I thought blah blah blah, and I was right. Is the comma correct?
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}
up vote
23
down vote
favorite
This sentence is bugging me:
I knew going in that the orange flavor component of the cake was going to be lacking, and I was right.
The comma doesn't seem to be enough, but the semicolon just looks wrong:
I knew going in that the orange flavor component of the cake was going to be lacking; and I was right.
Which of the above is correct and why?
punctuation commas semicolon
edited Jan 13 '14 at 1:40
Lyndon White
1,57921625
asked Jan 12 '14 at 22:26
Jolenealaska
1,38621130
add a comment |
up vote
23
down vote
favorite
This sentence is bugging me:
I knew going in that the orange flavor component of the cake was going to be lacking, and I was right.
The comma doesn't seem to be enough, but the semicolon just looks wrong:
I knew going in that the orange flavor component of the cake was going to be lacking; and I was right.
Which of the above is correct and why?
punctuation commas semicolon
edited Jan 13 '14 at 1:40
Lyndon White
1,57921625
asked Jan 12 '14 at 22:26
Jolenealaska
1,38621130
add a comment |
up vote
23
down vote
favorite
up vote
23
down vote
favorite
This sentence is bugging me:
I knew going in that the orange flavor component of the cake was going to be lacking, and I was right.
The comma doesn't seem to be enough, but the semicolon just looks wrong:
I knew going in that the orange flavor component of the cake was going to be lacking; and I was right.
Which of the above is correct and why?
punctuation commas semicolon
edited Jan 13 '14 at 1:40
Lyndon White
1,57921625
asked Jan 12 '14 at 22:26
Jolenealaska
1,38621130
This sentence is bugging me:
I knew going in that the orange flavor component of the cake was going to be lacking, and I was right.
The comma doesn't seem to be enough, but the semicolon just looks wrong:
I knew going in that the orange flavor component of the cake was going to be lacking; and I was right.
Which of the above is correct and why?
punctuation commas semicolon
punctuation commas semicolon
edited Jan 13 '14 at 1:40
Lyndon White
1,57921625
asked Jan 12 '14 at 22:26
Jolenealaska
1,38621130
edited Jan 13 '14 at 1:40
Lyndon White
1,57921625
asked Jan 12 '14 at 22:26
Jolenealaska
1,38621130
edited Jan 13 '14 at 1:40
Lyndon White
1,57921625
edited Jan 13 '14 at 1:40
Lyndon White
1,57921625
edited Jan 13 '14 at 1:40
Lyndon White
1,57921625
1,57921625
asked Jan 12 '14 at 22:26
Jolenealaska
1,38621130
asked Jan 12 '14 at 22:26
Jolenealaska
1,38621130
asked Jan 12 '14 at 22:26
Jolenealaska
1,38621130
1,38621130
add a comment |
add a comment |
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
up vote
40
down vote
accepted
The comma is enough as the second clause "I was right" is independent.
Commas are used before conjunctions (but, and, yet, or, so, etc.) when the two clauses they are coordinating can stand as independent sentences.
The semicolon is used when the first clause contains commas.
I knew going in that the orange, marzipan and chilli flavor component of the cake was going to be lacking; and I was right!
edited 4 hours ago
Laurel
29.2k654104
answered Jan 12 '14 at 22:48
Nomic
659610
8
Agreed: I would say that in OPs example using both a semicolon and 'and' is actually misuse, but it's a very minor point. (Either would be better than both).
– TimLymington
Jan 12 '14 at 23:40
The semicolon is used a comma would be confusing. My siblings were born in Atlanta, Georgia; Oak Ridge, Tennessee and Los Angeles, California. It serves as a kind of super-comma. More importantly, it is used to joint two independent clauses where there is no conjunction. You could say, "I knew going in that the orange flavor component of the cake was going to be lacking; I was right." I'd agree that this particular use of the semicolon is "pretentious." The semicolon is a wonderful punctuation mark; however, it is a mark that ought to be used judiciously.
