How to describe a definite one of Picasso's paintings as well as an indefinite one of them?
I'm sure there are many, many paintings drawn by Pablo Picasso.
How do you refer to one of those paintings?
First, here's what I know is a correct way of doing so:
a. I saw a Picasso at a museum.
b. I saw the Picasso at a museum.
But I'd like to use the word 'painting' in both a. and b. Now, I think I cannot say either of these:
c. *I saw a Picasso's painting at a museum.
d. *I saw the Picasso's painting at a museum.
Am I right that c. and d. don't work?
If so, how can I express a. and b. while still using the word 'painting'?
Here are some examples I can think of:
e. I saw a painting of Picasso at a museum.
f. I saw the painting of Picasso at a museum.
OR
g. I saw a painting of Picasso's at a museum.
h. I saw the painting of Picasso's at a museum.
OR
i. I saw one of Picasso's paintings at a museum.
j. I saw the one of Picasso's paintings at a museum.
Do e.-j. work as alternatives to a. and b.?
Also, if there are any other suggestions, please let me know.
possessives determiners
|
show 1 more comment
I'm sure there are many, many paintings drawn by Pablo Picasso.
How do you refer to one of those paintings?
First, here's what I know is a correct way of doing so:
a. I saw a Picasso at a museum.
b. I saw the Picasso at a museum.
But I'd like to use the word 'painting' in both a. and b. Now, I think I cannot say either of these:
c. *I saw a Picasso's painting at a museum.
d. *I saw the Picasso's painting at a museum.
Am I right that c. and d. don't work?
If so, how can I express a. and b. while still using the word 'painting'?
Here are some examples I can think of:
e. I saw a painting of Picasso at a museum.
f. I saw the painting of Picasso at a museum.
OR
g. I saw a painting of Picasso's at a museum.
h. I saw the painting of Picasso's at a museum.
OR
i. I saw one of Picasso's paintings at a museum.
j. I saw the one of Picasso's paintings at a museum.
Do e.-j. work as alternatives to a. and b.?
Also, if there are any other suggestions, please let me know.
possessives determiners
I would not call example B correct unless you changed it to "I saw the Picasso at the museum." As it is, you have not specified which museum you went to, which then further implies that there is only one Picasso painting in existence in all the museums, which is clearly not true. Specifying the museum with "the" now just states that there is only one Picasso at that museum.
– Darrel Hoffman
10 hours ago
@DarrelHoffman I hope you're not a native speaker of English. Just because you have not specified the museum in which you saw the Picasso doesn't mean there is only one Picasso in the world. Say, you were looking for a specific Picasso all over the world, and you did find that Picasso in a museum, but you don't want to let the listener know anything about the museum. In that scenario, you could easily say (b).
– listeneva
10 hours ago
I am a native English speaker, and that sentence just sounds really awkward to me. Sure, it's grammatically correct, and it works with your context added in, but by itself the sentence gives the unintended meaning that there is only one Picasso.
– Darrel Hoffman
10 hours ago
@DarrelHoffman When you're talking about none other than "Picasso", who on Earth would possibly interpret b. to mean that there is only one Picasso?
– listeneva
9 hours ago
That's exactly my point, and the reason the sentence feels wrong to me. It implies that there is only one of a thing which everyone knows there are many of. Without your context of looking for a specific painting, the sentence reads false by itself. It would work if it was describing something which is actually unique - "I saw the Mona Lisa at a museum", for example. But not for something of which there are many.
– Darrel Hoffman
9 hours ago
|
show 1 more comment
I'm sure there are many, many paintings drawn by Pablo Picasso.
How do you refer to one of those paintings?
First, here's what I know is a correct way of doing so:
a. I saw a Picasso at a museum.
b. I saw the Picasso at a museum.
But I'd like to use the word 'painting' in both a. and b. Now, I think I cannot say either of these:
c. *I saw a Picasso's painting at a museum.
d. *I saw the Picasso's painting at a museum.
Am I right that c. and d. don't work?
If so, how can I express a. and b. while still using the word 'painting'?
Here are some examples I can think of:
e. I saw a painting of Picasso at a museum.
f. I saw the painting of Picasso at a museum.
OR
g. I saw a painting of Picasso's at a museum.
h. I saw the painting of Picasso's at a museum.
