Is it convenient to ask the journal's editor for two additional days to complete a review?
I am assigned as a reviewer of an article for IEEE TNNLS (computer science), but unfortunately, I would be super busy during the week of the deadline. In fact, I need to submit a paper and also two postdoc applications during the same week.
I'm already trying to do as much as I can before that week, but it'd make things much easier (with better quality) if I can postpone the review at least for two more days. So, I like to know if it looks unprofessional to ask the editor for that extension and whether it'd damage my review performance/reputation in that journal?
journals peer-review review-articles
edited 2 days ago
Wrzlprmft♦
34.6k11109186
asked Mar 30 at 19:43
BabakBabak
1,5441829
add a comment |
I am assigned as a reviewer of an article for IEEE TNNLS (computer science), but unfortunately, I would be super busy during the week of the deadline. In fact, I need to submit a paper and also two postdoc applications during the same week.
I'm already trying to do as much as I can before that week, but it'd make things much easier (with better quality) if I can postpone the review at least for two more days. So, I like to know if it looks unprofessional to ask the editor for that extension and whether it'd damage my review performance/reputation in that journal?
journals peer-review review-articles
edited 2 days ago
Wrzlprmft♦
34.6k11109186
asked Mar 30 at 19:43
BabakBabak
1,5441829
16
A two day extension is almost nothing compared to the significant work of finding a new reviewer. I would just ask (in fact I've done so multiple times). They won't put you on a blacklist for such a reasonable request.
– Roland
Mar 30 at 20:59
1
Yes, you can I have asked an editor to extend the review and he did it, there is no worries.
– Monkia
Mar 30 at 23:33
6
I never ask. I submit my reviews whenever I have time.
– Prof. Santa Claus
2 days ago
2
@Prof.SantaClaus I may do that when I become a professor as big as Santa is! :D
– Babak
2 days ago
add a comment |
I am assigned as a reviewer of an article for IEEE TNNLS (computer science), but unfortunately, I would be super busy during the week of the deadline. In fact, I need to submit a paper and also two postdoc applications during the same week.
I'm already trying to do as much as I can before that week, but it'd make things much easier (with better quality) if I can postpone the review at least for two more days. So, I like to know if it looks unprofessional to ask the editor for that extension and whether it'd damage my review performance/reputation in that journal?
journals peer-review review-articles
edited 2 days ago
Wrzlprmft♦
34.6k11109186
asked Mar 30 at 19:43
BabakBabak
1,5441829
I am assigned as a reviewer of an article for IEEE TNNLS (computer science), but unfortunately, I would be super busy during the week of the deadline. In fact, I need to submit a paper and also two postdoc applications during the same week.
I'm already trying to do as much as I can before that week, but it'd make things much easier (with better quality) if I can postpone the review at least for two more days. So, I like to know if it looks unprofessional to ask the editor for that extension and whether it'd damage my review performance/reputation in that journal?
journals peer-review review-articles
journals peer-review review-articles
edited 2 days ago
Wrzlprmft♦
34.6k11109186
asked Mar 30 at 19:43
BabakBabak
1,5441829
edited 2 days ago
Wrzlprmft♦
34.6k11109186
asked Mar 30 at 19:43
BabakBabak
1,5441829
edited 2 days ago
Wrzlprmft♦
34.6k11109186
edited 2 days ago
Wrzlprmft♦
34.6k11109186
edited 2 days ago
Wrzlprmft♦
34.6k11109186
34.6k11109186
asked Mar 30 at 19:43
BabakBabak
1,5441829
asked Mar 30 at 19:43
BabakBabak
1,5441829
asked Mar 30 at 19:43
BabakBabak
1,5441829
1,5441829
16
A two day extension is almost nothing compared to the significant work of finding a new reviewer. I would just ask (in fact I've done so multiple times). They won't put you on a blacklist for such a reasonable request.
– Roland
Mar 30 at 20:59
1
Yes, you can I have asked an editor to extend the review and he did it, there is no worries.
– Monkia
Mar 30 at 23:33
6
I never ask. I submit my reviews whenever I have time.
