Put R under double integral












6















When I use $iint_R f(x,y)dA$ the letter $R$ is to the right of the double integral sign. How to make it under the sign? This is a simple question but I couldn't find a related question.






subscripts







share|improve this question




















  • 2





    @JouleV I managed to mess up the markdown quoting:-), I'll delete and repost the comment, thanks.

    – David Carlisle
    17 hours ago






  • 3





    you are using inline mathematics ($) the entire design of the layout for inline math is to make it fit within the normal line spacing of the text in a paragraph so limits move to subscript position, if you need the display style it it best to set it as a math display([...])

    – David Carlisle
    17 hours ago
















6















When I use $iint_R f(x,y)dA$ the letter $R$ is to the right of the double integral sign. How to make it under the sign? This is a simple question but I couldn't find a related question.






subscripts







share|improve this question




















  • 2





    @JouleV I managed to mess up the markdown quoting:-), I'll delete and repost the comment, thanks.

    – David Carlisle
    17 hours ago






  • 3





    you are using inline mathematics ($) the entire design of the layout for inline math is to make it fit within the normal line spacing of the text in a paragraph so limits move to subscript position, if you need the display style it it best to set it as a math display([...])

    – David Carlisle
    17 hours ago














6












6








6








When I use $iint_R f(x,y)dA$ the letter $R$ is to the right of the double integral sign. How to make it under the sign? This is a simple question but I couldn't find a related question.






subscripts







share|improve this question
















When I use $iint_R f(x,y)dA$ the letter $R$ is to the right of the double integral sign. How to make it under the sign? This is a simple question but I couldn't find a related question.






subscripts




subscripts






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 19 hours ago









JouleV

14.4k22664




14.4k22664










asked 19 hours ago









Haoran ChenHaoran Chen

25918




25918








  • 2





    @JouleV I managed to mess up the markdown quoting:-), I'll delete and repost the comment, thanks.

    – David Carlisle
    17 hours ago






  • 3





    you are using inline mathematics ($) the entire design of the layout for inline math is to make it fit within the normal line spacing of the text in a paragraph so limits move to subscript position, if you need the display style it it best to set it as a math display([...])

    – David Carlisle
    17 hours ago














  • 2





    @JouleV I managed to mess up the markdown quoting:-), I'll delete and repost the comment, thanks.

    – David Carlisle
    17 hours ago






  • 3





    you are using inline mathematics ($) the entire design of the layout for inline math is to make it fit within the normal line spacing of the text in a paragraph so limits move to subscript position, if you need the display style it it best to set it as a math display([...])

    – David Carlisle
    17 hours ago








2




2





@JouleV I managed to mess up the markdown quoting:-), I'll delete and repost the comment, thanks.

– David Carlisle
17 hours ago





@JouleV I managed to mess up the markdown quoting:-), I'll delete and repost the comment, thanks.

– David Carlisle
17 hours ago




3




3





you are using inline mathematics ($) the entire design of the layout for inline math is to make it fit within the normal line spacing of the text in a paragraph so limits move to subscript position, if you need the display style it it best to set it as a math display([...])

– David Carlisle
17 hours ago





you are using inline mathematics ($) the entire design of the layout for inline math is to make it fit within the normal line spacing of the text in a paragraph so limits move to subscript position, if you need the display style it it best to set it as a math display([...])

– David Carlisle
17 hours ago










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















12














Apart from JouleV's nice answer, you can use limits option to typeset the inline with equation with limits under the integral symbol.



documentclass{article}

usepackage{amsmath}

begin{document}

$iintlimits_a f(x,y) dA$

end{document}


to get:



enter image description here






share|improve this answer





















  • 3





    I'd say that iintlimits_R centers the R term far better than underset{R}{iint} does.

    – Mico
    16 hours ago








  • 1





    No upper limit should be used when limits follows a command for multiple integrals. You should also respect the OP’s preference for the differential.

    – egreg
    16 hours ago











  • @egreg I have updated my answer, thanks for the remark. Could you also briefly explain why no upper limit must be used?