OR
i. I saw one of Picasso's paintings at a museum.
j. I saw the one of Picasso's paintings at a museum.
Do e.-j. work as alternatives to a. and b.?
Also, if there are any other suggestions, please let me know.
possessives determiners
I'm sure there are many, many paintings drawn by Pablo Picasso.
How do you refer to one of those paintings?
First, here's what I know is a correct way of doing so:
a. I saw a Picasso at a museum.
b. I saw the Picasso at a museum.
But I'd like to use the word 'painting' in both a. and b. Now, I think I cannot say either of these:
c. *I saw a Picasso's painting at a museum.
d. *I saw the Picasso's painting at a museum.
Am I right that c. and d. don't work?
If so, how can I express a. and b. while still using the word 'painting'?
Here are some examples I can think of:
e. I saw a painting of Picasso at a museum.
f. I saw the painting of Picasso at a museum.
OR
g. I saw a painting of Picasso's at a museum.
h. I saw the painting of Picasso's at a museum.
OR
i. I saw one of Picasso's paintings at a museum.
j. I saw the one of Picasso's paintings at a museum.
Do e.-j. work as alternatives to a. and b.?
Also, if there are any other suggestions, please let me know.
possessives determiners
possessives determiners
edited 17 hours ago
listeneva
asked 17 hours ago
listenevalisteneva
9210
9210
I would not call example B correct unless you changed it to "I saw the Picasso at the museum." As it is, you have not specified which museum you went to, which then further implies that there is only one Picasso painting in existence in all the museums, which is clearly not true. Specifying the museum with "the" now just states that there is only one Picasso at that museum.
– Darrel Hoffman
10 hours ago
@DarrelHoffman I hope you're not a native speaker of English. Just because you have not specified the museum in which you saw the Picasso doesn't mean there is only one Picasso in the world. Say, you were looking for a specific Picasso all over the world, and you did find that Picasso in a museum, but you don't want to let the listener know anything about the museum. In that scenario, you could easily say (b).
– listeneva
10 hours ago
I am a native English speaker, and that sentence just sounds really awkward to me. Sure, it's grammatically correct, and it works with your context added in, but by itself the sentence gives the unintended meaning that there is only one Picasso.
– Darrel Hoffman
10 hours ago
@DarrelHoffman When you're talking about none other than "Picasso", who on Earth would possibly interpret b. to mean that there is only one Picasso?
– listeneva
9 hours ago
That's exactly my point, and the reason the sentence feels wrong to me. It implies that there is only one of a thing which everyone knows there are many of. Without your context of looking for a specific painting, the sentence reads false by itself. It would work if it was describing something which is actually unique - "I saw the Mona Lisa at a museum", for example. But not for something of which there are many.
– Darrel Hoffman
9 hours ago
|
show 1 more comment
I would not call example B correct unless you changed it to "I saw the Picasso at the museum." As it is, you have not specified which museum you went to, which then further implies that there is only one Picasso painting in existence in all the museums, which is clearly not true. Specifying the museum with "the" now just states that there is only one Picasso at that museum.
– Darrel Hoffman
10 hours ago
@DarrelHoffman I hope you're not a native speaker of English. Just because you have not specified the museum in which you saw the Picasso doesn't mean there is only one Picasso in the world. Say, you were looking for a specific Picasso all over the world, and you did find that Picasso in a museum, but you don't want to let the listener know anything about the museum. In that scenario, you could easily say (b).
– listeneva
10 hours ago
I am a native English speaker, and that sentence just sounds really awkward to me. Sure, it's grammatically correct, and it works with your context added in, but by itself the sentence gives the unintended meaning that there is only one Picasso.
– Darrel Hoffman
10 hours ago
@DarrelHoffman When you're talking about none other than "Picasso", who on Earth would possibly interpret b. to mean that there is only one Picasso?
– listeneva
9 hours ago
That's exactly my point, and the reason the sentence feels wrong to me. It implies that there is only one of a thing which everyone knows there are many of. Without your context of looking for a specific painting, the sentence reads false by itself. It would work if it was describing something which is actually unique - "I saw the Mona Lisa at a museum", for example. But not for something of which there are many.
