libssl-dev version dependency conflict with installed libssl1.0.0
up vote
7
down vote
favorite
3
Ubuntu 14.04
Repositories: universe, main
Ran apt-get update
Ran apt-cache policy libssl1.0.0
ddew@ddew-wsl:~$ apt-cache policy libssl1.0.0
libssl1.0.0:
Installed: 1.0.1f-1ubuntu2.11
Candidate: 1.0.1f-1ubuntu2.11
Version table:
*** 1.0.1f-1ubuntu2.11 0
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
1.0.1f-1ubuntu2 0
500 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ trusty/main amd64 Packages
Was surprised to see that the version advertised as the candidate is not the same as what is available from main and that the version available from main is older than the version that is already installed.
Attempted to install libssl-dev
ddew@ddew-wsl:~$ sudo apt-get install libssl-dev
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
or been moved out of Incoming.
The following information may help to resolve the situation:
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
libssl-dev : Depends: libssl1.0.0 (= 1.0.1f-1ubuntu2) but 1.0.1f-1ubuntu2.11 is to be installed
Recommends: libssl-doc but it is not going to be installed
E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages.
Out of curiosity, ran apt-cache policy libssl-dev
ddew@ddew-wsl:~$ apt-cache policy libssl-dev
libssl-dev:
Installed: (none)
Candidate: 1.0.1f-1ubuntu2
Version table:
1.0.1f-1ubuntu2 0
500 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ trusty/main amd64 Packages
apt
edited Feb 18 at 9:08
fkraiem
8,67331728
asked May 31 '15 at 1:15
Doug Dew
36114
add a comment |
up vote
7
down vote
favorite
3
Ubuntu 14.04
Repositories: universe, main
Ran apt-get update
Ran apt-cache policy libssl1.0.0
ddew@ddew-wsl:~$ apt-cache policy libssl1.0.0
libssl1.0.0:
Installed: 1.0.1f-1ubuntu2.11
Candidate: 1.0.1f-1ubuntu2.11
Version table:
*** 1.0.1f-1ubuntu2.11 0
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
1.0.1f-1ubuntu2 0
500 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ trusty/main amd64 Packages
Was surprised to see that the version advertised as the candidate is not the same as what is available from main and that the version available from main is older than the version that is already installed.
Attempted to install libssl-dev
ddew@ddew-wsl:~$ sudo apt-get install libssl-dev
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
or been moved out of Incoming.
The following information may help to resolve the situation:
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
libssl-dev : Depends: libssl1.0.0 (= 1.0.1f-1ubuntu2) but 1.0.1f-1ubuntu2.11 is to be installed
Recommends: libssl-doc but it is not going to be installed
E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages.
Out of curiosity, ran apt-cache policy libssl-dev
ddew@ddew-wsl:~$ apt-cache policy libssl-dev
libssl-dev:
Installed: (none)
Candidate: 1.0.1f-1ubuntu2
Version table:
1.0.1f-1ubuntu2 0
500 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ trusty/main amd64 Packages
apt
edited Feb 18 at 9:08
fkraiem
8,67331728
asked May 31 '15 at 1:15
Doug Dew
36114
I have two PPAs configured. One is for Chromium. The other is for VirtualBox. I wonder if either of those might have caused the installation of libssl1.0.0 version 1.0.1f-1ubuntu2.11
– Doug Dew
May 31 '15 at 1:29
Nope. I just checked some installation dates. It seems that libssl1.0.0 was installed before anything from either of those two PPAs was installed.
– Doug Dew
May 31 '15 at 1:39
According to the published package list, both libssl-dev and libssl1.0.0 should be at version 1.0.1f-1ubuntu2.11:
– Doug Dew
May 31 '15 at 1:41
packages.ubuntu.com/…
– Doug Dew
May 31 '15 at 1:41
So, it seems that my local package database for main is not up to date. But, I've run apt-get update. So, I'm not sure what to do next.
– Doug Dew
May 31 '15 at 1:43
add a comment |
up vote
7
down vote
favorite
3
up vote
7
down vote
favorite
3
3
Ubuntu 14.04
Repositories: universe, main
Ran apt-get update
Ran apt-cache policy libssl1.0.0
ddew@ddew-wsl:~$ apt-cache policy libssl1.0.0
libssl1.0.0:
Installed: 1.0.1f-1ubuntu2.11
Candidate: 1.0.1f-1ubuntu2.11
Version table:
*** 1.0.1f-1ubuntu2.11 0
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
1.0.1f-1ubuntu2 0
500 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ trusty/main amd64 Packages
Was surprised to see that the version advertised as the candidate is not the same as what is available from main and that the version available from main is older than the version that is already installed.