    – Raaja
    16 hours ago






  • 2





    @Raaja Because they’re badly positioned.

    – egreg
    16 hours ago











  • @egreg Huhh, like that ;) thanks.

    – Raaja
    16 hours ago



















4














I don't think this is a good idea, but if you want to have it, you can use underset:



documentclass{standalone}

usepackage{amsmath}

begin{document}

$underset{R}{iint} f(x,y)dA$

end{document}


enter image description here






share|improve this answer



















  • 1





    Sorry, but this is not the best choice.

    – egreg
    16 hours ago






  • 1





    @egreg Yes, it may not be the best, but it surely is a bad one. I will never write like that in my documents

    – JouleV
    16 hours ago














Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "85"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f485553%2fput-r-under-double-integral%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes








2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









12














Apart from JouleV's nice answer, you can use limits option to typeset the inline with equation with limits under the integral symbol.



documentclass{article}

usepackage{amsmath}

begin{document}

$iintlimits_a f(x,y) dA$

end{document}


to get:



enter image description here






share|improve this answer





















  • 3





    I'd say that iintlimits_R centers the R term far better than underset{R}{iint} does.

    – Mico
    16 hours ago








  • 1





    No upper limit should be used when limits follows a command for multiple integrals. You should also respect the OP’s preference for the differential.

    – egreg
    16 hours ago











  • @egreg I have updated my answer, thanks for the remark. Could you also briefly explain why no upper limit must be used?

    – Raaja
    16 hours ago






  • 2





    @Raaja Because they’re badly positioned.

    – egreg
    16 hours ago











  • @egreg Huhh, like that ;) thanks.

    – Raaja
    16 hours ago
















12














Apart from JouleV's nice answer, you can use limits option to typeset the inline with equation with limits under the integral symbol.



documentclass{article}

usepackage{amsmath}

begin{document}

$iintlimits_a f(x,y) dA$

end{document}


to get:



enter image description here






share|improve this answer





















  • 3





    I'd say that iintlimits_R centers the R term far better than underset{R}{iint} does.

    – Mico
    16 hours ago








  • 1





    No upper limit should be used when limits follows a command for multiple integrals. You should also respect the OP’s preference for the differential.

    – egreg
    16 hours ago











  • @egreg I have updated my answer, thanks for the remark. Could you also briefly explain why no upper limit must be used?

    – Raaja
    16 hours ago






  • 2





    @Raaja Because they’re badly positioned.

    – egreg
    16 hours ago











  • @egreg Huhh, like that ;) thanks.

    – Raaja
    16 hours ago














12












12








12







Apart from JouleV's nice answer, you can use limits option to typeset the inline with equation with limits under the integral symbol.



documentclass{article}

usepackage{amsmath}

begin{document}

$iintlimits_a f(x,y) dA$

end{document}


to get:



enter image description here






share|improve this answer















Apart from JouleV's nice answer, you can use limits option to typeset the inline with equation with limits under the integral symbol.



documentclass{article}

usepackage{amsmath}

begin{document}

$iintlimits_a f(x,y) dA$

end{document}


to get:



enter image description here







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited 16 hours ago

























answered 19 hours ago









RaajaRaaja

5,44121645




5,44121645








  • 3





    I'd say that iintlimits_R centers the R term far better than underset{R}{iint} does.

    – Mico
    16 hours ago








  • 1





    No upper limit should be used when limits follows a command for multiple integrals. You should also respect the OP’s preference for the differential.

    – egreg
    16 hours ago











  • @egreg I have updated my answer, thanks for the remark. Could you also briefly explain why no upper limit must be used?

    – Raaja
    16 hours ago






  • 2





    @Raaja Because they’re badly positioned.

    – egreg
    16 hours ago











  • @egreg Huhh, like that ;) thanks.

    – Raaja
    16 hours ago














  • 3





    I'd say that iintlimits_R centers the R term far better than underset{R}{iint} does.

    – Mico
    16 hours ago








  • 1





    No upper limit should be used when limits follows a command for multiple integrals. You should also respect the OP’s preference for the differential.