– Prof. Santa Claus
2 days ago
2
@Prof.SantaClaus I may do that when I become a professor as big as Santa is! :D
– Babak
2 days ago
add a comment |
16
A two day extension is almost nothing compared to the significant work of finding a new reviewer. I would just ask (in fact I've done so multiple times). They won't put you on a blacklist for such a reasonable request.
– Roland
Mar 30 at 20:59
1
Yes, you can I have asked an editor to extend the review and he did it, there is no worries.
– Monkia
Mar 30 at 23:33
6
I never ask. I submit my reviews whenever I have time.
– Prof. Santa Claus
2 days ago
2
@Prof.SantaClaus I may do that when I become a professor as big as Santa is! :D
– Babak
2 days ago
16
16
A two day extension is almost nothing compared to the significant work of finding a new reviewer. I would just ask (in fact I've done so multiple times). They won't put you on a blacklist for such a reasonable request.
– Roland
Mar 30 at 20:59
A two day extension is almost nothing compared to the significant work of finding a new reviewer. I would just ask (in fact I've done so multiple times). They won't put you on a blacklist for such a reasonable request.
– Roland
Mar 30 at 20:59
1
1
Yes, you can I have asked an editor to extend the review and he did it, there is no worries.
– Monkia
Mar 30 at 23:33
Yes, you can I have asked an editor to extend the review and he did it, there is no worries.
– Monkia
Mar 30 at 23:33
6
6
I never ask. I submit my reviews whenever I have time.
– Prof. Santa Claus
2 days ago
I never ask. I submit my reviews whenever I have time.
– Prof. Santa Claus
2 days ago
2
2
@Prof.SantaClaus I may do that when I become a professor as big as Santa is! :D
– Babak
2 days ago
@Prof.SantaClaus I may do that when I become a professor as big as Santa is! :D
– Babak
2 days ago
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
Getting a review in two days late for a journal article is pretty common. I wouldn't worry about anything less than being a week late. For conferences, deadlines can be tighter, but 2 days is nothing. Ideally you would let the editor know your review will be a couple of days late, but even if you didn't, it is not the end of the world.
answered Mar 30 at 22:41
StrongBad♦StrongBad
86.6k24216424
add a comment |
I wouldn't even ask. Just "tell".
Send a short email saying you will send the review a week later (more time than needed, don't want to come back in 2 days again). Don't phrase the email in a manner that requires a response from the editor--tell, don't ask (cut the back and forth chatter).
If the editor wants/needs to pull the paper, he will do so. But it's very unlikely he will. But just let him do what he does.
In addition, I would be practical and do a simple review. I love doing extensive murder board reviews. But you need to concentrate on your own stuff. There is probably an 80-20 rule where you can give 80% of the key improvements with 20% of the text and parsing time. In particular, if you are recommending rejection, I would be economical with your time and not investment much in improvement recommendations.
answered Mar 30 at 23:06
guestguest
1211
New contributor
guest is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
14
"Ask" will be interpreted as "tell" and is far more polite.
– Bob Brown
2 days ago
@BobBrown: I don't mind asking, but should I also apologize for the inconvenience? ;)
– Babak
2 days ago
1
@Babak - You can add that sentence in the same formally-ask, but in-reality-tell email. But that's just a politeness gesture. In reality, there is nothing in here to feel apologetic for. :)
– 299792458
2 days ago
@Babak If you like, but don't make a big deal of it. You are still "telling," after all. The point is to do so politely.
– Bob Brown
2 days ago
add a comment |
When I ask for an extension, I usually ask for a substantial one, i.e. one week not just 2 days. This way, if I need more than 2 days for some unforeseen reason I don’t have to ask for another extension. Moreover if the editor is really tight she/he can negotiate down to 2 days and everybody is happy.
Dear editor,
Due to unforeseen circumstances I can only guarantee submission of my report by[deadline+1 week]. I trust this firm new submission date is acceptable to the Journal.
answered 2 days ago
ZeroTheHeroZeroTheHero
1,577113
2
As an editor, I want people to ask for only what they need.
– jakebeal
2 days ago
1
@jakebeal so do I but I would rather not deal with people asking for a 2-day extension every 2nd day: I'm more interested in a firm deadline than a moving one.