– Darrel Hoffman
9 hours ago
I would not call example B correct unless you changed it to "I saw the Picasso at the museum." As it is, you have not specified which museum you went to, which then further implies that there is only one Picasso painting in existence in all the museums, which is clearly not true. Specifying the museum with "the" now just states that there is only one Picasso at that museum.
– Darrel Hoffman
10 hours ago
I would not call example B correct unless you changed it to "I saw the Picasso at the museum." As it is, you have not specified which museum you went to, which then further implies that there is only one Picasso painting in existence in all the museums, which is clearly not true. Specifying the museum with "the" now just states that there is only one Picasso at that museum.
– Darrel Hoffman
10 hours ago
@DarrelHoffman I hope you're not a native speaker of English. Just because you have not specified the museum in which you saw the Picasso doesn't mean there is only one Picasso in the world. Say, you were looking for a specific Picasso all over the world, and you did find that Picasso in a museum, but you don't want to let the listener know anything about the museum. In that scenario, you could easily say (b).
– listeneva
10 hours ago
@DarrelHoffman I hope you're not a native speaker of English. Just because you have not specified the museum in which you saw the Picasso doesn't mean there is only one Picasso in the world. Say, you were looking for a specific Picasso all over the world, and you did find that Picasso in a museum, but you don't want to let the listener know anything about the museum. In that scenario, you could easily say (b).
– listeneva
10 hours ago
I am a native English speaker, and that sentence just sounds really awkward to me. Sure, it's grammatically correct, and it works with your context added in, but by itself the sentence gives the unintended meaning that there is only one Picasso.
– Darrel Hoffman
10 hours ago
I am a native English speaker, and that sentence just sounds really awkward to me. Sure, it's grammatically correct, and it works with your context added in, but by itself the sentence gives the unintended meaning that there is only one Picasso.
– Darrel Hoffman
10 hours ago
@DarrelHoffman When you're talking about none other than "Picasso", who on Earth would possibly interpret b. to mean that there is only one Picasso?
– listeneva
9 hours ago
@DarrelHoffman When you're talking about none other than "Picasso", who on Earth would possibly interpret b. to mean that there is only one Picasso?
– listeneva
9 hours ago
That's exactly my point, and the reason the sentence feels wrong to me. It implies that there is only one of a thing which everyone knows there are many of. Without your context of looking for a specific painting, the sentence reads false by itself. It would work if it was describing something which is actually unique - "I saw the Mona Lisa at a museum", for example. But not for something of which there are many.
– Darrel Hoffman
9 hours ago
That's exactly my point, and the reason the sentence feels wrong to me. It implies that there is only one of a thing which everyone knows there are many of. Without your context of looking for a specific painting, the sentence reads false by itself. It would work if it was describing something which is actually unique - "I saw the Mona Lisa at a museum", for example. But not for something of which there are many.
– Darrel Hoffman
9 hours ago
|
show 1 more comment
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
- Your use of the possessive in both c and d is incorrect.
E and f are grammatical, but they mean that Picasso was the subject of the painting, not that he was the artist. (Unless it was a self portrait.)
G through i are also all fine—and they mean the same thing as a and b.
J is ungrammatical. If there is only one of his paintings at the museum, you can simply say, I saw Picasso's painting at a museum. Or, if you want to maintain the same use of only as in i, you could say I saw the only one of Picasso's paintings at a museum.
The simplest way to add painting to a and b is to just add it after Picasso and forget about the possessive:
I saw a Picasso painting at a museum.
I saw the Picasso painting at a museum.
In this construction, Picasso is used as an attribute noun, acting adjectivally to qualify painting. You are talking about a Picasso painting as opposed to a Renoir painting.
This is the same as:
I dined at a Gordon Ramsay restaurant.
I filled the tank of my car at an Esso gas station.
I have a Babe Ruth trading card in my collection.
Thanks for letting me know example j. doesn't work. Since j. doesn't work, is I saw Picasso's painting at a museum. example i.'s counterpart? If not, is there any other "definite" construction particularly corresponding to example i.? Also, what do you think is the reason for example j. being ungrammatical?
– listeneva
15 hours ago
@listeneva Yes, I just updated my answer. You can use the only one.
