Interchangeability of 'sunk into the ground' and 'sunken into the ground'





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}






up vote
0
down vote

favorite
1












This question differs from "sunk" or "sunken"? in that the other question, in my understanding, is about the act of sinking (as in the process of changing state from being above to being below something).





In a discussion I described buildings as 'sunk into the ground', meaning that they were built like buildings above-ground but set partially below.



As the other person did interpret it as the buildings actively sinking, I was looking up merriam-webster to show them the definition. Finding that at least the infinitive of what I tried to use would be 'sunken'.



What I am curious/not sure about though is if it would be 'sunken' in every case of using the word, or if my usage works too, i.e. in the following sentence:



"What conditions would make sinking them into the ground the predominant way of building large structures?"










share|improve this question






















  • Apart from "established" collocations like sunken eyes / road / cheeks / ships / rocks / vessels I think you should avoid that form. Note that as an adjective, we usually just go for sunk costs / floor / fence, so I'd just stick with that for your sunk posts. Linguistically, simpler is usually better in the long run.
    – FumbleFingers
    yesterday

















up vote
0
down vote

favorite
1












This question differs from "sunk" or "sunken"? in that the other question, in my understanding, is about the act of sinking (as in the process of changing state from being above to being below something).





In a discussion I described buildings as 'sunk into the ground', meaning that they were built like buildings above-ground but set partially below.



As the other person did interpret it as the buildings actively sinking, I was looking up merriam-webster to show them the definition. Finding that at least the infinitive of what I tried to use would be 'sunken'.



What I am curious/not sure about though is if it would be 'sunken' in every case of using the word, or if my usage works too, i.e. in the following sentence:



"What conditions would make sinking them into the ground the predominant way of building large structures?"










share|improve this question






















  • Apart from "established" collocations like sunken eyes / road / cheeks / ships / rocks / vessels I think you should avoid that form. Note that as an adjective, we usually just go for sunk costs / floor / fence, so I'd just stick with that for your sunk posts. Linguistically, simpler is usually better in the long run.
    – FumbleFingers
    yesterday













up vote
0
down vote

favorite
1









up vote
0
down vote

favorite
1






1





This question differs from "sunk" or "sunken"? in that the other question, in my understanding, is about the act of sinking (as in the process of changing state from being above to being below something).





In a discussion I described buildings as 'sunk into the ground', meaning that they were built like buildings above-ground but set partially below.



As the other person did interpret it as the buildings actively sinking, I was looking up merriam-webster to show them the definition. Finding that at least the infinitive of what I tried to use would be 'sunken'.



What I am curious/not sure about though is if it would be 'sunken' in every case of using the word, or if my usage works too, i.e. in the following sentence:



"What conditions would make sinking them into the ground the predominant way of building large structures?"










share|improve this question













This question differs from "sunk" or "sunken"? in that the other question, in my understanding, is about the act of sinking (as in the process of changing state from being above to being below something).





In a discussion I described buildings as 'sunk into the ground', meaning that they were built like buildings above-ground but set partially below.



As the other person did interpret it as the buildings actively sinking, I was looking up merriam-webster to show them the definition. Finding that at least the infinitive of what I tried to use would be 'sunken'.



What I am curious/not sure about though is if it would be 'sunken' in every case of using the word, or if my usage works too, i.e. in the following sentence:



"What conditions would make sinking them into the ground the predominant way of building large structures?"







word-usage






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked yesterday









dot_Sp0T

146115




146115












  • Apart from "established" collocations like sunken eyes / road / cheeks / ships / rocks / vessels I think you should avoid that form. Note that as an adjective, we usually just go for sunk costs / floor / fence, so I'd just stick with that for your sunk posts. Linguistically, simpler is usually better in the long run.
    – FumbleFingers
    yesterday


















  • Apart from "established" collocations like sunken eyes / road / cheeks / ships / rocks / vessels I think you should avoid that form. Note that as an adjective, we usually just go for sunk costs / floor / fence, so I'd just stick with that for your sunk posts. Linguistically, simpler is usually better in the long run.
    – FumbleFingers
    yesterday
















