What kind of capacitor is this in the image?





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}







3












$begingroup$


The power supply of my model railway got broken.



I think the problem is the capacitor shown in the image. So does somebody know which kind of capacitor this is?



enter image description here






capacitor identification







share|improve this question









New contributor




tobiias is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$








  • 6




    $begingroup$
    Looks like a 100 µF 35V electrolytic capacitor.
    $endgroup$
    – evildemonic
    6 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Measure the diameter (and height if there is a height restriction) with calipers. It tells you the specific package required for the replacement otherwise it may not fit onto the PCB.
    $endgroup$
    – Toor
    4 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Looks to me as though whatever is to the left of that capacitor is possibly the real cause of the problem. The cap itself looks fine other than a bit of gunk on the side from that other thing.
    $endgroup$
    – brhans
    4 hours ago


















3












$begingroup$


The power supply of my model railway got broken.



I think the problem is the capacitor shown in the image. So does somebody know which kind of capacitor this is?



enter image description here






capacitor identification







share|improve this question









New contributor




tobiias is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$








  • 6




    $begingroup$
    Looks like a 100 µF 35V electrolytic capacitor.
    $endgroup$
    – evildemonic
    6 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Measure the diameter (and height if there is a height restriction) with calipers. It tells you the specific package required for the replacement otherwise it may not fit onto the PCB.
    $endgroup$
    – Toor
    4 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Looks to me as though whatever is to the left of that capacitor is possibly the real cause of the problem. The cap itself looks fine other than a bit of gunk on the side from that other thing.
    $endgroup$
    – brhans
    4 hours ago














3












3








3





$begingroup$


The power supply of my model railway got broken.



I think the problem is the capacitor shown in the image. So does somebody know which kind of capacitor this is?



enter image description here






capacitor identification







share|improve this question









New contributor




tobiias is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$




The power supply of my model railway got broken.



I think the problem is the capacitor shown in the image. So does somebody know which kind of capacitor this is?



enter image description here






capacitor identification




capacitor identification






share|improve this question









New contributor




tobiias is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question









New contributor




tobiias is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 5 hours ago









SamGibson

11.8k41739




11.8k41739






New contributor




tobiias is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 6 hours ago









tobiiastobiias

161




161




New contributor




tobiias is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





tobiias is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






tobiias is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








  • 6




    $begingroup$
    Looks like a 100 µF 35V electrolytic capacitor.
    $endgroup$
    – evildemonic
    6 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Measure the diameter (and height if there is a height restriction) with calipers. It tells you the specific package required for the replacement otherwise it may not fit onto the PCB.
    $endgroup$
    – Toor
    4 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Looks to me as though whatever is to the left of that capacitor is possibly the real cause of the problem. The cap itself looks fine other than a bit of gunk on the side from that other thing.
    $endgroup$
    – brhans
    4 hours ago














  • 6




    $begingroup$
    Looks like a 100 µF 35V electrolytic capacitor.
    $endgroup$
    – evildemonic
    6 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Measure the diameter (and height if there is a height restriction) with calipers. It tells you the specific package required for the replacement otherwise it may not fit onto the PCB.
    $endgroup$
    – Toor
    4 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Looks to me as though whatever is to the left of that capacitor is possibly the real cause of the problem. The cap itself looks fine other than a bit of gunk on the side from that other thing.
    $endgroup$
    – brhans
    4 hours ago








6




6




$begingroup$
Looks like a 100 µF 35V electrolytic capacitor.
$endgroup$
– evildemonic
6 hours ago




$begingroup$
Looks like a 100 µF 35V electrolytic capacitor.
$endgroup$
– evildemonic
6 hours ago




1




1




$begingroup$
Measure the diameter (and height if there is a height restriction) with calipers. It tells you the specific package required for the replacement otherwise it may not fit onto the PCB.
$endgroup$
– Toor
4 hours ago




$begingroup$
Measure the diameter (and height if there is a height restriction) with calipers. It tells you the specific package required for the replacement otherwise it may not fit onto the PCB.
$endgroup$
– Toor
4 hours ago




