Is there a name for the substitution of “the + singular noun” for a plural noun?
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
For instance, I might say, "Overcrowding is a major concern in the classroom today" rather than "Overcrowding is a major concern in classrooms today".
Is that substitution a literary device?
The closest I can get is metonymy or synechdoche, which have similar functions but still don't match this specific kind of substitution.
nouns terminology definite-articles literary-device rhetorical-devices
bumped to the homepage by Community♦ 4 hours ago
This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
For instance, I might say, "Overcrowding is a major concern in the classroom today" rather than "Overcrowding is a major concern in classrooms today".
Is that substitution a literary device?
The closest I can get is metonymy or synechdoche, which have similar functions but still don't match this specific kind of substitution.
nouns terminology definite-articles literary-device rhetorical-devices
bumped to the homepage by Community♦ 4 hours ago
This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
I'm pretty sure that's just a form of synechdoche. The phrase "the classroom" is not substituting for "classrooms" though, but "schools" (which have classrooms as their parts).
– Blckknght
Oct 29 at 0:08
Ahhhh! Good point, that does make more sense.
– Miranda
Oct 29 at 0:09
It's still a good question. There might be a more specific name for a form that uses the specific structure "the X" to mean some larger thing that contains many Xs. Pars pro toto is a more specific term for a part referring to a whole (while synechdoche refers to both that and the reverse), but it's not limited to the "the X" form.
– Blckknght
Oct 29 at 0:18
@Blckknght: It can be a form of synecdoche, but not all usages fall into that category. It certainly doesn't in literal sentences like "The camel is a beast of burden that can withstand heat and drought" or "The sea is rough today." (Contrasting with "Camels are beasts of burden" and "We are facing heavy seas today.")
– Robusto
Oct 29 at 1:38
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
For instance, I might say, "Overcrowding is a major concern in the classroom today" rather than "Overcrowding is a major concern in classrooms today".
Is that substitution a literary device?
The closest I can get is metonymy or synechdoche, which have similar functions but still don't match this specific kind of substitution.
nouns terminology definite-articles literary-device rhetorical-devices
For instance, I might say, "Overcrowding is a major concern in the classroom today" rather than "Overcrowding is a major concern in classrooms today".
Is that substitution a literary device?
The closest I can get is metonymy or synechdoche, which have similar functions but still don't match this specific kind of substitution.
nouns terminology definite-articles literary-device rhetorical-devices
nouns terminology definite-articles literary-device rhetorical-devices
asked Oct 28 at 23:18
Miranda
111
111
bumped to the homepage by Community♦ 4 hours ago
This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
bumped to the homepage by Community♦ 4 hours ago
This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
I'm pretty sure that's just a form of synechdoche. The phrase "the classroom" is not substituting for "classrooms" though, but "schools" (which have classrooms as their parts).
– Blckknght
Oct 29 at 0:08
Ahhhh! Good point, that does make more sense.
– Miranda
Oct 29 at 0:09
It's still a good question. There might be a more specific name for a form that uses the specific structure "the X" to mean some larger thing that contains many Xs. Pars pro toto is a more specific term for a part referring to a whole (while synechdoche refers to both that and the reverse), but it's not limited to the "the X" form.
– Blckknght
Oct 29 at 0:18
@Blckknght: It can be a form of synecdoche, but not all usages fall into that category. It certainly doesn't in literal sentences like "The camel is a beast of burden that can withstand heat and drought" or "The sea is rough today." (Contrasting with "Camels are beasts of burden" and "We are facing heavy seas today.")
– Robusto
Oct 29 at 1:38
add a comment |
I'm pretty sure that's just a form of synechdoche. The phrase "the classroom" is not substituting for "classrooms" though, but "schools" (which have classrooms as their parts).
– Blckknght
Oct 29 at 0:08
Ahhhh! Good point, that does make more sense.
– Miranda
Oct 29 at 0:09
It's still a good question. There might be a more specific name for a form that uses the specific structure "the X" to mean some larger thing that contains many Xs. Pars pro toto is a more specific term for a part referring to a whole (while synechdoche refers to both that and the reverse), but it's not limited to the "the X" form.
– Blckknght
Oct 29 at 0:18
@Blckknght: It can be a form of synecdoche, but not all usages fall into that category. It certainly doesn't in literal sentences like "The camel is a beast of burden that can withstand heat and drought" or "The sea is rough today." (Contrasting with "Camels are beasts of burden" and "We are facing heavy seas today.")
