Is there a better way to rewrite the sentence? [on hold]
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}
Under extreme marine environmental conditions, ocean creatures in their life can secrete some bioactive compounds made up of special structure.
The compounds could be extracted to marine natural products by researchers.
There are three biggest sources from marine natural products : 1) A, 2) B, and 3) C.
structure
New contributor
put on hold as off-topic by JJJ, Lawrence, Jason Bassford, Cascabel, Mitch 2 days ago
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "Proofreading questions are off-topic unless a specific source of concern in the text is clearly identified." – JJJ, Lawrence, Jason Bassford, Cascabel, Mitch
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
add a comment |
Under extreme marine environmental conditions, ocean creatures in their life can secrete some bioactive compounds made up of special structure.
The compounds could be extracted to marine natural products by researchers.
There are three biggest sources from marine natural products : 1) A, 2) B, and 3) C.
structure
New contributor
put on hold as off-topic by JJJ, Lawrence, Jason Bassford, Cascabel, Mitch 2 days ago
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "Proofreading questions are off-topic unless a specific source of concern in the text is clearly identified." – JJJ, Lawrence, Jason Bassford, Cascabel, Mitch
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
add a comment |
Under extreme marine environmental conditions, ocean creatures in their life can secrete some bioactive compounds made up of special structure.
The compounds could be extracted to marine natural products by researchers.
There are three biggest sources from marine natural products : 1) A, 2) B, and 3) C.
structure
New contributor
Under extreme marine environmental conditions, ocean creatures in their life can secrete some bioactive compounds made up of special structure.
The compounds could be extracted to marine natural products by researchers.
There are three biggest sources from marine natural products : 1) A, 2) B, and 3) C.
structure
structure
New contributor
New contributor
New contributor
asked 2 days ago
webkwswebkws
1
1
New contributor
New contributor
put on hold as off-topic by JJJ, Lawrence, Jason Bassford, Cascabel, Mitch 2 days ago
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "Proofreading questions are off-topic unless a specific source of concern in the text is clearly identified." – JJJ, Lawrence, Jason Bassford, Cascabel, Mitch
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
put on hold as off-topic by JJJ, Lawrence, Jason Bassford, Cascabel, Mitch 2 days ago
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "Proofreading questions are off-topic unless a specific source of concern in the text is clearly identified." – JJJ, Lawrence, Jason Bassford, Cascabel, Mitch
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
You have three sentences here.
In the first I'd replace "their life" with "their lives", since more than one ocean creature is involved, and I'd replace "made up of special structure" with "with special structures", as I think it reads more naturally.
In the second sentence I'd replace "to" by "as"' because I'm assuming that the extracted compounds themselves are the natural products. [If the extracted compounds had to be processed, then they wouldn't be "natural marine products".]
In the last sentence, "principal sources" would read more naturally than "biggest sources". [I was going to suggest "main sources" but that would be an unintended pun, because 'main' can mean, as a noun, sea or ocean and, as an adjective, principal.]
I would change "in their lives" to "throughout their lives" (if that is what is meant). The use of the word "special" is problematic. What is "special" about these structures? And should it be "extracted to create natural marine products"? Note, "natural marine" is more ... uhm, natural than the other way round. (Also, coming from a scientific background, I find the use of "natural" to describe products pretty meaningless. Even dishonest/offensive.) And I wouldn't use "researchers" to describe people producing products; they might develop the concept but not productise it.
– James Random
2 days ago
Some better way to change structure of the sentences ? I mean sentence patterns.
– webkws
2 days ago
There's not much wrong with the sentence patterns, in my opinion.
– Philip Wood
2 days ago
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
You have three sentences here.
In the first I'd replace "their life" with "their lives", since more than one ocean creature is involved, and I'd replace "made up of special structure" with "with special structures", as I think it reads more naturally.
In the second sentence I'd replace "to" by "as"' because I'm assuming that the extracted compounds themselves are the natural products. [If the extracted compounds had to be processed, then they wouldn't be "natural marine products".]
In the last sentence, "principal sources" would read more naturally than "biggest sources". [I was going to suggest "main sources" but that would be an unintended pun, because 'main' can mean, as a noun, sea or ocean and, as an adjective, principal.]
I would change "in their lives" to "throughout their lives" (if that is what is meant). The use of the word "special" is problematic. What is "special" about these structures? And should it be "extracted to create natural marine products"? Note, "natural marine" is more ... uhm, natural than the other way round. (Also, coming from a scientific background, I find the use of "natural" to describe products pretty meaningless. Even dishonest/offensive.) And I wouldn't use "researchers" to describe people producing products; they might develop the concept but not productise it.
– James Random
2 days ago
Some better way to change structure of the sentences ? I mean sentence patterns.
– webkws
2 days ago
There's not much wrong with the sentence patterns, in my opinion.
– Philip Wood
2 days ago
add a comment |
You have three sentences here.
In the first I'd replace "their life" with "their lives", since more than one ocean creature is involved, and I'd replace "made up of special structure" with "with special structures", as I think it reads more naturally.