Attempted to install libssl-dev
ddew@ddew-wsl:~$ sudo apt-get install libssl-dev
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
or been moved out of Incoming.
The following information may help to resolve the situation:
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
libssl-dev : Depends: libssl1.0.0 (= 1.0.1f-1ubuntu2) but 1.0.1f-1ubuntu2.11 is to be installed
Recommends: libssl-doc but it is not going to be installed
E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages.
Out of curiosity, ran apt-cache policy libssl-dev
ddew@ddew-wsl:~$ apt-cache policy libssl-dev
libssl-dev:
Installed: (none)
Candidate: 1.0.1f-1ubuntu2
Version table:
1.0.1f-1ubuntu2 0
500 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ trusty/main amd64 Packages
apt
edited Feb 18 at 9:08
fkraiem
8,67331728
asked May 31 '15 at 1:15
Doug Dew
36114
Ubuntu 14.04
Repositories: universe, main
Ran apt-get update
Ran apt-cache policy libssl1.0.0
ddew@ddew-wsl:~$ apt-cache policy libssl1.0.0
libssl1.0.0:
Installed: 1.0.1f-1ubuntu2.11
Candidate: 1.0.1f-1ubuntu2.11
Version table:
*** 1.0.1f-1ubuntu2.11 0
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
1.0.1f-1ubuntu2 0
500 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ trusty/main amd64 Packages
Was surprised to see that the version advertised as the candidate is not the same as what is available from main and that the version available from main is older than the version that is already installed.
Attempted to install libssl-dev
ddew@ddew-wsl:~$ sudo apt-get install libssl-dev
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
or been moved out of Incoming.
The following information may help to resolve the situation:
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
libssl-dev : Depends: libssl1.0.0 (= 1.0.1f-1ubuntu2) but 1.0.1f-1ubuntu2.11 is to be installed
Recommends: libssl-doc but it is not going to be installed
E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages.
Out of curiosity, ran apt-cache policy libssl-dev
ddew@ddew-wsl:~$ apt-cache policy libssl-dev
libssl-dev:
Installed: (none)
Candidate: 1.0.1f-1ubuntu2
Version table:
1.0.1f-1ubuntu2 0
500 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ trusty/main amd64 Packages
apt
apt
edited Feb 18 at 9:08
fkraiem
8,67331728
asked May 31 '15 at 1:15
Doug Dew
36114
edited Feb 18 at 9:08
fkraiem
8,67331728
asked May 31 '15 at 1:15
Doug Dew
36114
edited Feb 18 at 9:08
fkraiem
8,67331728
edited Feb 18 at 9:08
fkraiem
8,67331728
edited Feb 18 at 9:08
fkraiem
8,67331728
8,67331728
asked May 31 '15 at 1:15
Doug Dew
36114
asked May 31 '15 at 1:15
Doug Dew
36114
asked May 31 '15 at 1:15
Doug Dew
36114
36114
I have two PPAs configured. One is for Chromium. The other is for VirtualBox. I wonder if either of those might have caused the installation of libssl1.0.0 version 1.0.1f-1ubuntu2.11
– Doug Dew
May 31 '15 at 1:29
Nope. I just checked some installation dates. It seems that libssl1.0.0 was installed before anything from either of those two PPAs was installed.
– Doug Dew
May 31 '15 at 1:39
According to the published package list, both libssl-dev and libssl1.0.0 should be at version 1.0.1f-1ubuntu2.11:
– Doug Dew
May 31 '15 at 1:41
packages.ubuntu.com/…
– Doug Dew
May 31 '15 at 1:41
So, it seems that my local package database for main is not up to date. But, I've run apt-get update. So, I'm not sure what to do next.
– Doug Dew
May 31 '15 at 1:43
add a comment |
I have two PPAs configured. One is for Chromium. The other is for VirtualBox. I wonder if either of those might have caused the installation of libssl1.0.0 version 1.0.1f-1ubuntu2.11
– Doug Dew
May 31 '15 at 1:29
Nope. I just checked some installation dates. It seems that libssl1.0.0 was installed before anything from either of those two PPAs was installed.
– Doug Dew
May 31 '15 at 1:39
According to the published package list, both libssl-dev and libssl1.0.0 should be at version 1.0.1f-1ubuntu2.11:
– Doug Dew
May 31 '15 at 1:41
packages.ubuntu.com/…
– Doug Dew
May 31 '15 at 1:41
So, it seems that my local package database for main is not up to date. But, I've run apt-get update. So, I'm not sure what to do next.
