Exposing GRASS GIS add-on in QGIS Processing framework?
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}
Having QGIS and GRASS GIS 7 installed, how can I expose a GRASS GIS add-on, which has been installed using g.extension
, in QGIS' Processing framework?
qgis grass qgis-processing add-ons
add a comment |
Having QGIS and GRASS GIS 7 installed, how can I expose a GRASS GIS add-on, which has been installed using g.extension
, in QGIS' Processing framework?
qgis grass qgis-processing add-ons
Thank you @PolyGeo for the edit. But the title is syntactically/grammatically now incorrect. At least, my poor English tells me, it should read: either "Exposing a GRASS GIS add-on in QGIS Processing framework?" or "Exposing GRASS GIS add-ons in QGIS Processing framework?".
– Nikos Alexandris
15 hours ago
The title is a summary of your question. It can normally be summarized in fewer characters (for search engine optimization and duplicate suggestions) by not insisting on a fully formed sentence.
– PolyGeo♦
15 hours ago
@PolyGeo I see. But I still think it should be grammatically correct.
– Nikos Alexandris
15 hours ago
add a comment |
Having QGIS and GRASS GIS 7 installed, how can I expose a GRASS GIS add-on, which has been installed using g.extension
, in QGIS' Processing framework?
qgis grass qgis-processing add-ons
Having QGIS and GRASS GIS 7 installed, how can I expose a GRASS GIS add-on, which has been installed using g.extension
, in QGIS' Processing framework?
qgis grass qgis-processing add-ons
qgis grass qgis-processing add-ons
edited 17 hours ago
PolyGeo♦
54k1782246
54k1782246
asked 17 hours ago
Nikos AlexandrisNikos Alexandris
1,0641528
1,0641528
Thank you @PolyGeo for the edit. But the title is syntactically/grammatically now incorrect. At least, my poor English tells me, it should read: either "Exposing a GRASS GIS add-on in QGIS Processing framework?" or "Exposing GRASS GIS add-ons in QGIS Processing framework?".
– Nikos Alexandris
15 hours ago
The title is a summary of your question. It can normally be summarized in fewer characters (for search engine optimization and duplicate suggestions) by not insisting on a fully formed sentence.
– PolyGeo♦
15 hours ago
@PolyGeo I see. But I still think it should be grammatically correct.
– Nikos Alexandris
15 hours ago
add a comment |
Thank you @PolyGeo for the edit. But the title is syntactically/grammatically now incorrect. At least, my poor English tells me, it should read: either "Exposing a GRASS GIS add-on in QGIS Processing framework?" or "Exposing GRASS GIS add-ons in QGIS Processing framework?".
– Nikos Alexandris
15 hours ago
The title is a summary of your question. It can normally be summarized in fewer characters (for search engine optimization and duplicate suggestions) by not insisting on a fully formed sentence.
– PolyGeo♦
15 hours ago
@PolyGeo I see. But I still think it should be grammatically correct.
– Nikos Alexandris
15 hours ago
Thank you @PolyGeo for the edit. But the title is syntactically/grammatically now incorrect. At least, my poor English tells me, it should read: either "Exposing a GRASS GIS add-on in QGIS Processing framework?" or "Exposing GRASS GIS add-ons in QGIS Processing framework?".
– Nikos Alexandris
15 hours ago
Thank you @PolyGeo for the edit. But the title is syntactically/grammatically now incorrect. At least, my poor English tells me, it should read: either "Exposing a GRASS GIS add-on in QGIS Processing framework?" or "Exposing GRASS GIS add-ons in QGIS Processing framework?".
– Nikos Alexandris
15 hours ago
The title is a summary of your question. It can normally be summarized in fewer characters (for search engine optimization and duplicate suggestions) by not insisting on a fully formed sentence.
– PolyGeo♦
15 hours ago
The title is a summary of your question. It can normally be summarized in fewer characters (for search engine optimization and duplicate suggestions) by not insisting on a fully formed sentence.
– PolyGeo♦
15 hours ago
@PolyGeo I see. But I still think it should be grammatically correct.
– Nikos Alexandris
15 hours ago
@PolyGeo I see. But I still think it should be grammatically correct.
– Nikos Alexandris
15 hours ago
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
QGIS core developer Nyal Dawson explained a best-practice approach in this e-mail thread.
Overview
Subclass QGIS' class
Grass7AlgorithmProvider
Set the value of
descriptionFolder
to the path of the add-on in questionOverride the methods for logo, descriptions, name etc.
An example of it, implemented by Panagiotis Mavrogiorgos is https://gitlab.com/natcapes/natcapes_qgis, which literally exposes the https://gitlab.com/natcapes/r.estimap.recreation GRASS GIS add-on under Processing.
Finally, it would be nice to have an update for https://issues.qgis.org/issues/21322 -- essentially, an update of the "documentation" file https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/blob/master/python/plugins/processing/algs/grass7/grass7.txt.
Related Screenshots
- Processing Toolbox and the normal GRASS GIS provider: https://i.imgur.com/3QZ4bB9.png
- QGIS Plugin in the 'natcapes_qgis' repository: https://i.imgur.com/UArlt36.png
- Install (the above mentioned QGIS) Plugin from ZIP: https://i.imgur.com/Q2sXNdw.png
- Plugin installed, provider activated: https://i.imgur.com/LdmpaWF.png
- The interface to
r.estimap.recreation
: https://i.imgur.com/uJbMSpw.png
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "79"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fgis.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f319331%2fexposing-grass-gis-add-on-in-qgis-processing-framework%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
QGIS core developer Nyal Dawson explained a best-practice approach in this e-mail thread.
