“which of the two things you should do”





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}






up vote
0
down vote

favorite












The phrase in question is:



... deciding which of the two things you should do, ...
(This is an excerpt from a passage but I can't find the original text right now. I'll add it later if necessary.)



========



+)
If you cannot decide which of the two things you should do, you are likely to get yourself into trouble by doing neither.



This one is the original sentence. (Sorry my memory is not so good...)



========



I think "which of the two things you should do" here should be an indirect question, a noun clause led by "which".



---> [[which of the two things] you should do] = a noun clause



And I think this is the one and only possible structure.



On the other hand, my teacher says "you should do" here can be a relative clause.



So in this case there is an omitted relative pronoun acting as the object of the clause, and its antecedent is "the two things."



---> [which [of the two things [(that) you should do]]] = NP



In her opinion both structures are possible, therefore it depends on the context.
However, I feel the second one awkward regardless of the context.



Whose opinion is correct?



(P.S. None of us is a native English speaker.)










share|improve this question









New contributor




thisisawug is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




















  • Your teacher is right about one thing: it's impossible to conclude anything without a complete sentence. (After deciding which of the two things you should do, you should do it.)
    – Jason Bassford
    yesterday












  • Unless you change the comma[s], there is no way to parse the fragment (as part of a sentence) other than with the reduced relative pronoun.
    – AmI
    yesterday










  • How about the original full sentence, which I updated? If only one of the two structures is possible, I wonder whether it's a syntactical matter or a pragmatic matter.
    – thisisawug
    yesterday










  • I wonder if this would be more suitable for English Language Learners (and would benefit more users there)?
    – Chappo
    yesterday



















up vote
0
down vote

favorite












The phrase in question is:



... deciding which of the two things you should do, ...
(This is an excerpt from a passage but I can't find the original text right now. I'll add it later if necessary.)



========



+)
If you cannot decide which of the two things you should do, you are likely to get yourself into trouble by doing neither.



This one is the original sentence. (Sorry my memory is not so good...)



========



I think "which of the two things you should do" here should be an indirect question, a noun clause led by "which".



---> [[which of the two things] you should do] = a noun clause



And I think this is the one and only possible structure.



On the other hand, my teacher says "you should do" here can be a relative clause.



So in this case there is an omitted relative pronoun acting as the object of the clause, and its antecedent is "the two things."



---> [which [of the two things [(that) you should do]]] = NP



In her opinion both structures are possible, therefore it depends on the context.
However, I feel the second one awkward regardless of the context.



Whose opinion is correct?



(P.S. None of us is a native English speaker.)










share|improve this question









New contributor




thisisawug is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




















  • Your teacher is right about one thing: it's impossible to conclude anything without a complete sentence. (After deciding which of the two things you should do, you should do it.)
    – Jason Bassford
    yesterday












  • Unless you change the comma[s], there is no way to parse the fragment (as part of a sentence) other than with the reduced relative pronoun.
    – AmI
    yesterday










  • How about the original full sentence, which I updated? If only one of the two structures is possible, I wonder whether it's a syntactical matter or a pragmatic matter.
    – thisisawug
    yesterday










  • I wonder if this would be more suitable for English Language Learners (and would benefit more users there)?
    – Chappo
    yesterday















up vote
0
down vote

favorite









up vote
0
down vote

favorite











The phrase in question is:



... deciding which of the two things you should do, ...
(This is an excerpt from a passage but I can't find the original text right now. I'll add it later if necessary.)



========



+)
If you cannot decide which of the two things you should do, you are likely to get yourself into trouble by doing neither.



This one is the original sentence. (Sorry my memory is not so good...)



========



I think "which of the two things you should do" here should be an indirect question, a noun clause led by "which".



---> [[which of the two things] you should do] = a noun clause



And I think this is the one and only possible structure.



On the other hand, my teacher says "you should do" here can be a relative clause.



So in this case there is an omitted relative pronoun acting as the object of the clause, and its antecedent is "the two things."



---> [which [of the two things [(that) you should do]]] = NP



In her opinion both structures are possible, therefore it depends on the context.
However, I feel the second one awkward regardless of the context.



Whose opinion is correct?