– Doug Dew
May 31 '15 at 1:43
I have two PPAs configured. One is for Chromium. The other is for VirtualBox. I wonder if either of those might have caused the installation of libssl1.0.0 version 1.0.1f-1ubuntu2.11
– Doug Dew
May 31 '15 at 1:29
I have two PPAs configured. One is for Chromium. The other is for VirtualBox. I wonder if either of those might have caused the installation of libssl1.0.0 version 1.0.1f-1ubuntu2.11
– Doug Dew
May 31 '15 at 1:29
Nope. I just checked some installation dates. It seems that libssl1.0.0 was installed before anything from either of those two PPAs was installed.
– Doug Dew
May 31 '15 at 1:39
Nope. I just checked some installation dates. It seems that libssl1.0.0 was installed before anything from either of those two PPAs was installed.
– Doug Dew
May 31 '15 at 1:39
According to the published package list, both libssl-dev and libssl1.0.0 should be at version 1.0.1f-1ubuntu2.11:
– Doug Dew
May 31 '15 at 1:41
According to the published package list, both libssl-dev and libssl1.0.0 should be at version 1.0.1f-1ubuntu2.11:
– Doug Dew
May 31 '15 at 1:41
packages.ubuntu.com/…
– Doug Dew
May 31 '15 at 1:41
packages.ubuntu.com/…
– Doug Dew
May 31 '15 at 1:41
So, it seems that my local package database for main is not up to date. But, I've run apt-get update. So, I'm not sure what to do next.
– Doug Dew
May 31 '15 at 1:43
So, it seems that my local package database for main is not up to date. But, I've run apt-get update. So, I'm not sure what to do next.
– Doug Dew
May 31 '15 at 1:43
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
up vote
8
down vote
Same problem on Ubuntu 16.04
$ apt-cache policy libssl1.0.0
libssl1.0.0:
Installed: 1.0.2g-1ubuntu4.5
Candidate: 1.0.2g-1ubuntu4.5
Version table:
*** 1.0.2g-1ubuntu4.5 100
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
1.0.2g-1ubuntu4.1 500
500 http://mirror.uoregon.edu/ubuntu xenial-updates/main amd64 Packages
500 http://mirror.uoregon.edu/ubuntu xenial-security/main amd64 Packages
1.0.2g-1ubuntu4 500
500 http://mirror.uoregon.edu/ubuntu xenial/main amd64 Packages
$ apt-cache policy libssl-dev
libssl-dev:
Installed: (none)
Candidate: 1.0.2g-1ubuntu4.1
Version table:
1.0.2g-1ubuntu4.1 500
500 http://mirror.uoregon.edu/ubuntu xenial-updates/main amd64 Packages
500 http://mirror.uoregon.edu/ubuntu xenial-security/main amd64 Packages
1.0.2g-1ubuntu4 500
500 http://mirror.uoregon.edu/ubuntu xenial/main amd64 Packages
So I fixed it with
sudo apt-get install libssl1.0.0=1.0.2g-1ubuntu4.1
answered Mar 11 '17 at 17:11
BHS
18112
+ This solution is nice. This will resolve almost conflict problems about unmet dependencies.
– christian Nguyen
Oct 19 '17 at 7:37
1
I had to go forapt-get install libssl1.0.0=1.0.2g-1ubuntu4. Good tip
– Tapajit Dey
Oct 24 '17 at 19:52
add a comment |
up vote
4
down vote
This worked for me:
Unable to install libssl1.0.0:i386 due to "unmet dependencies"?