– Michael Owen Sartin
Jan 13 '14 at 0:38
I will always remember:so, and, but, or, yet, for, nor
– Johnston
Jan 13 '14 at 2:15
Interestingly, in Italian you are usually taught not to use the comma at all in a case like this, precisely because you are using a conjunction that coordinates two independent sentences. The rationale is that you are just trying to reproduce the pause you make when you speak the sentence, so in other words it would be appropriate when writing direct speech, but not in a more formal setting.
– UncleZeiv
Jan 13 '14 at 10:22
add a comment |
up vote
15
down vote
They are both right. As is
I knew going in that the orange flavor component of the cake was going to be lacking. And I was right.
Your examples are both compound sentences. There are two independent clauses, joined by a conjunction (and) and separated by punctuation (either the comma or the semicolon). The comma is a softer break, the semicolon, a more significant one.
My example uses two separate sentences. This is an even more significant break and is somewhat more dramatic. A few purist would argue that sentences should not begin with a conjunction, but that viewpoint is probably not very ascendant today. Or do you disagree?
[Perhaps I should have begun this entire discussion with They are both right, as is ...? Or maybe They are both right; as is ...?]
answered Jan 12 '14 at 22:47
bib
68.4k8100212
2
Ha! You bring up a good point regarding starting a sentence with a conjunction, it's kind of like ending a sentence with a preposition. "This is the sort of English up with which I will not put."
– Jolenealaska
Jan 12 '14 at 23:25
This usage of 'And' isn't a conjunction. A conjunction is something that joins two clauses, while this is an 'And' at the beginning of the sentence. Now let the purists rave.
– Evgeni Sergeev
Jan 13 '14 at 11:50
add a comment |
up vote
9
down vote
A comma seems fine. A quick look at google books shows that commas are common here, though sometimes there’s no punctuation at all.
I found one case of parentheses, but not a single semicolon.
The Economist’s advice on semicolons is to use them:
to mark a pause longer than a comma and shorter than a full stop. Don't overdo them.
So, it’s seems that a comma is fine in your example.
answered Jan 12 '14 at 22:43
Daniel Harbour
5,3241221
I particularly like the "don't overdo them". There is something oddly pretentious about the semicolon.
– Jolenealaska
Jan 12 '14 at 23:08
I think your first example has a syntax error rather than a stylistic preference.
– JFA
Jan 13 '14 at 17:43
@JFA: Do you want to add some more detail: what's the nature of the syntactic error?
– Daniel Harbour
Jan 14 '14 at 2:33
1
@DanielHarbour Independent clauses need to be separated by commas. "I just knew it." and "I was right." can stand independently.
– jeremy
Jan 14 '14 at 3:11
@Jeremy. That's a convention you can choose to follow if you like. I note that several writers who I regard as great stylists (e.g., Atwood) do so only sometimes. But I would certainly regard this comma rule as a matter of style, not one of syntax. As a jobbing linguist, I regard syntax as being about why you have to say John often eats fish rather that John eats often fish. Maybe you place the division between grammar and style elsewhere.
– Daniel Harbour
Jan 14 '14 at 3:29
|
show 2 more comments
up vote
2
down vote
Yes it is correct, and here is why.
You have two independent clauses in that sentence, and that means they must be: A) separated with a period. This is because they can stand alone as two separate sentences, 2) joined with a semicolon; do not use a conjunction, 3) joined with a comma and a conjunction, and they can be written as one sentence.
Which of these you choose depends on the style of your writing.
answered Jan 13 '14 at 17:42
JFA
1,031920
add a comment |
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
40
down vote
accepted
The comma is enough as the second clause "I was right" is independent.
Commas are used before conjunctions (but, and, yet, or, so, etc.) when the two clauses they are coordinating can stand as independent sentences.
The semicolon is used when the first clause contains commas.
I knew going in that the orange, marzipan and chilli flavor component of the cake was going to be lacking; and I was right!
edited 4 hours ago
Laurel
29.2k654104
answered Jan 12 '14 at 22:48
Nomic
659610
8
Agreed: I would say that in OPs example using both a semicolon and 'and' is actually misuse, but it's a very minor point. (Either would be better than both).
