why was I not automatically prompted to update?
initial question
I was bragging on IRC about how NoModeSet finally allowed me to boot normally for the first time without tricking my graphics drivers not to run, and was told to run the following command:
jay@KingdomClubs:~$ uname -a && lsb_release -a && sudo lshw -C video
Linux KingdomClubs 4.15.0-43-generic #46-Ubuntu SMP Thu Dec 6 14:44:00 UTC 2018 i686 i686 i686 GNU/Linux
No LSB modules are available.
Distributor ID: Ubuntu
Description: Ubuntu 18.04.1 LTS
Release: 18.04
Codename: bionic
[sudo] password for jay:
*-display UNCLAIMED
description: VGA compatible controller
product: G72 [GeForce 7350 LE]
vendor: NVIDIA Corporation
physical id: 0
bus info: pci@0000:01:00.0
version: a1
width: 64 bits
clock: 33MHz
capabilities: pm msi pciexpress vga_controller bus_master cap_list
configuration: latency=0
resources: memory:fa000000-faffffff memory:d0000000-dfffffff memory:fb000000-fbffffff memory:c0000-dffff
jay@KingdomClubs:~$
I was told I wasn't up to date, and hadn't installed nVidia drivers. Indeed it seemed strange because I remember checking the lubuntu site and apparently they're latest LTS version was 18.04.2
I remember at one point being prompted to update automatically but I guess it didn't anymore. I'm not sure why. Anyway I ran the following as suggested on IRC:
sudo apt update && sudo apt upgrade
It's about 24% so hopefully that's a step in the right direction. Although it's unclear to me if this will install nVidia drivers. Would anyone know what I search in Synaptic Package Manager to get those?
IRC also suggested following:
apt full-upgrade
I assume I would precede that with 'sudo' to give root permission? But I am not sure what diff between "upgrade" and "full-upgrade" would be. Could anyone explain that?
I already used SPM to verify "ubuntu-drivers" was installed in response to How do I fix a frozen black screen on Lubuntu startup? which I thought meant that my video card driver software would be up to date but I guess I am wrong...
Or... is it possibly something to do with needing to activate it via the "autoinstall" command?
1st reply, to guiver
"if this is needed" sounds like it won't remove packages unless they interfere with system upgrade? I guess you would only do a normal "upgrade" if you were in the middle of something and didn't want to reboot right then. I guess I will run that next.
I got the following screen https://i.imgur.com/ZN7AVI5.png transcribed below:
Package configuration
┌──────────────────────────┤ Configuring grub-pc ├──────────────────────────┐
│ A new version (/tmp/grub.SnIFfR3w39) of configuration file │
│ /etc/default/grub is available, but the version installed currently has │
│ been locally modified. │
│ │
│ What do you want to do about modified configuration file grub? │
│ │
│ install the package maintainer's version │
│ keep the local version currently installed │
│ show the differences between the versions │
│ show a side-by-side difference between the versions │
│ show a 3-way difference between available versions │
│ do a 3-way merge between available versions │
│ start a new shell to examine the situation │
│ │
│ │
│ <Ok> │
│ │
└───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
I don't know if there was any major change to the grub file between 18.04.1 and 18.04.2 but it seems like the safe bet might be to take the first option (package maintainer's version) and then if I get the same problems at bootup as before, then redo my steps with switching quiet splash to nodemodeset?
On IRC it was recommended I just keep the local one, implying that there wasn't anything changed though, so I guess I'll do that for now?
I'm sure if I do full-upgrade
it will just prompt me again anyway. Options 3-7 I'm not sure I even want to think about, they sound complex.
drivers nvidia graphics lubuntu
add a comment |
initial question
I was bragging on IRC about how NoModeSet finally allowed me to boot normally for the first time without tricking my graphics drivers not to run, and was told to run the following command:
jay@KingdomClubs:~$ uname -a && lsb_release -a && sudo lshw -C video
Linux KingdomClubs 4.15.0-43-generic #46-Ubuntu SMP Thu Dec 6 14:44:00 UTC 2018 i686 i686 i686 GNU/Linux
No LSB modules are available.
