How to use 2 footnotes in the same word?












1















I have this Paragraph and I was wondering if it's possible to do what is underlined in the figure (RED), or if you know how to do this in another way, let me know. Basically the "DOM.Element" is a child of WEB API. So there are 2 things there. The "DOM" & "Element".



How to use multiple footnotes in this case? Is that a good way of doing it? TBH I haven't seen anything like it before.



enter image description here



For the LaTex folks:



As mentioned above, the design is created due to the reference of Cascade Style Sheets (CSS3) in a HyperText Markup Language (HTML5). This will assign different design commands for every 
textit{
DOMfootnote{ Document Object Model (DOM) - url{https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/Document_Object_Model}}
.Elementfootnote{ Element - url{https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/Element}}
}
individually, or in a form of a group using textit{Element.id} and/or textit{Element.className}.The benefit of using CSS at this stage is that it loads the styles of the elements before the page loads on the user's screen.









share|improve this question













migrated from english.stackexchange.com 5 hours ago


This question came from our site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts.























    1















    I have this Paragraph and I was wondering if it's possible to do what is underlined in the figure (RED), or if you know how to do this in another way, let me know. Basically the "DOM.Element" is a child of WEB API. So there are 2 things there. The "DOM" & "Element".



    How to use multiple footnotes in this case? Is that a good way of doing it? TBH I haven't seen anything like it before.



    enter image description here



    For the LaTex folks:



    As mentioned above, the design is created due to the reference of Cascade Style Sheets (CSS3) in a HyperText Markup Language (HTML5). This will assign different design commands for every 
    textit{
    DOMfootnote{ Document Object Model (DOM) - url{https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/Document_Object_Model}}
    .Elementfootnote{ Element - url{https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/Element}}
    }
    individually, or in a form of a group using textit{Element.id} and/or textit{Element.className}.The benefit of using CSS at this stage is that it loads the styles of the elements before the page loads on the user's screen.









    share|improve this question













    migrated from english.stackexchange.com 5 hours ago


    This question came from our site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts.





















      1












      1








      1








      I have this Paragraph and I was wondering if it's possible to do what is underlined in the figure (RED), or if you know how to do this in another way, let me know. Basically the "DOM.Element" is a child of WEB API. So there are 2 things there. The "DOM" & "Element".



      How to use multiple footnotes in this case? Is that a good way of doing it? TBH I haven't seen anything like it before.



      enter image description here



      For the LaTex folks:



      As mentioned above, the design is created due to the reference of Cascade Style Sheets (CSS3) in a HyperText Markup Language (HTML5). This will assign different design commands for every 
      textit{
      DOMfootnote{ Document Object Model (DOM) - url{https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/Document_Object_Model}}
      .Elementfootnote{ Element - url{https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/Element}}
      }
      individually, or in a form of a group using textit{Element.id} and/or textit{Element.className}.The benefit of using CSS at this stage is that it loads the styles of the elements before the page loads on the user's screen.









      share|improve this question














      I have this Paragraph and I was wondering if it's possible to do what is underlined in the figure (RED), or if you know how to do this in another way, let me know. Basically the "DOM.Element" is a child of WEB API. So there are 2 things there. The "DOM" & "Element".



      How to use multiple footnotes in this case? Is that a good way of doing it? TBH I haven't seen anything like it before.



      enter image description here



      For the LaTex folks:



      As mentioned above, the design is created due to the reference of Cascade Style Sheets (CSS3) in a HyperText Markup Language (HTML5). This will assign different design commands for every 
      textit{
      DOMfootnote{ Document Object Model (DOM) - url{https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/Document_Object_Model}}
      .Elementfootnote{ Element - url{https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/Element}}
      }
      individually, or in a form of a group using textit{Element.id} and/or textit{Element.className}.The benefit of using CSS at this stage is that it loads the styles of the elements before the page loads on the user's screen.






      footnotes






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked 5 hours ago







      Loizos Vasileiou











      migrated from english.stackexchange.com 5 hours ago


      This question came from our site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts.









      migrated from english.stackexchange.com 5 hours ago


      This question came from our site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts.
