– TimLymington
Jan 12 '14 at 23:40
The semicolon is used a comma would be confusing. My siblings were born in Atlanta, Georgia; Oak Ridge, Tennessee and Los Angeles, California. It serves as a kind of super-comma. More importantly, it is used to joint two independent clauses where there is no conjunction. You could say, "I knew going in that the orange flavor component of the cake was going to be lacking; I was right." I'd agree that this particular use of the semicolon is "pretentious." The semicolon is a wonderful punctuation mark; however, it is a mark that ought to be used judiciously.
– Michael Owen Sartin
Jan 13 '14 at 0:38
I will always remember:so, and, but, or, yet, for, nor
– Johnston
Jan 13 '14 at 2:15
Interestingly, in Italian you are usually taught not to use the comma at all in a case like this, precisely because you are using a conjunction that coordinates two independent sentences. The rationale is that you are just trying to reproduce the pause you make when you speak the sentence, so in other words it would be appropriate when writing direct speech, but not in a more formal setting.
– UncleZeiv
Jan 13 '14 at 10:22
add a comment |
up vote
40
down vote
accepted
The comma is enough as the second clause "I was right" is independent.
Commas are used before conjunctions (but, and, yet, or, so, etc.) when the two clauses they are coordinating can stand as independent sentences.
The semicolon is used when the first clause contains commas.
I knew going in that the orange, marzipan and chilli flavor component of the cake was going to be lacking; and I was right!
edited 4 hours ago
Laurel
29.2k654104
answered Jan 12 '14 at 22:48
Nomic
659610
8
Agreed: I would say that in OPs example using both a semicolon and 'and' is actually misuse, but it's a very minor point. (Either would be better than both).
– TimLymington
Jan 12 '14 at 23:40
The semicolon is used a comma would be confusing. My siblings were born in Atlanta, Georgia; Oak Ridge, Tennessee and Los Angeles, California. It serves as a kind of super-comma. More importantly, it is used to joint two independent clauses where there is no conjunction. You could say, "I knew going in that the orange flavor component of the cake was going to be lacking; I was right." I'd agree that this particular use of the semicolon is "pretentious." The semicolon is a wonderful punctuation mark; however, it is a mark that ought to be used judiciously.
– Michael Owen Sartin
Jan 13 '14 at 0:38
I will always remember:so, and, but, or, yet, for, nor
– Johnston
Jan 13 '14 at 2:15
Interestingly, in Italian you are usually taught not to use the comma at all in a case like this, precisely because you are using a conjunction that coordinates two independent sentences. The rationale is that you are just trying to reproduce the pause you make when you speak the sentence, so in other words it would be appropriate when writing direct speech, but not in a more formal setting.
– UncleZeiv
Jan 13 '14 at 10:22
add a comment |
up vote
40
down vote
accepted
up vote
40
down vote
accepted
The comma is enough as the second clause "I was right" is independent.
Commas are used before conjunctions (but, and, yet, or, so, etc.) when the two clauses they are coordinating can stand as independent sentences.
The semicolon is used when the first clause contains commas.
I knew going in that the orange, marzipan and chilli flavor component of the cake was going to be lacking; and I was right!
edited 4 hours ago
Laurel
29.2k654104
answered Jan 12 '14 at 22:48
Nomic
659610
The comma is enough as the second clause "I was right" is independent.
Commas are used before conjunctions (but, and, yet, or, so, etc.) when the two clauses they are coordinating can stand as independent sentences.
The semicolon is used when the first clause contains commas.
I knew going in that the orange, marzipan and chilli flavor component of the cake was going to be lacking; and I was right!
edited 4 hours ago
Laurel
29.2k654104
answered Jan 12 '14 at 22:48
Nomic
659610
edited 4 hours ago
Laurel
29.2k654104
edited 4 hours ago
Laurel
29.2k654104
edited 4 hours ago
Laurel
29.2k654104
29.2k654104
answered Jan 12 '14 at 22:48
Nomic
659610
answered Jan 12 '14 at 22:48
Nomic
659610
answered Jan 12 '14 at 22:48
Nomic
659610
659610
8
Agreed: I would say that in OPs example using both a semicolon and 'and' is actually misuse, but it's a very minor point. (Either would be better than both).
