Problems with making formula look great [on hold]












5















I have problems to make the below formula look great. Do you have any ideas on how I can make it look better?
enter image description here



This is this LaTeX code I have for it:



PTK = $PRF(PMK, text{"Pairwise key expansion"} || Min(AA, SPA) || \ Max{AA, SPA}|| Min(ANonce, SNonce) ||  Max(ANonce,SNonce))$


I appreciate all help!










share|improve this question









New contributor




Johan is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











put on hold as primarily opinion-based by JouleV, Sebastiano, Stefan Pinnow, Phelype Oleinik, Raaja 3 hours ago


Many good questions generate some degree of opinion based on expert experience, but answers to this question will tend to be almost entirely based on opinions, rather than facts, references, or specific expertise. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.














  • 2





    Welcome to TeX.SE. In order to help produce an expression that is not only visually appealing but also factually correct and meaningful, it would help to know what || stands for. Please advise.

    – Mico
    14 hours ago











  • @Mico Seems more like a norm-like operator to me.

    – Raaja
    14 hours ago











  • @Mico In cryptography || means string concatenation.

    – nomadictype
    8 hours ago











  • What does "great" mean?

    – David Richerby
    5 hours ago











  • Perhaps you could be more specific in your request. What is it that you do not like about your current output? We are happy to help with LaTeXing specific requests, but without explaining what you want, "great" and "better" are matters of opinion.

    – Sandy G
    3 hours ago
















5















I have problems to make the below formula look great. Do you have any ideas on how I can make it look better?
enter image description here



This is this LaTeX code I have for it:



PTK = $PRF(PMK, text{"Pairwise key expansion"} || Min(AA, SPA) || \ Max{AA, SPA}|| Min(ANonce, SNonce) ||  Max(ANonce,SNonce))$


I appreciate all help!










share|improve this question









New contributor




Johan is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











put on hold as primarily opinion-based by JouleV, Sebastiano, Stefan Pinnow, Phelype Oleinik, Raaja 3 hours ago


Many good questions generate some degree of opinion based on expert experience, but answers to this question will tend to be almost entirely based on opinions, rather than facts, references, or specific expertise. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.














  • 2





    Welcome to TeX.SE. In order to help produce an expression that is not only visually appealing but also factually correct and meaningful, it would help to know what || stands for. Please advise.

    – Mico
    14 hours ago











  • @Mico Seems more like a norm-like operator to me.

    – Raaja
    14 hours ago











  • @Mico In cryptography || means string concatenation.

    – nomadictype
    8 hours ago











  • What does "great" mean?

    – David Richerby
    5 hours ago











  • Perhaps you could be more specific in your request. What is it that you do not like about your current output? We are happy to help with LaTeXing specific requests, but without explaining what you want, "great" and "better" are matters of opinion.

    – Sandy G
    3 hours ago














5












5








5








I have problems to make the below formula look great. Do you have any ideas on how I can make it look better?
enter image description here



This is this LaTeX code I have for it:



PTK = $PRF(PMK, text{"Pairwise key expansion"} || Min(AA, SPA) || \ Max{AA, SPA}|| Min(ANonce, SNonce) ||  Max(ANonce,SNonce))$


I appreciate all help!










share|improve this question









New contributor




Johan is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












I have problems to make the below formula look great. Do you have any ideas on how I can make it look better?
enter image description here



This is this LaTeX code I have for it:



PTK = $PRF(PMK, text{"Pairwise key expansion"} || Min(AA, SPA) || \ Max{AA, SPA}|| Min(ANonce, SNonce) ||  Max(ANonce,SNonce))$


I appreciate all help!







math-mode alignment






share|improve this question









New contributor




Johan is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question









New contributor




Johan is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 10 hours ago









JouleV

5,71821549




5,71821549






New contributor




Johan is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 14 hours ago









JohanJohan

452




452




New contributor




Johan is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Johan is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Johan is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




put on hold as primarily opinion-based by JouleV, Sebastiano, Stefan Pinnow, Phelype Oleinik, Raaja 3 hours ago


Many good questions generate some degree of opinion based on expert experience, but answers to this question will tend to be almost entirely based on opinions, rather than facts, references, or specific expertise. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.









put on hold as primarily opinion-based by JouleV, Sebastiano, Stefan Pinnow, Phelype Oleinik, Raaja 3 hours ago


Many good questions generate some degree of opinion based on expert experience, but answers to this question will tend to be almost entirely based on opinions, rather than facts, references, or specific expertise. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.










  • 2





    Welcome to TeX.SE. In order to help produce an expression that is not only visually appealing but also factually correct and meaningful, it would help to know what || stands for. Please advise.

    – Mico
    14 hours ago











  • @Mico Seems more like a norm-like operator to me.

    – Raaja
    14 hours ago











  • @Mico In cryptography || means string concatenation.

    – nomadictype
    8 hours ago











  • What does "great" mean?

    – David Richerby
    5 hours ago











  • Perhaps you could be more specific in your request. What is it that you do not like about your current output? We are happy to help with LaTeXing specific requests, but without explaining what you want, "great" and "better" are matters of opinion.

    – Sandy G
    3 hours ago














  • 2





    Welcome to TeX.SE. In order to help produce an expression that is not only visually appealing but also factually correct and meaningful, it would help to know what || stands for. Please advise.

    – Mico
    14 hours ago











  • @Mico Seems more like a norm-like operator to me.

    – Raaja
    14 hours ago











  • @Mico In cryptography || means string concatenation.

    – nomadictype
    8 hours ago











  • What does "great" mean?

    – David Richerby
    5 hours ago











  • Perhaps you could be more specific in your request. What is it that you do not like about your current output? We are happy to help with LaTeXing specific requests, but without explaining what you want, "great" and "better" are matters of opinion.

    – Sandy G
    3 hours ago








2




2





Welcome to TeX.SE. In order to help produce an expression that is not only visually appealing but also factually correct and meaningful, it would help to know what || stands for. Please advise.

– Mico
14 hours ago





Welcome to TeX.SE. In order to help produce an expression that is not only visually appealing but also factually correct and meaningful, it would help to know what || stands for. Please advise.

– Mico
14 hours ago













@Mico Seems more like a norm-like operator to me.

– Raaja
14 hours ago





@Mico Seems more like a norm-like operator to me.

– Raaja
14 hours ago













@Mico In cryptography || means string concatenation.

– nomadictype
8 hours ago





@Mico In cryptography || means string concatenation.

– nomadictype
8 hours ago













What does "great" mean?

– David Richerby
5 hours ago





What does "great" mean?

– David Richerby
5 hours ago













Perhaps you could be more specific in your request. What is it that you do not like about your current output? We are happy to help with LaTeXing specific requests, but without explaining what you want, "great" and "better" are matters of opinion.

– Sandy G
3 hours ago





Perhaps you could be more specific in your request. What is it that you do not like about your current output? We are happy to help with LaTeXing specific requests, but without explaining what you want, "great" and "better" are matters of opinion.

– Sandy G
3 hours ago










4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes


















8














I don't know if it looks great, but do you want something like this?



enter image description here



documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}

begin{document}

[
begin{split}
text{PTK} = & text{PRF}left( text{PMK}, text{"Pairwise key expansion"} || min(text{AA}, text{SPA}) || right. \
& left. qquad max(text{AA}, text{SPA})|| min(text{ANonce}, text{SNonce}) || max(text{ANonce},text{SNonce})right)
end{split}
]

end{document}





share|improve this answer
























  • Thanks a lot for the great answer!

    – Johan
    13 hours ago



















9














Taking Ignasi's approach a step further...



documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
begin{document}
[
begin{split}
text{PTK} = text{PRF}bigl( &text{PMK}, text{``Pairwise key expansion''} \& || min(text{AA}, text{SPA}) \
& || max(text{AA}, text{SPA})\&|| min(text{ANonce}, text{SNonce}) \&|| max(text{ANonce},text{SNonce})bigr)
end{split}
]
end{document}


enter image description here



MFGA






share|improve this answer
























  • Thanks a lot for the great answer, I'll go for this one!

    – Johan
    13 hours ago






  • 2





    @Johan Thanks. While you can click the up-arrow to "upvote" any question or answer on this site that you find helpful, you can select only one answer for each of your questions to click the check on, as a means to "accept" the most suitable answer.

    – Steven B. Segletes
    13 hours ago





















5














IMHO your formula is in an algorithm and || stands for "or". So you should have a look at algorithm packages. Anyway this is a non-algorithm but algorithmic answer:



documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
begin{document}
[
begin{array}{r@{}l@{}l}
text{PTK}=PRF&(PMK, & text{``Pairwise key expansion''}\
&& || min(AA,SPA)\
&& || max(AA,SPA)\
&& || min(ANonce,SNonce)\
&& || max(ANonce,SNonce)\
&)&
end{array}
]
end{document}


enter image description here



Edit 1: Improved version



I prefer this way.



documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
begin{document}
[
begin{array}{rl}
text{PTK}=PRF(&\
& PMK,\
& (\
& quadtext{``Pairwise key expansion''}\
& quad||min(AA,SPA)\
& quad||max(AA,SPA)\
& quad||min(ANonce,SNonce)\
& quad||max(ANonce,SNonce)\
& )\
)&
end{array}
]
end{document}


enter image description here






share|improve this answer


























  • Alright thanks a lot! I'm not so good at LaTeX so I'll go for this one, since it looks much better than before! Not sure how much algorithm package would have improved it, but this looks good enough.

    – Johan
    13 hours ago











  • @Johan I already improved my answer.

    – JouleV
    13 hours ago



















2














I have two proposals. Most important is to properly define macros for specific object types in your document, in order to ensure uniformity.



documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}

newcommand{OOR}{mathrel{|}}
newcommand{tvar}[1]{mathrm{#1}}
newcommand{tdesc}[1]{textup{``#1''}}

begin{document}

[
begin{aligned}
tvar{PTK}=tvar{PRF}bigl(
&tvar{PMK},tdesc{Pairwise key expansion} \
& OOR min(tvar{AA},tvar{SPA})\
& OOR max(tvar{AA},tvar{SPA})\
& OOR min(tvar{ANonce},tvar{SNonce})\
& OOR max(tvar{ANonce},tvar{SNonce}) bigr)
end{aligned}
]

begin{multline*}
tvar{PTK}=tvar{PRF}bigl(
tvar{PMK},tdesc{Pairwise key expansion}
OOR min(tvar{AA},tvar{SPA}) OOR \
max(tvar{AA},tvar{SPA})
OOR min(tvar{ANonce},tvar{SNonce})
OOR max(tvar{ANonce},tvar{SNonce}) bigr)
end{multline*}

end{document}


enter image description here






share|improve this answer






























    4 Answers
    4






    active

    oldest

    votes








    4 Answers
    4






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    8














    I don't know if it looks great, but do you want something like this?



    enter image description here



    documentclass{article}
    usepackage{amsmath}

    begin{document}

    [
    begin{split}
    text{PTK} = & text{PRF}left( text{PMK}, text{"Pairwise key expansion"} || min(text{AA}, text{SPA}) || right. \
    & left. qquad max(text{AA}, text{SPA})|| min(text{ANonce}, text{SNonce}) || max(text{ANonce},text{SNonce})right)
    end{split}
    ]

    end{document}





    share|improve this answer
























    • Thanks a lot for the great answer!

      – Johan
      13 hours ago
















    8














    I don't know if it looks great, but do you want something like this?



    enter image description here



    documentclass{article}
    usepackage{amsmath}

    begin{document}

    [
    begin{split}
    text{PTK} = & text{PRF}left( text{PMK}, text{"Pairwise key expansion"} || min(text{AA}, text{SPA}) || right. \
    & left. qquad max(text{AA}, text{SPA})|| min(text{ANonce}, text{SNonce}) || max(text{ANonce},text{SNonce})right)
    end{split}
    ]

    end{document}





    share|improve this answer
























    • Thanks a lot for the great answer!

      – Johan
      13 hours ago














    8












    8








    8







    I don't know if it looks great, but do you want something like this?



    enter image description here



    documentclass{article}
    usepackage{amsmath}

    begin{document}

    [
    begin{split}
    text{PTK} = & text{PRF}left( text{PMK}, text{"Pairwise key expansion"} || min(text{AA}, text{SPA}) || right. \
    & left. qquad max(text{AA}, text{SPA})|| min(text{ANonce}, text{SNonce}) || max(text{ANonce},text{SNonce})right)
    end{split}
    ]

    end{document}





    share|improve this answer













    I don't know if it looks great, but do you want something like this?



    enter image description here



    documentclass{article}
    usepackage{amsmath}

    begin{document}

    [
    begin{split}
    text{PTK} = & text{PRF}left( text{PMK}, text{"Pairwise key expansion"} || min(text{AA}, text{SPA}) || right. \
    & left. qquad max(text{AA}, text{SPA})|| min(text{ANonce}, text{SNonce}) || max(text{ANonce},text{SNonce})right)
    end{split}
    ]

    end{document}






    share|improve this answer












    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer










    answered 13 hours ago









    IgnasiIgnasi

    94.8k4175318




    94.8k4175318













    • Thanks a lot for the great answer!

      – Johan
      13 hours ago



















    • Thanks a lot for the great answer!

      – Johan
      13 hours ago

















    Thanks a lot for the great answer!

    – Johan
    13 hours ago





    Thanks a lot for the great answer!

    – Johan
    13 hours ago











    9














    Taking Ignasi's approach a step further...



    documentclass{article}
    usepackage{amsmath}
    begin{document}
    [
    begin{split}
    text{PTK} = text{PRF}bigl( &text{PMK}, text{``Pairwise key expansion''} \& || min(text{AA}, text{SPA}) \
    & || max(text{AA}, text{SPA})\&|| min(text{ANonce}, text{SNonce}) \&|| max(text{ANonce},text{SNonce})bigr)
    end{split}
    ]
    end{document}


    enter image description here



    MFGA






    share|improve this answer
























    • Thanks a lot for the great answer, I'll go for this one!

      – Johan
      13 hours ago






    • 2





      @Johan Thanks. While you can click the up-arrow to "upvote" any question or answer on this site that you find helpful, you can select only one answer for each of your questions to click the check on, as a means to "accept" the most suitable answer.

      – Steven B. Segletes
      13 hours ago


















    9














    Taking Ignasi's approach a step further...



    documentclass{article}
    usepackage{amsmath}
    begin{document}
    [
    begin{split}
    text{PTK} = text{PRF}bigl( &text{PMK}, text{``Pairwise key expansion''} \& || min(text{AA}, text{SPA}) \
    & || max(text{AA}, text{SPA})\&|| min(text{ANonce}, text{SNonce}) \&|| max(text{ANonce},text{SNonce})bigr)
    end{split}
    ]
    end{document}


    enter image description here



    MFGA






    share|improve this answer
























    • Thanks a lot for the great answer, I'll go for this one!

      – Johan
      13 hours ago






    • 2





      @Johan Thanks. While you can click the up-arrow to "upvote" any question or answer on this site that you find helpful, you can select only one answer for each of your questions to click the check on, as a means to "accept" the most suitable answer.

      – Steven B. Segletes
      13 hours ago
















    9












    9








    9







    Taking Ignasi's approach a step further...



    documentclass{article}
    usepackage{amsmath}
    begin{document}
    [
    begin{split}
    text{PTK} = text{PRF}bigl( &text{PMK}, text{``Pairwise key expansion''} \& || min(text{AA}, text{SPA}) \
    & || max(text{AA}, text{SPA})\&|| min(text{ANonce}, text{SNonce}) \&|| max(text{ANonce},text{SNonce})bigr)
    end{split}
    ]
    end{document}


    enter image description here



    MFGA






    share|improve this answer













    Taking Ignasi's approach a step further...



    documentclass{article}
    usepackage{amsmath}
    begin{document}
    [
    begin{split}
    text{PTK} = text{PRF}bigl( &text{PMK}, text{``Pairwise key expansion''} \& || min(text{AA}, text{SPA}) \
    & || max(text{AA}, text{SPA})\&|| min(text{ANonce}, text{SNonce}) \&|| max(text{ANonce},text{SNonce})bigr)
    end{split}
    ]
    end{document}


    enter image description here



    MFGA







    share|improve this answer












    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer










    answered 13 hours ago









    Steven B. SegletesSteven B. Segletes

    158k9204411




    158k9204411













    • Thanks a lot for the great answer, I'll go for this one!

      – Johan
      13 hours ago






    • 2





      @Johan Thanks. While you can click the up-arrow to "upvote" any question or answer on this site that you find helpful, you can select only one answer for each of your questions to click the check on, as a means to "accept" the most suitable answer.

      – Steven B. Segletes
      13 hours ago





















    • Thanks a lot for the great answer, I'll go for this one!

      – Johan
      13 hours ago






    • 2





      @Johan Thanks. While you can click the up-arrow to "upvote" any question or answer on this site that you find helpful, you can select only one answer for each of your questions to click the check on, as a means to "accept" the most suitable answer.

      – Steven B. Segletes
      13 hours ago



















    Thanks a lot for the great answer, I'll go for this one!

    – Johan
    13 hours ago





    Thanks a lot for the great answer, I'll go for this one!

    – Johan
    13 hours ago




    2




    2





    @Johan Thanks. While you can click the up-arrow to "upvote" any question or answer on this site that you find helpful, you can select only one answer for each of your questions to click the check on, as a means to "accept" the most suitable answer.

    – Steven B. Segletes
    13 hours ago







    @Johan Thanks. While you can click the up-arrow to "upvote" any question or answer on this site that you find helpful, you can select only one answer for each of your questions to click the check on, as a means to "accept" the most suitable answer.

    – Steven B. Segletes
    13 hours ago













    5














    IMHO your formula is in an algorithm and || stands for "or". So you should have a look at algorithm packages. Anyway this is a non-algorithm but algorithmic answer:



    documentclass{article}
    usepackage{amsmath}
    begin{document}
    [
    begin{array}{r@{}l@{}l}
    text{PTK}=PRF&(PMK, & text{``Pairwise key expansion''}\
    && || min(AA,SPA)\
    && || max(AA,SPA)\
    && || min(ANonce,SNonce)\
    && || max(ANonce,SNonce)\
    &)&
    end{array}
    ]
    end{document}


    enter image description here



    Edit 1: Improved version



    I prefer this way.



    documentclass{article}
    usepackage{amsmath}
    begin{document}
    [
    begin{array}{rl}
    text{PTK}=PRF(&\
    & PMK,\
    & (\
    & quadtext{``Pairwise key expansion''}\
    & quad||min(AA,SPA)\
    & quad||max(AA,SPA)\
    & quad||min(ANonce,SNonce)\
    & quad||max(ANonce,SNonce)\
    & )\
    )&
    end{array}
    ]
    end{document}


    enter image description here






    share|improve this answer


























    • Alright thanks a lot! I'm not so good at LaTeX so I'll go for this one, since it looks much better than before! Not sure how much algorithm package would have improved it, but this looks good enough.

      – Johan
      13 hours ago











    • @Johan I already improved my answer.

      – JouleV
      13 hours ago
















    5














    IMHO your formula is in an algorithm and || stands for "or". So you should have a look at algorithm packages. Anyway this is a non-algorithm but algorithmic answer:



    documentclass{article}
    usepackage{amsmath}
    begin{document}
    [
    begin{array}{r@{}l@{}l}
    text{PTK}=PRF&(PMK, & text{``Pairwise key expansion''}\
    && || min(AA,SPA)\
    && || max(AA,SPA)\
    && || min(ANonce,SNonce)\
    && || max(ANonce,SNonce)\
    &)&
    end{array}
    ]
    end{document}


    enter image description here



    Edit 1: Improved version



    I prefer this way.



    documentclass{article}
    usepackage{amsmath}
    begin{document}
    [
    begin{array}{rl}
    text{PTK}=PRF(&\
    & PMK,\
    & (\
    & quadtext{``Pairwise key expansion''}\
    & quad||min(AA,SPA)\
    & quad||max(AA,SPA)\
    & quad||min(ANonce,SNonce)\
    & quad||max(ANonce,SNonce)\
    & )\
    )&
    end{array}
    ]
    end{document}


    enter image description here






    share|improve this answer


























    • Alright thanks a lot! I'm not so good at LaTeX so I'll go for this one, since it looks much better than before! Not sure how much algorithm package would have improved it, but this looks good enough.

      – Johan
      13 hours ago











    • @Johan I already improved my answer.

      – JouleV
      13 hours ago














    5












    5








    5







    IMHO your formula is in an algorithm and || stands for "or". So you should have a look at algorithm packages. Anyway this is a non-algorithm but algorithmic answer:



    documentclass{article}
    usepackage{amsmath}
    begin{document}
    [
    begin{array}{r@{}l@{}l}
    text{PTK}=PRF&(PMK, & text{``Pairwise key expansion''}\
    && || min(AA,SPA)\
    && || max(AA,SPA)\
    && || min(ANonce,SNonce)\
    && || max(ANonce,SNonce)\
    &)&
    end{array}
    ]
    end{document}


    enter image description here



    Edit 1: Improved version



    I prefer this way.



    documentclass{article}
    usepackage{amsmath}
    begin{document}
    [
    begin{array}{rl}
    text{PTK}=PRF(&\
    & PMK,\
    & (\
    & quadtext{``Pairwise key expansion''}\
    & quad||min(AA,SPA)\
    & quad||max(AA,SPA)\
    & quad||min(ANonce,SNonce)\
    & quad||max(ANonce,SNonce)\
    & )\
    )&
    end{array}
    ]
    end{document}


    enter image description here






    share|improve this answer















    IMHO your formula is in an algorithm and || stands for "or". So you should have a look at algorithm packages. Anyway this is a non-algorithm but algorithmic answer:



    documentclass{article}
    usepackage{amsmath}
    begin{document}
    [
    begin{array}{r@{}l@{}l}
    text{PTK}=PRF&(PMK, & text{``Pairwise key expansion''}\
    && || min(AA,SPA)\
    && || max(AA,SPA)\
    && || min(ANonce,SNonce)\
    && || max(ANonce,SNonce)\
    &)&
    end{array}
    ]
    end{document}


    enter image description here



    Edit 1: Improved version



    I prefer this way.



    documentclass{article}
    usepackage{amsmath}
    begin{document}
    [
    begin{array}{rl}
    text{PTK}=PRF(&\
    & PMK,\
    & (\
    & quadtext{``Pairwise key expansion''}\
    & quad||min(AA,SPA)\
    & quad||max(AA,SPA)\
    & quad||min(ANonce,SNonce)\
    & quad||max(ANonce,SNonce)\
    & )\
    )&
    end{array}
    ]
    end{document}


    enter image description here







    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited 11 hours ago

























    answered 13 hours ago









    JouleVJouleV

    5,71821549




    5,71821549













    • Alright thanks a lot! I'm not so good at LaTeX so I'll go for this one, since it looks much better than before! Not sure how much algorithm package would have improved it, but this looks good enough.

      – Johan
      13 hours ago











    • @Johan I already improved my answer.

      – JouleV
      13 hours ago



















    • Alright thanks a lot! I'm not so good at LaTeX so I'll go for this one, since it looks much better than before! Not sure how much algorithm package would have improved it, but this looks good enough.

      – Johan
      13 hours ago











    • @Johan I already improved my answer.

      – JouleV
      13 hours ago

















    Alright thanks a lot! I'm not so good at LaTeX so I'll go for this one, since it looks much better than before! Not sure how much algorithm package would have improved it, but this looks good enough.

    – Johan
    13 hours ago





    Alright thanks a lot! I'm not so good at LaTeX so I'll go for this one, since it looks much better than before! Not sure how much algorithm package would have improved it, but this looks good enough.

    – Johan
    13 hours ago













    @Johan I already improved my answer.

    – JouleV
    13 hours ago





    @Johan I already improved my answer.

    – JouleV
    13 hours ago











    2














    I have two proposals. Most important is to properly define macros for specific object types in your document, in order to ensure uniformity.



    documentclass{article}
    usepackage{amsmath}

    newcommand{OOR}{mathrel{|}}
    newcommand{tvar}[1]{mathrm{#1}}
    newcommand{tdesc}[1]{textup{``#1''}}

    begin{document}

    [
    begin{aligned}
    tvar{PTK}=tvar{PRF}bigl(
    &tvar{PMK},tdesc{Pairwise key expansion} \
    & OOR min(tvar{AA},tvar{SPA})\
    & OOR max(tvar{AA},tvar{SPA})\
    & OOR min(tvar{ANonce},tvar{SNonce})\
    & OOR max(tvar{ANonce},tvar{SNonce}) bigr)
    end{aligned}
    ]

    begin{multline*}
    tvar{PTK}=tvar{PRF}bigl(
    tvar{PMK},tdesc{Pairwise key expansion}
    OOR min(tvar{AA},tvar{SPA}) OOR \
    max(tvar{AA},tvar{SPA})
    OOR min(tvar{ANonce},tvar{SNonce})
    OOR max(tvar{ANonce},tvar{SNonce}) bigr)
    end{multline*}

    end{document}


    enter image description here






    share|improve this answer




























      2














      I have two proposals. Most important is to properly define macros for specific object types in your document, in order to ensure uniformity.



      documentclass{article}
      usepackage{amsmath}

      newcommand{OOR}{mathrel{|}}
      newcommand{tvar}[1]{mathrm{#1}}
      newcommand{tdesc}[1]{textup{``#1''}}

      begin{document}

      [
      begin{aligned}
      tvar{PTK}=tvar{PRF}bigl(
      &tvar{PMK},tdesc{Pairwise key expansion} \
      & OOR min(tvar{AA},tvar{SPA})\
      & OOR max(tvar{AA},tvar{SPA})\
      & OOR min(tvar{ANonce},tvar{SNonce})\
      & OOR max(tvar{ANonce},tvar{SNonce}) bigr)
      end{aligned}
      ]

      begin{multline*}
      tvar{PTK}=tvar{PRF}bigl(
      tvar{PMK},tdesc{Pairwise key expansion}
      OOR min(tvar{AA},tvar{SPA}) OOR \
      max(tvar{AA},tvar{SPA})
      OOR min(tvar{ANonce},tvar{SNonce})
      OOR max(tvar{ANonce},tvar{SNonce}) bigr)
      end{multline*}

      end{document}


      enter image description here






      share|improve this answer


























        2












        2








        2







        I have two proposals. Most important is to properly define macros for specific object types in your document, in order to ensure uniformity.



        documentclass{article}
        usepackage{amsmath}

        newcommand{OOR}{mathrel{|}}
        newcommand{tvar}[1]{mathrm{#1}}
        newcommand{tdesc}[1]{textup{``#1''}}

        begin{document}

        [
        begin{aligned}
        tvar{PTK}=tvar{PRF}bigl(
        &tvar{PMK},tdesc{Pairwise key expansion} \
        & OOR min(tvar{AA},tvar{SPA})\
        & OOR max(tvar{AA},tvar{SPA})\
        & OOR min(tvar{ANonce},tvar{SNonce})\
        & OOR max(tvar{ANonce},tvar{SNonce}) bigr)
        end{aligned}
        ]

        begin{multline*}
        tvar{PTK}=tvar{PRF}bigl(
        tvar{PMK},tdesc{Pairwise key expansion}
        OOR min(tvar{AA},tvar{SPA}) OOR \
        max(tvar{AA},tvar{SPA})
        OOR min(tvar{ANonce},tvar{SNonce})
        OOR max(tvar{ANonce},tvar{SNonce}) bigr)
        end{multline*}

        end{document}


        enter image description here






        share|improve this answer













        I have two proposals. Most important is to properly define macros for specific object types in your document, in order to ensure uniformity.



        documentclass{article}
        usepackage{amsmath}

        newcommand{OOR}{mathrel{|}}
        newcommand{tvar}[1]{mathrm{#1}}
        newcommand{tdesc}[1]{textup{``#1''}}

        begin{document}

        [
        begin{aligned}
        tvar{PTK}=tvar{PRF}bigl(
        &tvar{PMK},tdesc{Pairwise key expansion} \
        & OOR min(tvar{AA},tvar{SPA})\
        & OOR max(tvar{AA},tvar{SPA})\
        & OOR min(tvar{ANonce},tvar{SNonce})\
        & OOR max(tvar{ANonce},tvar{SNonce}) bigr)
        end{aligned}
        ]

        begin{multline*}
        tvar{PTK}=tvar{PRF}bigl(
        tvar{PMK},tdesc{Pairwise key expansion}
        OOR min(tvar{AA},tvar{SPA}) OOR \
        max(tvar{AA},tvar{SPA})
        OOR min(tvar{ANonce},tvar{SNonce})
        OOR max(tvar{ANonce},tvar{SNonce}) bigr)
        end{multline*}

        end{document}


        enter image description here







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered 12 hours ago









        egregegreg

        726k8819223230




        726k8819223230















            Popular posts from this blog

            數位音樂下載

            格利澤436b

            When can things happen in Etherscan, such as the picture below?