(P.S. None of us is a native English speaker.)










share|improve this question









New contributor




thisisawug is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











The phrase in question is:



... deciding which of the two things you should do, ...
(This is an excerpt from a passage but I can't find the original text right now. I'll add it later if necessary.)



========



+)
If you cannot decide which of the two things you should do, you are likely to get yourself into trouble by doing neither.



This one is the original sentence. (Sorry my memory is not so good...)



========



I think "which of the two things you should do" here should be an indirect question, a noun clause led by "which".



---> [[which of the two things] you should do] = a noun clause



And I think this is the one and only possible structure.



On the other hand, my teacher says "you should do" here can be a relative clause.



So in this case there is an omitted relative pronoun acting as the object of the clause, and its antecedent is "the two things."



---> [which [of the two things [(that) you should do]]] = NP



In her opinion both structures are possible, therefore it depends on the context.
However, I feel the second one awkward regardless of the context.



Whose opinion is correct?



(P.S. None of us is a native English speaker.)







questions relative-clauses indirect-question






share|improve this question









New contributor




thisisawug is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question









New contributor




thisisawug is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited yesterday





















New contributor




thisisawug is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked yesterday









thisisawug

12




12




New contributor




thisisawug is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





thisisawug is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






thisisawug is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












  • Your teacher is right about one thing: it's impossible to conclude anything without a complete sentence. (After deciding which of the two things you should do, you should do it.)
    – Jason Bassford
    yesterday












  • Unless you change the comma[s], there is no way to parse the fragment (as part of a sentence) other than with the reduced relative pronoun.
    – AmI
    yesterday










  • How about the original full sentence, which I updated? If only one of the two structures is possible, I wonder whether it's a syntactical matter or a pragmatic matter.
    – thisisawug
    yesterday










  • I wonder if this would be more suitable for English Language Learners (and would benefit more users there)?
    – Chappo
    yesterday




















  • Your teacher is right about one thing: it's impossible to conclude anything without a complete sentence. (After deciding which of the two things you should do, you should do it.)
    – Jason Bassford
    yesterday












  • Unless you change the comma[s], there is no way to parse the fragment (as part of a sentence) other than with the reduced relative pronoun.
    – AmI
    yesterday










  • How about the original full sentence, which I updated? If only one of the two structures is possible, I wonder whether it's a syntactical matter or a pragmatic matter.
    – thisisawug
    yesterday










  • I wonder if this would be more suitable for English Language Learners (and would benefit more users there)?
    – Chappo
    yesterday


















Your teacher is right about one thing: it's impossible to conclude anything without a complete sentence. (After deciding which of the two things you should do, you should do it.)
– Jason Bassford
yesterday






Your teacher is right about one thing: it's impossible to conclude anything without a complete sentence. (After deciding which of the two things you should do, you should do it.)
– Jason Bassford
yesterday














Unless you change the comma[s], there is no way to parse the fragment (as part of a sentence) other than with the reduced relative pronoun.
– AmI
yesterday




Unless you change the comma[s], there is no way to parse the fragment (as part of a sentence) other than with the reduced relative pronoun.
– AmI
yesterday












How about the original full sentence, which I updated? If only one of the two structures is possible, I wonder whether it's a syntactical matter or a pragmatic matter.
– thisisawug
yesterday




How about the original full sentence, which I updated? If only one of the two structures is possible, I wonder whether it's a syntactical matter or a pragmatic matter.
– thisisawug
yesterday












I wonder if this would be more suitable for English Language Learners (and would benefit more users there)?
– Chappo
yesterday






I wonder if this would be more suitable for English Language Learners (and would benefit more users there)?
– Chappo
yesterday

















active

oldest

votes











Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "97"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});






thisisawug is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










 

draft saved


draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f473972%2fwhich-of-the-two-things-you-should-do%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown






























active

oldest

votes













active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








thisisawug is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










 

draft saved


draft discarded


















thisisawug is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













thisisawug is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












thisisawug is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.















 


draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f473972%2fwhich-of-the-two-things-you-should-do%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

數位音樂下載

When can things happen in Etherscan, such as the picture below?

格利澤436b