Finding the solution set for a quadratic inequality $x^2-2<frac{7}{2}x$












3












$begingroup$



If $x^2-2<frac{7}{2}x$ then what is the solution set for $x$?




I have most of the problem done, I just don't know how to lay out my answer. The answer is supposed to be $$boxed{-frac12<x<4}$$



First, I rewrote the problem saying $x^2-frac{7}{2}x-2<0$, and to be able to conveniently factor it I decided to multiply both sides by 2:



$$2x^2-7x-4<0$$



$$(2x+1)(x-4)<0$$



$$x<-frac12, x<4, text{or} (-infty, -frac12) cup (-infty, 4)$$



I know that doesn't make sense because that's the solution set for the equation less than $0$, when really we want to find the solution set for it less than $frac72x$. So how do I get the above solution? Would it suffice to just draw a number line and say if all values less than $-frac12$ and all values greater than $4$ turn the equation to $<0$ then it must be values between $-frac12 text{and} 4$?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    You have almost solved it - draw a picture of $y = (2x+1)(x-4)$ and conclude that this graph is less than $0$ on the set $(-1/2, 4)$
    $endgroup$
    – Jack
    2 days ago
















3












$begingroup$



If $x^2-2<frac{7}{2}x$ then what is the solution set for $x$?




I have most of the problem done, I just don't know how to lay out my answer. The answer is supposed to be $$boxed{-frac12<x<4}$$



First, I rewrote the problem saying $x^2-frac{7}{2}x-2<0$, and to be able to conveniently factor it I decided to multiply both sides by 2:



$$2x^2-7x-4<0$$



$$(2x+1)(x-4)<0$$



$$x<-frac12, x<4, text{or} (-infty, -frac12) cup (-infty, 4)$$



I know that doesn't make sense because that's the solution set for the equation less than $0$, when really we want to find the solution set for it less than $frac72x$. So how do I get the above solution? Would it suffice to just draw a number line and say if all values less than $-frac12$ and all values greater than $4$ turn the equation to $<0$ then it must be values between $-frac12 text{and} 4$?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    You have almost solved it - draw a picture of $y = (2x+1)(x-4)$ and conclude that this graph is less than $0$ on the set $(-1/2, 4)$
    $endgroup$
    – Jack
    2 days ago














3












3








3





$begingroup$



If $x^2-2<frac{7}{2}x$ then what is the solution set for $x$?




I have most of the problem done, I just don't know how to lay out my answer. The answer is supposed to be $$boxed{-frac12<x<4}$$



First, I rewrote the problem saying $x^2-frac{7}{2}x-2<0$, and to be able to conveniently factor it I decided to multiply both sides by 2:



$$2x^2-7x-4<0$$



$$(2x+1)(x-4)<0$$



$$x<-frac12, x<4, text{or} (-infty, -frac12) cup (-infty, 4)$$



I know that doesn't make sense because that's the solution set for the equation less than $0$, when really we want to find the solution set for it less than $frac72x$. So how do I get the above solution? Would it suffice to just draw a number line and say if all values less than $-frac12$ and all values greater than $4$ turn the equation to $<0$ then it must be values between $-frac12 text{and} 4$?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$





If $x^2-2<frac{7}{2}x$ then what is the solution set for $x$?




I have most of the problem done, I just don't know how to lay out my answer. The answer is supposed to be $$boxed{-frac12<x<4}$$



First, I rewrote the problem saying $x^2-frac{7}{2}x-2<0$, and to be able to conveniently factor it I decided to multiply both sides by 2:



$$2x^2-7x-4<0$$



$$(2x+1)(x-4)<0$$



$$x<-frac12, x<4, text{or} (-infty, -frac12) cup (-infty, 4)$$



I know that doesn't make sense because that's the solution set for the equation less than $0$, when really we want to find the solution set for it less than $frac72x$. So how do I get the above solution? Would it suffice to just draw a number line and say if all values less than $-frac12$ and all values greater than $4$ turn the equation to $<0$ then it must be values between $-frac12 text{and} 4$?