– TimLymington
Jan 12 '14 at 23:40
The semicolon is used a comma would be confusing. My siblings were born in Atlanta, Georgia; Oak Ridge, Tennessee and Los Angeles, California. It serves as a kind of super-comma. More importantly, it is used to joint two independent clauses where there is no conjunction. You could say, "I knew going in that the orange flavor component of the cake was going to be lacking; I was right." I'd agree that this particular use of the semicolon is "pretentious." The semicolon is a wonderful punctuation mark; however, it is a mark that ought to be used judiciously.
– Michael Owen Sartin
Jan 13 '14 at 0:38
I will always remember:so, and, but, or, yet, for, nor
– Johnston
Jan 13 '14 at 2:15
Interestingly, in Italian you are usually taught not to use the comma at all in a case like this, precisely because you are using a conjunction that coordinates two independent sentences. The rationale is that you are just trying to reproduce the pause you make when you speak the sentence, so in other words it would be appropriate when writing direct speech, but not in a more formal setting.
– UncleZeiv
Jan 13 '14 at 10:22
add a comment |
8
Agreed: I would say that in OPs example using both a semicolon and 'and' is actually misuse, but it's a very minor point. (Either would be better than both).
– TimLymington
Jan 12 '14 at 23:40
The semicolon is used a comma would be confusing. My siblings were born in Atlanta, Georgia; Oak Ridge, Tennessee and Los Angeles, California. It serves as a kind of super-comma. More importantly, it is used to joint two independent clauses where there is no conjunction. You could say, "I knew going in that the orange flavor component of the cake was going to be lacking; I was right." I'd agree that this particular use of the semicolon is "pretentious." The semicolon is a wonderful punctuation mark; however, it is a mark that ought to be used judiciously.
– Michael Owen Sartin
Jan 13 '14 at 0:38
I will always remember:so, and, but, or, yet, for, nor
– Johnston
Jan 13 '14 at 2:15
Interestingly, in Italian you are usually taught not to use the comma at all in a case like this, precisely because you are using a conjunction that coordinates two independent sentences. The rationale is that you are just trying to reproduce the pause you make when you speak the sentence, so in other words it would be appropriate when writing direct speech, but not in a more formal setting.
– UncleZeiv
Jan 13 '14 at 10:22
8
8
Agreed: I would say that in OPs example using both a semicolon and 'and' is actually misuse, but it's a very minor point. (Either would be better than both).
– TimLymington
Jan 12 '14 at 23:40
Agreed: I would say that in OPs example using both a semicolon and 'and' is actually misuse, but it's a very minor point. (Either would be better than both).
– TimLymington
Jan 12 '14 at 23:40
The semicolon is used a comma would be confusing. My siblings were born in Atlanta, Georgia; Oak Ridge, Tennessee and Los Angeles, California. It serves as a kind of super-comma. More importantly, it is used to joint two independent clauses where there is no conjunction. You could say, "I knew going in that the orange flavor component of the cake was going to be lacking; I was right." I'd agree that this particular use of the semicolon is "pretentious." The semicolon is a wonderful punctuation mark; however, it is a mark that ought to be used judiciously.
– Michael Owen Sartin
Jan 13 '14 at 0:38
The semicolon is used a comma would be confusing. My siblings were born in Atlanta, Georgia; Oak Ridge, Tennessee and Los Angeles, California. It serves as a kind of super-comma. More importantly, it is used to joint two independent clauses where there is no conjunction. You could say, "I knew going in that the orange flavor component of the cake was going to be lacking; I was right." I'd agree that this particular use of the semicolon is "pretentious." The semicolon is a wonderful punctuation mark; however, it is a mark that ought to be used judiciously.
– Michael Owen Sartin
Jan 13 '14 at 0:38
I will always remember:
so, and, but, or, yet, for, nor– Johnston
Jan 13 '14 at 2:15
I will always remember:
so, and, but, or, yet, for, nor– Johnston
Jan 13 '14 at 2:15
Interestingly, in Italian you are usually taught not to use the comma at all in a case like this, precisely because you are using a conjunction that coordinates two independent sentences. The rationale is that you are just trying to reproduce the pause you make when you speak the sentence, so in other words it would be appropriate when writing direct speech, but not in a more formal setting.