– Jason Bassford
15 hours ago
Thanks. But 'only' adds an additional meaning to it. Can I perhaps say something like I saw the one painting by Picasso in a museum? as a "definite" counterpart to example i.?
– listeneva
15 hours ago
@listeneva Sure, that sentence is fine. But it doesn't parallel the use of the possessive that i uses. So, I wouldn't say it's a counterpart.
– Jason Bassford
15 hours ago
you could say "I saw the only one of Picasso's paintings at a museum"
I would say that "I saw Picasso's only painting" is much more idiomatic in this case, while still retaining the "only".
– Flater
13 hours ago
|
show 1 more comment
All sentences are grammatically correct, except:
- d - which cannot be salvaged.
- c - I am not sure if it is correct (probably not), but it sounds very unnatural. I would never use it.
Of Picasso means that Picasso was the model for the painting (as well as Mona Lisa was the model for another painting).
By Picasso means that Picasso was the painter.
"Picasso's painting" is ambiguous and can mean anything:
- Picasso is the painter;
- Picasso is the model;
- Picasso is the owner of the painting (as in: "Mona Lisa" is now Picasso's painting.)
"painting of Picasso's" means a painting representing Picasso's something (maybe Picasso's apartment).
To answer the main question:
How do you refer to one of those paintings?
one should say:
I saw one of Picasso's paintings at a museum.
or: (to remove ambiguity):
I saw a painting by Picasso at a museum.
If you know the painting's name, you can say:
I saw [painting name] by Picasso at a museum.
Good comment from @MartinBonner
Both c and d can be rescued by changing "Picasso's" to "Picasso".
I'm surprised that you think c. is "grammatically correct." If so, then is it also correct to say I saw a his painting at a museum.?
– listeneva
16 hours ago
@listeneva: noted. Tnx.
– virolino
16 hours ago
A possible phrase is "One of Picasso's paintings". Or consider using the paintings name if it is definiti: "I saw Guernica"
– James K
16 hours ago
1
@JamesK But that phrase is in example "i."
– listeneva
16 hours ago
1
c is wrong. Both c and d can be rescued by changing "Picasso's" to "Picasso".
– Martin Bonner
14 hours ago
|
show 1 more comment
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "481"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fell.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f201059%2fhow-to-describe-a-definite-one-of-picassos-paintings-as-well-as-an-indefinite-o%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
- Your use of the possessive in both c and d is incorrect.
E and f are grammatical, but they mean that Picasso was the subject of the painting, not that he was the artist. (Unless it was a self portrait.)
G through i are also all fine—and they mean the same thing as a and b.
J is ungrammatical. If there is only one of his paintings at the museum, you can simply say, I saw Picasso's painting at a museum. Or, if you want to maintain the same use of only as in i, you could say I saw the only one of Picasso's paintings at a museum.
The simplest way to add painting to a and b is to just add it after Picasso and forget about the possessive:
I saw a Picasso painting at a museum.
I saw the Picasso painting at a museum.
In this construction, Picasso is used as an attribute noun, acting adjectivally to qualify painting. You are talking about a Picasso painting as opposed to a Renoir painting.
This is the same as:
I dined at a Gordon Ramsay restaurant.
I filled the tank of my car at an Esso gas station.
I have a Babe Ruth trading card in my collection.
Thanks for letting me know example j. doesn't work. Since j. doesn't work, is I saw Picasso's painting at a museum. example i.'s counterpart? If not, is there any other "definite" construction particularly corresponding to example i.? Also, what do you think is the reason for example j. being ungrammatical?
– listeneva
15 hours ago
@listeneva Yes, I just updated my answer. You can use the only one.
– Jason Bassford
15 hours ago
Thanks. But 'only' adds an additional meaning to it. Can I perhaps say something like I saw the one painting by Picasso in a museum? as a "definite" counterpart to example i.?
– listeneva
15 hours ago
@listeneva Sure, that sentence is fine. But it doesn't parallel the use of the possessive that i uses. So, I wouldn't say it's a counterpart.
– Jason Bassford
15 hours ago
you could say "I saw the only one of Picasso's paintings at a museum"
I would say that "I saw Picasso's only painting" is much more idiomatic in this case, while still retaining the "only".
– Flater
13 hours ago
|
show 1 more comment
- Your use of the possessive in both c and d is incorrect.