– Robusto
Oct 29 at 1:38
I'm pretty sure that's just a form of synechdoche. The phrase "the classroom" is not substituting for "classrooms" though, but "schools" (which have classrooms as their parts).
– Blckknght
Oct 29 at 0:08
I'm pretty sure that's just a form of synechdoche. The phrase "the classroom" is not substituting for "classrooms" though, but "schools" (which have classrooms as their parts).
– Blckknght
Oct 29 at 0:08
Ahhhh! Good point, that does make more sense.
– Miranda
Oct 29 at 0:09
Ahhhh! Good point, that does make more sense.
– Miranda
Oct 29 at 0:09
It's still a good question. There might be a more specific name for a form that uses the specific structure "the X" to mean some larger thing that contains many Xs. Pars pro toto is a more specific term for a part referring to a whole (while synechdoche refers to both that and the reverse), but it's not limited to the "the X" form.
– Blckknght
Oct 29 at 0:18
It's still a good question. There might be a more specific name for a form that uses the specific structure "the X" to mean some larger thing that contains many Xs. Pars pro toto is a more specific term for a part referring to a whole (while synechdoche refers to both that and the reverse), but it's not limited to the "the X" form.
– Blckknght
Oct 29 at 0:18
@Blckknght: It can be a form of synecdoche, but not all usages fall into that category. It certainly doesn't in literal sentences like "The camel is a beast of burden that can withstand heat and drought" or "The sea is rough today." (Contrasting with "Camels are beasts of burden" and "We are facing heavy seas today.")
– Robusto
Oct 29 at 1:38
@Blckknght: It can be a form of synecdoche, but not all usages fall into that category. It certainly doesn't in literal sentences like "The camel is a beast of burden that can withstand heat and drought" or "The sea is rough today." (Contrasting with "Camels are beasts of burden" and "We are facing heavy seas today.")
– Robusto
Oct 29 at 1:38
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
I wonder if substituting the article "the" in the second sentence isn't so much a literary device but a stylistic grammar choice. Omitting "the" before the plural noun (zero-article), "classrooms," denotes a generic class or kind, while "the classroom" is a sort of mix between a definite article and a proper article. In either sentence, though, the effect is slightly different: while both refer to the general, "the classroom" suggests an idea or ideal while "classrooms" suggests difference but ties them together by a shared characteristic (i.e. over-crowding). Nonetheless "the" is a super versatile article which can subtly change the effect and tone of any sentence.
Welcome to our site. While these are interesting musings on the role of the article, you haven't addressed the question of what one calls this kind of substitution. Note that this site is a bit different from other Q&A sites: an answer is expected to be authoritative, detailed, and explain why it is correct - preferably by quoting a reference hyperlinked to the source. You can edit your post to add this detail; for further guidance, see How to Answer. :-)
– Chappo
Oct 29 at 0:49
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
I wonder if substituting the article "the" in the second sentence isn't so much a literary device but a stylistic grammar choice. Omitting "the" before the plural noun (zero-article), "classrooms," denotes a generic class or kind, while "the classroom" is a sort of mix between a definite article and a proper article. In either sentence, though, the effect is slightly different: while both refer to the general, "the classroom" suggests an idea or ideal while "classrooms" suggests difference but ties them together by a shared characteristic (i.e. over-crowding). Nonetheless "the" is a super versatile article which can subtly change the effect and tone of any sentence.
Welcome to our site. While these are interesting musings on the role of the article, you haven't addressed the question of what one calls this kind of substitution. Note that this site is a bit different from other Q&A sites: an answer is expected to be authoritative, detailed, and explain why it is correct - preferably by quoting a reference hyperlinked to the source. You can edit your post to add this detail; for further guidance, see How to Answer. :-)
– Chappo
Oct 29 at 0:49
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
I wonder if substituting the article "the" in the second sentence isn't so much a literary device but a stylistic grammar choice. Omitting "the" before the plural noun (zero-article), "classrooms," denotes a generic class or kind, while "the classroom" is a sort of mix between a definite article and a proper article. In either sentence, though, the effect is slightly different: while both refer to the general, "the classroom" suggests an idea or ideal while "classrooms" suggests difference but ties them together by a shared characteristic (i.e. over-crowding). Nonetheless "the" is a super versatile article which can subtly change the effect and tone of any sentence.
