Is there a technique used when someone splits a compound noun into two parts?
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}
My student has asked whether the splitting of the compound word keyhole into key hole is a particular literary technique. I didn't know!
It's relevant to the text, as it is about disconnection and distance in relationships.
nouns literary-techniques compound-adjectives
New contributor
add a comment |
My student has asked whether the splitting of the compound word keyhole into key hole is a particular literary technique. I didn't know!
It's relevant to the text, as it is about disconnection and distance in relationships.
nouns literary-techniques compound-adjectives
New contributor
Check this answer.
– Ubi hatt
2 days ago
But "keyhole" is a single word (a compound noun) with the meaning a hole for a key. It's not a syntactic construction with "hole" as head and "key" as modifier, which could be construed to have a different meaning, i.e. a strategically important hole.
– BillJ
2 days ago
I would not have any problem with the split. Despite BillJ's objection, no one would think that "asshole" and "ass hole" were different things.
– Hot Licks
2 days ago
1
Most compound words originated as two separate words placed beside each other, and they still have meaning if treated separately. Instead of saying a keyhole, you can say a hole for a key and it will be perfectly understandable. Or you could just put the space back in, also without a problem. Doing so might appear a little strange, but if it's in the right context, it might emphasize something you're trying to say. And, again, there's nothing wrong with splitting the words back into two again—especially if each word, on its own, is a valid word.
– Jason Bassford
2 days ago
@JasonBassford - And it should be noted that, in quoted speech, adding or removing the space implies a difference in how the words are spoken. With "key hole" more emphasis would be placed on "key", and the words would be more distinctly separated.
– Hot Licks
2 days ago
add a comment |
My student has asked whether the splitting of the compound word keyhole into key hole is a particular literary technique. I didn't know!
It's relevant to the text, as it is about disconnection and distance in relationships.
nouns literary-techniques compound-adjectives
New contributor
My student has asked whether the splitting of the compound word keyhole into key hole is a particular literary technique. I didn't know!
It's relevant to the text, as it is about disconnection and distance in relationships.
nouns literary-techniques compound-adjectives
nouns literary-techniques compound-adjectives
New contributor
New contributor
New contributor
asked 2 days ago
MarnieMarnie
111
111
New contributor
New contributor
Check this answer.
– Ubi hatt
2 days ago
But "keyhole" is a single word (a compound noun) with the meaning a hole for a key. It's not a syntactic construction with "hole" as head and "key" as modifier, which could be construed to have a different meaning, i.e. a strategically important hole.
– BillJ
2 days ago
I would not have any problem with the split. Despite BillJ's objection, no one would think that "asshole" and "ass hole" were different things.
– Hot Licks
2 days ago
1
Most compound words originated as two separate words placed beside each other, and they still have meaning if treated separately. Instead of saying a keyhole, you can say a hole for a key and it will be perfectly understandable. Or you could just put the space back in, also without a problem. Doing so might appear a little strange, but if it's in the right context, it might emphasize something you're trying to say. And, again, there's nothing wrong with splitting the words back into two again—especially if each word, on its own, is a valid word.
– Jason Bassford
2 days ago
@JasonBassford - And it should be noted that, in quoted speech, adding or removing the space implies a difference in how the words are spoken. With "key hole" more emphasis would be placed on "key", and the words would be more distinctly separated.
– Hot Licks
2 days ago
add a comment |
Check this answer.
– Ubi hatt
2 days ago
But "keyhole" is a single word (a compound noun) with the meaning a hole for a key. It's not a syntactic construction with "hole" as head and "key" as modifier, which could be construed to have a different meaning, i.e. a strategically important hole.
– BillJ
2 days ago
I would not have any problem with the split. Despite BillJ's objection, no one would think that "asshole" and "ass hole" were different things.
– Hot Licks
2 days ago
1
Most compound words originated as two separate words placed beside each other, and they still have meaning if treated separately. Instead of saying a keyhole, you can say a hole for a key and it will be perfectly understandable. Or you could just put the space back in, also without a problem. Doing so might appear a little strange, but if it's in the right context, it might emphasize something you're trying to say. And, again, there's nothing wrong with splitting the words back into two again—especially if each word, on its own, is a valid word.
