Calculating Wattage for Resistor in High Frequency Application?
$begingroup$
I am making a MOSFET driving circuit.
Frequency : 400 kHz [50% duty cycle]
Gate voltage: 12 V
Total gate charge : 210 nC as per datasheet IRFP460
Rise time: 100 ns
[Q=I*t]
Current: 2.1 A
Gate resistor: V/I > 12/2.1 > 5.7 ohm
Peak power: I * I * R > 2.1 * 2.1 * 5.7 > 25.1370 W
1 watt resistor is OK ?
resistors high-frequency
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I am making a MOSFET driving circuit.
Frequency : 400 kHz [50% duty cycle]
Gate voltage: 12 V
Total gate charge : 210 nC as per datasheet IRFP460
Rise time: 100 ns
[Q=I*t]
Current: 2.1 A
Gate resistor: V/I > 12/2.1 > 5.7 ohm
Peak power: I * I * R > 2.1 * 2.1 * 5.7 > 25.1370 W
1 watt resistor is OK ?
resistors high-frequency
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
Dividing peak power by frequency doesn't make sense to me. As you say, the units are watt-seconds, not watts.
$endgroup$
– Elliot Alderson
2 days ago
$begingroup$
I think i should remove Average Power line .
$endgroup$
– Israr Sayed
yesterday
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I am making a MOSFET driving circuit.
Frequency : 400 kHz [50% duty cycle]
Gate voltage: 12 V
Total gate charge : 210 nC as per datasheet IRFP460
Rise time: 100 ns
[Q=I*t]
Current: 2.1 A
Gate resistor: V/I > 12/2.1 > 5.7 ohm
Peak power: I * I * R > 2.1 * 2.1 * 5.7 > 25.1370 W
1 watt resistor is OK ?
resistors high-frequency
$endgroup$
I am making a MOSFET driving circuit.
Frequency : 400 kHz [50% duty cycle]
Gate voltage: 12 V
Total gate charge : 210 nC as per datasheet IRFP460
Rise time: 100 ns
[Q=I*t]
Current: 2.1 A
Gate resistor: V/I > 12/2.1 > 5.7 ohm
Peak power: I * I * R > 2.1 * 2.1 * 5.7 > 25.1370 W
1 watt resistor is OK ?
resistors high-frequency
resistors high-frequency
edited yesterday
Israr Sayed
asked 2 days ago
Israr SayedIsrar Sayed
376
376
2
$begingroup$
Dividing peak power by frequency doesn't make sense to me. As you say, the units are watt-seconds, not watts.
$endgroup$
– Elliot Alderson
2 days ago
$begingroup$
I think i should remove Average Power line .
$endgroup$
– Israr Sayed
yesterday
add a comment |
2
$begingroup$
Dividing peak power by frequency doesn't make sense to me. As you say, the units are watt-seconds, not watts.
$endgroup$
– Elliot Alderson
2 days ago
$begingroup$
I think i should remove Average Power line .
$endgroup$
– Israr Sayed
yesterday
2
2
$begingroup$
Dividing peak power by frequency doesn't make sense to me. As you say, the units are watt-seconds, not watts.
$endgroup$
– Elliot Alderson
2 days ago
$begingroup$
Dividing peak power by frequency doesn't make sense to me. As you say, the units are watt-seconds, not watts.
$endgroup$
– Elliot Alderson
2 days ago
$begingroup$
I think i should remove Average Power line .
$endgroup$
– Israr Sayed
yesterday
$begingroup$
I think i should remove Average Power line .
$endgroup$
– Israr Sayed
yesterday
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The figure below shows the Gate Voltage versus Total Gate Charge for the IRFP460 MOSFET:
With a gate drive voltage $V_{DR} = 12,mathrm{V}$, it's possible to estimate a total gate charge of $155,mathrm{nC}$.