E and f are grammatical, but they mean that Picasso was the subject of the painting, not that he was the artist. (Unless it was a self portrait.)
G through i are also all fine—and they mean the same thing as a and b.
J is ungrammatical. If there is only one of his paintings at the museum, you can simply say, I saw Picasso's painting at a museum. Or, if you want to maintain the same use of only as in i, you could say I saw the only one of Picasso's paintings at a museum.
The simplest way to add painting to a and b is to just add it after Picasso and forget about the possessive:
I saw a Picasso painting at a museum.
I saw the Picasso painting at a museum.
In this construction, Picasso is used as an attribute noun, acting adjectivally to qualify painting. You are talking about a Picasso painting as opposed to a Renoir painting.
This is the same as:
I dined at a Gordon Ramsay restaurant.
I filled the tank of my car at an Esso gas station.
I have a Babe Ruth trading card in my collection.
Thanks for letting me know example j. doesn't work. Since j. doesn't work, is I saw Picasso's painting at a museum. example i.'s counterpart? If not, is there any other "definite" construction particularly corresponding to example i.? Also, what do you think is the reason for example j. being ungrammatical?
– listeneva
15 hours ago
@listeneva Yes, I just updated my answer. You can use the only one.
– Jason Bassford
15 hours ago
Thanks. But 'only' adds an additional meaning to it. Can I perhaps say something like I saw the one painting by Picasso in a museum? as a "definite" counterpart to example i.?
– listeneva
15 hours ago
@listeneva Sure, that sentence is fine. But it doesn't parallel the use of the possessive that i uses. So, I wouldn't say it's a counterpart.
– Jason Bassford
15 hours ago
you could say "I saw the only one of Picasso's paintings at a museum"
I would say that "I saw Picasso's only painting" is much more idiomatic in this case, while still retaining the "only".
– Flater
13 hours ago
|
show 1 more comment
- Your use of the possessive in both c and d is incorrect.
E and f are grammatical, but they mean that Picasso was the subject of the painting, not that he was the artist. (Unless it was a self portrait.)
G through i are also all fine—and they mean the same thing as a and b.
J is ungrammatical. If there is only one of his paintings at the museum, you can simply say, I saw Picasso's painting at a museum. Or, if you want to maintain the same use of only as in i, you could say I saw the only one of Picasso's paintings at a museum.
The simplest way to add painting to a and b is to just add it after Picasso and forget about the possessive:
I saw a Picasso painting at a museum.
I saw the Picasso painting at a museum.
In this construction, Picasso is used as an attribute noun, acting adjectivally to qualify painting. You are talking about a Picasso painting as opposed to a Renoir painting.
This is the same as:
I dined at a Gordon Ramsay restaurant.
I filled the tank of my car at an Esso gas station.
I have a Babe Ruth trading card in my collection.
- Your use of the possessive in both c and d is incorrect.
E and f are grammatical, but they mean that Picasso was the subject of the painting, not that he was the artist. (Unless it was a self portrait.)
G through i are also all fine—and they mean the same thing as a and b.
J is ungrammatical. If there is only one of his paintings at the museum, you can simply say, I saw Picasso's painting at a museum. Or, if you want to maintain the same use of only as in i, you could say I saw the only one of Picasso's paintings at a museum.
The simplest way to add painting to a and b is to just add it after Picasso and forget about the possessive:
I saw a Picasso painting at a museum.
I saw the Picasso painting at a museum.
In this construction, Picasso is used as an attribute noun, acting adjectivally to qualify painting. You are talking about a Picasso painting as opposed to a Renoir painting.
This is the same as:
I dined at a Gordon Ramsay restaurant.
I filled the tank of my car at an Esso gas station.
I have a Babe Ruth trading card in my collection.
edited 15 hours ago
answered 16 hours ago
Jason BassfordJason Bassford
16.3k22238
16.3k22238
Thanks for letting me know example j. doesn't work. Since j. doesn't work, is I saw Picasso's painting at a museum. example i.'s counterpart? If not, is there any other "definite" construction particularly corresponding to example i.? Also, what do you think is the reason for example j. being ungrammatical?
– listeneva
15 hours ago
@listeneva Yes, I just updated my answer. You can use the only one.