– UncleZeiv
Jan 13 '14 at 10:22
Interestingly, in Italian you are usually taught not to use the comma at all in a case like this, precisely because you are using a conjunction that coordinates two independent sentences. The rationale is that you are just trying to reproduce the pause you make when you speak the sentence, so in other words it would be appropriate when writing direct speech, but not in a more formal setting.
– UncleZeiv
Jan 13 '14 at 10:22
add a comment |
up vote
15
down vote
They are both right. As is
I knew going in that the orange flavor component of the cake was going to be lacking. And I was right.
Your examples are both compound sentences. There are two independent clauses, joined by a conjunction (and) and separated by punctuation (either the comma or the semicolon). The comma is a softer break, the semicolon, a more significant one.
My example uses two separate sentences. This is an even more significant break and is somewhat more dramatic. A few purist would argue that sentences should not begin with a conjunction, but that viewpoint is probably not very ascendant today. Or do you disagree?
[Perhaps I should have begun this entire discussion with They are both right, as is ...? Or maybe They are both right; as is ...?]
answered Jan 12 '14 at 22:47
bib
68.4k8100212
2
Ha! You bring up a good point regarding starting a sentence with a conjunction, it's kind of like ending a sentence with a preposition. "This is the sort of English up with which I will not put."
– Jolenealaska
Jan 12 '14 at 23:25
This usage of 'And' isn't a conjunction. A conjunction is something that joins two clauses, while this is an 'And' at the beginning of the sentence. Now let the purists rave.
– Evgeni Sergeev
Jan 13 '14 at 11:50
add a comment |
up vote
15
down vote
They are both right. As is
I knew going in that the orange flavor component of the cake was going to be lacking. And I was right.
Your examples are both compound sentences. There are two independent clauses, joined by a conjunction (and) and separated by punctuation (either the comma or the semicolon). The comma is a softer break, the semicolon, a more significant one.
My example uses two separate sentences. This is an even more significant break and is somewhat more dramatic. A few purist would argue that sentences should not begin with a conjunction, but that viewpoint is probably not very ascendant today. Or do you disagree?
[Perhaps I should have begun this entire discussion with They are both right, as is ...? Or maybe They are both right; as is ...?]
answered Jan 12 '14 at 22:47
bib
68.4k8100212
2
Ha! You bring up a good point regarding starting a sentence with a conjunction, it's kind of like ending a sentence with a preposition. "This is the sort of English up with which I will not put."
– Jolenealaska
Jan 12 '14 at 23:25
This usage of 'And' isn't a conjunction. A conjunction is something that joins two clauses, while this is an 'And' at the beginning of the sentence. Now let the purists rave.
– Evgeni Sergeev
Jan 13 '14 at 11:50
add a comment |
up vote
15
down vote
up vote
15
down vote
They are both right. As is
I knew going in that the orange flavor component of the cake was going to be lacking. And I was right.
Your examples are both compound sentences. There are two independent clauses, joined by a conjunction (and) and separated by punctuation (either the comma or the semicolon). The comma is a softer break, the semicolon, a more significant one.
My example uses two separate sentences. This is an even more significant break and is somewhat more dramatic. A few purist would argue that sentences should not begin with a conjunction, but that viewpoint is probably not very ascendant today. Or do you disagree?
[Perhaps I should have begun this entire discussion with They are both right, as is ...? Or maybe They are both right; as is ...?]
answered Jan 12 '14 at 22:47
bib
68.4k8100212
They are both right. As is
I knew going in that the orange flavor component of the cake was going to be lacking. And I was right.
Your examples are both compound sentences. There are two independent clauses, joined by a conjunction (and) and separated by punctuation (either the comma or the semicolon). The comma is a softer break, the semicolon, a more significant one.
My example uses two separate sentences. This is an even more significant break and is somewhat more dramatic. A few purist would argue that sentences should not begin with a conjunction, but that viewpoint is probably not very ascendant today. Or do you disagree?