If $i_g $ represents the gate current, $Q$ the charge going into the gate and $tb$ (beginning time) and $te$ (ending time) to represent a time interval, then:
$$ Q = int_{tb}^{te}i_gdt $$
METHOD 1: (a first estimate)
Here the $i_g$ is considered constant ($Ig_{(ON)}$) during the charge ($tp_{(ON)}$) and constant ($Ig_{(OFF)}$) during discharge time ($tp_{(OFF)}$); roughly shown in the figure below:
So, the integral above reduces simply to (considering $tp_{(ON)}=100,mathrm{ns}$ and $Q_g$ as the total gate charge):
$$ Q_g = Ig_{(ON)} times tp_{(ON)} $$
or
$$ Ig_{(ON)} = frac{Q_g}{tp_{(ON)}} = frac{155,mathrm{nC}}{100,mathrm{ns}}= 1.55,mathrm{A}$$
The gate resistor $R_G$ must be calculated taking in account that, in “flat” part of the switching period (plot above), the gate voltage is constant at about $5.2$ V:
$$ R_G = frac{12,mathrm{V} - 5.2,mathrm{V}}{1.55,mathrm{A}} = 4.39 space Omega approx 4.7 space Omega$$
In order to simplify I consider here $Ig_{(OFF)}=-Ig_{(ON)}$. So, the root mean square value for $i_g$ is:
$$ I_{RMS}= Ig_{(ON)}sqrt{2 times frac{tp_{(ON)}}{T} } approx 0.438,mathrm{A}$$
Finally, the average power for $R_G$ is:
$$ P = I_{RMS}^2R_G approx 0.9,mathrm{W} $$
METHOD 2:
Here the $i_g$ is considered as a straight line with maximum value $Ig_{pk_{(ON)}}$ and decreasing to zero at the end of time $tp_{(ON)}$ - as an approximation to the actual exponential decay (more realistic). Similar consideration is made for the gate discharge time:
An example of real measurement:
Retaining a $R_G = 4.7 space Omega$, the peak gate current can be calculated as:
$$ Ig_{pk_{(ON)}} = frac{12,mathrm{V}}{4.7 space Omega} approx 2.553,mathrm{A} $$
In order to simplify I consider here $Ig_{pk_{(OFF)}}=-Ig_{pk_{(ON)}}$. So, the root mean square value for $i_g$ is:
$$ I_{RMS}= Ig_{pk_{(ON)}}sqrt{frac{2}{3} times frac{tp_{(ON)}}{T} } approx 0.417,mathrm{A}$$
Finally, the average power for $R_G$ is:
$$ P = I_{RMS}^2R_G approx 0.817,mathrm{W} $$
No major differences from the value previously calculated.
THIRD METHOD
Just to mention a more precise (and more laborious) method. Here, $i_g$ is considered a true exponential decaying function (see figure above):
$$ i_g = Ig_{pk_{(ON)}}e^{-frac{t}{R_GC_{eff}}} $$
where $C_{eff}$ is the effective gate input capacitance of MOSFET. So:
$$ i_g = frac{V_{DR}}{R_G}e^{-frac{t}{R_GC_{eff}}} $$
In the time interval $0$ to $t_s$, the total gate charge ("consumed") is given by:
$$ Q_g = int_{0}^{t_s} frac{V_{DR}}{R_G}e^{-frac{t}{R_GC_{eff}}}dt $$
This integral can be solved for a parameter ($R_G$ or $t_s$), when others are known.
CONCLUSION: The average power values were below $1,mathrm{W}$, but a margin of safety can be applied for guarantee.
$endgroup$
3
$begingroup$
I created an account to let you know that this answer is one of the best answers I've seen, on any site, in a long time. Just brilliant.
$endgroup$
– LogicalBranch
yesterday
2
$begingroup$
This could become the canonical answer to questions of this kind. Thorough and well written. However, could you please add links or citations to the sources of the graphics?
$endgroup$
– Elliot Alderson
yesterday
1
$begingroup$
So much effort for approximate solutions, have a look to the simple and exact Dave Tweed's one below.
$endgroup$
– carloc
yesterday
1
$begingroup$
Estimating Total Gate Charge from Graph nice.
$endgroup$
– Israr Sayed
yesterday
1
$begingroup$
@carloc: Just AFTER doing the paper/pencil work it's possible to conclude that the solutions are similar. My contributions is aligned with the standard procedures recommended by manufacturers. Also deals with the gate resistor estimation.
$endgroup$
– Dirceu Rodrigues Jr
yesterday
|
show 7 more comments
$begingroup$
Dividing the peak power by the frequency is not useful.
Instead, you would multiply it by the duty cycle. If you're dumping 25 W of power into the resistor for 2 × 100 ns out of every 2.5 µs. This would be an average power of
$$25 W cdotfrac{2 cdot 100 ns}{2.5 mu s} = 2 W$$
Clearly, your 1W resistor is not going to cut it!
However, the peak instantaneous power is not really a good estimate of the average power during the switching transient. A better estimate can be arrived at by considering the energy flow into and out of the gate capacitance.
For an R-C circuit, the energy dissipated in the resistor is basically equal to the energy that ends up on the capacitor. If your gate charge is 210 nC and your gate voltage is 12V, this represents
$$Energy = frac{1}{2}cdot Charge cdot Voltage$$
$$0.5 cdot 210 nC cdot 12 V = 1.26 mu J$$
This is the energy you're dumping into the gate capacitance, and then dumping out again on every switching cycle. All of this energy gets dissipated in the gate resistor.