Apart from "established" collocations like sunken eyes / road / cheeks / ships / rocks / vessels I think you should avoid that form. Note that as an adjective, we usually just go for sunk costs / floor / fence, so I'd just stick with that for your sunk posts. Linguistically, simpler is usually better in the long run.
– FumbleFingers
yesterday




Apart from "established" collocations like sunken eyes / road / cheeks / ships / rocks / vessels I think you should avoid that form. Note that as an adjective, we usually just go for sunk costs / floor / fence, so I'd just stick with that for your sunk posts. Linguistically, simpler is usually better in the long run.
– FumbleFingers
yesterday










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
-1
down vote













I was the "other person" confused by the original title, so hopefully an explanation of my thoughts helps out.



I'll start with the word "sunken". On dictionary.com (which I mainly use because it has an easy-to-remember name and is free) it's exclusively an adjective in modern use and definition 3 is the one I think is most relevant:




situated or lying on a lower level




Using this definition, a "sunken building" being one in which the bottom floor is below ground is entirely valid, regardless of how the building got there.



Using "sunk" as an adjective in the same way is grammatical, but according to the same dictionary the adjective definitions of "sunk" are much more narrow and technical. On the other hand, in my experience native speakers of English would use "sunk" as an adjective interchangeably with "sunken" so either version would be comprehensible.



In contrast, the terms "sink", "sinking", and "sank" only have relevant definitions as verbs. Those definitions exclusively have connotations of something which starts high, and then goes down, which is why I don't think they are appropriate for a structure being built underground from the start.



TL;DR Both adjective forms "sunk" and "sunken" are appropriate to describe a building which is substantially underground. The verb forms "sink", "sinking", and "sank" are not appropriate in standard English for describing a building process where a structure is constructed inside a hole.



(As an aside, in the world you're constructing using the forms of "sink" as slang or jargon for the "build something mostly underground" process you end up with sounds like a fun idea, it just doesn't align with current usage of those terms in the real world)






share|improve this answer





















    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "97"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














     

    draft saved


    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f473977%2finterchangeability-of-sunk-into-the-ground-and-sunken-into-the-ground%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    -1
    down vote













    I was the "other person" confused by the original title, so hopefully an explanation of my thoughts helps out.



    I'll start with the word "sunken". On dictionary.com (which I mainly use because it has an easy-to-remember name and is free) it's exclusively an adjective in modern use and definition 3 is the one I think is most relevant:




    situated or lying on a lower level




    Using this definition, a "sunken building" being one in which the bottom floor is below ground is entirely valid, regardless of how the building got there.



    Using "sunk" as an adjective in the same way is grammatical, but according to the same dictionary the adjective definitions of "sunk" are much more narrow and technical. On the other hand, in my experience native speakers of English would use "sunk" as an adjective interchangeably with "sunken" so either version would be comprehensible.



    In contrast, the terms "sink", "sinking", and "sank" only have relevant definitions as verbs. Those definitions exclusively have connotations of something which starts high, and then goes down, which is why I don't think they are appropriate for a structure being built underground from the start.



    TL;DR Both adjective forms "sunk" and "sunken" are appropriate to describe a building which is substantially underground. The verb forms "sink", "sinking", and "sank" are not appropriate in standard English for describing a building process where a structure is constructed inside a hole.



    (As an aside, in the world you're constructing using the forms of "sink" as slang or jargon for the "build something mostly underground" process you end up with sounds like a fun idea, it just doesn't align with current usage of those terms in the real world)






    share|improve this answer

























      up vote
      -1
      down vote













      I was the "other person" confused by the original title, so hopefully an explanation of my thoughts helps out.



      I'll start with the word "sunken". On dictionary.com (which I mainly use because it has an easy-to-remember name and is free) it's exclusively an adjective in modern use and definition 3 is the one I think is most relevant:




      situated or lying on a lower level




      Using this definition, a "sunken building" being one in which the bottom floor is below ground is entirely valid, regardless of how the building got there.