Overview
Subclass QGIS' class
Grass7AlgorithmProvider
Set the value of
descriptionFolder
to the path of the add-on in questionOverride the methods for logo, descriptions, name etc.
An example of it, implemented by Panagiotis Mavrogiorgos is https://gitlab.com/natcapes/natcapes_qgis, which literally exposes the https://gitlab.com/natcapes/r.estimap.recreation GRASS GIS add-on under Processing.
Finally, it would be nice to have an update for https://issues.qgis.org/issues/21322 -- essentially, an update of the "documentation" file https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/blob/master/python/plugins/processing/algs/grass7/grass7.txt.
Related Screenshots
- Processing Toolbox and the normal GRASS GIS provider: https://i.imgur.com/3QZ4bB9.png
- QGIS Plugin in the 'natcapes_qgis' repository: https://i.imgur.com/UArlt36.png
- Install (the above mentioned QGIS) Plugin from ZIP: https://i.imgur.com/Q2sXNdw.png
- Plugin installed, provider activated: https://i.imgur.com/LdmpaWF.png
- The interface to
r.estimap.recreation
: https://i.imgur.com/uJbMSpw.png
add a comment |
QGIS core developer Nyal Dawson explained a best-practice approach in this e-mail thread.
Overview
Subclass QGIS' class
Grass7AlgorithmProvider
Set the value of
descriptionFolder
to the path of the add-on in questionOverride the methods for logo, descriptions, name etc.
An example of it, implemented by Panagiotis Mavrogiorgos is https://gitlab.com/natcapes/natcapes_qgis, which literally exposes the https://gitlab.com/natcapes/r.estimap.recreation GRASS GIS add-on under Processing.
Finally, it would be nice to have an update for https://issues.qgis.org/issues/21322 -- essentially, an update of the "documentation" file https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/blob/master/python/plugins/processing/algs/grass7/grass7.txt.
Related Screenshots
- Processing Toolbox and the normal GRASS GIS provider: https://i.imgur.com/3QZ4bB9.png
- QGIS Plugin in the 'natcapes_qgis' repository: https://i.imgur.com/UArlt36.png
- Install (the above mentioned QGIS) Plugin from ZIP: https://i.imgur.com/Q2sXNdw.png
- Plugin installed, provider activated: https://i.imgur.com/LdmpaWF.png
- The interface to
r.estimap.recreation
: https://i.imgur.com/uJbMSpw.png
add a comment |
QGIS core developer Nyal Dawson explained a best-practice approach in this e-mail thread.
Overview
Subclass QGIS' class
Grass7AlgorithmProvider
Set the value of
descriptionFolder
to the path of the add-on in questionOverride the methods for logo, descriptions, name etc.
An example of it, implemented by Panagiotis Mavrogiorgos is https://gitlab.com/natcapes/natcapes_qgis, which literally exposes the https://gitlab.com/natcapes/r.estimap.recreation GRASS GIS add-on under Processing.
Finally, it would be nice to have an update for https://issues.qgis.org/issues/21322 -- essentially, an update of the "documentation" file https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/blob/master/python/plugins/processing/algs/grass7/grass7.txt.
Related Screenshots
- Processing Toolbox and the normal GRASS GIS provider: https://i.imgur.com/3QZ4bB9.png
- QGIS Plugin in the 'natcapes_qgis' repository: https://i.imgur.com/UArlt36.png
- Install (the above mentioned QGIS) Plugin from ZIP: https://i.imgur.com/Q2sXNdw.png
- Plugin installed, provider activated: https://i.imgur.com/LdmpaWF.png
- The interface to
r.estimap.recreation
: https://i.imgur.com/uJbMSpw.png
QGIS core developer Nyal Dawson explained a best-practice approach in this e-mail thread.
Overview
Subclass QGIS' class
Grass7AlgorithmProvider
Set the value of
descriptionFolder
to the path of the add-on in questionOverride the methods for logo, descriptions, name etc.
An example of it, implemented by Panagiotis Mavrogiorgos is https://gitlab.com/natcapes/natcapes_qgis, which literally exposes the https://gitlab.com/natcapes/r.estimap.recreation GRASS GIS add-on under Processing.
Finally, it would be nice to have an update for https://issues.qgis.org/issues/21322 -- essentially, an update of the "documentation" file https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/blob/master/python/plugins/processing/algs/grass7/grass7.txt.
Related Screenshots
- Processing Toolbox and the normal GRASS GIS provider: https://i.imgur.com/3QZ4bB9.png
- QGIS Plugin in the 'natcapes_qgis' repository: https://i.imgur.com/UArlt36.png
- Install (the above mentioned QGIS) Plugin from ZIP: https://i.imgur.com/Q2sXNdw.png
- Plugin installed, provider activated: https://i.imgur.com/LdmpaWF.png
- The interface to
r.estimap.recreation
: https://i.imgur.com/uJbMSpw.png
edited 15 hours ago
answered 17 hours ago
Nikos AlexandrisNikos Alexandris
1,0641528
1,0641528
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Geographic Information Systems Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fgis.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f319331%2fexposing-grass-gis-add-on-in-qgis-processing-framework%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Thank you @PolyGeo for the edit. But the title is syntactically/grammatically now incorrect. At least, my poor English tells me, it should read: either "Exposing a GRASS GIS add-on in QGIS Processing framework?" or "Exposing GRASS GIS add-ons in QGIS Processing framework?".
– Nikos Alexandris
15 hours ago
The title is a summary of your question. It can normally be summarized in fewer characters (for search engine optimization and duplicate suggestions) by not insisting on a fully formed sentence.
– PolyGeo♦
15 hours ago
@PolyGeo I see. But I still think it should be grammatically correct.
– Nikos Alexandris
15 hours ago