– ZeroTheHero
2 days ago
@jakebeal People know only a subjective probability distribution of the time they need, not a specific value. Which quantile (or other statistic) do you want them to ask? It seems reasonable that if someone expects the review to take 2 days on average, there's still a 1/5 chance that it will take 1 week, and in that case the editor might like them to ask for the week directly.
– JiK
yesterday
@jakebeal I was also advised, and now practice, asking for approximately max(3days, X*30%) more extra time, rounded to the nearest week, if I estimated I needed X time to finish, to give myself a small buffer and avoid asking twice. So two days are likely to become a week, a week 10 days, and 3 months (very extensive revision, happened once) 4 months. I will, if I can, submit sooner, but I'll also be very happy if I realize I underestimated and can now actually still finish at a reasonable pace rather than forgoing sleep for the last 3 days before the submission.
– penelope
yesterday
@ZeroTheHero Actually, I'd still prefer to have somebody give me their honest estimate and then bug them again if they don't deliver. At least I know I've got their attention, rather than being shuffled into the "don't have to think about it this week" pile, which is likely to lead to asking for another week the next week.
– jakebeal
yesterday
|
show 1 more comment
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "415"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2facademia.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f127299%2fis-it-convenient-to-ask-the-journals-editor-for-two-additional-days-to-complete%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Getting a review in two days late for a journal article is pretty common. I wouldn't worry about anything less than being a week late. For conferences, deadlines can be tighter, but 2 days is nothing. Ideally you would let the editor know your review will be a couple of days late, but even if you didn't, it is not the end of the world.
answered Mar 30 at 22:41
StrongBad♦StrongBad
86.6k24216424
add a comment |
Getting a review in two days late for a journal article is pretty common. I wouldn't worry about anything less than being a week late. For conferences, deadlines can be tighter, but 2 days is nothing. Ideally you would let the editor know your review will be a couple of days late, but even if you didn't, it is not the end of the world.
answered Mar 30 at 22:41
StrongBad♦StrongBad
86.6k24216424
add a comment |
Getting a review in two days late for a journal article is pretty common. I wouldn't worry about anything less than being a week late. For conferences, deadlines can be tighter, but 2 days is nothing. Ideally you would let the editor know your review will be a couple of days late, but even if you didn't, it is not the end of the world.
answered Mar 30 at 22:41
StrongBad♦StrongBad
86.6k24216424
Getting a review in two days late for a journal article is pretty common. I wouldn't worry about anything less than being a week late. For conferences, deadlines can be tighter, but 2 days is nothing. Ideally you would let the editor know your review will be a couple of days late, but even if you didn't, it is not the end of the world.
answered Mar 30 at 22:41
StrongBad♦StrongBad
86.6k24216424
answered Mar 30 at 22:41
StrongBad♦StrongBad
86.6k24216424
answered Mar 30 at 22:41
StrongBad♦StrongBad
86.6k24216424
answered Mar 30 at 22:41
StrongBad♦StrongBad
86.6k24216424
86.6k24216424
add a comment |
add a comment |
I wouldn't even ask. Just "tell".
Send a short email saying you will send the review a week later (more time than needed, don't want to come back in 2 days again). Don't phrase the email in a manner that requires a response from the editor--tell, don't ask (cut the back and forth chatter).
If the editor wants/needs to pull the paper, he will do so. But it's very unlikely he will. But just let him do what he does.
In addition, I would be practical and do a simple review. I love doing extensive murder board reviews. But you need to concentrate on your own stuff. There is probably an 80-20 rule where you can give 80% of the key improvements with 20% of the text and parsing time. In particular, if you are recommending rejection, I would be economical with your time and not investment much in improvement recommendations.
answered Mar 30 at 23:06
guestguest
1211
New contributor
guest is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
14
"Ask" will be interpreted as "tell" and is far more polite.
– Bob Brown
2 days ago
@BobBrown: I don't mind asking, but should I also apologize for the inconvenience? ;)
– Babak
2 days ago
1
@Babak - You can add that sentence in the same formally-ask, but in-reality-tell email. But that's just a politeness gesture. In reality, there is nothing in here to feel apologetic for. :)
– 299792458
2 days ago
@Babak If you like, but don't make a big deal of it. You are still "telling," after all. The point is to do so politely.
