Is this sentence grammatically correct?

Multi tool use
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}
The following sentence is grammatically correct:
He swung his legs, and sang a song.
But I'm unsure if this is correct:
He swung his legs, singing a song.
It sounds correct to me, but I'm not sure about the present participle, unless what is meant is:
He swung his legs, [and he was] singing a song.
grammar tenses
migrated from writing.stackexchange.com yesterday
This question came from our site for the craft of professional writing, including fiction, non-fiction, technical, scholarly, and commercial writing.
add a comment |
The following sentence is grammatically correct:
He swung his legs, and sang a song.
But I'm unsure if this is correct:
He swung his legs, singing a song.
It sounds correct to me, but I'm not sure about the present participle, unless what is meant is:
He swung his legs, [and he was] singing a song.
grammar tenses
migrated from writing.stackexchange.com yesterday
This question came from our site for the craft of professional writing, including fiction, non-fiction, technical, scholarly, and commercial writing.
add a comment |
The following sentence is grammatically correct:
He swung his legs, and sang a song.
But I'm unsure if this is correct:
He swung his legs, singing a song.
It sounds correct to me, but I'm not sure about the present participle, unless what is meant is:
He swung his legs, [and he was] singing a song.
grammar tenses
The following sentence is grammatically correct:
He swung his legs, and sang a song.
But I'm unsure if this is correct:
He swung his legs, singing a song.
It sounds correct to me, but I'm not sure about the present participle, unless what is meant is:
He swung his legs, [and he was] singing a song.
grammar tenses
grammar tenses
asked yesterday


Bradley MarquesBradley Marques
1084
1084
migrated from writing.stackexchange.com yesterday
This question came from our site for the craft of professional writing, including fiction, non-fiction, technical, scholarly, and commercial writing.
migrated from writing.stackexchange.com yesterday
This question came from our site for the craft of professional writing, including fiction, non-fiction, technical, scholarly, and commercial writing.
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
You ask whether the sentences are "grammatically correct" - which they are.
But, to me, they do not (necessarily) mean the same thing:
He swung his legs, and [then] sang a song.
Although both parts of the sentence are in the simple past tense, it is not clear from your wording whether the two actions were sequential or simultaneous.
He swung his legs, [while] singing a song.
Here, the first part of the sentence is in the simple past tense, but the second part is in a continuous tense and it is clear that the two actions were simultaneous.
So in summary:
- Yes, they are both "grammatically correct".
- But, the first sentence is ambiguous as to whether the two actions were sequential or simultaneous.
- In the second sentence, the two actions were clearly simultaneous.
Makes sense to me. Thanks!
– Bradley Marques
5 hours ago
add a comment |
"He swung his legs, and sang a song."
Tense-wise, this is correct. But, it does't need a comma. Your "and" sufficiently links the two clauses. If he was doing more than just swinging his legs you would insert a comma to list his actions. Such as:
"He swung his legs, waving his arms and singing a song."
"He swung his legs, singing a song."
This sentence is correct. Yes, your comma takes the place of your "and was". There is no disagreement between your participles.
I suppose you were going for asonginance, but did you need to duplicate "a song"?
– Hot Licks
yesterday
@HotLicks My bad. Edited.
– matildalee23
yesterday
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "97"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f493851%2fis-this-sentence-grammatically-correct%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
You ask whether the sentences are "grammatically correct" - which they are.
But, to me, they do not (necessarily) mean the same thing:
He swung his legs, and [then] sang a song.
Although both parts of the sentence are in the simple past tense, it is not clear from your wording whether the two actions were sequential or simultaneous.
He swung his legs, [while] singing a song.
Here, the first part of the sentence is in the simple past tense, but the second part is in a continuous tense and it is clear that the two actions were simultaneous.
So in summary:
- Yes, they are both "grammatically correct".
- But, the first sentence is ambiguous as to whether the two actions were sequential or simultaneous.
- In the second sentence, the two actions were clearly simultaneous.
Makes sense to me. Thanks!
– Bradley Marques
5 hours ago
add a comment |
You ask whether the sentences are "grammatically correct" - which they are.
But, to me, they do not (necessarily) mean the same thing:
He swung his legs, and [then] sang a song.
Although both parts of the sentence are in the simple past tense, it is not clear from your wording whether the two actions were sequential or simultaneous.
He swung his legs, [while] singing a song.
Here, the first part of the sentence is in the simple past tense, but the second part is in a continuous tense and it is clear that the two actions were simultaneous.
So in summary:
- Yes, they are both "grammatically correct".
- But, the first sentence is ambiguous as to whether the two actions were sequential or simultaneous.
