Principle C of Binding Theory and Cataphoric Reference, why these notions are against each other?
Principle C of Binding Theory stated that 'referential expression' can not be c-commanded, even across clause boundaries.
While cataphoric reference refers to a reference which occurs before its antecedent.
These two notions are obviously against each other.
Is Binding Theory, in this case, not valid anymore due to the time being?
Or there are some kinds of exception in the Binding Theory?
Any comments or answers will be appreciated...
grammar syntax
migrated from english.stackexchange.com 2 days ago
This question came from our site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts.
add a comment |
Principle C of Binding Theory stated that 'referential expression' can not be c-commanded, even across clause boundaries.
While cataphoric reference refers to a reference which occurs before its antecedent.
These two notions are obviously against each other.
Is Binding Theory, in this case, not valid anymore due to the time being?
Or there are some kinds of exception in the Binding Theory?
Any comments or answers will be appreciated...
grammar syntax
migrated from english.stackexchange.com 2 days ago
This question came from our site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts.
1
Why do you say "These two notions are obviously against each other"? C-command makes no reference to left-right order, does it?
– Greg Lee
yesterday
add a comment |
Principle C of Binding Theory stated that 'referential expression' can not be c-commanded, even across clause boundaries.
While cataphoric reference refers to a reference which occurs before its antecedent.
These two notions are obviously against each other.
Is Binding Theory, in this case, not valid anymore due to the time being?
Or there are some kinds of exception in the Binding Theory?
Any comments or answers will be appreciated...
grammar syntax
Principle C of Binding Theory stated that 'referential expression' can not be c-commanded, even across clause boundaries.
While cataphoric reference refers to a reference which occurs before its antecedent.
These two notions are obviously against each other.
Is Binding Theory, in this case, not valid anymore due to the time being?
Or there are some kinds of exception in the Binding Theory?
Any comments or answers will be appreciated...
grammar syntax
grammar syntax
asked 2 days ago
Soesanto Tjiaman
migrated from english.stackexchange.com 2 days ago
This question came from our site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts.
migrated from english.stackexchange.com 2 days ago
This question came from our site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts.
1
Why do you say "These two notions are obviously against each other"? C-command makes no reference to left-right order, does it?
– Greg Lee
yesterday
add a comment |
1
Why do you say "These two notions are obviously against each other"? C-command makes no reference to left-right order, does it?
– Greg Lee
yesterday
1
1
Why do you say "These two notions are obviously against each other"? C-command makes no reference to left-right order, does it?
– Greg Lee
yesterday
Why do you say "These two notions are obviously against each other"? C-command makes no reference to left-right order, does it?
– Greg Lee
yesterday
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "312"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2flinguistics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f30994%2fprinciple-c-of-binding-theory-and-cataphoric-reference-why-these-notions-are-ag%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Linguistics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2flinguistics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f30994%2fprinciple-c-of-binding-theory-and-cataphoric-reference-why-these-notions-are-ag%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
Why do you say "These two notions are obviously against each other"? C-command makes no reference to left-right order, does it?
– Greg Lee
yesterday