– Bob Brown
2 days ago
add a comment |
I wouldn't even ask. Just "tell".
Send a short email saying you will send the review a week later (more time than needed, don't want to come back in 2 days again). Don't phrase the email in a manner that requires a response from the editor--tell, don't ask (cut the back and forth chatter).
If the editor wants/needs to pull the paper, he will do so. But it's very unlikely he will. But just let him do what he does.
In addition, I would be practical and do a simple review. I love doing extensive murder board reviews. But you need to concentrate on your own stuff. There is probably an 80-20 rule where you can give 80% of the key improvements with 20% of the text and parsing time. In particular, if you are recommending rejection, I would be economical with your time and not investment much in improvement recommendations.
answered Mar 30 at 23:06
guestguest
1211
New contributor
guest is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
14
"Ask" will be interpreted as "tell" and is far more polite.
– Bob Brown
2 days ago
@BobBrown: I don't mind asking, but should I also apologize for the inconvenience? ;)
– Babak
2 days ago
1
@Babak - You can add that sentence in the same formally-ask, but in-reality-tell email. But that's just a politeness gesture. In reality, there is nothing in here to feel apologetic for. :)
– 299792458
2 days ago
@Babak If you like, but don't make a big deal of it. You are still "telling," after all. The point is to do so politely.
– Bob Brown
2 days ago
add a comment |
I wouldn't even ask. Just "tell".
Send a short email saying you will send the review a week later (more time than needed, don't want to come back in 2 days again). Don't phrase the email in a manner that requires a response from the editor--tell, don't ask (cut the back and forth chatter).
If the editor wants/needs to pull the paper, he will do so. But it's very unlikely he will. But just let him do what he does.
In addition, I would be practical and do a simple review. I love doing extensive murder board reviews. But you need to concentrate on your own stuff. There is probably an 80-20 rule where you can give 80% of the key improvements with 20% of the text and parsing time. In particular, if you are recommending rejection, I would be economical with your time and not investment much in improvement recommendations.
answered Mar 30 at 23:06
guestguest
1211
New contributor
guest is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
I wouldn't even ask. Just "tell".
Send a short email saying you will send the review a week later (more time than needed, don't want to come back in 2 days again). Don't phrase the email in a manner that requires a response from the editor--tell, don't ask (cut the back and forth chatter).
If the editor wants/needs to pull the paper, he will do so. But it's very unlikely he will. But just let him do what he does.
In addition, I would be practical and do a simple review. I love doing extensive murder board reviews. But you need to concentrate on your own stuff. There is probably an 80-20 rule where you can give 80% of the key improvements with 20% of the text and parsing time. In particular, if you are recommending rejection, I would be economical with your time and not investment much in improvement recommendations.
answered Mar 30 at 23:06
guestguest
1211
New contributor
guest is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
answered Mar 30 at 23:06
guestguest
1211
New contributor
guest is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
answered Mar 30 at 23:06
guestguest
1211
answered Mar 30 at 23:06
guestguest
1211
1211
New contributor
guest is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
guest is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
guest is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
14
"Ask" will be interpreted as "tell" and is far more polite.
– Bob Brown
2 days ago
@BobBrown: I don't mind asking, but should I also apologize for the inconvenience? ;)
– Babak
2 days ago
1
@Babak - You can add that sentence in the same formally-ask, but in-reality-tell email. But that's just a politeness gesture. In reality, there is nothing in here to feel apologetic for. :)
– 299792458
2 days ago
@Babak If you like, but don't make a big deal of it. You are still "telling," after all. The point is to do so politely.
– Bob Brown
2 days ago
add a comment |
14
"Ask" will be interpreted as "tell" and is far more polite.
– Bob Brown
2 days ago
@BobBrown: I don't mind asking, but should I also apologize for the inconvenience? ;)
– Babak
2 days ago
1
@Babak - You can add that sentence in the same formally-ask, but in-reality-tell email. But that's just a politeness gesture. In reality, there is nothing in here to feel apologetic for. :)
– 299792458
2 days ago
@Babak If you like, but don't make a big deal of it. You are still "telling," after all. The point is to do so politely.