[Perhaps I should have begun this entire discussion with They are both right, as is ...? Or maybe They are both right; as is ...?]
answered Jan 12 '14 at 22:47
bib
68.4k8100212
edited Jan 12 '14 at 23:37
answered Jan 12 '14 at 22:47
bib
68.4k8100212
answered Jan 12 '14 at 22:47
bib
68.4k8100212
answered Jan 12 '14 at 22:47
bib
68.4k8100212
68.4k8100212
2
Ha! You bring up a good point regarding starting a sentence with a conjunction, it's kind of like ending a sentence with a preposition. "This is the sort of English up with which I will not put."
– Jolenealaska
Jan 12 '14 at 23:25
This usage of 'And' isn't a conjunction. A conjunction is something that joins two clauses, while this is an 'And' at the beginning of the sentence. Now let the purists rave.
– Evgeni Sergeev
Jan 13 '14 at 11:50
add a comment |
2
Ha! You bring up a good point regarding starting a sentence with a conjunction, it's kind of like ending a sentence with a preposition. "This is the sort of English up with which I will not put."
– Jolenealaska
Jan 12 '14 at 23:25
This usage of 'And' isn't a conjunction. A conjunction is something that joins two clauses, while this is an 'And' at the beginning of the sentence. Now let the purists rave.
– Evgeni Sergeev
Jan 13 '14 at 11:50
2
2
Ha! You bring up a good point regarding starting a sentence with a conjunction, it's kind of like ending a sentence with a preposition. "This is the sort of English up with which I will not put."
– Jolenealaska
Jan 12 '14 at 23:25
Ha! You bring up a good point regarding starting a sentence with a conjunction, it's kind of like ending a sentence with a preposition. "This is the sort of English up with which I will not put."
– Jolenealaska
Jan 12 '14 at 23:25
This usage of 'And' isn't a conjunction. A conjunction is something that joins two clauses, while this is an 'And' at the beginning of the sentence. Now let the purists rave.
– Evgeni Sergeev
Jan 13 '14 at 11:50
This usage of 'And' isn't a conjunction. A conjunction is something that joins two clauses, while this is an 'And' at the beginning of the sentence. Now let the purists rave.
– Evgeni Sergeev
Jan 13 '14 at 11:50
add a comment |
up vote
9
down vote
A comma seems fine. A quick look at google books shows that commas are common here, though sometimes there’s no punctuation at all.
I found one case of parentheses, but not a single semicolon.
The Economist’s advice on semicolons is to use them:
to mark a pause longer than a comma and shorter than a full stop. Don't overdo them.
So, it’s seems that a comma is fine in your example.
answered Jan 12 '14 at 22:43
Daniel Harbour
5,3241221
I particularly like the "don't overdo them". There is something oddly pretentious about the semicolon.
– Jolenealaska
Jan 12 '14 at 23:08
I think your first example has a syntax error rather than a stylistic preference.
– JFA
Jan 13 '14 at 17:43
@JFA: Do you want to add some more detail: what's the nature of the syntactic error?
– Daniel Harbour
Jan 14 '14 at 2:33
1
@DanielHarbour Independent clauses need to be separated by commas. "I just knew it." and "I was right." can stand independently.
– jeremy
Jan 14 '14 at 3:11
@Jeremy. That's a convention you can choose to follow if you like. I note that several writers who I regard as great stylists (e.g., Atwood) do so only sometimes. But I would certainly regard this comma rule as a matter of style, not one of syntax. As a jobbing linguist, I regard syntax as being about why you have to say John often eats fish rather that John eats often fish. Maybe you place the division between grammar and style elsewhere.
– Daniel Harbour
Jan 14 '14 at 3:29
|
show 2 more comments
up vote
9
down vote
A comma seems fine. A quick look at google books shows that commas are common here, though sometimes there’s no punctuation at all.
I found one case of parentheses, but not a single semicolon.
The Economist’s advice on semicolons is to use them:
to mark a pause longer than a comma and shorter than a full stop. Don't overdo them.