Distributor ID: Ubuntu
Description: Ubuntu 18.04.1 LTS
Release: 18.04
Codename: bionic
[sudo] password for jay:
*-display UNCLAIMED
description: VGA compatible controller
product: G72 [GeForce 7350 LE]
vendor: NVIDIA Corporation
physical id: 0
bus info: pci@0000:01:00.0
version: a1
width: 64 bits
clock: 33MHz
capabilities: pm msi pciexpress vga_controller bus_master cap_list
configuration: latency=0
resources: memory:fa000000-faffffff memory:d0000000-dfffffff memory:fb000000-fbffffff memory:c0000-dffff
jay@KingdomClubs:~$
I was told I wasn't up to date, and hadn't installed nVidia drivers. Indeed it seemed strange because I remember checking the lubuntu site and apparently they're latest LTS version was 18.04.2
I remember at one point being prompted to update automatically but I guess it didn't anymore. I'm not sure why. Anyway I ran the following as suggested on IRC:
sudo apt update && sudo apt upgrade
It's about 24% so hopefully that's a step in the right direction. Although it's unclear to me if this will install nVidia drivers. Would anyone know what I search in Synaptic Package Manager to get those?
IRC also suggested following:
apt full-upgrade
I assume I would precede that with 'sudo' to give root permission? But I am not sure what diff between "upgrade" and "full-upgrade" would be. Could anyone explain that?
I already used SPM to verify "ubuntu-drivers" was installed in response to How do I fix a frozen black screen on Lubuntu startup? which I thought meant that my video card driver software would be up to date but I guess I am wrong...
Or... is it possibly something to do with needing to activate it via the "autoinstall" command?
1st reply, to guiver
"if this is needed" sounds like it won't remove packages unless they interfere with system upgrade? I guess you would only do a normal "upgrade" if you were in the middle of something and didn't want to reboot right then. I guess I will run that next.
I got the following screen https://i.imgur.com/ZN7AVI5.png transcribed below:
Package configuration
┌──────────────────────────┤ Configuring grub-pc ├──────────────────────────┐
│ A new version (/tmp/grub.SnIFfR3w39) of configuration file │
│ /etc/default/grub is available, but the version installed currently has │
│ been locally modified. │
│ │
│ What do you want to do about modified configuration file grub? │
│ │
│ install the package maintainer's version │
│ keep the local version currently installed │
│ show the differences between the versions │
│ show a side-by-side difference between the versions │
│ show a 3-way difference between available versions │
│ do a 3-way merge between available versions │
│ start a new shell to examine the situation │
│ │
│ │
│ <Ok> │
│ │
└───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
I don't know if there was any major change to the grub file between 18.04.1 and 18.04.2 but it seems like the safe bet might be to take the first option (package maintainer's version) and then if I get the same problems at bootup as before, then redo my steps with switching quiet splash to nodemodeset?
On IRC it was recommended I just keep the local one, implying that there wasn't anything changed though, so I guess I'll do that for now?
I'm sure if I do full-upgrade
it will just prompt me again anyway. Options 3-7 I'm not sure I even want to think about, they sound complex.
drivers nvidia graphics lubuntu
Yes you needsudo apt full-upgrade
, but if you check your documentation (man apt
) you'll see full-upgrade performs the function of upgrade but will remove currently installed packages if this is needed to upgrade the system as a whole. or it performs all of upgrade and more. Upgrade has limits on what packages it can upgrade, full-upgrade or dist-upgrade do all. They may require reboot, restarting of services etc which upgrade allows you to postpone those till a later more suitable time.
– guiverc
Mar 20 at 7:10
I have replied above. Is there a major diff between dist-upgrade and full-upgrade?
– VistaRefugee
Mar 20 at 7:36
1
Questions on this site should be on a single topic, after a single response. The 'dist-upgrade' is mostly fromapt-get
, and in theman apt-get
you get more detail. It's my belief that inapt
they do the same thing (the manualman
page doesn't refer to dist-upgrade; it's there I think for people like me with fingers that know apt-get commands) I would suggest sticking with package-maintainers version unless you have a reason not to; you can 'show differences' if it'll help you decide. I always add comments of date/who-made-change/why when I change something which i see in show-diffs.
– guiverc
Mar 20 at 7:42
add a comment |
initial question
I was bragging on IRC about how NoModeSet finally allowed me to boot normally for the first time without tricking my graphics drivers not to run, and was told to run the following command:
jay@KingdomClubs:~$ uname -a && lsb_release -a && sudo lshw -C video
Linux KingdomClubs 4.15.0-43-generic #46-Ubuntu SMP Thu Dec 6 14:44:00 UTC 2018 i686 i686 i686 GNU/Linux
No LSB modules are available.