To get the average power, multiply the energy per cycle by the number of cycles per second, giving
$$1.26 mu J cdot 2 cdot 400 kHz = 1.088 W$$
Your 1W resistor would be running at its limit, with no margin. I would use a 2W resistor here.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("schematics", function () {
StackExchange.schematics.init();
});
}, "cicuitlab");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "135"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2felectronics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f428730%2fcalculating-wattage-for-resistor-in-high-frequency-application%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The figure below shows the Gate Voltage versus Total Gate Charge for the IRFP460 MOSFET:
With a gate drive voltage $V_{DR} = 12,mathrm{V}$, it's possible to estimate a total gate charge of $155,mathrm{nC}$.
If $i_g $ represents the gate current, $Q$ the charge going into the gate and $tb$ (beginning time) and $te$ (ending time) to represent a time interval, then:
$$ Q = int_{tb}^{te}i_gdt $$
METHOD 1: (a first estimate)
Here the $i_g$ is considered constant ($Ig_{(ON)}$) during the charge ($tp_{(ON)}$) and constant ($Ig_{(OFF)}$) during discharge time ($tp_{(OFF)}$); roughly shown in the figure below:
So, the integral above reduces simply to (considering $tp_{(ON)}=100,mathrm{ns}$ and $Q_g$ as the total gate charge):
$$ Q_g = Ig_{(ON)} times tp_{(ON)} $$
or
$$ Ig_{(ON)} = frac{Q_g}{tp_{(ON)}} = frac{155,mathrm{nC}}{100,mathrm{ns}}= 1.55,mathrm{A}$$
The gate resistor $R_G$ must be calculated taking in account that, in “flat” part of the switching period (plot above), the gate voltage is constant at about $5.2$ V:
$$ R_G = frac{12,mathrm{V} - 5.2,mathrm{V}}{1.55,mathrm{A}} = 4.39 space Omega approx 4.7 space Omega$$
In order to simplify I consider here $Ig_{(OFF)}=-Ig_{(ON)}$. So, the root mean square value for $i_g$ is:
$$ I_{RMS}= Ig_{(ON)}sqrt{2 times frac{tp_{(ON)}}{T} } approx 0.438,mathrm{A}$$
Finally, the average power for $R_G$ is:
$$ P = I_{RMS}^2R_G approx 0.9,mathrm{W} $$
METHOD 2:
Here the $i_g$ is considered as a straight line with maximum value $Ig_{pk_{(ON)}}$ and decreasing to zero at the end of time $tp_{(ON)}$ - as an approximation to the actual exponential decay (more realistic). Similar consideration is made for the gate discharge time:
An example of real measurement:
Retaining a $R_G = 4.7 space Omega$, the peak gate current can be calculated as:
$$ Ig_{pk_{(ON)}} = frac{12,mathrm{V}}{4.7 space Omega} approx 2.553,mathrm{A} $$
In order to simplify I consider here $Ig_{pk_{(OFF)}}=-Ig_{pk_{(ON)}}$. So, the root mean square value for $i_g$ is:
$$ I_{RMS}= Ig_{pk_{(ON)}}sqrt{frac{2}{3} times frac{tp_{(ON)}}{T} } approx 0.417,mathrm{A}$$
Finally, the average power for $R_G$ is:
$$ P = I_{RMS}^2R_G approx 0.817,mathrm{W} $$
No major differences from the value previously calculated.
THIRD METHOD
Just to mention a more precise (and more laborious) method. Here, $i_g$ is considered a true exponential decaying function (see figure above):
$$ i_g = Ig_{pk_{(ON)}}e^{-frac{t}{R_GC_{eff}}} $$
where $C_{eff}$ is the effective gate input capacitance of MOSFET. So:
$$ i_g = frac{V_{DR}}{R_G}e^{-frac{t}{R_GC_{eff}}} $$
In the time interval $0$ to $t_s$, the total gate charge ("consumed") is given by:
$$ Q_g = int_{0}^{t_s} frac{V_{DR}}{R_G}e^{-frac{t}{R_GC_{eff}}}dt $$
This integral can be solved for a parameter ($R_G$ or $t_s$), when others are known.
CONCLUSION: The average power values were below $1,mathrm{W}$, but a margin of safety can be applied for guarantee.
$endgroup$
3
$begingroup$
I created an account to let you know that this answer is one of the best answers I've seen, on any site, in a long time. Just brilliant.
