here for more information on default keyboard shortcuts :)
edited Apr 12 '17 at 7:23
Community♦
1
1
answered Aug 10 '10 at 14:26
myusuf3myusuf3
13.4k338099
13.4k338099
add a comment |
add a comment |
Apart from awesome, other choices are DWM & WMii. I don't know much about WMii but DWM is extremely simple and slick and has all customization contained in the source code itself. However, this means it requires you to recompile it everytime you change a shortcut. This is what gives dwm its power and performance.
My choice would be awesome - it can be easily installed from official ubuntu repositories.
sudo apt-get install awesome awesome-extras
HOWTO: Setup AwesomeWM - Ignore the build from src instructions if u use above install command
I couldn't post these links in my answer as I lack enough reputation to submit more than 1 hyperlink. Trying to post via comments. BTW, here are some awesome ubuntuforums threads about using awesome in ubuntu ;-). Awesome Window Manager 3.0 : ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=948361 Awesome - A brief introduction : ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=675292 Wireless in awesome with wicd/nm : ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1260250
– koushik
Aug 10 '10 at 15:32
add a comment |
Apart from awesome, other choices are DWM & WMii. I don't know much about WMii but DWM is extremely simple and slick and has all customization contained in the source code itself. However, this means it requires you to recompile it everytime you change a shortcut. This is what gives dwm its power and performance.
My choice would be awesome - it can be easily installed from official ubuntu repositories.
sudo apt-get install awesome awesome-extras
HOWTO: Setup AwesomeWM - Ignore the build from src instructions if u use above install command
I couldn't post these links in my answer as I lack enough reputation to submit more than 1 hyperlink. Trying to post via comments. BTW, here are some awesome ubuntuforums threads about using awesome in ubuntu ;-). Awesome Window Manager 3.0 : ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=948361 Awesome - A brief introduction : ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=675292 Wireless in awesome with wicd/nm : ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1260250
– koushik
Aug 10 '10 at 15:32
add a comment |
Apart from awesome, other choices are DWM & WMii. I don't know much about WMii but DWM is extremely simple and slick and has all customization contained in the source code itself. However, this means it requires you to recompile it everytime you change a shortcut. This is what gives dwm its power and performance.
My choice would be awesome - it can be easily installed from official ubuntu repositories.
sudo apt-get install awesome awesome-extras
HOWTO: Setup AwesomeWM - Ignore the build from src instructions if u use above install command
Apart from awesome, other choices are DWM & WMii. I don't know much about WMii but DWM is extremely simple and slick and has all customization contained in the source code itself. However, this means it requires you to recompile it everytime you change a shortcut. This is what gives dwm its power and performance.
My choice would be awesome - it can be easily installed from official ubuntu repositories.
sudo apt-get install awesome awesome-extras
HOWTO: Setup AwesomeWM - Ignore the build from src instructions if u use above install command
answered Aug 10 '10 at 15:31
koushikkoushik
3,62632032
3,62632032
I couldn't post these links in my answer as I lack enough reputation to submit more than 1 hyperlink. Trying to post via comments. BTW, here are some awesome ubuntuforums threads about using awesome in ubuntu ;-). Awesome Window Manager 3.0 : ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=948361 Awesome - A brief introduction : ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=675292 Wireless in awesome with wicd/nm : ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1260250
– koushik
Aug 10 '10 at 15:32
add a comment |
I couldn't post these links in my answer as I lack enough reputation to submit more than 1 hyperlink. Trying to post via comments. BTW, here are some awesome ubuntuforums threads about using awesome in ubuntu ;-). Awesome Window Manager 3.0 : ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=948361 Awesome - A brief introduction : ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=675292 Wireless in awesome with wicd/nm : ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1260250
– koushik
Aug 10 '10 at 15:32
I couldn't post these links in my answer as I lack enough reputation to submit more than 1 hyperlink. Trying to post via comments. BTW, here are some awesome ubuntuforums threads about using awesome in ubuntu ;-). Awesome Window Manager 3.0 : ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=948361 Awesome - A brief introduction : ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=675292 Wireless in awesome with wicd/nm : ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1260250
– koushik
Aug 10 '10 at 15:32
I couldn't post these links in my answer as I lack enough reputation to submit more than 1 hyperlink. Trying to post via comments. BTW, here are some awesome ubuntuforums threads about using awesome in ubuntu ;-). Awesome Window Manager 3.0 : ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=948361 Awesome - A brief introduction : ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=675292 Wireless in awesome with wicd/nm : ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1260250
– koushik
Aug 10 '10 at 15:32
add a comment |
I would argue that Emacs has crossed the boundary of being a text editor and is now a full blown OS, and at least for me, is my prefered keyboard centric user interface. I mean the above statement as a compliment and a strong recommendation of the program rather than the tired joke some people imply with the same statement.
I usually invoke it in a terminal window with:
emacs -nw
Of course install it with:
sudo apt install emacs
I am still surprised that Ubuntu and Canonical choose not to install it by default.
It does have a somewhat steep learning curve, but will reward you with a rich working environment and editor. Start your exploration by using it's built in tutorial, which you can invoke with:
ctrl-h t
add a comment |
I would argue that Emacs has crossed the boundary of being a text editor and is now a full blown OS, and at least for me, is my prefered keyboard centric user interface. I mean the above statement as a compliment and a strong recommendation of the program rather than the tired joke some people imply with the same statement.
I usually invoke it in a terminal window with:
emacs -nw
Of course install it with:
sudo apt install emacs
I am still surprised that Ubuntu and Canonical choose not to install it by default.
It does have a somewhat steep learning curve, but will reward you with a rich working environment and editor. Start your exploration by using it's built in tutorial, which you can invoke with:
ctrl-h t
add a comment |
I would argue that Emacs has crossed the boundary of being a text editor and is now a full blown OS, and at least for me, is my prefered keyboard centric user interface. I mean the above statement as a compliment and a strong recommendation of the program rather than the tired joke some people imply with the same statement.
I usually invoke it in a terminal window with:
emacs -nw
Of course install it with:
sudo apt install emacs
I am still surprised that Ubuntu and Canonical choose not to install it by default.
It does have a somewhat steep learning curve, but will reward you with a rich working environment and editor. Start your exploration by using it's built in tutorial, which you can invoke with:
ctrl-h t
I would argue that Emacs has crossed the boundary of being a text editor and is now a full blown OS, and at least for me, is my prefered keyboard centric user interface. I mean the above statement as a compliment and a strong recommendation of the program rather than the tired joke some people imply with the same statement.
I usually invoke it in a terminal window with:
emacs -nw
Of course install it with:
sudo apt install emacs
I am still surprised that Ubuntu and Canonical choose not to install it by default.
It does have a somewhat steep learning curve, but will reward you with a rich working environment and editor. Start your exploration by using it's built in tutorial, which you can invoke with:
ctrl-h t
edited Mar 10 at 15:14
answered Dec 5 '16 at 0:03
hazizhaziz
1,52752843
1,52752843
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Ask Ubuntu!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f1844%2fis-there-a-keyboard-centric-desktop-wm-available%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown