The conference started tomorrow
I heard when someone told "The conference started tomorrow" so my question is: is it correct grammatical and acceptible? If yes when I can use it?
grammaticality tenses
New contributor
add a comment |
I heard when someone told "The conference started tomorrow" so my question is: is it correct grammatical and acceptible? If yes when I can use it?
grammaticality tenses
New contributor
2
I reckon it's grammatically correct as everything is in the right place but it's semantically dubious because tomorrow can surely never be in the past.
– Andrew Leach♦
5 hours ago
Conjugate 'to start' ... if this makes no sense to you post your question on the ELL site.
– lbf
4 hours ago
2
Welcome to EL&U. Please edit your post to include the precise context in which you heard this expression. It could be acceptable, for example, if it reflects a change in schedule: The conference started tomorrow according to the approved agenda, but because of the blizzard, the opening session now takes place on Friday. Or, there might be even more contrived scenarios involving time zone differences or some such. Without knowing more details about what was said and when, we cannot say for certain whether it was an error, a grammatical but awkward usage, or deliberate.
– choster
4 hours ago
add a comment |
I heard when someone told "The conference started tomorrow" so my question is: is it correct grammatical and acceptible? If yes when I can use it?
grammaticality tenses
New contributor
I heard when someone told "The conference started tomorrow" so my question is: is it correct grammatical and acceptible? If yes when I can use it?
grammaticality tenses
grammaticality tenses
New contributor
New contributor
edited 4 hours ago
youngblood
New contributor
asked 5 hours ago
youngbloodyoungblood
11
11
New contributor
New contributor
2
I reckon it's grammatically correct as everything is in the right place but it's semantically dubious because tomorrow can surely never be in the past.
– Andrew Leach♦
5 hours ago
Conjugate 'to start' ... if this makes no sense to you post your question on the ELL site.
– lbf
4 hours ago
2
Welcome to EL&U. Please edit your post to include the precise context in which you heard this expression. It could be acceptable, for example, if it reflects a change in schedule: The conference started tomorrow according to the approved agenda, but because of the blizzard, the opening session now takes place on Friday. Or, there might be even more contrived scenarios involving time zone differences or some such. Without knowing more details about what was said and when, we cannot say for certain whether it was an error, a grammatical but awkward usage, or deliberate.
– choster
4 hours ago
add a comment |
2
I reckon it's grammatically correct as everything is in the right place but it's semantically dubious because tomorrow can surely never be in the past.
– Andrew Leach♦
5 hours ago
Conjugate 'to start' ... if this makes no sense to you post your question on the ELL site.
– lbf
4 hours ago
2
Welcome to EL&U. Please edit your post to include the precise context in which you heard this expression. It could be acceptable, for example, if it reflects a change in schedule: The conference started tomorrow according to the approved agenda, but because of the blizzard, the opening session now takes place on Friday. Or, there might be even more contrived scenarios involving time zone differences or some such. Without knowing more details about what was said and when, we cannot say for certain whether it was an error, a grammatical but awkward usage, or deliberate.
– choster
4 hours ago
2
2
I reckon it's grammatically correct as everything is in the right place but it's semantically dubious because tomorrow can surely never be in the past.
– Andrew Leach♦
5 hours ago
I reckon it's grammatically correct as everything is in the right place but it's semantically dubious because tomorrow can surely never be in the past.
– Andrew Leach♦
5 hours ago
Conjugate 'to start' ... if this makes no sense to you post your question on the ELL site.
– lbf
4 hours ago
Conjugate 'to start' ... if this makes no sense to you post your question on the ELL site.
– lbf
4 hours ago
2
2
Welcome to EL&U. Please edit your post to include the precise context in which you heard this expression. It could be acceptable, for example, if it reflects a change in schedule: The conference started tomorrow according to the approved agenda, but because of the blizzard, the opening session now takes place on Friday. Or, there might be even more contrived scenarios involving time zone differences or some such. Without knowing more details about what was said and when, we cannot say for certain whether it was an error, a grammatical but awkward usage, or deliberate.
– choster
4 hours ago
Welcome to EL&U. Please edit your post to include the precise context in which you heard this expression. It could be acceptable, for example, if it reflects a change in schedule: The conference started tomorrow according to the approved agenda, but because of the blizzard, the opening session now takes place on Friday. Or, there might be even more contrived scenarios involving time zone differences or some such. Without knowing more details about what was said and when, we cannot say for certain whether it was an error, a grammatical but awkward usage, or deliberate.
– choster
4 hours ago
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
It's definitely incorrect. There is a reason we use tenses. We cannot use the simple past tense for future events.
"The conference will start tomorrow" makes sense.
If you're referring to an event from the past that started the next day, you can say simply that.
"The conference started the next day."
New contributor
Answers that fail to take into account possible context make me tense.
– Hot Licks
3 hours ago
Please do not include generic website 'recommendations' and other superfluous comments in your answers. I have amended your answer to remove those.
– TrevorD
1 hour ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "97"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
youngblood is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f489001%2fthe-conference-started-tomorrow%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
It's definitely incorrect. There is a reason we use tenses. We cannot use the simple past tense for future events.
"The conference will start tomorrow" makes sense.
If you're referring to an event from the past that started the next day, you can say simply that.
"The conference started the next day."
New contributor
Answers that fail to take into account possible context make me tense.
– Hot Licks
3 hours ago
Please do not include generic website 'recommendations' and other superfluous comments in your answers. I have amended your answer to remove those.
– TrevorD
1 hour ago
add a comment |
It's definitely incorrect. There is a reason we use tenses. We cannot use the simple past tense for future events.
"The conference will start tomorrow" makes sense.
If you're referring to an event from the past that started the next day, you can say simply that.
"The conference started the next day."
New contributor
Answers that fail to take into account possible context make me tense.
– Hot Licks
3 hours ago
Please do not include generic website 'recommendations' and other superfluous comments in your answers. I have amended your answer to remove those.
– TrevorD
1 hour ago
add a comment |
It's definitely incorrect. There is a reason we use tenses. We cannot use the simple past tense for future events.
"The conference will start tomorrow" makes sense.
If you're referring to an event from the past that started the next day, you can say simply that.
"The conference started the next day."
New contributor
It's definitely incorrect. There is a reason we use tenses. We cannot use the simple past tense for future events.
"The conference will start tomorrow" makes sense.
If you're referring to an event from the past that started the next day, you can say simply that.
"The conference started the next day."
New contributor
edited 1 hour ago
TrevorD
10.6k22257
10.6k22257
New contributor
answered 4 hours ago
MikeMike
342
342
New contributor
New contributor
Answers that fail to take into account possible context make me tense.
– Hot Licks
3 hours ago
Please do not include generic website 'recommendations' and other superfluous comments in your answers. I have amended your answer to remove those.
– TrevorD
1 hour ago
add a comment |
Answers that fail to take into account possible context make me tense.
– Hot Licks
3 hours ago
Please do not include generic website 'recommendations' and other superfluous comments in your answers. I have amended your answer to remove those.
– TrevorD
1 hour ago
Answers that fail to take into account possible context make me tense.
– Hot Licks
3 hours ago
Answers that fail to take into account possible context make me tense.
– Hot Licks
3 hours ago
Please do not include generic website 'recommendations' and other superfluous comments in your answers. I have amended your answer to remove those.
– TrevorD
1 hour ago
Please do not include generic website 'recommendations' and other superfluous comments in your answers. I have amended your answer to remove those.
– TrevorD
1 hour ago
add a comment |
youngblood is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
youngblood is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
youngblood is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
youngblood is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language & Usage Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f489001%2fthe-conference-started-tomorrow%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
2
I reckon it's grammatically correct as everything is in the right place but it's semantically dubious because tomorrow can surely never be in the past.
– Andrew Leach♦
5 hours ago
Conjugate 'to start' ... if this makes no sense to you post your question on the ELL site.
– lbf
4 hours ago
2
Welcome to EL&U. Please edit your post to include the precise context in which you heard this expression. It could be acceptable, for example, if it reflects a change in schedule: The conference started tomorrow according to the approved agenda, but because of the blizzard, the opening session now takes place on Friday. Or, there might be even more contrived scenarios involving time zone differences or some such. Without knowing more details about what was said and when, we cannot say for certain whether it was an error, a grammatical but awkward usage, or deliberate.
– choster
4 hours ago