1




1




$begingroup$
Looks to me as though whatever is to the left of that capacitor is possibly the real cause of the problem. The cap itself looks fine other than a bit of gunk on the side from that other thing.
$endgroup$
– brhans
4 hours ago




$begingroup$
Looks to me as though whatever is to the left of that capacitor is possibly the real cause of the problem. The cap itself looks fine other than a bit of gunk on the side from that other thing.
$endgroup$
– brhans
4 hours ago










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















8












$begingroup$

It's a 100uF/35V aluminum electrolytic capacitor. Aluminum electrolytic capacitors do not, in my experience, use the 3-digit system. From this datasheet:



enter image description here



I see what appears to be flux on the PCB, but often caps will bulge up if they are dying. If it has actually leaked from the cap, then it should be replaced.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$









  • 2




    $begingroup$
    You are right about the 3 digit capacitance code. A second look at the datasheet linked by Enginerd shows that the three digit code applies to the part number, not the marking.
    $endgroup$
    – JRE
    6 hours ago



















4












$begingroup$

That is an aluminum electrolytic capacitor.



100 microfarad, rated for 35V.



I'm not sure there's anything wrong with it, though. It has score marks across the top. If it had gone bad, then it would have burst along those lines.



It looks like there's some glue on one side, but that's about it.



The trace to the left of it looks burned.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$





















    3












    $begingroup$

    The capacitance value I state is based on the assumption that the "100" marked on the capacitor is a three digit code as apposed to the literal capacitance of the capacitor. This may not be the case, I am leaving my "answer" in the hope that someone can clear this up. -Edit



    Second Edit. I did more digging and it looks like indeed this cap is 100uF, and what really sealed it for me is as Sphero Pefhany pointed out, a 10uF rating would only need a two digit marking as would any value up too 99uF. So it must be 100uF -Edit



    That is a surface mount aluminum electrolytic capacitor It is rated for 35V with a capacity of 10.0 uF.



    The "100" is a code that translates as first digit followed by a second digit finished by a power of ten digit. The scale starts at uF, for example to get 47uF the code is: 470, or if you have a code of 331 that's 33 * 10^1 uF or 330uF capacitance.



    A chart with capacitor codes can be found in this document. link






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$









    • 4




      $begingroup$
      No, it is 100uF. In fact the photo in your link shows how 10uF capacitors are marked, which is different from the part number.
      $endgroup$
      – Spehro Pefhany
      6 hours ago






    • 3




      $begingroup$
      I Agree with Sphero Pefhany.
      $endgroup$
      – MikeTeX
      5 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      @SpehroPefhany You are right that the chart (STANDARD VALUES AND CASE SIZES) data sheet I posted is explicitly for a part number breakdown and not necessary related to the actual markings on the cap. However I have seen this convention used for many capacitors with this type of form factor which is how my answer came about. I can't cite any actual standard nor can I find a source that states when the actual value or an abbreviated value is used. I'll update my answer to highlight this ambiguity.
      $endgroup$
      – Clipboard_Waving_Enginerd
      5 hours ago












    Your Answer






    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("schematics", function () {
    StackExchange.schematics.init();
    });
    }, "cicuitlab");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "135"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });






    tobiias is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2felectronics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f433867%2fwhat-kind-of-capacitor-is-this-in-the-image%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes








    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    8












    $begingroup$

    It's a 100uF/35V aluminum electrolytic capacitor. Aluminum electrolytic capacitors do not, in my experience, use the 3-digit system. From this datasheet:



    enter image description here



    I see what appears to be flux on the PCB, but often caps will bulge up if they are dying. If it has actually leaked from the cap, then it should be replaced.






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$









    • 2




      $begingroup$
      You are right about the 3 digit capacitance code. A second look at the datasheet linked by Enginerd shows that the three digit code applies to the part number, not the marking.
      $endgroup$
      – JRE
      6 hours ago
















    8












    $begingroup$

    It's a 100uF/35V aluminum electrolytic capacitor. Aluminum electrolytic capacitors do not, in my experience, use the 3-digit system. From this datasheet:



    enter image description here



    I see what appears to be flux on the PCB, but often caps will bulge up if they are dying. If it has actually leaked from the cap, then it should be replaced.