– Bob Brown
2 days ago
14
14
"Ask" will be interpreted as "tell" and is far more polite.
– Bob Brown
2 days ago
"Ask" will be interpreted as "tell" and is far more polite.
– Bob Brown
2 days ago
@BobBrown: I don't mind asking, but should I also apologize for the inconvenience? ;)
– Babak
2 days ago
@BobBrown: I don't mind asking, but should I also apologize for the inconvenience? ;)
– Babak
2 days ago
1
1
@Babak - You can add that sentence in the same formally-ask, but in-reality-tell email. But that's just a politeness gesture. In reality, there is nothing in here to feel apologetic for. :)
– 299792458
2 days ago
@Babak - You can add that sentence in the same formally-ask, but in-reality-tell email. But that's just a politeness gesture. In reality, there is nothing in here to feel apologetic for. :)
– 299792458
2 days ago
@Babak If you like, but don't make a big deal of it. You are still "telling," after all. The point is to do so politely.
– Bob Brown
2 days ago
@Babak If you like, but don't make a big deal of it. You are still "telling," after all. The point is to do so politely.
– Bob Brown
2 days ago
add a comment |
When I ask for an extension, I usually ask for a substantial one, i.e. one week not just 2 days. This way, if I need more than 2 days for some unforeseen reason I don’t have to ask for another extension. Moreover if the editor is really tight she/he can negotiate down to 2 days and everybody is happy.
Dear editor,
Due to unforeseen circumstances I can only guarantee submission of my report by[deadline+1 week]. I trust this firm new submission date is acceptable to the Journal.
answered 2 days ago
ZeroTheHeroZeroTheHero
1,577113
2
As an editor, I want people to ask for only what they need.
– jakebeal
2 days ago
1
@jakebeal so do I but I would rather not deal with people asking for a 2-day extension every 2nd day: I'm more interested in a firm deadline than a moving one.
– ZeroTheHero
2 days ago
@jakebeal People know only a subjective probability distribution of the time they need, not a specific value. Which quantile (or other statistic) do you want them to ask? It seems reasonable that if someone expects the review to take 2 days on average, there's still a 1/5 chance that it will take 1 week, and in that case the editor might like them to ask for the week directly.
– JiK
yesterday
@jakebeal I was also advised, and now practice, asking for approximately max(3days, X*30%) more extra time, rounded to the nearest week, if I estimated I needed X time to finish, to give myself a small buffer and avoid asking twice. So two days are likely to become a week, a week 10 days, and 3 months (very extensive revision, happened once) 4 months. I will, if I can, submit sooner, but I'll also be very happy if I realize I underestimated and can now actually still finish at a reasonable pace rather than forgoing sleep for the last 3 days before the submission.
– penelope
yesterday
@ZeroTheHero Actually, I'd still prefer to have somebody give me their honest estimate and then bug them again if they don't deliver. At least I know I've got their attention, rather than being shuffled into the "don't have to think about it this week" pile, which is likely to lead to asking for another week the next week.
– jakebeal
yesterday
|
show 1 more comment
When I ask for an extension, I usually ask for a substantial one, i.e. one week not just 2 days. This way, if I need more than 2 days for some unforeseen reason I don’t have to ask for another extension. Moreover if the editor is really tight she/he can negotiate down to 2 days and everybody is happy.
Dear editor,
Due to unforeseen circumstances I can only guarantee submission of my report by[deadline+1 week]. I trust this firm new submission date is acceptable to the Journal.
answered 2 days ago
ZeroTheHeroZeroTheHero
1,577113
2
As an editor, I want people to ask for only what they need.
– jakebeal
2 days ago
1
@jakebeal so do I but I would rather not deal with people asking for a 2-day extension every 2nd day: I'm more interested in a firm deadline than a moving one.
– ZeroTheHero
2 days ago
@jakebeal People know only a subjective probability distribution of the time they need, not a specific value. Which quantile (or other statistic) do you want them to ask? It seems reasonable that if someone expects the review to take 2 days on average, there's still a 1/5 chance that it will take 1 week, and in that case the editor might like them to ask for the week directly.