$endgroup$
– LogicalBranch
yesterday
2
$begingroup$
This could become the canonical answer to questions of this kind. Thorough and well written. However, could you please add links or citations to the sources of the graphics?
$endgroup$
– Elliot Alderson
yesterday
1
$begingroup$
So much effort for approximate solutions, have a look to the simple and exact Dave Tweed's one below.
$endgroup$
– carloc
yesterday
1
$begingroup$
Estimating Total Gate Charge from Graph nice.
$endgroup$
– Israr Sayed
yesterday
1
$begingroup$
@carloc: Just AFTER doing the paper/pencil work it's possible to conclude that the solutions are similar. My contributions is aligned with the standard procedures recommended by manufacturers. Also deals with the gate resistor estimation.
$endgroup$
– Dirceu Rodrigues Jr
yesterday
|
show 7 more comments
$begingroup$
The figure below shows the Gate Voltage versus Total Gate Charge for the IRFP460 MOSFET:
With a gate drive voltage $V_{DR} = 12,mathrm{V}$, it's possible to estimate a total gate charge of $155,mathrm{nC}$.
If $i_g $ represents the gate current, $Q$ the charge going into the gate and $tb$ (beginning time) and $te$ (ending time) to represent a time interval, then:
$$ Q = int_{tb}^{te}i_gdt $$
METHOD 1: (a first estimate)
Here the $i_g$ is considered constant ($Ig_{(ON)}$) during the charge ($tp_{(ON)}$) and constant ($Ig_{(OFF)}$) during discharge time ($tp_{(OFF)}$); roughly shown in the figure below:
So, the integral above reduces simply to (considering $tp_{(ON)}=100,mathrm{ns}$ and $Q_g$ as the total gate charge):
$$ Q_g = Ig_{(ON)} times tp_{(ON)} $$
or
$$ Ig_{(ON)} = frac{Q_g}{tp_{(ON)}} = frac{155,mathrm{nC}}{100,mathrm{ns}}= 1.55,mathrm{A}$$
The gate resistor $R_G$ must be calculated taking in account that, in “flat” part of the switching period (plot above), the gate voltage is constant at about $5.2$ V:
$$ R_G = frac{12,mathrm{V} - 5.2,mathrm{V}}{1.55,mathrm{A}} = 4.39 space Omega approx 4.7 space Omega$$
In order to simplify I consider here $Ig_{(OFF)}=-Ig_{(ON)}$. So, the root mean square value for $i_g$ is:
$$ I_{RMS}= Ig_{(ON)}sqrt{2 times frac{tp_{(ON)}}{T} } approx 0.438,mathrm{A}$$
Finally, the average power for $R_G$ is:
$$ P = I_{RMS}^2R_G approx 0.9,mathrm{W} $$
METHOD 2:
Here the $i_g$ is considered as a straight line with maximum value $Ig_{pk_{(ON)}}$ and decreasing to zero at the end of time $tp_{(ON)}$ - as an approximation to the actual exponential decay (more realistic). Similar consideration is made for the gate discharge time:
An example of real measurement:
Retaining a $R_G = 4.7 space Omega$, the peak gate current can be calculated as:
$$ Ig_{pk_{(ON)}} = frac{12,mathrm{V}}{4.7 space Omega} approx 2.553,mathrm{A} $$
In order to simplify I consider here $Ig_{pk_{(OFF)}}=-Ig_{pk_{(ON)}}$. So, the root mean square value for $i_g$ is:
$$ I_{RMS}= Ig_{pk_{(ON)}}sqrt{frac{2}{3} times frac{tp_{(ON)}}{T} } approx 0.417,mathrm{A}$$
Finally, the average power for $R_G$ is:
$$ P = I_{RMS}^2R_G approx 0.817,mathrm{W} $$
No major differences from the value previously calculated.
THIRD METHOD
Just to mention a more precise (and more laborious) method. Here, $i_g$ is considered a true exponential decaying function (see figure above):
$$ i_g = Ig_{pk_{(ON)}}e^{-frac{t}{R_GC_{eff}}} $$
where $C_{eff}$ is the effective gate input capacitance of MOSFET. So:
$$ i_g = frac{V_{DR}}{R_G}e^{-frac{t}{R_GC_{eff}}} $$
In the time interval $0$ to $t_s$, the total gate charge ("consumed") is given by:
$$ Q_g = int_{0}^{t_s} frac{V_{DR}}{R_G}e^{-frac{t}{R_GC_{eff}}}dt $$
This integral can be solved for a parameter ($R_G$ or $t_s$), when others are known.