algebra-precalculus inequality quadratics






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited 2 days ago









YuiTo Cheng

2,4064937




2,4064937










asked 2 days ago









Lex_iLex_i

1127




1127








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    You have almost solved it - draw a picture of $y = (2x+1)(x-4)$ and conclude that this graph is less than $0$ on the set $(-1/2, 4)$
    $endgroup$
    – Jack
    2 days ago














  • 1




    $begingroup$
    You have almost solved it - draw a picture of $y = (2x+1)(x-4)$ and conclude that this graph is less than $0$ on the set $(-1/2, 4)$
    $endgroup$
    – Jack
    2 days ago








1




1




$begingroup$
You have almost solved it - draw a picture of $y = (2x+1)(x-4)$ and conclude that this graph is less than $0$ on the set $(-1/2, 4)$
$endgroup$
– Jack
2 days ago




$begingroup$
You have almost solved it - draw a picture of $y = (2x+1)(x-4)$ and conclude that this graph is less than $0$ on the set $(-1/2, 4)$
$endgroup$
– Jack
2 days ago










4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes


















3












$begingroup$

You are on the right track. From $(2x+1)(x-4)<0$, you know that equality occurs when $x=-1/2$ and when $x=4$. To be safe, check the intervals begin{align}x<-1/2:quad &2x+1<0,quad x-4<0implies(2x+1)(x-4)>0\-1/2<x<4:quad&2x+1>0,quad x-4<0implies(2x+1)(x-4)<0\x>4:quad&2x+1>0,quad x-4>0implies(2x+1)(x-4)>0end{align} Therefore the only solution to the inequality is $-1/2<x<4$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$





















    2












    $begingroup$

    For $(2x+1)(x-4)<0$ to be true, you want one of the numbers $(2x+1), (x-4)$ to be negative, and the other to be positive.



    Option 1: the first is negative:



    $2x+1<0, x-4>0$ translates to $x<-frac12$ and $x>4$ which is, of course, impossible.



    Option 2: The first is positive:
    $2x+1>0, x-4<0$ translates to $x>-frac12$ and $x<4$ which means $xin(-frac12, 4)$.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$





















      0












      $begingroup$

      The inequality is $(x-frac 7 4)^{2}<2+frac {49} {16}$. This means $-r <x-frac 7 4 <r$ where $r=sqrt {2+frac {49} {16}}=frac 9 4$. Can you continue?






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$





















        0












        $begingroup$

        The key realization is that $ab<0$ if and only if one of them is positive, and one of them is negative.



        So we know that



        $$2x+1 <0 implies x < - frac 1 2 ;;;;; text{and} ;;;;; x-4<0 implies x<4$$



        But notice that, for some values of $x$, you might have some of these positive, or at other times negative. So we have to consider three potential solution sets:





        • $x$ is between $-1/2,4$


        • $x$ is less than $-1/2$


        • $x$ is greater than $4$


        If $x<-1/2$, then $2x+1<0$, but $x-4<0$ too, so their product is positive.



        Similarly, if $x>4$, then both factors and thus their product is positive.



        Thus, neither solution set can satisfy the inequalities simultaneously (and thus cannot solve the original inequality). The only conclusion left is that $-1/2 < x < 4$.



        Indeed, since $x>-1/2$, we have $2x+1>0$, but since $x<4$ we have $x-4<0$. This means their product is negative, which is precisely what we want!





        A more intuitive method might be to consider that, as noted, the original inequality is



        $$x^2 - frac 7 2 x - 2 < 0$$



        When is a quadratic negative? As it happens, you can easily see, if the leading coefficient is positive, then the quadratic is negative between its two roots! (For negative leading coefficient, it is negative outside of its roots instead.)



        Yet another method might be to consider the three cases for this inequality: either $x$ is to the left of the leftmost root, in between the two, or to the right of the rightmost root. Plug in some $x$ on each interval - say, $x=-1, x=0, x=5$, respectively - and see which give you cases less than zero, and those that don't. Owing to how the quadratic behaves, the corresponding "test values" that satisfy the inequality are on the interval that is the solution (left of the left root, in-between, or right of the right root), and thus your answer would be those intervals. (Granted this isn't much different than the method noted in the previous paragraph, but if you find this easier to process more power to you man.)