– JiK
yesterday
@jakebeal I was also advised, and now practice, asking for approximately max(3days, X*30%) more extra time, rounded to the nearest week, if I estimated I needed X time to finish, to give myself a small buffer and avoid asking twice. So two days are likely to become a week, a week 10 days, and 3 months (very extensive revision, happened once) 4 months. I will, if I can, submit sooner, but I'll also be very happy if I realize I underestimated and can now actually still finish at a reasonable pace rather than forgoing sleep for the last 3 days before the submission.
– penelope
yesterday
@ZeroTheHero Actually, I'd still prefer to have somebody give me their honest estimate and then bug them again if they don't deliver. At least I know I've got their attention, rather than being shuffled into the "don't have to think about it this week" pile, which is likely to lead to asking for another week the next week.
– jakebeal
yesterday
|
show 1 more comment
When I ask for an extension, I usually ask for a substantial one, i.e. one week not just 2 days. This way, if I need more than 2 days for some unforeseen reason I don’t have to ask for another extension. Moreover if the editor is really tight she/he can negotiate down to 2 days and everybody is happy.
Dear editor,
Due to unforeseen circumstances I can only guarantee submission of my report by[deadline+1 week]. I trust this firm new submission date is acceptable to the Journal.
answered 2 days ago
ZeroTheHeroZeroTheHero
1,577113
When I ask for an extension, I usually ask for a substantial one, i.e. one week not just 2 days. This way, if I need more than 2 days for some unforeseen reason I don’t have to ask for another extension. Moreover if the editor is really tight she/he can negotiate down to 2 days and everybody is happy.
Dear editor,
Due to unforeseen circumstances I can only guarantee submission of my report by[deadline+1 week]. I trust this firm new submission date is acceptable to the Journal.
answered 2 days ago
ZeroTheHeroZeroTheHero
1,577113
answered 2 days ago
ZeroTheHeroZeroTheHero
1,577113
answered 2 days ago
ZeroTheHeroZeroTheHero
1,577113
answered 2 days ago
ZeroTheHeroZeroTheHero
1,577113
1,577113
2
As an editor, I want people to ask for only what they need.
– jakebeal
2 days ago
1
@jakebeal so do I but I would rather not deal with people asking for a 2-day extension every 2nd day: I'm more interested in a firm deadline than a moving one.
– ZeroTheHero
2 days ago
@jakebeal People know only a subjective probability distribution of the time they need, not a specific value. Which quantile (or other statistic) do you want them to ask? It seems reasonable that if someone expects the review to take 2 days on average, there's still a 1/5 chance that it will take 1 week, and in that case the editor might like them to ask for the week directly.
– JiK
yesterday
@jakebeal I was also advised, and now practice, asking for approximately max(3days, X*30%) more extra time, rounded to the nearest week, if I estimated I needed X time to finish, to give myself a small buffer and avoid asking twice. So two days are likely to become a week, a week 10 days, and 3 months (very extensive revision, happened once) 4 months. I will, if I can, submit sooner, but I'll also be very happy if I realize I underestimated and can now actually still finish at a reasonable pace rather than forgoing sleep for the last 3 days before the submission.
– penelope
yesterday
@ZeroTheHero Actually, I'd still prefer to have somebody give me their honest estimate and then bug them again if they don't deliver. At least I know I've got their attention, rather than being shuffled into the "don't have to think about it this week" pile, which is likely to lead to asking for another week the next week.
– jakebeal
yesterday
|
show 1 more comment
2
As an editor, I want people to ask for only what they need.
– jakebeal
2 days ago
1
@jakebeal so do I but I would rather not deal with people asking for a 2-day extension every 2nd day: I'm more interested in a firm deadline than a moving one.
– ZeroTheHero
2 days ago
@jakebeal People know only a subjective probability distribution of the time they need, not a specific value. Which quantile (or other statistic) do you want them to ask? It seems reasonable that if someone expects the review to take 2 days on average, there's still a 1/5 chance that it will take 1 week, and in that case the editor might like them to ask for the week directly.