    – egreg
    16 hours ago











  • @egreg I have updated my answer, thanks for the remark. Could you also briefly explain why no upper limit must be used?

    – Raaja
    16 hours ago






  • 2





    @Raaja Because they’re badly positioned.

    – egreg
    16 hours ago











  • @egreg Huhh, like that ;) thanks.

    – Raaja
    16 hours ago








3




3





I'd say that iintlimits_R centers the R term far better than underset{R}{iint} does.

– Mico
16 hours ago







I'd say that iintlimits_R centers the R term far better than underset{R}{iint} does.

– Mico
16 hours ago






1




1





No upper limit should be used when limits follows a command for multiple integrals. You should also respect the OP’s preference for the differential.

– egreg
16 hours ago





No upper limit should be used when limits follows a command for multiple integrals. You should also respect the OP’s preference for the differential.

– egreg
16 hours ago













@egreg I have updated my answer, thanks for the remark. Could you also briefly explain why no upper limit must be used?

– Raaja
16 hours ago





@egreg I have updated my answer, thanks for the remark. Could you also briefly explain why no upper limit must be used?

– Raaja
16 hours ago




2




2





@Raaja Because they’re badly positioned.

– egreg
16 hours ago





@Raaja Because they’re badly positioned.

– egreg
16 hours ago













@egreg Huhh, like that ;) thanks.

– Raaja
16 hours ago





@egreg Huhh, like that ;) thanks.

– Raaja
16 hours ago











4














I don't think this is a good idea, but if you want to have it, you can use underset:



documentclass{standalone}

usepackage{amsmath}

begin{document}

$underset{R}{iint} f(x,y)dA$

end{document}


enter image description here






share|improve this answer



















  • 1





    Sorry, but this is not the best choice.

    – egreg
    16 hours ago






  • 1





    @egreg Yes, it may not be the best, but it surely is a bad one. I will never write like that in my documents

    – JouleV
    16 hours ago


















4














I don't think this is a good idea, but if you want to have it, you can use underset:



documentclass{standalone}

usepackage{amsmath}

begin{document}

$underset{R}{iint} f(x,y)dA$

end{document}


enter image description here






share|improve this answer



















  • 1





    Sorry, but this is not the best choice.

    – egreg
    16 hours ago






  • 1





    @egreg Yes, it may not be the best, but it surely is a bad one. I will never write like that in my documents

    – JouleV
    16 hours ago
















4












4








4







I don't think this is a good idea, but if you want to have it, you can use underset:



documentclass{standalone}

usepackage{amsmath}

begin{document}

$underset{R}{iint} f(x,y)dA$

end{document}


enter image description here






share|improve this answer













I don't think this is a good idea, but if you want to have it, you can use underset:



documentclass{standalone}

usepackage{amsmath}

begin{document}

$underset{R}{iint} f(x,y)dA$

end{document}


enter image description here







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered 19 hours ago









JouleVJouleV

14.4k22664




14.4k22664








  • 1





    Sorry, but this is not the best choice.

    – egreg
    16 hours ago






  • 1





    @egreg Yes, it may not be the best, but it surely is a bad one. I will never write like that in my documents

    – JouleV
    16 hours ago
















  • 1





    Sorry, but this is not the best choice.

    – egreg
    16 hours ago






  • 1





    @egreg Yes, it may not be the best, but it surely is a bad one. I will never write like that in my documents

    – JouleV
    16 hours ago










1




1





Sorry, but this is not the best choice.

– egreg
16 hours ago





Sorry, but this is not the best choice.