– Jason Bassford
15 hours ago
Thanks. But 'only' adds an additional meaning to it. Can I perhaps say something like I saw the one painting by Picasso in a museum? as a "definite" counterpart to example i.?
– listeneva
15 hours ago
@listeneva Sure, that sentence is fine. But it doesn't parallel the use of the possessive that i uses. So, I wouldn't say it's a counterpart.
– Jason Bassford
15 hours ago
you could say "I saw the only one of Picasso's paintings at a museum"
I would say that "I saw Picasso's only painting" is much more idiomatic in this case, while still retaining the "only".
– Flater
13 hours ago
|
show 1 more comment
Thanks for letting me know example j. doesn't work. Since j. doesn't work, is I saw Picasso's painting at a museum. example i.'s counterpart? If not, is there any other "definite" construction particularly corresponding to example i.? Also, what do you think is the reason for example j. being ungrammatical?
– listeneva
15 hours ago
@listeneva Yes, I just updated my answer. You can use the only one.
– Jason Bassford
15 hours ago
Thanks. But 'only' adds an additional meaning to it. Can I perhaps say something like I saw the one painting by Picasso in a museum? as a "definite" counterpart to example i.?
– listeneva
15 hours ago
@listeneva Sure, that sentence is fine. But it doesn't parallel the use of the possessive that i uses. So, I wouldn't say it's a counterpart.
– Jason Bassford
15 hours ago
you could say "I saw the only one of Picasso's paintings at a museum"
I would say that "I saw Picasso's only painting" is much more idiomatic in this case, while still retaining the "only".
– Flater
13 hours ago
Thanks for letting me know example j. doesn't work. Since j. doesn't work, is I saw Picasso's painting at a museum. example i.'s counterpart? If not, is there any other "definite" construction particularly corresponding to example i.? Also, what do you think is the reason for example j. being ungrammatical?
– listeneva
15 hours ago
Thanks for letting me know example j. doesn't work. Since j. doesn't work, is I saw Picasso's painting at a museum. example i.'s counterpart? If not, is there any other "definite" construction particularly corresponding to example i.? Also, what do you think is the reason for example j. being ungrammatical?
– listeneva
15 hours ago
@listeneva Yes, I just updated my answer. You can use the only one.
– Jason Bassford
15 hours ago
@listeneva Yes, I just updated my answer. You can use the only one.
– Jason Bassford
15 hours ago
Thanks. But 'only' adds an additional meaning to it. Can I perhaps say something like I saw the one painting by Picasso in a museum? as a "definite" counterpart to example i.?
– listeneva
15 hours ago
Thanks. But 'only' adds an additional meaning to it. Can I perhaps say something like I saw the one painting by Picasso in a museum? as a "definite" counterpart to example i.?
– listeneva
15 hours ago
@listeneva Sure, that sentence is fine. But it doesn't parallel the use of the possessive that i uses. So, I wouldn't say it's a counterpart.
– Jason Bassford
15 hours ago
@listeneva Sure, that sentence is fine. But it doesn't parallel the use of the possessive that i uses. So, I wouldn't say it's a counterpart.
– Jason Bassford
15 hours ago
you could say "I saw the only one of Picasso's paintings at a museum"
I would say that "I saw Picasso's only painting" is much more idiomatic in this case, while still retaining the "only".– Flater
13 hours ago
you could say "I saw the only one of Picasso's paintings at a museum"
I would say that "I saw Picasso's only painting" is much more idiomatic in this case, while still retaining the "only".– Flater
13 hours ago
|
show 1 more comment
All sentences are grammatically correct, except:
- d - which cannot be salvaged.
- c - I am not sure if it is correct (probably not), but it sounds very unnatural. I would never use it.
Of Picasso means that Picasso was the model for the painting (as well as Mona Lisa was the model for another painting).
By Picasso means that Picasso was the painter.
"Picasso's painting" is ambiguous and can mean anything:
- Picasso is the painter;
- Picasso is the model;
- Picasso is the owner of the painting (as in: "Mona Lisa" is now Picasso's painting.)
"painting of Picasso's" means a painting representing Picasso's something (maybe Picasso's apartment).