– JiK
yesterday
@jakebeal I was also advised, and now practice, asking for approximately max(3days, X*30%) more extra time, rounded to the nearest week, if I estimated I needed X time to finish, to give myself a small buffer and avoid asking twice. So two days are likely to become a week, a week 10 days, and 3 months (very extensive revision, happened once) 4 months. I will, if I can, submit sooner, but I'll also be very happy if I realize I underestimated and can now actually still finish at a reasonable pace rather than forgoing sleep for the last 3 days before the submission.
– penelope
yesterday
@ZeroTheHero Actually, I'd still prefer to have somebody give me their honest estimate and then bug them again if they don't deliver. At least I know I've got their attention, rather than being shuffled into the "don't have to think about it this week" pile, which is likely to lead to asking for another week the next week.
– jakebeal
yesterday
2
2
As an editor, I want people to ask for only what they need.
– jakebeal
2 days ago
As an editor, I want people to ask for only what they need.
– jakebeal
2 days ago
1
1
@jakebeal so do I but I would rather not deal with people asking for a 2-day extension every 2nd day: I'm more interested in a firm deadline than a moving one.
– ZeroTheHero
2 days ago
@jakebeal so do I but I would rather not deal with people asking for a 2-day extension every 2nd day: I'm more interested in a firm deadline than a moving one.
– ZeroTheHero
2 days ago
@jakebeal People know only a subjective probability distribution of the time they need, not a specific value. Which quantile (or other statistic) do you want them to ask? It seems reasonable that if someone expects the review to take 2 days on average, there's still a 1/5 chance that it will take 1 week, and in that case the editor might like them to ask for the week directly.
– JiK
yesterday
@jakebeal People know only a subjective probability distribution of the time they need, not a specific value. Which quantile (or other statistic) do you want them to ask? It seems reasonable that if someone expects the review to take 2 days on average, there's still a 1/5 chance that it will take 1 week, and in that case the editor might like them to ask for the week directly.
– JiK
yesterday
@jakebeal I was also advised, and now practice, asking for approximately max(3days, X*30%) more extra time, rounded to the nearest week, if I estimated I needed X time to finish, to give myself a small buffer and avoid asking twice. So two days are likely to become a week, a week 10 days, and 3 months (very extensive revision, happened once) 4 months. I will, if I can, submit sooner, but I'll also be very happy if I realize I underestimated and can now actually still finish at a reasonable pace rather than forgoing sleep for the last 3 days before the submission.
– penelope
yesterday
@jakebeal I was also advised, and now practice, asking for approximately max(3days, X*30%) more extra time, rounded to the nearest week, if I estimated I needed X time to finish, to give myself a small buffer and avoid asking twice. So two days are likely to become a week, a week 10 days, and 3 months (very extensive revision, happened once) 4 months. I will, if I can, submit sooner, but I'll also be very happy if I realize I underestimated and can now actually still finish at a reasonable pace rather than forgoing sleep for the last 3 days before the submission.
– penelope
yesterday
@ZeroTheHero Actually, I'd still prefer to have somebody give me their honest estimate and then bug them again if they don't deliver. At least I know I've got their attention, rather than being shuffled into the "don't have to think about it this week" pile, which is likely to lead to asking for another week the next week.
– jakebeal
yesterday
@ZeroTheHero Actually, I'd still prefer to have somebody give me their honest estimate and then bug them again if they don't deliver. At least I know I've got their attention, rather than being shuffled into the "don't have to think about it this week" pile, which is likely to lead to asking for another week the next week.
– jakebeal
yesterday
|
show 1 more comment
Thanks for contributing an answer to Academia Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2facademia.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f127299%2fis-it-convenient-to-ask-the-journals-editor-for-two-additional-days-to-complete%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
16
A two day extension is almost nothing compared to the significant work of finding a new reviewer. I would just ask (in fact I've done so multiple times). They won't put you on a blacklist for such a reasonable request.
– Roland
Mar 30 at 20:59
1
Yes, you can I have asked an editor to extend the review and he did it, there is no worries.
– Monkia
Mar 30 at 23:33
6
I never ask. I submit my reviews whenever I have time.
– Prof. Santa Claus
2 days ago
2
@Prof.SantaClaus I may do that when I become a professor as big as Santa is! :D
– Babak
2 days ago