sudo apt-get install libssl1.0.0/trusty libssl-dev/trusty openssl/trusty
edited Feb 18 at 10:48
David Foerster
27.6k1363108
answered Aug 20 '15 at 7:18
vitiral
1415
1
For people on Ubuntu 16.04, you'll have to run this :sudo apt-get install libssl/xenial libssl-dev/xenial openssl/xenial
– Curos
Dec 18 '16 at 16:22
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
Update the answer from @BHS for Ubuntu 18.04 in Dec 2018
I got the error
libcurl4-openssl-dev : Conflicts: libssl1.0-dev but 1.0.2n-1ubuntu5.1 is to be installed
Then it fixed with
sudo apt-get install libssl1.0.0=1.0.2n-1ubuntu5.1
answered Dec 5 at 19:30
thuanle
1
New contributor
thuanle is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
8
down vote
Same problem on Ubuntu 16.04
$ apt-cache policy libssl1.0.0
libssl1.0.0:
Installed: 1.0.2g-1ubuntu4.5
Candidate: 1.0.2g-1ubuntu4.5
Version table:
*** 1.0.2g-1ubuntu4.5 100
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
1.0.2g-1ubuntu4.1 500
500 http://mirror.uoregon.edu/ubuntu xenial-updates/main amd64 Packages
500 http://mirror.uoregon.edu/ubuntu xenial-security/main amd64 Packages
1.0.2g-1ubuntu4 500
500 http://mirror.uoregon.edu/ubuntu xenial/main amd64 Packages
$ apt-cache policy libssl-dev
libssl-dev:
Installed: (none)
Candidate: 1.0.2g-1ubuntu4.1
Version table:
1.0.2g-1ubuntu4.1 500
500 http://mirror.uoregon.edu/ubuntu xenial-updates/main amd64 Packages
500 http://mirror.uoregon.edu/ubuntu xenial-security/main amd64 Packages
1.0.2g-1ubuntu4 500
500 http://mirror.uoregon.edu/ubuntu xenial/main amd64 Packages
So I fixed it with
sudo apt-get install libssl1.0.0=1.0.2g-1ubuntu4.1
answered Mar 11 '17 at 17:11
BHS
18112
+ This solution is nice. This will resolve almost conflict problems about unmet dependencies.
– christian Nguyen
Oct 19 '17 at 7:37
1
I had to go forapt-get install libssl1.0.0=1.0.2g-1ubuntu4. Good tip
– Tapajit Dey
Oct 24 '17 at 19:52
add a comment |
up vote
8
down vote
Same problem on Ubuntu 16.04
$ apt-cache policy libssl1.0.0
libssl1.0.0:
Installed: 1.0.2g-1ubuntu4.5
Candidate: 1.0.2g-1ubuntu4.5
Version table:
*** 1.0.2g-1ubuntu4.5 100
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
1.0.2g-1ubuntu4.1 500
500 http://mirror.uoregon.edu/ubuntu xenial-updates/main amd64 Packages
500 http://mirror.uoregon.edu/ubuntu xenial-security/main amd64 Packages
1.0.2g-1ubuntu4 500
500 http://mirror.uoregon.edu/ubuntu xenial/main amd64 Packages
$ apt-cache policy libssl-dev
libssl-dev:
Installed: (none)
Candidate: 1.0.2g-1ubuntu4.1
Version table:
1.0.2g-1ubuntu4.1 500
500 http://mirror.uoregon.edu/ubuntu xenial-updates/main amd64 Packages
500 http://mirror.uoregon.edu/ubuntu xenial-security/main amd64 Packages
1.0.2g-1ubuntu4 500
500 http://mirror.uoregon.edu/ubuntu xenial/main amd64 Packages
So I fixed it with
sudo apt-get install libssl1.0.0=1.0.2g-1ubuntu4.1
answered Mar 11 '17 at 17:11
BHS
18112
+ This solution is nice. This will resolve almost conflict problems about unmet dependencies.
– christian Nguyen
Oct 19 '17 at 7:37
1
I had to go forapt-get install libssl1.0.0=1.0.2g-1ubuntu4. Good tip
– Tapajit Dey
Oct 24 '17 at 19:52
add a comment |
up vote
8
down vote
up vote
8
down vote
Same problem on Ubuntu 16.04
$ apt-cache policy libssl1.0.0
libssl1.0.0:
Installed: 1.0.2g-1ubuntu4.5
Candidate: 1.0.2g-1ubuntu4.5
Version table:
*** 1.0.2g-1ubuntu4.5 100
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
1.0.2g-1ubuntu4.1 500
500 http://mirror.uoregon.edu/ubuntu xenial-updates/main amd64 Packages
500 http://mirror.uoregon.edu/ubuntu xenial-security/main amd64 Packages
1.0.2g-1ubuntu4 500
500 http://mirror.uoregon.edu/ubuntu xenial/main amd64 Packages
$ apt-cache policy libssl-dev
libssl-dev:
Installed: (none)
Candidate: 1.0.2g-1ubuntu4.1
Version table:
1.0.2g-1ubuntu4.1 500
500 http://mirror.uoregon.edu/ubuntu xenial-updates/main amd64 Packages
500 http://mirror.uoregon.edu/ubuntu xenial-security/main amd64 Packages
1.0.2g-1ubuntu4 500
500 http://mirror.uoregon.edu/ubuntu xenial/main amd64 Packages
So I fixed it with
sudo apt-get install libssl1.0.0=1.0.2g-1ubuntu4.1
answered Mar 11 '17 at 17:11
BHS
18112
Same problem on Ubuntu 16.04
$ apt-cache policy libssl1.0.0
libssl1.0.0:
Installed: 1.0.2g-1ubuntu4.5
Candidate: 1.0.2g-1ubuntu4.5
Version table:
*** 1.0.2g-1ubuntu4.5 100
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
1.0.2g-1ubuntu4.1 500
500 http://mirror.uoregon.edu/ubuntu xenial-updates/main amd64 Packages
500 http://mirror.uoregon.edu/ubuntu xenial-security/main amd64 Packages
1.0.2g-1ubuntu4 500
500 http://mirror.uoregon.edu/ubuntu xenial/main amd64 Packages
$ apt-cache policy libssl-dev
libssl-dev:
Installed: (none)
Candidate: 1.0.2g-1ubuntu4.1
Version table:
1.0.2g-1ubuntu4.1 500
500 http://mirror.uoregon.edu/ubuntu xenial-updates/main amd64 Packages
500 http://mirror.uoregon.edu/ubuntu xenial-security/main amd64 Packages
1.0.2g-1ubuntu4 500
500 http://mirror.uoregon.edu/ubuntu xenial/main amd64 Packages
So I fixed it with
sudo apt-get install libssl1.0.0=1.0.2g-1ubuntu4.1
answered Mar 11 '17 at 17:11
BHS
18112
answered Mar 11 '17 at 17:11
BHS
18112
answered Mar 11 '17 at 17:11
BHS
18112
answered Mar 11 '17 at 17:11
BHS
18112
18112
+ This solution is nice. This will resolve almost conflict problems about unmet dependencies.
– christian Nguyen
Oct 19 '17 at 7:37
1
I had to go forapt-get install libssl1.0.0=1.0.2g-1ubuntu4. Good tip
– Tapajit Dey
Oct 24 '17 at 19:52
add a comment |
+ This solution is nice. This will resolve almost conflict problems about unmet dependencies.
– christian Nguyen
Oct 19 '17 at 7:37
1
I had to go forapt-get install libssl1.0.0=1.0.2g-1ubuntu4. Good tip
– Tapajit Dey
Oct 24 '17 at 19:52
+ This solution is nice. This will resolve almost conflict problems about unmet dependencies.
– christian Nguyen
Oct 19 '17 at 7:37
+ This solution is nice. This will resolve almost conflict problems about unmet dependencies.
– christian Nguyen
Oct 19 '17 at 7:37
1
1
I had to go for
apt-get install libssl1.0.0=1.0.2g-1ubuntu4. Good tip– Tapajit Dey
Oct 24 '17 at 19:52
I had to go for
apt-get install libssl1.0.0=1.0.2g-1ubuntu4. Good tip– Tapajit Dey
Oct 24 '17 at 19:52
add a comment |
up vote
4
down vote
This worked for me:
Unable to install libssl1.0.0:i386 due to "unmet dependencies"?
sudo apt-get install libssl1.0.0/trusty libssl-dev/trusty openssl/trusty
edited Feb 18 at 10:48
David Foerster
27.6k1363108
answered Aug 20 '15 at 7:18
vitiral
1415
1
For people on Ubuntu 16.04, you'll have to run this :sudo apt-get install libssl/xenial libssl-dev/xenial openssl/xenial
– Curos
Dec 18 '16 at 16:22
add a comment |
up vote
4
down vote
This worked for me:
Unable to install libssl1.0.0:i386 due to "unmet dependencies"?
sudo apt-get install libssl1.0.0/trusty libssl-dev/trusty openssl/trusty
edited Feb 18 at 10:48
David Foerster
27.6k1363108
answered Aug 20 '15 at 7:18
vitiral
1415
1
For people on Ubuntu 16.04, you'll have to run this :sudo apt-get install libssl/xenial libssl-dev/xenial openssl/xenial
– Curos
Dec 18 '16 at 16:22
add a comment |
up vote
4
down vote
up vote
4
down vote
This worked for me:
Unable to install libssl1.0.0:i386 due to "unmet dependencies"?
sudo apt-get install libssl1.0.0/trusty libssl-dev/trusty openssl/trusty
edited Feb 18 at 10:48
David Foerster
27.6k1363108
answered Aug 20 '15 at 7:18
vitiral
1415
This worked for me:
Unable to install libssl1.0.0:i386 due to "unmet dependencies"?