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$









    • 2




      $begingroup$
      You are right about the 3 digit capacitance code. A second look at the datasheet linked by Enginerd shows that the three digit code applies to the part number, not the marking.
      $endgroup$
      – JRE
      6 hours ago














    8












    8








    8





    $begingroup$

    It's a 100uF/35V aluminum electrolytic capacitor. Aluminum electrolytic capacitors do not, in my experience, use the 3-digit system. From this datasheet:



    enter image description here



    I see what appears to be flux on the PCB, but often caps will bulge up if they are dying. If it has actually leaked from the cap, then it should be replaced.






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$



    It's a 100uF/35V aluminum electrolytic capacitor. Aluminum electrolytic capacitors do not, in my experience, use the 3-digit system. From this datasheet:



    enter image description here



    I see what appears to be flux on the PCB, but often caps will bulge up if they are dying. If it has actually leaked from the cap, then it should be replaced.







    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited 5 hours ago

























    answered 6 hours ago









    Spehro PefhanySpehro Pefhany

    215k5164437




    215k5164437








    • 2




      $begingroup$
      You are right about the 3 digit capacitance code. A second look at the datasheet linked by Enginerd shows that the three digit code applies to the part number, not the marking.
      $endgroup$
      – JRE
      6 hours ago














    • 2




      $begingroup$
      You are right about the 3 digit capacitance code. A second look at the datasheet linked by Enginerd shows that the three digit code applies to the part number, not the marking.
      $endgroup$
      – JRE
      6 hours ago








    2




    2




    $begingroup$
    You are right about the 3 digit capacitance code. A second look at the datasheet linked by Enginerd shows that the three digit code applies to the part number, not the marking.
    $endgroup$
    – JRE
    6 hours ago




    $begingroup$
    You are right about the 3 digit capacitance code. A second look at the datasheet linked by Enginerd shows that the three digit code applies to the part number, not the marking.
    $endgroup$
    – JRE
    6 hours ago













    4












    $begingroup$

    That is an aluminum electrolytic capacitor.



    100 microfarad, rated for 35V.



    I'm not sure there's anything wrong with it, though. It has score marks across the top. If it had gone bad, then it would have burst along those lines.



    It looks like there's some glue on one side, but that's about it.



    The trace to the left of it looks burned.






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$


















      4












      $begingroup$

      That is an aluminum electrolytic capacitor.



      100 microfarad, rated for 35V.



      I'm not sure there's anything wrong with it, though. It has score marks across the top. If it had gone bad, then it would have burst along those lines.



      It looks like there's some glue on one side, but that's about it.



      The trace to the left of it looks burned.






      share|improve this answer











      $endgroup$
















        4












        4








        4





        $begingroup$

        That is an aluminum electrolytic capacitor.



        100 microfarad, rated for 35V.



        I'm not sure there's anything wrong with it, though. It has score marks across the top. If it had gone bad, then it would have burst along those lines.



        It looks like there's some glue on one side, but that's about it.



        The trace to the left of it looks burned.






        share|improve this answer











        $endgroup$



        That is an aluminum electrolytic capacitor.



        100 microfarad, rated for 35V.



        I'm not sure there's anything wrong with it, though. It has score marks across the top. If it had gone bad, then it would have burst along those lines.



        It looks like there's some glue on one side, but that's about it.



        The trace to the left of it looks burned.







        share|improve this answer














        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer








        edited 6 hours ago

























        answered 6 hours ago









        JREJRE

        23.8k54379




        23.8k54379























            3












            $begingroup$

            The capacitance value I state is based on the assumption that the "100" marked on the capacitor is a three digit code as apposed to the literal capacitance of the capacitor. This may not be the case, I am leaving my "answer" in the hope that someone can clear this up. -Edit



            Second Edit. I did more digging and it looks like indeed this cap is 100uF, and what really sealed it for me is as Sphero Pefhany pointed out, a 10uF rating would only need a two digit marking as would any value up too 99uF. So it must be 100uF -Edit



            That is a surface mount aluminum electrolytic capacitor It is rated for 35V with a capacity of 10.0 uF.