        And of course, a graph always helps if it's available. Though a graph doesn't constitute a full-blown proof, it can always be helpful for getting an intuition of the situation. Indeed for the inequality above, we have the graph below, which makes the solution set immediately clear:



        enter image description here






        share|cite|improve this answer











        $endgroup$














          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3181993%2ffinding-the-solution-set-for-a-quadratic-inequality-x2-2-frac72x%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          4 Answers
          4






          active

          oldest

          votes








          4 Answers
          4






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          3












          $begingroup$

          You are on the right track. From $(2x+1)(x-4)<0$, you know that equality occurs when $x=-1/2$ and when $x=4$. To be safe, check the intervals begin{align}x<-1/2:quad &2x+1<0,quad x-4<0implies(2x+1)(x-4)>0\-1/2<x<4:quad&2x+1>0,quad x-4<0implies(2x+1)(x-4)<0\x>4:quad&2x+1>0,quad x-4>0implies(2x+1)(x-4)>0end{align} Therefore the only solution to the inequality is $-1/2<x<4$.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$


















            3












            $begingroup$

            You are on the right track. From $(2x+1)(x-4)<0$, you know that equality occurs when $x=-1/2$ and when $x=4$. To be safe, check the intervals begin{align}x<-1/2:quad &2x+1<0,quad x-4<0implies(2x+1)(x-4)>0\-1/2<x<4:quad&2x+1>0,quad x-4<0implies(2x+1)(x-4)<0\x>4:quad&2x+1>0,quad x-4>0implies(2x+1)(x-4)>0end{align} Therefore the only solution to the inequality is $-1/2<x<4$.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$
















              3












              3








              3





              $begingroup$

              You are on the right track. From $(2x+1)(x-4)<0$, you know that equality occurs when $x=-1/2$ and when $x=4$. To be safe, check the intervals begin{align}x<-1/2:quad &2x+1<0,quad x-4<0implies(2x+1)(x-4)>0\-1/2<x<4:quad&2x+1>0,quad x-4<0implies(2x+1)(x-4)<0\x>4:quad&2x+1>0,quad x-4>0implies(2x+1)(x-4)>0end{align} Therefore the only solution to the inequality is $-1/2<x<4$.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$



              You are on the right track. From $(2x+1)(x-4)<0$, you know that equality occurs when $x=-1/2$ and when $x=4$. To be safe, check the intervals begin{align}x<-1/2:quad &2x+1<0,quad x-4<0implies(2x+1)(x-4)>0\-1/2<x<4:quad&2x+1>0,quad x-4<0implies(2x+1)(x-4)<0\x>4:quad&2x+1>0,quad x-4>0implies(2x+1)(x-4)>0end{align} Therefore the only solution to the inequality is $-1/2<x<4$.







              share|cite|improve this answer












              share|cite|improve this answer



              share|cite|improve this answer










              answered 2 days ago









              TheSimpliFireTheSimpliFire

              13.2k62464




              13.2k62464























                  2












                  $begingroup$

                  For $(2x+1)(x-4)<0$ to be true, you want one of the numbers $(2x+1), (x-4)$ to be negative, and the other to be positive.



                  Option 1: the first is negative:



                  $2x+1<0, x-4>0$ translates to $x<-frac12$ and $x>4$ which is, of course, impossible.



                  Option 2: The first is positive:
                  $2x+1>0, x-4<0$ translates to $x>-frac12$ and $x<4$ which means $xin(-frac12, 4)$.






                  share|cite|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$


















                    2












                    $begingroup$

                    For $(2x+1)(x-4)<0$ to be true, you want one of the numbers $(2x+1), (x-4)$ to be negative, and the other to be positive.



                    Option 1: the first is negative:



                    $2x+1<0, x-4>0$ translates to $x<-frac12$ and $x>4$ which is, of course, impossible.



                    Option 2: The first is positive:
                    $2x+1>0, x-4<0$ translates to $x>-frac12$ and $x<4$ which means $xin(-frac12, 4)$.






                    share|cite|improve this answer









                    $endgroup$
















                      2












                      2








                      2





                      $begingroup$

                      For $(2x+1)(x-4)<0$ to be true, you want one of the numbers $(2x+1), (x-4)$ to be negative, and the other to be positive.