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          0














          Just use "DOM element" instead.



          "DOM.Element" is not actually a word. It is way used to represent a DOM element in a programming context. In that context it would indeed behave like word and your usage might be correct.



          However the sentence or the text is not in that kind of context. If it was you'd have no need to footnote either "DOM" or "Element". This is a general explanation using normal English so you should use normal words and expressions.



          Same is true of element id and class. I understand what you are trying here but the text is talking about the general concepts on a very general level not about the specific types in a programming context.



          I am guessing that later in the text it gets more technical and that is where the usage comes from?



          CSS is from "Cascading StyleSheets". Not "Cascade".






          share|improve this answer
























          • Also the entire first sentence makes no sense at all, and it’s impossible to tell what the antecedent of this in the second sentence is supposed to be (the design, perhaps?). The whole thing is in dire need of editing and proofreading.

            – Janus Bahs Jacquet
            2 hours ago











          • @JanusBahsJacquet "This" refers to the browser reading the referenced CSS and applying it to the document. More or less the entire first sentence. Which refers to "as was explained before" But you are right it is pretty much incomprehensible. I just happened to know what he was trying to explain, so I did not notice. LOL.

            – Ville Niemi
            2 hours ago











          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "166"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fwriting.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f43247%2fhow-to-use-2-footnotes-in-the-same-word%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown
























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          0














          Just use "DOM element" instead.



          "DOM.Element" is not actually a word. It is way used to represent a DOM element in a programming context. In that context it would indeed behave like word and your usage might be correct.



          However the sentence or the text is not in that kind of context. If it was you'd have no need to footnote either "DOM" or "Element". This is a general explanation using normal English so you should use normal words and expressions.



          Same is true of element id and class. I understand what you are trying here but the text is talking about the general concepts on a very general level not about the specific types in a programming context.



          I am guessing that later in the text it gets more technical and that is where the usage comes from?



          CSS is from "Cascading StyleSheets". Not "Cascade".






          share|improve this answer
























          • Also the entire first sentence makes no sense at all, and it’s impossible to tell what the antecedent of this in the second sentence is supposed to be (the design, perhaps?). The whole thing is in dire need of editing and proofreading.

            – Janus Bahs Jacquet
            2 hours ago











          • @JanusBahsJacquet "This" refers to the browser reading the referenced CSS and applying it to the document. More or less the entire first sentence. Which refers to "as was explained before" But you are right it is pretty much incomprehensible. I just happened to know what he was trying to explain, so I did not notice. LOL.

            – Ville Niemi
            2 hours ago
















          0














          Just use "DOM element" instead.



          "DOM.Element" is not actually a word. It is way used to represent a DOM element in a programming context. In that context it would indeed behave like word and your usage might be correct.



          However the sentence or the text is not in that kind of context. If it was you'd have no need to footnote either "DOM" or "Element". This is a general explanation using normal English so you should use normal words and expressions.



          Same is true of element id and class. I understand what you are trying here but the text is talking about the general concepts on a very general level not about the specific types in a programming context.



          I am guessing that later in the text it gets more technical and that is where the usage comes from?



          CSS is from "Cascading StyleSheets". Not "Cascade".






          share|improve this answer
























          • Also the entire first sentence makes no sense at all, and it’s impossible to tell what the antecedent of this in the second sentence is supposed to be (the design, perhaps?). The whole thing is in dire need of editing and proofreading.

            – Janus Bahs Jacquet
            2 hours ago











          • @JanusBahsJacquet "This" refers to the browser reading the referenced CSS and applying it to the document. More or less the entire first sentence. Which refers to "as was explained before" But you are right it is pretty much incomprehensible. I just happened to know what he was trying to explain, so I did not notice. LOL.