– Jason Bassford
2 days ago
@JasonBassford - And it should be noted that, in quoted speech, adding or removing the space implies a difference in how the words are spoken. With "key hole" more emphasis would be placed on "key", and the words would be more distinctly separated.
– Hot Licks
2 days ago
Check this answer.
– Ubi hatt
2 days ago
Check this answer.
– Ubi hatt
2 days ago
But "keyhole" is a single word (a compound noun) with the meaning a hole for a key. It's not a syntactic construction with "hole" as head and "key" as modifier, which could be construed to have a different meaning, i.e. a strategically important hole.
– BillJ
2 days ago
But "keyhole" is a single word (a compound noun) with the meaning a hole for a key. It's not a syntactic construction with "hole" as head and "key" as modifier, which could be construed to have a different meaning, i.e. a strategically important hole.
– BillJ
2 days ago
I would not have any problem with the split. Despite BillJ's objection, no one would think that "asshole" and "ass hole" were different things.
– Hot Licks
2 days ago
I would not have any problem with the split. Despite BillJ's objection, no one would think that "asshole" and "ass hole" were different things.
– Hot Licks
2 days ago
1
1
Most compound words originated as two separate words placed beside each other, and they still have meaning if treated separately. Instead of saying a keyhole, you can say a hole for a key and it will be perfectly understandable. Or you could just put the space back in, also without a problem. Doing so might appear a little strange, but if it's in the right context, it might emphasize something you're trying to say. And, again, there's nothing wrong with splitting the words back into two again—especially if each word, on its own, is a valid word.
– Jason Bassford
2 days ago
Most compound words originated as two separate words placed beside each other, and they still have meaning if treated separately. Instead of saying a keyhole, you can say a hole for a key and it will be perfectly understandable. Or you could just put the space back in, also without a problem. Doing so might appear a little strange, but if it's in the right context, it might emphasize something you're trying to say. And, again, there's nothing wrong with splitting the words back into two again—especially if each word, on its own, is a valid word.
– Jason Bassford
2 days ago
@JasonBassford - And it should be noted that, in quoted speech, adding or removing the space implies a difference in how the words are spoken. With "key hole" more emphasis would be placed on "key", and the words would be more distinctly separated.
– Hot Licks
2 days ago
@JasonBassford - And it should be noted that, in quoted speech, adding or removing the space implies a difference in how the words are spoken. With "key hole" more emphasis would be placed on "key", and the words would be more distinctly separated.
– Hot Licks
2 days ago
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "97"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Marnie is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f492693%2fis-there-a-technique-used-when-someone-splits-a-compound-noun-into-two-parts%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Marnie is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Marnie is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Marnie is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Marnie is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language & Usage Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f492693%2fis-there-a-technique-used-when-someone-splits-a-compound-noun-into-two-parts%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Check this answer.
– Ubi hatt
2 days ago
But "keyhole" is a single word (a compound noun) with the meaning a hole for a key. It's not a syntactic construction with "hole" as head and "key" as modifier, which could be construed to have a different meaning, i.e. a strategically important hole.
– BillJ
2 days ago
I would not have any problem with the split. Despite BillJ's objection, no one would think that "asshole" and "ass hole" were different things.
– Hot Licks
2 days ago
1
Most compound words originated as two separate words placed beside each other, and they still have meaning if treated separately. Instead of saying a keyhole, you can say a hole for a key and it will be perfectly understandable. Or you could just put the space back in, also without a problem. Doing so might appear a little strange, but if it's in the right context, it might emphasize something you're trying to say. And, again, there's nothing wrong with splitting the words back into two again—especially if each word, on its own, is a valid word.
– Jason Bassford
2 days ago
@JasonBassford - And it should be noted that, in quoted speech, adding or removing the space implies a difference in how the words are spoken. With "key hole" more emphasis would be placed on "key", and the words would be more distinctly separated.
– Hot Licks
2 days ago