To answer the main question:
How do you refer to one of those paintings?
one should say:
I saw one of Picasso's paintings at a museum.
or: (to remove ambiguity):
I saw a painting by Picasso at a museum.
If you know the painting's name, you can say:
I saw [painting name] by Picasso at a museum.
Good comment from @MartinBonner
Both c and d can be rescued by changing "Picasso's" to "Picasso".
I'm surprised that you think c. is "grammatically correct." If so, then is it also correct to say I saw a his painting at a museum.?
– listeneva
16 hours ago
@listeneva: noted. Tnx.
– virolino
16 hours ago
A possible phrase is "One of Picasso's paintings". Or consider using the paintings name if it is definiti: "I saw Guernica"
– James K
16 hours ago
1
@JamesK But that phrase is in example "i."
– listeneva
16 hours ago
1
c is wrong. Both c and d can be rescued by changing "Picasso's" to "Picasso".
– Martin Bonner
14 hours ago
|
show 1 more comment
All sentences are grammatically correct, except:
- d - which cannot be salvaged.
- c - I am not sure if it is correct (probably not), but it sounds very unnatural. I would never use it.
Of Picasso means that Picasso was the model for the painting (as well as Mona Lisa was the model for another painting).
By Picasso means that Picasso was the painter.
"Picasso's painting" is ambiguous and can mean anything:
- Picasso is the painter;
- Picasso is the model;
- Picasso is the owner of the painting (as in: "Mona Lisa" is now Picasso's painting.)
"painting of Picasso's" means a painting representing Picasso's something (maybe Picasso's apartment).
To answer the main question:
How do you refer to one of those paintings?
one should say:
I saw one of Picasso's paintings at a museum.
or: (to remove ambiguity):
I saw a painting by Picasso at a museum.
If you know the painting's name, you can say:
I saw [painting name] by Picasso at a museum.
Good comment from @MartinBonner
Both c and d can be rescued by changing "Picasso's" to "Picasso".
I'm surprised that you think c. is "grammatically correct." If so, then is it also correct to say I saw a his painting at a museum.?
– listeneva
16 hours ago
@listeneva: noted. Tnx.
– virolino
16 hours ago
A possible phrase is "One of Picasso's paintings". Or consider using the paintings name if it is definiti: "I saw Guernica"
– James K
16 hours ago
1
@JamesK But that phrase is in example "i."
– listeneva
16 hours ago
1
c is wrong. Both c and d can be rescued by changing "Picasso's" to "Picasso".
– Martin Bonner
14 hours ago
|
show 1 more comment
All sentences are grammatically correct, except:
- d - which cannot be salvaged.
- c - I am not sure if it is correct (probably not), but it sounds very unnatural. I would never use it.
Of Picasso means that Picasso was the model for the painting (as well as Mona Lisa was the model for another painting).
By Picasso means that Picasso was the painter.
"Picasso's painting" is ambiguous and can mean anything:
- Picasso is the painter;
- Picasso is the model;
- Picasso is the owner of the painting (as in: "Mona Lisa" is now Picasso's painting.)
"painting of Picasso's" means a painting representing Picasso's something (maybe Picasso's apartment).
To answer the main question:
How do you refer to one of those paintings?
one should say:
I saw one of Picasso's paintings at a museum.
or: (to remove ambiguity):
I saw a painting by Picasso at a museum.
If you know the painting's name, you can say:
I saw [painting name] by Picasso at a museum.
Good comment from @MartinBonner
Both c and d can be rescued by changing "Picasso's" to "Picasso".
All sentences are grammatically correct, except:
- d - which cannot be salvaged.
- c - I am not sure if it is correct (probably not), but it sounds very unnatural. I would never use it.
Of Picasso means that Picasso was the model for the painting (as well as Mona Lisa was the model for another painting).
By Picasso means that Picasso was the painter.
"Picasso's painting" is ambiguous and can mean anything:
- Picasso is the painter;
- Picasso is the model;
- Picasso is the owner of the painting (as in: "Mona Lisa" is now Picasso's painting.)
"painting of Picasso's" means a painting representing Picasso's something (maybe Picasso's apartment).
To answer the main question:
How do you refer to one of those paintings?
one should say:
I saw one of Picasso's paintings at a museum.
or: (to remove ambiguity):
I saw a painting by Picasso at a museum.