                      Option 1: the first is negative:



                      $2x+1<0, x-4>0$ translates to $x<-frac12$ and $x>4$ which is, of course, impossible.



                      Option 2: The first is positive:
                      $2x+1>0, x-4<0$ translates to $x>-frac12$ and $x<4$ which means $xin(-frac12, 4)$.






                      share|cite|improve this answer









                      $endgroup$



                      For $(2x+1)(x-4)<0$ to be true, you want one of the numbers $(2x+1), (x-4)$ to be negative, and the other to be positive.



                      Option 1: the first is negative:



                      $2x+1<0, x-4>0$ translates to $x<-frac12$ and $x>4$ which is, of course, impossible.



                      Option 2: The first is positive:
                      $2x+1>0, x-4<0$ translates to $x>-frac12$ and $x<4$ which means $xin(-frac12, 4)$.







                      share|cite|improve this answer












                      share|cite|improve this answer



                      share|cite|improve this answer










                      answered 2 days ago









                      5xum5xum

                      92.6k394162




                      92.6k394162























                          0












                          $begingroup$

                          The inequality is $(x-frac 7 4)^{2}<2+frac {49} {16}$. This means $-r <x-frac 7 4 <r$ where $r=sqrt {2+frac {49} {16}}=frac 9 4$. Can you continue?






                          share|cite|improve this answer









                          $endgroup$


















                            0












                            $begingroup$

                            The inequality is $(x-frac 7 4)^{2}<2+frac {49} {16}$. This means $-r <x-frac 7 4 <r$ where $r=sqrt {2+frac {49} {16}}=frac 9 4$. Can you continue?






                            share|cite|improve this answer









                            $endgroup$
















                              0












                              0








                              0





                              $begingroup$

                              The inequality is $(x-frac 7 4)^{2}<2+frac {49} {16}$. This means $-r <x-frac 7 4 <r$ where $r=sqrt {2+frac {49} {16}}=frac 9 4$. Can you continue?






                              share|cite|improve this answer









                              $endgroup$



                              The inequality is $(x-frac 7 4)^{2}<2+frac {49} {16}$. This means $-r <x-frac 7 4 <r$ where $r=sqrt {2+frac {49} {16}}=frac 9 4$. Can you continue?







                              share|cite|improve this answer












                              share|cite|improve this answer



                              share|cite|improve this answer










                              answered 2 days ago









                              Kavi Rama MurthyKavi Rama Murthy

                              74.4k53270




                              74.4k53270























                                  0












                                  $begingroup$

                                  The key realization is that $ab<0$ if and only if one of them is positive, and one of them is negative.



                                  So we know that



                                  $$2x+1 <0 implies x < - frac 1 2 ;;;;; text{and} ;;;;; x-4<0 implies x<4$$



                                  But notice that, for some values of $x$, you might have some of these positive, or at other times negative. So we have to consider three potential solution sets:





                                  • $x$ is between $-1/2,4$


                                  • $x$ is less than $-1/2$


                                  • $x$ is greater than $4$


                                  If $x<-1/2$, then $2x+1<0$, but $x-4<0$ too, so their product is positive.



                                  Similarly, if $x>4$, then both factors and thus their product is positive.



                                  Thus, neither solution set can satisfy the inequalities simultaneously (and thus cannot solve the original inequality). The only conclusion left is that $-1/2 < x < 4$.



                                  Indeed, since $x>-1/2$, we have $2x+1>0$, but since $x<4$ we have $x-4<0$. This means their product is negative, which is precisely what we want!





                                  A more intuitive method might be to consider that, as noted, the original inequality is



                                  $$x^2 - frac 7 2 x - 2 < 0$$



                                  When is a quadratic negative? As it happens, you can easily see, if the leading coefficient is positive, then the quadratic is negative between its two roots! (For negative leading coefficient, it is negative outside of its roots instead.)