Distributor ID: Ubuntu
Description: Ubuntu 18.04.1 LTS
Release: 18.04
Codename: bionic
[sudo] password for jay:
*-display UNCLAIMED
description: VGA compatible controller
product: G72 [GeForce 7350 LE]
vendor: NVIDIA Corporation
physical id: 0
bus info: pci@0000:01:00.0
version: a1
width: 64 bits
clock: 33MHz
capabilities: pm msi pciexpress vga_controller bus_master cap_list
configuration: latency=0
resources: memory:fa000000-faffffff memory:d0000000-dfffffff memory:fb000000-fbffffff memory:c0000-dffff
jay@KingdomClubs:~$
I was told I wasn't up to date, and hadn't installed nVidia drivers. Indeed it seemed strange because I remember checking the lubuntu site and apparently they're latest LTS version was 18.04.2
I remember at one point being prompted to update automatically but I guess it didn't anymore. I'm not sure why. Anyway I ran the following as suggested on IRC:
sudo apt update && sudo apt upgrade
It's about 24% so hopefully that's a step in the right direction. Although it's unclear to me if this will install nVidia drivers. Would anyone know what I search in Synaptic Package Manager to get those?
IRC also suggested following:
apt full-upgrade
I assume I would precede that with 'sudo' to give root permission? But I am not sure what diff between "upgrade" and "full-upgrade" would be. Could anyone explain that?
I already used SPM to verify "ubuntu-drivers" was installed in response to How do I fix a frozen black screen on Lubuntu startup? which I thought meant that my video card driver software would be up to date but I guess I am wrong...
Or... is it possibly something to do with needing to activate it via the "autoinstall" command?
1st reply, to guiver
"if this is needed" sounds like it won't remove packages unless they interfere with system upgrade? I guess you would only do a normal "upgrade" if you were in the middle of something and didn't want to reboot right then. I guess I will run that next.
I got the following screen https://i.imgur.com/ZN7AVI5.png transcribed below:
Package configuration
┌──────────────────────────┤ Configuring grub-pc ├──────────────────────────┐
│ A new version (/tmp/grub.SnIFfR3w39) of configuration file │
│ /etc/default/grub is available, but the version installed currently has │
│ been locally modified. │
│ │
│ What do you want to do about modified configuration file grub? │
│ │
│ install the package maintainer's version │
│ keep the local version currently installed │
│ show the differences between the versions │
│ show a side-by-side difference between the versions │
│ show a 3-way difference between available versions │
│ do a 3-way merge between available versions │
│ start a new shell to examine the situation │
│ │
│ │
│ <Ok> │
│ │
└───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
I don't know if there was any major change to the grub file between 18.04.1 and 18.04.2 but it seems like the safe bet might be to take the first option (package maintainer's version) and then if I get the same problems at bootup as before, then redo my steps with switching quiet splash to nodemodeset?
On IRC it was recommended I just keep the local one, implying that there wasn't anything changed though, so I guess I'll do that for now?
I'm sure if I do full-upgrade
it will just prompt me again anyway. Options 3-7 I'm not sure I even want to think about, they sound complex.
drivers nvidia graphics lubuntu
initial question
I was bragging on IRC about how NoModeSet finally allowed me to boot normally for the first time without tricking my graphics drivers not to run, and was told to run the following command:
jay@KingdomClubs:~$ uname -a && lsb_release -a && sudo lshw -C video
Linux KingdomClubs 4.15.0-43-generic #46-Ubuntu SMP Thu Dec 6 14:44:00 UTC 2018 i686 i686 i686 GNU/Linux
No LSB modules are available.