            The "100" is a code that translates as first digit followed by a second digit finished by a power of ten digit. The scale starts at uF, for example to get 47uF the code is: 470, or if you have a code of 331 that's 33 * 10^1 uF or 330uF capacitance.



            A chart with capacitor codes can be found in this document. link






            share|improve this answer











            $endgroup$









            • 4




              $begingroup$
              No, it is 100uF. In fact the photo in your link shows how 10uF capacitors are marked, which is different from the part number.
              $endgroup$
              – Spehro Pefhany
              6 hours ago






            • 3




              $begingroup$
              I Agree with Sphero Pefhany.
              $endgroup$
              – MikeTeX
              5 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              @SpehroPefhany You are right that the chart (STANDARD VALUES AND CASE SIZES) data sheet I posted is explicitly for a part number breakdown and not necessary related to the actual markings on the cap. However I have seen this convention used for many capacitors with this type of form factor which is how my answer came about. I can't cite any actual standard nor can I find a source that states when the actual value or an abbreviated value is used. I'll update my answer to highlight this ambiguity.
              $endgroup$
              – Clipboard_Waving_Enginerd
              5 hours ago
















            3












            $begingroup$

            The capacitance value I state is based on the assumption that the "100" marked on the capacitor is a three digit code as apposed to the literal capacitance of the capacitor. This may not be the case, I am leaving my "answer" in the hope that someone can clear this up. -Edit



            Second Edit. I did more digging and it looks like indeed this cap is 100uF, and what really sealed it for me is as Sphero Pefhany pointed out, a 10uF rating would only need a two digit marking as would any value up too 99uF. So it must be 100uF -Edit



            That is a surface mount aluminum electrolytic capacitor It is rated for 35V with a capacity of 10.0 uF.



            The "100" is a code that translates as first digit followed by a second digit finished by a power of ten digit. The scale starts at uF, for example to get 47uF the code is: 470, or if you have a code of 331 that's 33 * 10^1 uF or 330uF capacitance.



            A chart with capacitor codes can be found in this document. link






            share|improve this answer











            $endgroup$









            • 4




              $begingroup$
              No, it is 100uF. In fact the photo in your link shows how 10uF capacitors are marked, which is different from the part number.
              $endgroup$
              – Spehro Pefhany
              6 hours ago






            • 3




              $begingroup$
              I Agree with Sphero Pefhany.
              $endgroup$
              – MikeTeX
              5 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              @SpehroPefhany You are right that the chart (STANDARD VALUES AND CASE SIZES) data sheet I posted is explicitly for a part number breakdown and not necessary related to the actual markings on the cap. However I have seen this convention used for many capacitors with this type of form factor which is how my answer came about. I can't cite any actual standard nor can I find a source that states when the actual value or an abbreviated value is used. I'll update my answer to highlight this ambiguity.
              $endgroup$
              – Clipboard_Waving_Enginerd
              5 hours ago














            3












            3








            3





            $begingroup$

            The capacitance value I state is based on the assumption that the "100" marked on the capacitor is a three digit code as apposed to the literal capacitance of the capacitor. This may not be the case, I am leaving my "answer" in the hope that someone can clear this up. -Edit



            Second Edit. I did more digging and it looks like indeed this cap is 100uF, and what really sealed it for me is as Sphero Pefhany pointed out, a 10uF rating would only need a two digit marking as would any value up too 99uF. So it must be 100uF -Edit



            That is a surface mount aluminum electrolytic capacitor It is rated for 35V with a capacity of 10.0 uF.