So, it’s seems that a comma is fine in your example.
answered Jan 12 '14 at 22:43
Daniel Harbour
5,3241221
I particularly like the "don't overdo them". There is something oddly pretentious about the semicolon.
– Jolenealaska
Jan 12 '14 at 23:08
I think your first example has a syntax error rather than a stylistic preference.
– JFA
Jan 13 '14 at 17:43
@JFA: Do you want to add some more detail: what's the nature of the syntactic error?
– Daniel Harbour
Jan 14 '14 at 2:33
1
@DanielHarbour Independent clauses need to be separated by commas. "I just knew it." and "I was right." can stand independently.
– jeremy
Jan 14 '14 at 3:11
@Jeremy. That's a convention you can choose to follow if you like. I note that several writers who I regard as great stylists (e.g., Atwood) do so only sometimes. But I would certainly regard this comma rule as a matter of style, not one of syntax. As a jobbing linguist, I regard syntax as being about why you have to say John often eats fish rather that John eats often fish. Maybe you place the division between grammar and style elsewhere.
– Daniel Harbour
Jan 14 '14 at 3:29
|
show 2 more comments
up vote
9
down vote
up vote
9
down vote
A comma seems fine. A quick look at google books shows that commas are common here, though sometimes there’s no punctuation at all.
I found one case of parentheses, but not a single semicolon.
The Economist’s advice on semicolons is to use them:
to mark a pause longer than a comma and shorter than a full stop. Don't overdo them.
So, it’s seems that a comma is fine in your example.
answered Jan 12 '14 at 22:43
Daniel Harbour
5,3241221
A comma seems fine. A quick look at google books shows that commas are common here, though sometimes there’s no punctuation at all.
I found one case of parentheses, but not a single semicolon.
The Economist’s advice on semicolons is to use them:
to mark a pause longer than a comma and shorter than a full stop. Don't overdo them.
So, it’s seems that a comma is fine in your example.
answered Jan 12 '14 at 22:43
Daniel Harbour
5,3241221
answered Jan 12 '14 at 22:43
Daniel Harbour
5,3241221
answered Jan 12 '14 at 22:43
Daniel Harbour
5,3241221
answered Jan 12 '14 at 22:43
Daniel Harbour
5,3241221
5,3241221
I particularly like the "don't overdo them". There is something oddly pretentious about the semicolon.
– Jolenealaska
Jan 12 '14 at 23:08
I think your first example has a syntax error rather than a stylistic preference.
– JFA
Jan 13 '14 at 17:43
@JFA: Do you want to add some more detail: what's the nature of the syntactic error?
– Daniel Harbour
Jan 14 '14 at 2:33
1
@DanielHarbour Independent clauses need to be separated by commas. "I just knew it." and "I was right." can stand independently.
– jeremy
Jan 14 '14 at 3:11
@Jeremy. That's a convention you can choose to follow if you like. I note that several writers who I regard as great stylists (e.g., Atwood) do so only sometimes. But I would certainly regard this comma rule as a matter of style, not one of syntax. As a jobbing linguist, I regard syntax as being about why you have to say John often eats fish rather that John eats often fish. Maybe you place the division between grammar and style elsewhere.
– Daniel Harbour
Jan 14 '14 at 3:29
|
show 2 more comments
I particularly like the "don't overdo them". There is something oddly pretentious about the semicolon.
– Jolenealaska
Jan 12 '14 at 23:08
I think your first example has a syntax error rather than a stylistic preference.
– JFA
Jan 13 '14 at 17:43
@JFA: Do you want to add some more detail: what's the nature of the syntactic error?
– Daniel Harbour
Jan 14 '14 at 2:33
1
@DanielHarbour Independent clauses need to be separated by commas. "I just knew it." and "I was right." can stand independently.
– jeremy
Jan 14 '14 at 3:11
@Jeremy. That's a convention you can choose to follow if you like. I note that several writers who I regard as great stylists (e.g., Atwood) do so only sometimes. But I would certainly regard this comma rule as a matter of style, not one of syntax. As a jobbing linguist, I regard syntax as being about why you have to say John often eats fish rather that John eats often fish. Maybe you place the division between grammar and style elsewhere.