sudo apt-get install libssl1.0.0/trusty libssl-dev/trusty openssl/trusty
edited Feb 18 at 10:48
David Foerster
27.6k1363108
answered Aug 20 '15 at 7:18
vitiral
1415
edited Feb 18 at 10:48
David Foerster
27.6k1363108
edited Feb 18 at 10:48
David Foerster
27.6k1363108
edited Feb 18 at 10:48
David Foerster
27.6k1363108
27.6k1363108
answered Aug 20 '15 at 7:18
vitiral
1415
answered Aug 20 '15 at 7:18
vitiral
1415
answered Aug 20 '15 at 7:18
vitiral
1415
1415
1
For people on Ubuntu 16.04, you'll have to run this :sudo apt-get install libssl/xenial libssl-dev/xenial openssl/xenial
– Curos
Dec 18 '16 at 16:22
add a comment |
1
For people on Ubuntu 16.04, you'll have to run this :sudo apt-get install libssl/xenial libssl-dev/xenial openssl/xenial
– Curos
Dec 18 '16 at 16:22
1
1
For people on Ubuntu 16.04, you'll have to run this :
sudo apt-get install libssl/xenial libssl-dev/xenial openssl/xenial– Curos
Dec 18 '16 at 16:22
For people on Ubuntu 16.04, you'll have to run this :
sudo apt-get install libssl/xenial libssl-dev/xenial openssl/xenial– Curos
Dec 18 '16 at 16:22
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
Update the answer from @BHS for Ubuntu 18.04 in Dec 2018
I got the error
libcurl4-openssl-dev : Conflicts: libssl1.0-dev but 1.0.2n-1ubuntu5.1 is to be installed
Then it fixed with
sudo apt-get install libssl1.0.0=1.0.2n-1ubuntu5.1
answered Dec 5 at 19:30
thuanle
1
New contributor
thuanle is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
Update the answer from @BHS for Ubuntu 18.04 in Dec 2018
I got the error
libcurl4-openssl-dev : Conflicts: libssl1.0-dev but 1.0.2n-1ubuntu5.1 is to be installed
Then it fixed with
sudo apt-get install libssl1.0.0=1.0.2n-1ubuntu5.1
answered Dec 5 at 19:30
thuanle
1
New contributor
thuanle is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
Update the answer from @BHS for Ubuntu 18.04 in Dec 2018
I got the error
libcurl4-openssl-dev : Conflicts: libssl1.0-dev but 1.0.2n-1ubuntu5.1 is to be installed
Then it fixed with
sudo apt-get install libssl1.0.0=1.0.2n-1ubuntu5.1
answered Dec 5 at 19:30
thuanle
1
New contributor
thuanle is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Update the answer from @BHS for Ubuntu 18.04 in Dec 2018
I got the error
libcurl4-openssl-dev : Conflicts: libssl1.0-dev but 1.0.2n-1ubuntu5.1 is to be installed
Then it fixed with
sudo apt-get install libssl1.0.0=1.0.2n-1ubuntu5.1
answered Dec 5 at 19:30
thuanle
1
New contributor
thuanle is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
answered Dec 5 at 19:30
thuanle
1
New contributor
thuanle is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
answered Dec 5 at 19:30
thuanle
1
answered Dec 5 at 19:30
thuanle
1
1
New contributor
thuanle is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
thuanle is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
thuanle is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
add a comment |
draft saved
draft discarded
Thanks for contributing an answer to Ask Ubuntu!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
draft saved
draft discarded
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f630439%2flibssl-dev-version-dependency-conflict-with-installed-libssl1-0-0%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
I have two PPAs configured. One is for Chromium. The other is for VirtualBox. I wonder if either of those might have caused the installation of libssl1.0.0 version 1.0.1f-1ubuntu2.11
– Doug Dew
May 31 '15 at 1:29
Nope. I just checked some installation dates. It seems that libssl1.0.0 was installed before anything from either of those two PPAs was installed.
– Doug Dew
May 31 '15 at 1:39
According to the published package list, both libssl-dev and libssl1.0.0 should be at version 1.0.1f-1ubuntu2.11:
– Doug Dew
May 31 '15 at 1:41
packages.ubuntu.com/…
– Doug Dew
May 31 '15 at 1:41
So, it seems that my local package database for main is not up to date. But, I've run apt-get update. So, I'm not sure what to do next.
– Doug Dew
May 31 '15 at 1:43