                                  Yet another method might be to consider the three cases for this inequality: either $x$ is to the left of the leftmost root, in between the two, or to the right of the rightmost root. Plug in some $x$ on each interval - say, $x=-1, x=0, x=5$, respectively - and see which give you cases less than zero, and those that don't. Owing to how the quadratic behaves, the corresponding "test values" that satisfy the inequality are on the interval that is the solution (left of the left root, in-between, or right of the right root), and thus your answer would be those intervals. (Granted this isn't much different than the method noted in the previous paragraph, but if you find this easier to process more power to you man.)



                                  And of course, a graph always helps if it's available. Though a graph doesn't constitute a full-blown proof, it can always be helpful for getting an intuition of the situation. Indeed for the inequality above, we have the graph below, which makes the solution set immediately clear:



                                  enter image description here






                                  share|cite|improve this answer











                                  $endgroup$


















                                    0












                                    $begingroup$

                                    The key realization is that $ab<0$ if and only if one of them is positive, and one of them is negative.



                                    So we know that



                                    $$2x+1 <0 implies x < - frac 1 2 ;;;;; text{and} ;;;;; x-4<0 implies x<4$$



                                    But notice that, for some values of $x$, you might have some of these positive, or at other times negative. So we have to consider three potential solution sets:





                                    • $x$ is between $-1/2,4$


                                    • $x$ is less than $-1/2$


                                    • $x$ is greater than $4$


                                    If $x<-1/2$, then $2x+1<0$, but $x-4<0$ too, so their product is positive.



                                    Similarly, if $x>4$, then both factors and thus their product is positive.



                                    Thus, neither solution set can satisfy the inequalities simultaneously (and thus cannot solve the original inequality). The only conclusion left is that $-1/2 < x < 4$.



                                    Indeed, since $x>-1/2$, we have $2x+1>0$, but since $x<4$ we have $x-4<0$. This means their product is negative, which is precisely what we want!





                                    A more intuitive method might be to consider that, as noted, the original inequality is



                                    $$x^2 - frac 7 2 x - 2 < 0$$



                                    When is a quadratic negative? As it happens, you can easily see, if the leading coefficient is positive, then the quadratic is negative between its two roots! (For negative leading coefficient, it is negative outside of its roots instead.)



                                    Yet another method might be to consider the three cases for this inequality: either $x$ is to the left of the leftmost root, in between the two, or to the right of the rightmost root. Plug in some $x$ on each interval - say, $x=-1, x=0, x=5$, respectively - and see which give you cases less than zero, and those that don't. Owing to how the quadratic behaves, the corresponding "test values" that satisfy the inequality are on the interval that is the solution (left of the left root, in-between, or right of the right root), and thus your answer would be those intervals. (Granted this isn't much different than the method noted in the previous paragraph, but if you find this easier to process more power to you man.)



                                    And of course, a graph always helps if it's available. Though a graph doesn't constitute a full-blown proof, it can always be helpful for getting an intuition of the situation. Indeed for the inequality above, we have the graph below, which makes the solution set immediately clear:



                                    enter image description here






                                    share|cite|improve this answer











                                    $endgroup$
















                                      0












                                      0








                                      0





                                      $begingroup$

                                      The key realization is that $ab<0$ if and only if one of them is positive, and one of them is negative.



                                      So we know that



                                      $$2x+1 <0 implies x < - frac 1 2 ;;;;; text{and} ;;;;; x-4<0 implies x<4$$



                                      But notice that, for some values of $x$, you might have some of these positive, or at other times negative. So we have to consider three potential solution sets:





                                      • $x$ is between $-1/2,4$


                                      • $x$ is less than $-1/2$


                                      • $x$ is greater than $4$


                                      If $x<-1/2$, then $2x+1<0$, but $x-4<0$ too, so their product is positive.



                                      Similarly, if $x>4$, then both factors and thus their product is positive.



                                      Thus, neither solution set can satisfy the inequalities simultaneously (and thus cannot solve the original inequality). The only conclusion left is that $-1/2 < x < 4$.



                                      Indeed, since $x>-1/2$, we have $2x+1>0$, but since $x<4$ we have $x-4<0$. This means their product is negative, which is precisely what we want!





                                      A more intuitive method might be to consider that, as noted, the original inequality is



                                      $$x^2 - frac 7 2 x - 2 < 0$$



                                      When is a quadratic negative? As it happens, you can easily see, if the leading coefficient is positive, then the quadratic is negative between its two roots! (For negative leading coefficient, it is negative outside of its roots instead.)