CONCLUSION: The average power values were below $1,mathrm{W}$, but a margin of safety can be applied for guarantee.
$endgroup$
3
$begingroup$
I created an account to let you know that this answer is one of the best answers I've seen, on any site, in a long time. Just brilliant.
$endgroup$
– LogicalBranch
yesterday
2
$begingroup$
This could become the canonical answer to questions of this kind. Thorough and well written. However, could you please add links or citations to the sources of the graphics?
$endgroup$
– Elliot Alderson
yesterday
1
$begingroup$
So much effort for approximate solutions, have a look to the simple and exact Dave Tweed's one below.
$endgroup$
– carloc
yesterday
1
$begingroup$
Estimating Total Gate Charge from Graph nice.
$endgroup$
– Israr Sayed
yesterday
1
$begingroup$
@carloc: Just AFTER doing the paper/pencil work it's possible to conclude that the solutions are similar. My contributions is aligned with the standard procedures recommended by manufacturers. Also deals with the gate resistor estimation.
$endgroup$
– Dirceu Rodrigues Jr
yesterday
|
show 7 more comments
$begingroup$
The figure below shows the Gate Voltage versus Total Gate Charge for the IRFP460 MOSFET:
With a gate drive voltage $V_{DR} = 12,mathrm{V}$, it's possible to estimate a total gate charge of $155,mathrm{nC}$.
If $i_g $ represents the gate current, $Q$ the charge going into the gate and $tb$ (beginning time) and $te$ (ending time) to represent a time interval, then:
$$ Q = int_{tb}^{te}i_gdt $$
METHOD 1: (a first estimate)
Here the $i_g$ is considered constant ($Ig_{(ON)}$) during the charge ($tp_{(ON)}$) and constant ($Ig_{(OFF)}$) during discharge time ($tp_{(OFF)}$); roughly shown in the figure below:
So, the integral above reduces simply to (considering $tp_{(ON)}=100,mathrm{ns}$ and $Q_g$ as the total gate charge):
$$ Q_g = Ig_{(ON)} times tp_{(ON)} $$
or
$$ Ig_{(ON)} = frac{Q_g}{tp_{(ON)}} = frac{155,mathrm{nC}}{100,mathrm{ns}}= 1.55,mathrm{A}$$
The gate resistor $R_G$ must be calculated taking in account that, in “flat” part of the switching period (plot above), the gate voltage is constant at about $5.2$ V:
$$ R_G = frac{12,mathrm{V} - 5.2,mathrm{V}}{1.55,mathrm{A}} = 4.39 space Omega approx 4.7 space Omega$$
In order to simplify I consider here $Ig_{(OFF)}=-Ig_{(ON)}$. So, the root mean square value for $i_g$ is:
$$ I_{RMS}= Ig_{(ON)}sqrt{2 times frac{tp_{(ON)}}{T} } approx 0.438,mathrm{A}$$
Finally, the average power for $R_G$ is:
$$ P = I_{RMS}^2R_G approx 0.9,mathrm{W} $$
METHOD 2:
Here the $i_g$ is considered as a straight line with maximum value $Ig_{pk_{(ON)}}$ and decreasing to zero at the end of time $tp_{(ON)}$ - as an approximation to the actual exponential decay (more realistic). Similar consideration is made for the gate discharge time:
An example of real measurement:
Retaining a $R_G = 4.7 space Omega$, the peak gate current can be calculated as:
$$ Ig_{pk_{(ON)}} = frac{12,mathrm{V}}{4.7 space Omega} approx 2.553,mathrm{A} $$
In order to simplify I consider here $Ig_{pk_{(OFF)}}=-Ig_{pk_{(ON)}}$. So, the root mean square value for $i_g$ is:
$$ I_{RMS}= Ig_{pk_{(ON)}}sqrt{frac{2}{3} times frac{tp_{(ON)}}{T} } approx 0.417,mathrm{A}$$
Finally, the average power for $R_G$ is:
$$ P = I_{RMS}^2R_G approx 0.817,mathrm{W} $$
No major differences from the value previously calculated.
THIRD METHOD
Just to mention a more precise (and more laborious) method. Here, $i_g$ is considered a true exponential decaying function (see figure above):
$$ i_g = Ig_{pk_{(ON)}}e^{-frac{t}{R_GC_{eff}}} $$
where $C_{eff}$ is the effective gate input capacitance of MOSFET. So:
$$ i_g = frac{V_{DR}}{R_G}e^{-frac{t}{R_GC_{eff}}} $$
In the time interval $0$ to $t_s$, the total gate charge ("consumed") is given by:
$$ Q_g = int_{0}^{t_s} frac{V_{DR}}{R_G}e^{-frac{t}{R_GC_{eff}}}dt $$
This integral can be solved for a parameter ($R_G$ or $t_s$), when others are known.