Distributor ID: Ubuntu
Description: Ubuntu 18.04.1 LTS
Release: 18.04
Codename: bionic
[sudo] password for jay:
*-display UNCLAIMED
description: VGA compatible controller
product: G72 [GeForce 7350 LE]
vendor: NVIDIA Corporation
physical id: 0
bus info: pci@0000:01:00.0
version: a1
width: 64 bits
clock: 33MHz
capabilities: pm msi pciexpress vga_controller bus_master cap_list
configuration: latency=0
resources: memory:fa000000-faffffff memory:d0000000-dfffffff memory:fb000000-fbffffff memory:c0000-dffff
jay@KingdomClubs:~$
I was told I wasn't up to date, and hadn't installed nVidia drivers. Indeed it seemed strange because I remember checking the lubuntu site and apparently they're latest LTS version was 18.04.2
I remember at one point being prompted to update automatically but I guess it didn't anymore. I'm not sure why. Anyway I ran the following as suggested on IRC:
sudo apt update && sudo apt upgrade
It's about 24% so hopefully that's a step in the right direction. Although it's unclear to me if this will install nVidia drivers. Would anyone know what I search in Synaptic Package Manager to get those?
IRC also suggested following:
apt full-upgrade
I assume I would precede that with 'sudo' to give root permission? But I am not sure what diff between "upgrade" and "full-upgrade" would be. Could anyone explain that?
I already used SPM to verify "ubuntu-drivers" was installed in response to How do I fix a frozen black screen on Lubuntu startup? which I thought meant that my video card driver software would be up to date but I guess I am wrong...
Or... is it possibly something to do with needing to activate it via the "autoinstall" command?
1st reply, to guiver
"if this is needed" sounds like it won't remove packages unless they interfere with system upgrade? I guess you would only do a normal "upgrade" if you were in the middle of something and didn't want to reboot right then. I guess I will run that next.
I got the following screen https://i.imgur.com/ZN7AVI5.png transcribed below:
Package configuration
┌──────────────────────────┤ Configuring grub-pc ├──────────────────────────┐
│ A new version (/tmp/grub.SnIFfR3w39) of configuration file │
│ /etc/default/grub is available, but the version installed currently has │
│ been locally modified. │
│ │
│ What do you want to do about modified configuration file grub? │
│ │
│ install the package maintainer's version │
│ keep the local version currently installed │
│ show the differences between the versions │
│ show a side-by-side difference between the versions │
│ show a 3-way difference between available versions │
│ do a 3-way merge between available versions │
│ start a new shell to examine the situation │
│ │
│ │
│ <Ok> │
│ │
└───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
I don't know if there was any major change to the grub file between 18.04.1 and 18.04.2 but it seems like the safe bet might be to take the first option (package maintainer's version) and then if I get the same problems at bootup as before, then redo my steps with switching quiet splash to nodemodeset?
On IRC it was recommended I just keep the local one, implying that there wasn't anything changed though, so I guess I'll do that for now?
I'm sure if I do full-upgrade
it will just prompt me again anyway. Options 3-7 I'm not sure I even want to think about, they sound complex.
drivers nvidia graphics lubuntu
drivers nvidia graphics lubuntu
edited Mar 20 at 7:35
VistaRefugee
asked Mar 20 at 6:52
VistaRefugeeVistaRefugee
186
186
Yes you needsudo apt full-upgrade
, but if you check your documentation (man apt
) you'll see full-upgrade performs the function of upgrade but will remove currently installed packages if this is needed to upgrade the system as a whole. or it performs all of upgrade and more. Upgrade has limits on what packages it can upgrade, full-upgrade or dist-upgrade do all. They may require reboot, restarting of services etc which upgrade allows you to postpone those till a later more suitable time.
– guiverc
Mar 20 at 7:10
I have replied above. Is there a major diff between dist-upgrade and full-upgrade?
– VistaRefugee
Mar 20 at 7:36
1
Questions on this site should be on a single topic, after a single response. The 'dist-upgrade' is mostly fromapt-get
, and in theman apt-get
you get more detail. It's my belief that inapt
they do the same thing (the manualman
page doesn't refer to dist-upgrade; it's there I think for people like me with fingers that know apt-get commands) I would suggest sticking with package-maintainers version unless you have a reason not to; you can 'show differences' if it'll help you decide. I always add comments of date/who-made-change/why when I change something which i see in show-diffs.
– guiverc
Mar 20 at 7:42
add a comment |
Yes you needsudo apt full-upgrade
, but if you check your documentation (man apt
) you'll see full-upgrade performs the function of upgrade but will remove currently installed packages if this is needed to upgrade the system as a whole. or it performs all of upgrade and more. Upgrade has limits on what packages it can upgrade, full-upgrade or dist-upgrade do all. They may require reboot, restarting of services etc which upgrade allows you to postpone those till a later more suitable time.
