What would I call someone who restrains a person and holds them back?












0















I'm writing a short story, and one of the characters gets held back by the villain's assistant. I'm imagining him being held and restrained as if he is being arrested and handcuffed. I think the word for it would be a control hold?



Here is the sentence:



"Ezekiel only had a second to stare in shock and panic before he felt someone hold him back and force his hands behind his back, as if he was being arrested. He tried to struggle his way out, but they had a strong hold on him. He didn’t even have to turn his head to know who his ___ was.



What should I put in the blanks here?



(i'm a bit nervous to post this because this probably seems worse than it actually is i swear it stays pg)










share|improve this question























  • What about Apprehender if the general flow will allow?

    – Cass Lopez
    2 days ago











  • Is there only one person holding him back ("someone") because you say "they" had a strong hold on him?

    – KannE
    2 days ago











  • Why not "restrainer"? Or look at synonyms for "restrain" -- detain, restrict, subdue, suppress. In fact, "subduer" is fairly commonly used in this sense.

    – Hot Licks
    2 days ago











  • I want to use assailant in that context. However, it doesn't mean specifically somebody who has a hold of somebody else.

    – Jason Bassford
    2 days ago






  • 1





    @KannE i meant a singular "they", as in the gender neutral pronoun ;)

    – NylaTheWolf
    5 hours ago
















0















I'm writing a short story, and one of the characters gets held back by the villain's assistant. I'm imagining him being held and restrained as if he is being arrested and handcuffed. I think the word for it would be a control hold?



Here is the sentence:



"Ezekiel only had a second to stare in shock and panic before he felt someone hold him back and force his hands behind his back, as if he was being arrested. He tried to struggle his way out, but they had a strong hold on him. He didn’t even have to turn his head to know who his ___ was.



What should I put in the blanks here?



(i'm a bit nervous to post this because this probably seems worse than it actually is i swear it stays pg)










share|improve this question























  • What about Apprehender if the general flow will allow?

    – Cass Lopez
    2 days ago











  • Is there only one person holding him back ("someone") because you say "they" had a strong hold on him?

    – KannE
    2 days ago











  • Why not "restrainer"? Or look at synonyms for "restrain" -- detain, restrict, subdue, suppress. In fact, "subduer" is fairly commonly used in this sense.

    – Hot Licks
    2 days ago











  • I want to use assailant in that context. However, it doesn't mean specifically somebody who has a hold of somebody else.

    – Jason Bassford
    2 days ago






  • 1





    @KannE i meant a singular "they", as in the gender neutral pronoun ;)

    – NylaTheWolf
    5 hours ago














0












0








0








I'm writing a short story, and one of the characters gets held back by the villain's assistant. I'm imagining him being held and restrained as if he is being arrested and handcuffed. I think the word for it would be a control hold?



Here is the sentence:



"Ezekiel only had a second to stare in shock and panic before he felt someone hold him back and force his hands behind his back, as if he was being arrested. He tried to struggle his way out, but they had a strong hold on him. He didn’t even have to turn his head to know who his ___ was.



What should I put in the blanks here?



(i'm a bit nervous to post this because this probably seems worse than it actually is i swear it stays pg)










share|improve this question














I'm writing a short story, and one of the characters gets held back by the villain's assistant. I'm imagining him being held and restrained as if he is being arrested and handcuffed. I think the word for it would be a control hold?



Here is the sentence:



"Ezekiel only had a second to stare in shock and panic before he felt someone hold him back and force his hands behind his back, as if he was being arrested. He tried to struggle his way out, but they had a strong hold on him. He didn’t even have to turn his head to know who his ___ was.



What should I put in the blanks here?



(i'm a bit nervous to post this because this probably seems worse than it actually is i swear it stays pg)







single-word-requests word-choice etymology






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Mar 31 at 0:29









NylaTheWolfNylaTheWolf

141




141













  • What about Apprehender if the general flow will allow?

    – Cass Lopez
    2 days ago











  • Is there only one person holding him back ("someone") because you say "they" had a strong hold on him?