CONCLUSION: The average power values were below $1,mathrm{W}$, but a margin of safety can be applied for guarantee.
$endgroup$
The figure below shows the Gate Voltage versus Total Gate Charge for the IRFP460 MOSFET:
With a gate drive voltage $V_{DR} = 12,mathrm{V}$, it's possible to estimate a total gate charge of $155,mathrm{nC}$.
If $i_g $ represents the gate current, $Q$ the charge going into the gate and $tb$ (beginning time) and $te$ (ending time) to represent a time interval, then:
$$ Q = int_{tb}^{te}i_gdt $$
METHOD 1: (a first estimate)
Here the $i_g$ is considered constant ($Ig_{(ON)}$) during the charge ($tp_{(ON)}$) and constant ($Ig_{(OFF)}$) during discharge time ($tp_{(OFF)}$); roughly shown in the figure below:
So, the integral above reduces simply to (considering $tp_{(ON)}=100,mathrm{ns}$ and $Q_g$ as the total gate charge):
$$ Q_g = Ig_{(ON)} times tp_{(ON)} $$
or
$$ Ig_{(ON)} = frac{Q_g}{tp_{(ON)}} = frac{155,mathrm{nC}}{100,mathrm{ns}}= 1.55,mathrm{A}$$
The gate resistor $R_G$ must be calculated taking in account that, in “flat” part of the switching period (plot above), the gate voltage is constant at about $5.2$ V:
$$ R_G = frac{12,mathrm{V} - 5.2,mathrm{V}}{1.55,mathrm{A}} = 4.39 space Omega approx 4.7 space Omega$$
In order to simplify I consider here $Ig_{(OFF)}=-Ig_{(ON)}$. So, the root mean square value for $i_g$ is:
$$ I_{RMS}= Ig_{(ON)}sqrt{2 times frac{tp_{(ON)}}{T} } approx 0.438,mathrm{A}$$
Finally, the average power for $R_G$ is:
$$ P = I_{RMS}^2R_G approx 0.9,mathrm{W} $$
METHOD 2:
Here the $i_g$ is considered as a straight line with maximum value $Ig_{pk_{(ON)}}$ and decreasing to zero at the end of time $tp_{(ON)}$ - as an approximation to the actual exponential decay (more realistic). Similar consideration is made for the gate discharge time:
An example of real measurement:
Retaining a $R_G = 4.7 space Omega$, the peak gate current can be calculated as:
$$ Ig_{pk_{(ON)}} = frac{12,mathrm{V}}{4.7 space Omega} approx 2.553,mathrm{A} $$
In order to simplify I consider here $Ig_{pk_{(OFF)}}=-Ig_{pk_{(ON)}}$. So, the root mean square value for $i_g$ is:
$$ I_{RMS}= Ig_{pk_{(ON)}}sqrt{frac{2}{3} times frac{tp_{(ON)}}{T} } approx 0.417,mathrm{A}$$
Finally, the average power for $R_G$ is:
$$ P = I_{RMS}^2R_G approx 0.817,mathrm{W} $$
No major differences from the value previously calculated.
THIRD METHOD
Just to mention a more precise (and more laborious) method. Here, $i_g$ is considered a true exponential decaying function (see figure above):
$$ i_g = Ig_{pk_{(ON)}}e^{-frac{t}{R_GC_{eff}}} $$
where $C_{eff}$ is the effective gate input capacitance of MOSFET. So:
$$ i_g = frac{V_{DR}}{R_G}e^{-frac{t}{R_GC_{eff}}} $$
In the time interval $0$ to $t_s$, the total gate charge ("consumed") is given by:
$$ Q_g = int_{0}^{t_s} frac{V_{DR}}{R_G}e^{-frac{t}{R_GC_{eff}}}dt $$
This integral can be solved for a parameter ($R_G$ or $t_s$), when others are known.
CONCLUSION: The average power values were below $1,mathrm{W}$, but a margin of safety can be applied for guarantee.
edited yesterday
Elliot Alderson
7,83011022
7,83011022
answered yesterday
Dirceu Rodrigues JrDirceu Rodrigues Jr
1,961612
1,961612
3
$begingroup$
I created an account to let you know that this answer is one of the best answers I've seen, on any site, in a long time. Just brilliant.