– guiverc
Mar 20 at 7:10
I have replied above. Is there a major diff between dist-upgrade and full-upgrade?
– VistaRefugee
Mar 20 at 7:36
1
Questions on this site should be on a single topic, after a single response. The 'dist-upgrade' is mostly fromapt-get
, and in theman apt-get
you get more detail. It's my belief that inapt
they do the same thing (the manualman
page doesn't refer to dist-upgrade; it's there I think for people like me with fingers that know apt-get commands) I would suggest sticking with package-maintainers version unless you have a reason not to; you can 'show differences' if it'll help you decide. I always add comments of date/who-made-change/why when I change something which i see in show-diffs.
– guiverc
Mar 20 at 7:42
Yes you need
sudo apt full-upgrade
, but if you check your documentation (man apt
) you'll see full-upgrade performs the function of upgrade but will remove currently installed packages if this is needed to upgrade the system as a whole. or it performs all of upgrade and more. Upgrade has limits on what packages it can upgrade, full-upgrade or dist-upgrade do all. They may require reboot, restarting of services etc which upgrade allows you to postpone those till a later more suitable time.– guiverc
Mar 20 at 7:10
Yes you need
sudo apt full-upgrade
, but if you check your documentation (man apt
) you'll see full-upgrade performs the function of upgrade but will remove currently installed packages if this is needed to upgrade the system as a whole. or it performs all of upgrade and more. Upgrade has limits on what packages it can upgrade, full-upgrade or dist-upgrade do all. They may require reboot, restarting of services etc which upgrade allows you to postpone those till a later more suitable time.– guiverc
Mar 20 at 7:10
I have replied above. Is there a major diff between dist-upgrade and full-upgrade?
– VistaRefugee
Mar 20 at 7:36
I have replied above. Is there a major diff between dist-upgrade and full-upgrade?
– VistaRefugee
Mar 20 at 7:36
1
1
Questions on this site should be on a single topic, after a single response. The 'dist-upgrade' is mostly from
apt-get
, and in the man apt-get
you get more detail. It's my belief that in apt
they do the same thing (the manual man
page doesn't refer to dist-upgrade; it's there I think for people like me with fingers that know apt-get commands) I would suggest sticking with package-maintainers version unless you have a reason not to; you can 'show differences' if it'll help you decide. I always add comments of date/who-made-change/why when I change something which i see in show-diffs.– guiverc
Mar 20 at 7:42
Questions on this site should be on a single topic, after a single response. The 'dist-upgrade' is mostly from
apt-get
, and in the man apt-get
you get more detail. It's my belief that in apt
they do the same thing (the manual man
page doesn't refer to dist-upgrade; it's there I think for people like me with fingers that know apt-get commands) I would suggest sticking with package-maintainers version unless you have a reason not to; you can 'show differences' if it'll help you decide. I always add comments of date/who-made-change/why when I change something which i see in show-diffs.– guiverc
Mar 20 at 7:42
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "89"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f1127141%2fwhy-was-i-not-automatically-prompted-to-update%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Ask Ubuntu!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f1127141%2fwhy-was-i-not-automatically-prompted-to-update%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Yes you need
sudo apt full-upgrade
, but if you check your documentation (man apt
) you'll see full-upgrade performs the function of upgrade but will remove currently installed packages if this is needed to upgrade the system as a whole. or it performs all of upgrade and more. Upgrade has limits on what packages it can upgrade, full-upgrade or dist-upgrade do all. They may require reboot, restarting of services etc which upgrade allows you to postpone those till a later more suitable time.– guiverc
Mar 20 at 7:10
I have replied above. Is there a major diff between dist-upgrade and full-upgrade?
– VistaRefugee
Mar 20 at 7:36
1
Questions on this site should be on a single topic, after a single response. The 'dist-upgrade' is mostly from
apt-get
, and in theman apt-get
you get more detail. It's my belief that inapt
they do the same thing (the manualman
page doesn't refer to dist-upgrade; it's there I think for people like me with fingers that know apt-get commands) I would suggest sticking with package-maintainers version unless you have a reason not to; you can 'show differences' if it'll help you decide. I always add comments of date/who-made-change/why when I change something which i see in show-diffs.– guiverc
Mar 20 at 7:42