    – KannE
    2 days ago











  • Why not "restrainer"? Or look at synonyms for "restrain" -- detain, restrict, subdue, suppress. In fact, "subduer" is fairly commonly used in this sense.

    – Hot Licks
    2 days ago











  • I want to use assailant in that context. However, it doesn't mean specifically somebody who has a hold of somebody else.

    – Jason Bassford
    2 days ago






  • 1





    @KannE i meant a singular "they", as in the gender neutral pronoun ;)

    – NylaTheWolf
    5 hours ago



















  • What about Apprehender if the general flow will allow?

    – Cass Lopez
    2 days ago











  • Is there only one person holding him back ("someone") because you say "they" had a strong hold on him?

    – KannE
    2 days ago











  • Why not "restrainer"? Or look at synonyms for "restrain" -- detain, restrict, subdue, suppress. In fact, "subduer" is fairly commonly used in this sense.

    – Hot Licks
    2 days ago











  • I want to use assailant in that context. However, it doesn't mean specifically somebody who has a hold of somebody else.

    – Jason Bassford
    2 days ago






  • 1





    @KannE i meant a singular "they", as in the gender neutral pronoun ;)

    – NylaTheWolf
    5 hours ago

















What about Apprehender if the general flow will allow?

– Cass Lopez
2 days ago





What about Apprehender if the general flow will allow?

– Cass Lopez
2 days ago













Is there only one person holding him back ("someone") because you say "they" had a strong hold on him?

– KannE
2 days ago





Is there only one person holding him back ("someone") because you say "they" had a strong hold on him?

– KannE
2 days ago













Why not "restrainer"? Or look at synonyms for "restrain" -- detain, restrict, subdue, suppress. In fact, "subduer" is fairly commonly used in this sense.

– Hot Licks
2 days ago





Why not "restrainer"? Or look at synonyms for "restrain" -- detain, restrict, subdue, suppress. In fact, "subduer" is fairly commonly used in this sense.

– Hot Licks
2 days ago













I want to use assailant in that context. However, it doesn't mean specifically somebody who has a hold of somebody else.

– Jason Bassford
2 days ago





I want to use assailant in that context. However, it doesn't mean specifically somebody who has a hold of somebody else.

– Jason Bassford
2 days ago




1




1





@KannE i meant a singular "they", as in the gender neutral pronoun ;)

– NylaTheWolf
5 hours ago





@KannE i meant a singular "they", as in the gender neutral pronoun ;)

– NylaTheWolf
5 hours ago










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















0














I think it would be very natural to say "He didn't even have to turn his head to know who his captor was," but that might have the implication that he his being held for a long time.






share|improve this answer
























  • I had the exact same thought process.

    – NylaTheWolf
    5 hours ago










protected by tchrist 2 days ago



Thank you for your interest in this question.
Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).



Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?














1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









0














I think it would be very natural to say "He didn't even have to turn his head to know who his captor was," but that might have the implication that he his being held for a long time.






share|improve this answer
























  • I had the exact same thought process.

    – NylaTheWolf
    5 hours ago
















0














I think it would be very natural to say "He didn't even have to turn his head to know who his captor was," but that might have the implication that he his being held for a long time.






share|improve this answer
























  • I had the exact same thought process.

    – NylaTheWolf
    5 hours ago














0












0








0







I think it would be very natural to say "He didn't even have to turn his head to know who his captor was," but that might have the implication that he his being held for a long time.






share|improve this answer













I think it would be very natural to say "He didn't even have to turn his head to know who his captor was," but that might have the implication that he his being held for a long time.







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered 2 days ago









eenbeetjeeenbeetje

3687




3687













  • I had the exact same thought process.

    – NylaTheWolf
    5 hours ago



















  • I had the exact same thought process.

    – NylaTheWolf
    5 hours ago

















I had the exact same thought process.

– NylaTheWolf
5 hours ago





I had the exact same thought process.

– NylaTheWolf
5 hours ago





protected by tchrist 2 days ago



Thank you for your interest in this question.
Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).



Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?



Popular posts from this blog

數位音樂下載

When can things happen in Etherscan, such as the picture below?

格利澤436b