– egreg
16 hours ago




1




1





@egreg Yes, it may not be the best, but it surely is a bad one. I will never write like that in my documents

– JouleV
16 hours ago







@egreg Yes, it may not be the best, but it surely is a bad one. I will never write like that in my documents

– JouleV
16 hours ago




















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid …



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f485553%2fput-r-under-double-integral%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







-

Popular posts from this blog

數位音樂下載

Image
數位音樂下載 為非以「實體」方式來販賣音樂的相關產品，而使用數位格式如mp3、AAC等文件格式來進行銷售販賣的一种音乐产业形式。著名的數位音樂下載服務商有iTunes Store、RecoChoku、Google Play音乐和微软Zune等。数字音乐下载在二十一世纪初一度风靡全球， [1] [2] 使得传统唱片产业走向衰落，但其自身也在2010年代流媒体音乐服务如Apple Music、Spotify等的挤压下迅速失去市场份额。 [3] [4] 数字音乐下载有便于携带、传播迅速、制作简单成本低等优点，与流媒体音乐相比也能更好保障音乐人权益； [5] 但它同时很可能带来侵犯版权和滥用的情形， [6] 也给音乐产业带来了诸多不利影响。数字音乐下载为音乐人和乐迷提供了更加便捷直接的交流渠道，也一定程度上推动了网络音乐人的出现和独立音乐的迅速发展。 [7] 目录 1 历史 1.1 技术积淀（1987-2000） 1.2 出现与兴起（2000-2004） 1.3 唱片市场的颠覆者（2004-2007） 1.4 巅峰和衰落（2005-2013） 1.5 摇摇欲坠的现状与不可预知的明天（2014至今） 2 主要文件格式 2.1 PCM编码格式 2.1.1 WAV 2.1.2 APE 2.1.3 FLAC 2.2 苹果推出的无损文件格式 2.2.1 AIFF 2.2.2 ALAC 2.3 有损压缩格式 2.3.1 MP3 2.3.2 AAC 3 主要市场 3.1 iTunes Store 3.2 Google Play音乐商店 3.3 亚马逊音乐商店 3.4 部分其他音乐商店 4 影响与评价 4.1 对音乐产业的影响 4.2 对科技行业的影响 4.3 正面评价 4.4 负面评价 4.4.1 侵权问题 4.4.2 经营模式不明晰 4.4.3 不适应移动时代 4.5 文化现象 5 延伸阅读 6 参考资料 历史 苹果iTunes+iPod的软硬件搭配让数字音...
Read more

When can things happen in Etherscan, such as the picture below?

Image
2 I don't know why balance of the address is 0. when can this situation? etherscan balances share | improve this question asked yesterday Ru Hi Ru Hi 11 1 New contributor Ru Hi is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering. Check out our Code of Conduct. add a comment  |  ...
Read more

格利澤436b

Image
格利泽436b 太陽系外行星 太陽系外行星列表 艺术家笔下的格利泽436b 母恆星 母恆星 Gliese 436 星座 獅子座 赤經 ( α ) 11 h  42 m  11.0941 s [1] 赤緯 ( δ ) +26° 42′ 23.652″ [1] 距離 33.4 ly (10.2 pc) 光譜類型 M2.5 V [1] 軌道參數 半长轴 ( a ) 0.0291±0.0004 [2] AU 軌道離心率 ( e ) 0.150±0.012 [2] 公轉週期 ( P ) 2.643904±0.000005 [3] d (0.00723849 y) 軌道傾角 ( i ) 85.8 +0.21 −0.25 [3] ° 角距 ( θ ) 2.794 mas 近星點時間 ( T 0 ) 2,451,551.716 ±0.01 JD 半振幅 ( K ) 18.68±0.8 m/s 物理性质 质量 ( m ) 22.2±1.0 [2] M ⊕ 半徑 ( r ) 4.327±0.183 [2] [4] R ⊕ 密度 ( ρ ) 1.51 g cm -3 表面重力 ( g ) 1.18 g 溫度 ( T ) 712±36 [2] K 發現 發現時間 2004 發現者 巴特勒、沃格特、 馬西 et al. 發現方法 徑向速度、凌日法 發現地點 美國加利福尼亞州 發表論文 出版 其他名稱 Ross 905 b, GJ 436 b, [5] LTT 13213 b, GCTP 2704.10 b, LHS 310, AC+27:28217 b, Vyssotsky 616 b, HIP 57087 b, GEN# +9.80120068 b, LP 319-75 b, G 121-7 b, LSPM J1142+2642 b, 1RXS J114211.9+264328 b, ASCC 683818 b, G 147-68 b, UCAC2 41198281 b, BP...
Read more