$endgroup$
– LogicalBranch
yesterday
2
$begingroup$
This could become the canonical answer to questions of this kind. Thorough and well written. However, could you please add links or citations to the sources of the graphics?
$endgroup$
– Elliot Alderson
yesterday
1
$begingroup$
So much effort for approximate solutions, have a look to the simple and exact Dave Tweed's one below.
$endgroup$
– carloc
yesterday
1
$begingroup$
Estimating Total Gate Charge from Graph nice.
$endgroup$
– Israr Sayed
yesterday
1
$begingroup$
@carloc: Just AFTER doing the paper/pencil work it's possible to conclude that the solutions are similar. My contributions is aligned with the standard procedures recommended by manufacturers. Also deals with the gate resistor estimation.
$endgroup$
– Dirceu Rodrigues Jr
yesterday
|
show 7 more comments
3
$begingroup$
I created an account to let you know that this answer is one of the best answers I've seen, on any site, in a long time. Just brilliant.
$endgroup$
– LogicalBranch
yesterday
2
$begingroup$
This could become the canonical answer to questions of this kind. Thorough and well written. However, could you please add links or citations to the sources of the graphics?
$endgroup$
– Elliot Alderson
yesterday
1
$begingroup$
So much effort for approximate solutions, have a look to the simple and exact Dave Tweed's one below.
$endgroup$
– carloc
yesterday
1
$begingroup$
Estimating Total Gate Charge from Graph nice.
$endgroup$
– Israr Sayed
yesterday
1
$begingroup$
@carloc: Just AFTER doing the paper/pencil work it's possible to conclude that the solutions are similar. My contributions is aligned with the standard procedures recommended by manufacturers. Also deals with the gate resistor estimation.
$endgroup$
– Dirceu Rodrigues Jr
yesterday
3
3
$begingroup$
I created an account to let you know that this answer is one of the best answers I've seen, on any site, in a long time. Just brilliant.
$endgroup$
– LogicalBranch
yesterday
$begingroup$
I created an account to let you know that this answer is one of the best answers I've seen, on any site, in a long time. Just brilliant.
$endgroup$
– LogicalBranch
yesterday
2
2
$begingroup$
This could become the canonical answer to questions of this kind. Thorough and well written. However, could you please add links or citations to the sources of the graphics?
$endgroup$
– Elliot Alderson
yesterday
$begingroup$
This could become the canonical answer to questions of this kind. Thorough and well written. However, could you please add links or citations to the sources of the graphics?
$endgroup$
– Elliot Alderson
yesterday
1
1
$begingroup$
So much effort for approximate solutions, have a look to the simple and exact Dave Tweed's one below.
$endgroup$
– carloc
yesterday
$begingroup$
So much effort for approximate solutions, have a look to the simple and exact Dave Tweed's one below.
$endgroup$
– carloc
yesterday
1
1
$begingroup$
Estimating Total Gate Charge from Graph nice.
$endgroup$
– Israr Sayed
yesterday
$begingroup$
Estimating Total Gate Charge from Graph nice.
$endgroup$
– Israr Sayed
yesterday
1
1
$begingroup$
@carloc: Just AFTER doing the paper/pencil work it's possible to conclude that the solutions are similar. My contributions is aligned with the standard procedures recommended by manufacturers. Also deals with the gate resistor estimation.
$endgroup$
– Dirceu Rodrigues Jr
yesterday
$begingroup$
@carloc: Just AFTER doing the paper/pencil work it's possible to conclude that the solutions are similar. My contributions is aligned with the standard procedures recommended by manufacturers. Also deals with the gate resistor estimation.
$endgroup$
– Dirceu Rodrigues Jr
yesterday
|
show 7 more comments
$begingroup$
Dividing the peak power by the frequency is not useful.
Instead, you would multiply it by the duty cycle. If you're dumping 25 W of power into the resistor for 2 × 100 ns out of every 2.5 µs. This would be an average power of
$$25 W cdotfrac{2 cdot 100 ns}{2.5 mu s} = 2 W$$
Clearly, your 1W resistor is not going to cut it!
However, the peak instantaneous power is not really a good estimate of the average power during the switching transient. A better estimate can be arrived at by considering the energy flow into and out of the gate capacitance.
For an R-C circuit, the energy dissipated in the resistor is basically equal to the energy that ends up on the capacitor. If your gate charge is 210 nC and your gate voltage is 12V, this represents
$$Energy = frac{1}{2}cdot Charge cdot Voltage$$
$$0.5 cdot 210 nC cdot 12 V = 1.26 mu J$$
This is the energy you're dumping into the gate capacitance, and then dumping out again on every switching cycle. All of this energy gets dissipated in the gate resistor.