      Using "sunk" as an adjective in the same way is grammatical, but according to the same dictionary the adjective definitions of "sunk" are much more narrow and technical. On the other hand, in my experience native speakers of English would use "sunk" as an adjective interchangeably with "sunken" so either version would be comprehensible.



      In contrast, the terms "sink", "sinking", and "sank" only have relevant definitions as verbs. Those definitions exclusively have connotations of something which starts high, and then goes down, which is why I don't think they are appropriate for a structure being built underground from the start.



      TL;DR Both adjective forms "sunk" and "sunken" are appropriate to describe a building which is substantially underground. The verb forms "sink", "sinking", and "sank" are not appropriate in standard English for describing a building process where a structure is constructed inside a hole.



      (As an aside, in the world you're constructing using the forms of "sink" as slang or jargon for the "build something mostly underground" process you end up with sounds like a fun idea, it just doesn't align with current usage of those terms in the real world)






      share|improve this answer























        up vote
        -1
        down vote










        up vote
        -1
        down vote









        I was the "other person" confused by the original title, so hopefully an explanation of my thoughts helps out.



        I'll start with the word "sunken". On dictionary.com (which I mainly use because it has an easy-to-remember name and is free) it's exclusively an adjective in modern use and definition 3 is the one I think is most relevant:




        situated or lying on a lower level




        Using this definition, a "sunken building" being one in which the bottom floor is below ground is entirely valid, regardless of how the building got there.



        Using "sunk" as an adjective in the same way is grammatical, but according to the same dictionary the adjective definitions of "sunk" are much more narrow and technical. On the other hand, in my experience native speakers of English would use "sunk" as an adjective interchangeably with "sunken" so either version would be comprehensible.



        In contrast, the terms "sink", "sinking", and "sank" only have relevant definitions as verbs. Those definitions exclusively have connotations of something which starts high, and then goes down, which is why I don't think they are appropriate for a structure being built underground from the start.



        TL;DR Both adjective forms "sunk" and "sunken" are appropriate to describe a building which is substantially underground. The verb forms "sink", "sinking", and "sank" are not appropriate in standard English for describing a building process where a structure is constructed inside a hole.



        (As an aside, in the world you're constructing using the forms of "sink" as slang or jargon for the "build something mostly underground" process you end up with sounds like a fun idea, it just doesn't align with current usage of those terms in the real world)






        share|improve this answer












        I was the "other person" confused by the original title, so hopefully an explanation of my thoughts helps out.



        I'll start with the word "sunken". On dictionary.com (which I mainly use because it has an easy-to-remember name and is free) it's exclusively an adjective in modern use and definition 3 is the one I think is most relevant:




        situated or lying on a lower level




        Using this definition, a "sunken building" being one in which the bottom floor is below ground is entirely valid, regardless of how the building got there.



        Using "sunk" as an adjective in the same way is grammatical, but according to the same dictionary the adjective definitions of "sunk" are much more narrow and technical. On the other hand, in my experience native speakers of English would use "sunk" as an adjective interchangeably with "sunken" so either version would be comprehensible.



        In contrast, the terms "sink", "sinking", and "sank" only have relevant definitions as verbs. Those definitions exclusively have connotations of something which starts high, and then goes down, which is why I don't think they are appropriate for a structure being built underground from the start.



        TL;DR Both adjective forms "sunk" and "sunken" are appropriate to describe a building which is substantially underground. The verb forms "sink", "sinking", and "sank" are not appropriate in standard English for describing a building process where a structure is constructed inside a hole.



        (As an aside, in the world you're constructing using the forms of "sink" as slang or jargon for the "build something mostly underground" process you end up with sounds like a fun idea, it just doesn't align with current usage of those terms in the real world)







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered yesterday









        Kamil Drakari

        767110




        767110






























             

            draft saved


            draft discarded



















































             


            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f473977%2finterchangeability-of-sunk-into-the-ground-and-sunken-into-the-ground%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            How did Captain America manage to do this?

            迪纳利

            南乌拉尔铁路局