            – Ville Niemi
            2 hours ago














          0












          0








          0







          Just use "DOM element" instead.



          "DOM.Element" is not actually a word. It is way used to represent a DOM element in a programming context. In that context it would indeed behave like word and your usage might be correct.



          However the sentence or the text is not in that kind of context. If it was you'd have no need to footnote either "DOM" or "Element". This is a general explanation using normal English so you should use normal words and expressions.



          Same is true of element id and class. I understand what you are trying here but the text is talking about the general concepts on a very general level not about the specific types in a programming context.



          I am guessing that later in the text it gets more technical and that is where the usage comes from?



          CSS is from "Cascading StyleSheets". Not "Cascade".






          share|improve this answer













          Just use "DOM element" instead.



          "DOM.Element" is not actually a word. It is way used to represent a DOM element in a programming context. In that context it would indeed behave like word and your usage might be correct.



          However the sentence or the text is not in that kind of context. If it was you'd have no need to footnote either "DOM" or "Element". This is a general explanation using normal English so you should use normal words and expressions.



          Same is true of element id and class. I understand what you are trying here but the text is talking about the general concepts on a very general level not about the specific types in a programming context.



          I am guessing that later in the text it gets more technical and that is where the usage comes from?



          CSS is from "Cascading StyleSheets". Not "Cascade".







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered 3 hours ago









          Ville NiemiVille Niemi

          1,05244




          1,05244













          • Also the entire first sentence makes no sense at all, and it’s impossible to tell what the antecedent of this in the second sentence is supposed to be (the design, perhaps?). The whole thing is in dire need of editing and proofreading.

            – Janus Bahs Jacquet
            2 hours ago











          • @JanusBahsJacquet "This" refers to the browser reading the referenced CSS and applying it to the document. More or less the entire first sentence. Which refers to "as was explained before" But you are right it is pretty much incomprehensible. I just happened to know what he was trying to explain, so I did not notice. LOL.

            – Ville Niemi
            2 hours ago



















          • Also the entire first sentence makes no sense at all, and it’s impossible to tell what the antecedent of this in the second sentence is supposed to be (the design, perhaps?). The whole thing is in dire need of editing and proofreading.

            – Janus Bahs Jacquet
            2 hours ago











          • @JanusBahsJacquet "This" refers to the browser reading the referenced CSS and applying it to the document. More or less the entire first sentence. Which refers to "as was explained before" But you are right it is pretty much incomprehensible. I just happened to know what he was trying to explain, so I did not notice. LOL.

            – Ville Niemi
            2 hours ago

















          Also the entire first sentence makes no sense at all, and it’s impossible to tell what the antecedent of this in the second sentence is supposed to be (the design, perhaps?). The whole thing is in dire need of editing and proofreading.

          – Janus Bahs Jacquet
          2 hours ago





          Also the entire first sentence makes no sense at all, and it’s impossible to tell what the antecedent of this in the second sentence is supposed to be (the design, perhaps?). The whole thing is in dire need of editing and proofreading.

          – Janus Bahs Jacquet
          2 hours ago













          @JanusBahsJacquet "This" refers to the browser reading the referenced CSS and applying it to the document. More or less the entire first sentence. Which refers to "as was explained before" But you are right it is pretty much incomprehensible. I just happened to know what he was trying to explain, so I did not notice. LOL.

          – Ville Niemi
          2 hours ago





          @JanusBahsJacquet "This" refers to the browser reading the referenced CSS and applying it to the document. More or less the entire first sentence. Which refers to "as was explained before" But you are right it is pretty much incomprehensible. I just happened to know what he was trying to explain, so I did not notice. LOL.

          – Ville Niemi
          2 hours ago


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Writing Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fwriting.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f43247%2fhow-to-use-2-footnotes-in-the-same-word%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          How did Captain America manage to do this?

          迪纳利

          南乌拉尔铁路局