            The "100" is a code that translates as first digit followed by a second digit finished by a power of ten digit. The scale starts at uF, for example to get 47uF the code is: 470, or if you have a code of 331 that's 33 * 10^1 uF or 330uF capacitance.



            A chart with capacitor codes can be found in this document. link






            share|improve this answer











            $endgroup$



            The capacitance value I state is based on the assumption that the "100" marked on the capacitor is a three digit code as apposed to the literal capacitance of the capacitor. This may not be the case, I am leaving my "answer" in the hope that someone can clear this up. -Edit



            Second Edit. I did more digging and it looks like indeed this cap is 100uF, and what really sealed it for me is as Sphero Pefhany pointed out, a 10uF rating would only need a two digit marking as would any value up too 99uF. So it must be 100uF -Edit



            That is a surface mount aluminum electrolytic capacitor It is rated for 35V with a capacity of 10.0 uF.



            The "100" is a code that translates as first digit followed by a second digit finished by a power of ten digit. The scale starts at uF, for example to get 47uF the code is: 470, or if you have a code of 331 that's 33 * 10^1 uF or 330uF capacitance.



            A chart with capacitor codes can be found in this document. link







            share|improve this answer














            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer








            edited 4 hours ago

























            answered 6 hours ago









            Clipboard_Waving_EnginerdClipboard_Waving_Enginerd

            16216




            16216








            • 4




              $begingroup$
              No, it is 100uF. In fact the photo in your link shows how 10uF capacitors are marked, which is different from the part number.
              $endgroup$
              – Spehro Pefhany
              6 hours ago






            • 3




              $begingroup$
              I Agree with Sphero Pefhany.
              $endgroup$
              – MikeTeX
              5 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              @SpehroPefhany You are right that the chart (STANDARD VALUES AND CASE SIZES) data sheet I posted is explicitly for a part number breakdown and not necessary related to the actual markings on the cap. However I have seen this convention used for many capacitors with this type of form factor which is how my answer came about. I can't cite any actual standard nor can I find a source that states when the actual value or an abbreviated value is used. I'll update my answer to highlight this ambiguity.
              $endgroup$
              – Clipboard_Waving_Enginerd
              5 hours ago














            • 4




              $begingroup$
              No, it is 100uF. In fact the photo in your link shows how 10uF capacitors are marked, which is different from the part number.
              $endgroup$
              – Spehro Pefhany
              6 hours ago






            • 3




              $begingroup$
              I Agree with Sphero Pefhany.
              $endgroup$
              – MikeTeX
              5 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              @SpehroPefhany You are right that the chart (STANDARD VALUES AND CASE SIZES) data sheet I posted is explicitly for a part number breakdown and not necessary related to the actual markings on the cap. However I have seen this convention used for many capacitors with this type of form factor which is how my answer came about. I can't cite any actual standard nor can I find a source that states when the actual value or an abbreviated value is used. I'll update my answer to highlight this ambiguity.
              $endgroup$
              – Clipboard_Waving_Enginerd
              5 hours ago








            4




            4




            $begingroup$
            No, it is 100uF. In fact the photo in your link shows how 10uF capacitors are marked, which is different from the part number.
            $endgroup$
            – Spehro Pefhany
            6 hours ago




            $begingroup$
            No, it is 100uF. In fact the photo in your link shows how 10uF capacitors are marked, which is different from the part number.
            $endgroup$
            – Spehro Pefhany
            6 hours ago




            3




            3




            $begingroup$
            I Agree with Sphero Pefhany.
            $endgroup$
            – MikeTeX
            5 hours ago




            $begingroup$
            I Agree with Sphero Pefhany.
            $endgroup$
            – MikeTeX
            5 hours ago












            $begingroup$
            @SpehroPefhany You are right that the chart (STANDARD VALUES AND CASE SIZES) data sheet I posted is explicitly for a part number breakdown and not necessary related to the actual markings on the cap. However I have seen this convention used for many capacitors with this type of form factor which is how my answer came about. I can't cite any actual standard nor can I find a source that states when the actual value or an abbreviated value is used. I'll update my answer to highlight this ambiguity.
            $endgroup$
            – Clipboard_Waving_Enginerd
            5 hours ago