To get the average power, multiply the energy per cycle by the number of cycles per second, giving
$$1.26 mu J cdot 2 cdot 400 kHz = 1.088 W$$
Your 1W resistor would be running at its limit, with no margin. I would use a 2W resistor here.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Dividing the peak power by the frequency is not useful.
Instead, you would multiply it by the duty cycle. If you're dumping 25 W of power into the resistor for 2 × 100 ns out of every 2.5 µs. This would be an average power of
$$25 W cdotfrac{2 cdot 100 ns}{2.5 mu s} = 2 W$$
Clearly, your 1W resistor is not going to cut it!
However, the peak instantaneous power is not really a good estimate of the average power during the switching transient. A better estimate can be arrived at by considering the energy flow into and out of the gate capacitance.
For an R-C circuit, the energy dissipated in the resistor is basically equal to the energy that ends up on the capacitor. If your gate charge is 210 nC and your gate voltage is 12V, this represents
$$Energy = frac{1}{2}cdot Charge cdot Voltage$$
$$0.5 cdot 210 nC cdot 12 V = 1.26 mu J$$
This is the energy you're dumping into the gate capacitance, and then dumping out again on every switching cycle. All of this energy gets dissipated in the gate resistor.
To get the average power, multiply the energy per cycle by the number of cycles per second, giving
$$1.26 mu J cdot 2 cdot 400 kHz = 1.088 W$$
Your 1W resistor would be running at its limit, with no margin. I would use a 2W resistor here.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Dividing the peak power by the frequency is not useful.
Instead, you would multiply it by the duty cycle. If you're dumping 25 W of power into the resistor for 2 × 100 ns out of every 2.5 µs. This would be an average power of
$$25 W cdotfrac{2 cdot 100 ns}{2.5 mu s} = 2 W$$
Clearly, your 1W resistor is not going to cut it!
However, the peak instantaneous power is not really a good estimate of the average power during the switching transient. A better estimate can be arrived at by considering the energy flow into and out of the gate capacitance.
For an R-C circuit, the energy dissipated in the resistor is basically equal to the energy that ends up on the capacitor. If your gate charge is 210 nC and your gate voltage is 12V, this represents
$$Energy = frac{1}{2}cdot Charge cdot Voltage$$
$$0.5 cdot 210 nC cdot 12 V = 1.26 mu J$$
This is the energy you're dumping into the gate capacitance, and then dumping out again on every switching cycle. All of this energy gets dissipated in the gate resistor.
To get the average power, multiply the energy per cycle by the number of cycles per second, giving
$$1.26 mu J cdot 2 cdot 400 kHz = 1.088 W$$
Your 1W resistor would be running at its limit, with no margin. I would use a 2W resistor here.
$endgroup$
Dividing the peak power by the frequency is not useful.
Instead, you would multiply it by the duty cycle. If you're dumping 25 W of power into the resistor for 2 × 100 ns out of every 2.5 µs. This would be an average power of
$$25 W cdotfrac{2 cdot 100 ns}{2.5 mu s} = 2 W$$
Clearly, your 1W resistor is not going to cut it!
However, the peak instantaneous power is not really a good estimate of the average power during the switching transient. A better estimate can be arrived at by considering the energy flow into and out of the gate capacitance.
For an R-C circuit, the energy dissipated in the resistor is basically equal to the energy that ends up on the capacitor. If your gate charge is 210 nC and your gate voltage is 12V, this represents
$$Energy = frac{1}{2}cdot Charge cdot Voltage$$
$$0.5 cdot 210 nC cdot 12 V = 1.26 mu J$$
This is the energy you're dumping into the gate capacitance, and then dumping out again on every switching cycle. All of this energy gets dissipated in the gate resistor.
To get the average power, multiply the energy per cycle by the number of cycles per second, giving
$$1.26 mu J cdot 2 cdot 400 kHz = 1.088 W$$
Your 1W resistor would be running at its limit, with no margin. I would use a 2W resistor here.
edited yesterday
answered 2 days ago
Dave Tweed♦Dave Tweed
122k9152264
122k9152264
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Electrical Engineering Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2felectronics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f428730%2fcalculating-wattage-for-resistor-in-high-frequency-application%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
2
$begingroup$
Dividing peak power by frequency doesn't make sense to me. As you say, the units are watt-seconds, not watts.
$endgroup$
– Elliot Alderson
2 days ago
$begingroup$
I think i should remove Average Power line .
$endgroup$
– Israr Sayed
yesterday