In the second sentence I'd replace "to" by "as"' because I'm assuming that the extracted compounds themselves are the natural products. [If the extracted compounds had to be processed, then they wouldn't be "natural marine products".]
In the last sentence, "principal sources" would read more naturally than "biggest sources". [I was going to suggest "main sources" but that would be an unintended pun, because 'main' can mean, as a noun, sea or ocean and, as an adjective, principal.]
I would change "in their lives" to "throughout their lives" (if that is what is meant). The use of the word "special" is problematic. What is "special" about these structures? And should it be "extracted to create natural marine products"? Note, "natural marine" is more ... uhm, natural than the other way round. (Also, coming from a scientific background, I find the use of "natural" to describe products pretty meaningless. Even dishonest/offensive.) And I wouldn't use "researchers" to describe people producing products; they might develop the concept but not productise it.
– James Random
2 days ago
Some better way to change structure of the sentences ? I mean sentence patterns.
– webkws
2 days ago
There's not much wrong with the sentence patterns, in my opinion.
– Philip Wood
2 days ago
add a comment |
You have three sentences here.
In the first I'd replace "their life" with "their lives", since more than one ocean creature is involved, and I'd replace "made up of special structure" with "with special structures", as I think it reads more naturally.
In the second sentence I'd replace "to" by "as"' because I'm assuming that the extracted compounds themselves are the natural products. [If the extracted compounds had to be processed, then they wouldn't be "natural marine products".]
In the last sentence, "principal sources" would read more naturally than "biggest sources". [I was going to suggest "main sources" but that would be an unintended pun, because 'main' can mean, as a noun, sea or ocean and, as an adjective, principal.]
You have three sentences here.
In the first I'd replace "their life" with "their lives", since more than one ocean creature is involved, and I'd replace "made up of special structure" with "with special structures", as I think it reads more naturally.
In the second sentence I'd replace "to" by "as"' because I'm assuming that the extracted compounds themselves are the natural products. [If the extracted compounds had to be processed, then they wouldn't be "natural marine products".]
In the last sentence, "principal sources" would read more naturally than "biggest sources". [I was going to suggest "main sources" but that would be an unintended pun, because 'main' can mean, as a noun, sea or ocean and, as an adjective, principal.]
answered 2 days ago
Philip WoodPhilip Wood
3256
3256
I would change "in their lives" to "throughout their lives" (if that is what is meant). The use of the word "special" is problematic. What is "special" about these structures? And should it be "extracted to create natural marine products"? Note, "natural marine" is more ... uhm, natural than the other way round. (Also, coming from a scientific background, I find the use of "natural" to describe products pretty meaningless. Even dishonest/offensive.) And I wouldn't use "researchers" to describe people producing products; they might develop the concept but not productise it.
– James Random
2 days ago
Some better way to change structure of the sentences ? I mean sentence patterns.
– webkws
2 days ago
There's not much wrong with the sentence patterns, in my opinion.
– Philip Wood
2 days ago
add a comment |
I would change "in their lives" to "throughout their lives" (if that is what is meant). The use of the word "special" is problematic. What is "special" about these structures? And should it be "extracted to create natural marine products"? Note, "natural marine" is more ... uhm, natural than the other way round. (Also, coming from a scientific background, I find the use of "natural" to describe products pretty meaningless. Even dishonest/offensive.) And I wouldn't use "researchers" to describe people producing products; they might develop the concept but not productise it.
– James Random
2 days ago
Some better way to change structure of the sentences ? I mean sentence patterns.
– webkws
2 days ago
There's not much wrong with the sentence patterns, in my opinion.
– Philip Wood
2 days ago
I would change "in their lives" to "throughout their lives" (if that is what is meant). The use of the word "special" is problematic. What is "special" about these structures? And should it be "extracted to create natural marine products"? Note, "natural marine" is more ... uhm, natural than the other way round. (Also, coming from a scientific background, I find the use of "natural" to describe products pretty meaningless. Even dishonest/offensive.) And I wouldn't use "researchers" to describe people producing products; they might develop the concept but not productise it.
– James Random
2 days ago
I would change "in their lives" to "throughout their lives" (if that is what is meant). The use of the word "special" is problematic. What is "special" about these structures? And should it be "extracted to create natural marine products"? Note, "natural marine" is more ... uhm, natural than the other way round. (Also, coming from a scientific background, I find the use of "natural" to describe products pretty meaningless. Even dishonest/offensive.) And I wouldn't use "researchers" to describe people producing products; they might develop the concept but not productise it.
– James Random
2 days ago
Some better way to change structure of the sentences ? I mean sentence patterns.
– webkws
2 days ago
Some better way to change structure of the sentences ? I mean sentence patterns.
– webkws
2 days ago
There's not much wrong with the sentence patterns, in my opinion.
– Philip Wood
2 days ago
There's not much wrong with the sentence patterns, in my opinion.
– Philip Wood
2 days ago
add a comment |