Welcome to our site. While these are interesting musings on the role of the article, you haven't addressed the question of what one calls this kind of substitution. Note that this site is a bit different from other Q&A sites: an answer is expected to be authoritative, detailed, and explain why it is correct - preferably by quoting a reference hyperlinked to the source. You can edit your post to add this detail; for further guidance, see How to Answer. :-)
– Chappo
Oct 29 at 0:49
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
I wonder if substituting the article "the" in the second sentence isn't so much a literary device but a stylistic grammar choice. Omitting "the" before the plural noun (zero-article), "classrooms," denotes a generic class or kind, while "the classroom" is a sort of mix between a definite article and a proper article. In either sentence, though, the effect is slightly different: while both refer to the general, "the classroom" suggests an idea or ideal while "classrooms" suggests difference but ties them together by a shared characteristic (i.e. over-crowding). Nonetheless "the" is a super versatile article which can subtly change the effect and tone of any sentence.
I wonder if substituting the article "the" in the second sentence isn't so much a literary device but a stylistic grammar choice. Omitting "the" before the plural noun (zero-article), "classrooms," denotes a generic class or kind, while "the classroom" is a sort of mix between a definite article and a proper article. In either sentence, though, the effect is slightly different: while both refer to the general, "the classroom" suggests an idea or ideal while "classrooms" suggests difference but ties them together by a shared characteristic (i.e. over-crowding). Nonetheless "the" is a super versatile article which can subtly change the effect and tone of any sentence.
answered Oct 29 at 0:16
C___
11
11
Welcome to our site. While these are interesting musings on the role of the article, you haven't addressed the question of what one calls this kind of substitution. Note that this site is a bit different from other Q&A sites: an answer is expected to be authoritative, detailed, and explain why it is correct - preferably by quoting a reference hyperlinked to the source. You can edit your post to add this detail; for further guidance, see How to Answer. :-)
– Chappo
Oct 29 at 0:49
add a comment |
Welcome to our site. While these are interesting musings on the role of the article, you haven't addressed the question of what one calls this kind of substitution. Note that this site is a bit different from other Q&A sites: an answer is expected to be authoritative, detailed, and explain why it is correct - preferably by quoting a reference hyperlinked to the source. You can edit your post to add this detail; for further guidance, see How to Answer. :-)
– Chappo
Oct 29 at 0:49
Welcome to our site. While these are interesting musings on the role of the article, you haven't addressed the question of what one calls this kind of substitution. Note that this site is a bit different from other Q&A sites: an answer is expected to be authoritative, detailed, and explain why it is correct - preferably by quoting a reference hyperlinked to the source. You can edit your post to add this detail; for further guidance, see How to Answer. :-)
– Chappo
Oct 29 at 0:49
Welcome to our site. While these are interesting musings on the role of the article, you haven't addressed the question of what one calls this kind of substitution. Note that this site is a bit different from other Q&A sites: an answer is expected to be authoritative, detailed, and explain why it is correct - preferably by quoting a reference hyperlinked to the source. You can edit your post to add this detail; for further guidance, see How to Answer. :-)
– Chappo
Oct 29 at 0:49
add a comment |
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f470532%2fis-there-a-name-for-the-substitution-of-the-singular-noun-for-a-plural-noun%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
I'm pretty sure that's just a form of synechdoche. The phrase "the classroom" is not substituting for "classrooms" though, but "schools" (which have classrooms as their parts).
– Blckknght
Oct 29 at 0:08
Ahhhh! Good point, that does make more sense.
– Miranda
Oct 29 at 0:09
It's still a good question. There might be a more specific name for a form that uses the specific structure "the X" to mean some larger thing that contains many Xs. Pars pro toto is a more specific term for a part referring to a whole (while synechdoche refers to both that and the reverse), but it's not limited to the "the X" form.
– Blckknght
Oct 29 at 0:18
@Blckknght: It can be a form of synecdoche, but not all usages fall into that category. It certainly doesn't in literal sentences like "The camel is a beast of burden that can withstand heat and drought" or "The sea is rough today." (Contrasting with "Camels are beasts of burden" and "We are facing heavy seas today.")
– Robusto
Oct 29 at 1:38