– Daniel Harbour
Jan 14 '14 at 3:29
I particularly like the "don't overdo them". There is something oddly pretentious about the semicolon.
– Jolenealaska
Jan 12 '14 at 23:08
I particularly like the "don't overdo them". There is something oddly pretentious about the semicolon.
– Jolenealaska
Jan 12 '14 at 23:08
I think your first example has a syntax error rather than a stylistic preference.
– JFA
Jan 13 '14 at 17:43
I think your first example has a syntax error rather than a stylistic preference.
– JFA
Jan 13 '14 at 17:43
@JFA: Do you want to add some more detail: what's the nature of the syntactic error?
– Daniel Harbour
Jan 14 '14 at 2:33
@JFA: Do you want to add some more detail: what's the nature of the syntactic error?
– Daniel Harbour
Jan 14 '14 at 2:33
1
1
@DanielHarbour Independent clauses need to be separated by commas. "I just knew it." and "I was right." can stand independently.
– jeremy
Jan 14 '14 at 3:11
@DanielHarbour Independent clauses need to be separated by commas. "I just knew it." and "I was right." can stand independently.
– jeremy
Jan 14 '14 at 3:11
@Jeremy. That's a convention you can choose to follow if you like. I note that several writers who I regard as great stylists (e.g., Atwood) do so only sometimes. But I would certainly regard this comma rule as a matter of style, not one of syntax. As a jobbing linguist, I regard syntax as being about why you have to say John often eats fish rather that John eats often fish. Maybe you place the division between grammar and style elsewhere.
– Daniel Harbour
Jan 14 '14 at 3:29
@Jeremy. That's a convention you can choose to follow if you like. I note that several writers who I regard as great stylists (e.g., Atwood) do so only sometimes. But I would certainly regard this comma rule as a matter of style, not one of syntax. As a jobbing linguist, I regard syntax as being about why you have to say John often eats fish rather that John eats often fish. Maybe you place the division between grammar and style elsewhere.
– Daniel Harbour
Jan 14 '14 at 3:29
|
show 2 more comments
up vote
2
down vote
Yes it is correct, and here is why.
You have two independent clauses in that sentence, and that means they must be: A) separated with a period. This is because they can stand alone as two separate sentences, 2) joined with a semicolon; do not use a conjunction, 3) joined with a comma and a conjunction, and they can be written as one sentence.
Which of these you choose depends on the style of your writing.
answered Jan 13 '14 at 17:42
JFA
1,031920
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
Yes it is correct, and here is why.
You have two independent clauses in that sentence, and that means they must be: A) separated with a period. This is because they can stand alone as two separate sentences, 2) joined with a semicolon; do not use a conjunction, 3) joined with a comma and a conjunction, and they can be written as one sentence.
Which of these you choose depends on the style of your writing.
answered Jan 13 '14 at 17:42
JFA
1,031920
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
up vote
2
down vote
Yes it is correct, and here is why.
You have two independent clauses in that sentence, and that means they must be: A) separated with a period. This is because they can stand alone as two separate sentences, 2) joined with a semicolon; do not use a conjunction, 3) joined with a comma and a conjunction, and they can be written as one sentence.
Which of these you choose depends on the style of your writing.
answered Jan 13 '14 at 17:42
JFA
1,031920
Yes it is correct, and here is why.
You have two independent clauses in that sentence, and that means they must be: A) separated with a period. This is because they can stand alone as two separate sentences, 2) joined with a semicolon; do not use a conjunction, 3) joined with a comma and a conjunction, and they can be written as one sentence.
Which of these you choose depends on the style of your writing.
answered Jan 13 '14 at 17:42
JFA
1,031920
edited Jan 27 '14 at 20:40
answered Jan 13 '14 at 17:42
JFA
1,031920
answered Jan 13 '14 at 17:42
JFA
1,031920
answered Jan 13 '14 at 17:42
JFA
1,031920
1,031920
add a comment |
add a comment |
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f145876%2fi-thought-blah-blah-blah-and-i-was-right-is-the-comma-correct%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