            $begingroup$
            @SpehroPefhany You are right that the chart (STANDARD VALUES AND CASE SIZES) data sheet I posted is explicitly for a part number breakdown and not necessary related to the actual markings on the cap. However I have seen this convention used for many capacitors with this type of form factor which is how my answer came about. I can't cite any actual standard nor can I find a source that states when the actual value or an abbreviated value is used. I'll update my answer to highlight this ambiguity.
            $endgroup$
            – Clipboard_Waving_Enginerd
            5 hours ago










            tobiias is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            tobiias is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













            tobiias is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












            tobiias is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
















            Thanks for contributing an answer to Electrical Engineering Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid …



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2felectronics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f433867%2fwhat-kind-of-capacitor-is-this-in-the-image%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            -

            Popular posts from this blog

            Category:香港粉麵

            更多信息，请参阅 香港粉麵 。 此分類包括香港常見的麵條類食品，粉麵類型請放於Category:面条分類 This page is only for reference, If you need detailed information, please check here
            Read more

            List *all* the tuples!

            Image
            27 4 $begingroup$ Write a program, given an input n , will generate all possible n-tuples using natural numbers. n=1 (1),(2),(3),(4),(5),(6)... n=2 (1,1),(1,2),(2,1),(2,2),(1,3),(3,1),(2,3),(3,2),(3,3)... n=6 (1,1,1,1,1,1) (1,1,1,1,2,1) (1,1,1,2,1,1)... The output may be in any order that does not break any other rules. The program must be written to run forever and list all applicable tuples exactly once, in theory. In reality, your program will reach your integer type's limit and crash. This is acceptable as long the program would run infinitely long if only your integer type was unlimited. Each valid tuple must be listed within finite time, if only the program were allowed to run that long. The output may, at your option, include zeroes in addition to the natural numbers. You may choos...
            Read more

            Channel [V]

            Image
              本文介紹的是國際性音樂電視頻道Channel [V]的主條目。關於在臺灣地區前稱Channel [V]的子電視頻道，請見「 FOX (台灣頻道) 」。 body.skin-minerva .mw-parser-output table.infobox caption{text-align:center} Channel [V] Channel [V] 所有者 星空傳媒 福斯傳媒集團 星空華文傳媒（中国大陆频道） 开播日期 1991年9月15日 口号 全球最強華語音樂頻道；亞洲第一音樂頻道 播出地区 亞洲各地 旧称 衛視音樂台 取代者 [V] by FOX (東南亞和中東國家版本) 姊妹频道 星空衛視 收看方法 有线电视   澳門澳門有線電視 [V]國際頻道：73頻道 [V]中國頻道：74頻道   中国深圳天威视讯 [V]中國頻道：尚未定頻   中国南京数字电视 [V]中國頻道：91頻道   中国中国大陸数字电视 [V]中國頻道：随地区而变 宽带电视   香港now寬頻電視 [V]國際頻道：534頻道 臺灣中華電信MOD [V]國際娛樂頻道HD：151頻道   新加坡Mio TV [V]國際娛樂頻道HD：352頻道 [V]中國頻道：547頻道 Channel [V] 是一個國際性的音樂電視頻道，隸屬於星空傳媒，在東亞、東南亞、南亞、中東地區等地多個國家播放。該頻道主要播放英文主流音樂和一些區域性語言的歌曲，其中在台灣與中國大陸主要播放華語流行音樂。2010年8月星空傳媒把中国大陆頻道控股權易手予上海市人民政府牽頭成立的華人文化產業投資基金 [1] 。 目录 1 V的含義 2 Channel [V]國際頻道 3 Channel [V]臺灣頻道 4 Channel [V]中國頻道 5 其它的Channel [V]頻道 6 参见 7 參考資料 8 外部链接 V的含義 官方並無提供字母 V 的確切含義，以下是流傳的說法： 最廣泛的說法是V代表胜利（victory）...
            Read more