If you know the painting's name, you can say:
I saw [painting name] by Picasso at a museum.
Good comment from @MartinBonner
Both c and d can be rescued by changing "Picasso's" to "Picasso".
edited 14 hours ago
answered 17 hours ago
virolinovirolino
2,0441223
2,0441223
I'm surprised that you think c. is "grammatically correct." If so, then is it also correct to say I saw a his painting at a museum.?
– listeneva
16 hours ago
@listeneva: noted. Tnx.
– virolino
16 hours ago
A possible phrase is "One of Picasso's paintings". Or consider using the paintings name if it is definiti: "I saw Guernica"
– James K
16 hours ago
1
@JamesK But that phrase is in example "i."
– listeneva
16 hours ago
1
c is wrong. Both c and d can be rescued by changing "Picasso's" to "Picasso".
– Martin Bonner
14 hours ago
|
show 1 more comment
I'm surprised that you think c. is "grammatically correct." If so, then is it also correct to say I saw a his painting at a museum.?
– listeneva
16 hours ago
@listeneva: noted. Tnx.
– virolino
16 hours ago
A possible phrase is "One of Picasso's paintings". Or consider using the paintings name if it is definiti: "I saw Guernica"
– James K
16 hours ago
1
@JamesK But that phrase is in example "i."
– listeneva
16 hours ago
1
c is wrong. Both c and d can be rescued by changing "Picasso's" to "Picasso".
– Martin Bonner
14 hours ago
I'm surprised that you think c. is "grammatically correct." If so, then is it also correct to say I saw a his painting at a museum.?
– listeneva
16 hours ago
I'm surprised that you think c. is "grammatically correct." If so, then is it also correct to say I saw a his painting at a museum.?
– listeneva
16 hours ago
@listeneva: noted. Tnx.
– virolino
16 hours ago
@listeneva: noted. Tnx.
– virolino
16 hours ago
A possible phrase is "One of Picasso's paintings". Or consider using the paintings name if it is definiti: "I saw Guernica"
– James K
16 hours ago
A possible phrase is "One of Picasso's paintings". Or consider using the paintings name if it is definiti: "I saw Guernica"
– James K
16 hours ago
1
1
@JamesK But that phrase is in example "i."
– listeneva
16 hours ago
@JamesK But that phrase is in example "i."
– listeneva
16 hours ago
1
1
c is wrong. Both c and d can be rescued by changing "Picasso's" to "Picasso".
– Martin Bonner
14 hours ago
c is wrong. Both c and d can be rescued by changing "Picasso's" to "Picasso".
– Martin Bonner
14 hours ago
|
show 1 more comment
Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language Learners Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fell.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f201059%2fhow-to-describe-a-definite-one-of-picassos-paintings-as-well-as-an-indefinite-o%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
I would not call example B correct unless you changed it to "I saw the Picasso at the museum." As it is, you have not specified which museum you went to, which then further implies that there is only one Picasso painting in existence in all the museums, which is clearly not true. Specifying the museum with "the" now just states that there is only one Picasso at that museum.
– Darrel Hoffman
10 hours ago
@DarrelHoffman I hope you're not a native speaker of English. Just because you have not specified the museum in which you saw the Picasso doesn't mean there is only one Picasso in the world. Say, you were looking for a specific Picasso all over the world, and you did find that Picasso in a museum, but you don't want to let the listener know anything about the museum. In that scenario, you could easily say (b).
– listeneva
10 hours ago
I am a native English speaker, and that sentence just sounds really awkward to me. Sure, it's grammatically correct, and it works with your context added in, but by itself the sentence gives the unintended meaning that there is only one Picasso.
– Darrel Hoffman
10 hours ago
@DarrelHoffman When you're talking about none other than "Picasso", who on Earth would possibly interpret b. to mean that there is only one Picasso?
– listeneva
9 hours ago
That's exactly my point, and the reason the sentence feels wrong to me. It implies that there is only one of a thing which everyone knows there are many of. Without your context of looking for a specific painting, the sentence reads false by itself. It would work if it was describing something which is actually unique - "I saw the Mona Lisa at a museum", for example. But not for something of which there are many.
– Darrel Hoffman
9 hours ago