                                      Yet another method might be to consider the three cases for this inequality: either $x$ is to the left of the leftmost root, in between the two, or to the right of the rightmost root. Plug in some $x$ on each interval - say, $x=-1, x=0, x=5$, respectively - and see which give you cases less than zero, and those that don't. Owing to how the quadratic behaves, the corresponding "test values" that satisfy the inequality are on the interval that is the solution (left of the left root, in-between, or right of the right root), and thus your answer would be those intervals. (Granted this isn't much different than the method noted in the previous paragraph, but if you find this easier to process more power to you man.)



                                      And of course, a graph always helps if it's available. Though a graph doesn't constitute a full-blown proof, it can always be helpful for getting an intuition of the situation. Indeed for the inequality above, we have the graph below, which makes the solution set immediately clear:



                                      enter image description here






                                      share|cite|improve this answer











                                      $endgroup$



                                      The key realization is that $ab<0$ if and only if one of them is positive, and one of them is negative.



                                      So we know that



                                      $$2x+1 <0 implies x < - frac 1 2 ;;;;; text{and} ;;;;; x-4<0 implies x<4$$



                                      But notice that, for some values of $x$, you might have some of these positive, or at other times negative. So we have to consider three potential solution sets:





                                      • $x$ is between $-1/2,4$


                                      • $x$ is less than $-1/2$


                                      • $x$ is greater than $4$


                                      If $x<-1/2$, then $2x+1<0$, but $x-4<0$ too, so their product is positive.



                                      Similarly, if $x>4$, then both factors and thus their product is positive.



                                      Thus, neither solution set can satisfy the inequalities simultaneously (and thus cannot solve the original inequality). The only conclusion left is that $-1/2 < x < 4$.



                                      Indeed, since $x>-1/2$, we have $2x+1>0$, but since $x<4$ we have $x-4<0$. This means their product is negative, which is precisely what we want!





                                      A more intuitive method might be to consider that, as noted, the original inequality is



                                      $$x^2 - frac 7 2 x - 2 < 0$$



                                      When is a quadratic negative? As it happens, you can easily see, if the leading coefficient is positive, then the quadratic is negative between its two roots! (For negative leading coefficient, it is negative outside of its roots instead.)



                                      Yet another method might be to consider the three cases for this inequality: either $x$ is to the left of the leftmost root, in between the two, or to the right of the rightmost root. Plug in some $x$ on each interval - say, $x=-1, x=0, x=5$, respectively - and see which give you cases less than zero, and those that don't. Owing to how the quadratic behaves, the corresponding "test values" that satisfy the inequality are on the interval that is the solution (left of the left root, in-between, or right of the right root), and thus your answer would be those intervals. (Granted this isn't much different than the method noted in the previous paragraph, but if you find this easier to process more power to you man.)



                                      And of course, a graph always helps if it's available. Though a graph doesn't constitute a full-blown proof, it can always be helpful for getting an intuition of the situation. Indeed for the inequality above, we have the graph below, which makes the solution set immediately clear:



                                      enter image description here







                                      share|cite|improve this answer














                                      share|cite|improve this answer



                                      share|cite|improve this answer








                                      edited 2 days ago

























                                      answered 2 days ago









                                      Eevee TrainerEevee Trainer

                                      10.5k31842




                                      10.5k31842






























                                          draft saved

                                          draft discarded




















































                                          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                                          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                          But avoid



                                          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                                          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                                          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                          draft saved


                                          draft discarded














                                          StackExchange.ready(
                                          function () {
                                          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3181993%2ffinding-the-solution-set-for-a-quadratic-inequality-x2-2-frac72x%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                                          }
                                          );

                                          Post as a guest















                                          Required, but never shown





















































                                          Required, but never shown














                                          Required, but never shown












                                          Required, but never shown







                                          Required, but never shown

































                                          Required, but never shown














                                          Required, but never shown












                                          Required, but never shown







                                          Required, but never shown







                                          Popular posts from this blog

                                          數位音樂下載

                                          When can things happen in Etherscan, such as the picture below?

                                          格利澤436b