- In the second sentence, the two actions were clearly simultaneous.
Makes sense to me. Thanks!
– Bradley Marques
5 hours ago
add a comment |
You ask whether the sentences are "grammatically correct" - which they are.
But, to me, they do not (necessarily) mean the same thing:
He swung his legs, and [then] sang a song.
Although both parts of the sentence are in the simple past tense, it is not clear from your wording whether the two actions were sequential or simultaneous.
He swung his legs, [while] singing a song.
Here, the first part of the sentence is in the simple past tense, but the second part is in a continuous tense and it is clear that the two actions were simultaneous.
So in summary:
- Yes, they are both "grammatically correct".
- But, the first sentence is ambiguous as to whether the two actions were sequential or simultaneous.
- In the second sentence, the two actions were clearly simultaneous.
You ask whether the sentences are "grammatically correct" - which they are.
But, to me, they do not (necessarily) mean the same thing:
He swung his legs, and [then] sang a song.
Although both parts of the sentence are in the simple past tense, it is not clear from your wording whether the two actions were sequential or simultaneous.
He swung his legs, [while] singing a song.
Here, the first part of the sentence is in the simple past tense, but the second part is in a continuous tense and it is clear that the two actions were simultaneous.
So in summary:
- Yes, they are both "grammatically correct".
- But, the first sentence is ambiguous as to whether the two actions were sequential or simultaneous.
- In the second sentence, the two actions were clearly simultaneous.
answered yesterday
TrevorDTrevorD
10.7k22458
10.7k22458
Makes sense to me. Thanks!
– Bradley Marques
5 hours ago
add a comment |
Makes sense to me. Thanks!
– Bradley Marques
5 hours ago
Makes sense to me. Thanks!
– Bradley Marques
5 hours ago
Makes sense to me. Thanks!
– Bradley Marques
5 hours ago
add a comment |
"He swung his legs, and sang a song."
Tense-wise, this is correct. But, it does't need a comma. Your "and" sufficiently links the two clauses. If he was doing more than just swinging his legs you would insert a comma to list his actions. Such as:
"He swung his legs, waving his arms and singing a song."
"He swung his legs, singing a song."
This sentence is correct. Yes, your comma takes the place of your "and was". There is no disagreement between your participles.
I suppose you were going for asonginance, but did you need to duplicate "a song"?
– Hot Licks
yesterday
@HotLicks My bad. Edited.
– matildalee23
yesterday
add a comment |
"He swung his legs, and sang a song."
Tense-wise, this is correct. But, it does't need a comma. Your "and" sufficiently links the two clauses. If he was doing more than just swinging his legs you would insert a comma to list his actions. Such as:
"He swung his legs, waving his arms and singing a song."
"He swung his legs, singing a song."
This sentence is correct. Yes, your comma takes the place of your "and was". There is no disagreement between your participles.
I suppose you were going for asonginance, but did you need to duplicate "a song"?
– Hot Licks
yesterday
@HotLicks My bad. Edited.
– matildalee23
yesterday
add a comment |
"He swung his legs, and sang a song."
Tense-wise, this is correct. But, it does't need a comma. Your "and" sufficiently links the two clauses. If he was doing more than just swinging his legs you would insert a comma to list his actions. Such as:
"He swung his legs, waving his arms and singing a song."
"He swung his legs, singing a song."
This sentence is correct. Yes, your comma takes the place of your "and was". There is no disagreement between your participles.
"He swung his legs, and sang a song."
Tense-wise, this is correct. But, it does't need a comma. Your "and" sufficiently links the two clauses. If he was doing more than just swinging his legs you would insert a comma to list his actions. Such as:
"He swung his legs, waving his arms and singing a song."
"He swung his legs, singing a song."
This sentence is correct. Yes, your comma takes the place of your "and was". There is no disagreement between your participles.
edited yesterday
answered yesterday
matildalee23matildalee23
1212
1212
I suppose you were going for asonginance, but did you need to duplicate "a song"?
– Hot Licks
yesterday
@HotLicks My bad. Edited.
– matildalee23
yesterday
add a comment |
I suppose you were going for asonginance, but did you need to duplicate "a song"?
– Hot Licks
yesterday
@HotLicks My bad. Edited.
– matildalee23
yesterday
I suppose you were going for asonginance, but did you need to duplicate "a song"?
– Hot Licks
yesterday
I suppose you were going for asonginance, but did you need to duplicate "a song"?
– Hot Licks
yesterday
@HotLicks My bad. Edited.
– matildalee23
yesterday
@HotLicks My bad. Edited.
– matildalee23
yesterday
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language & Usage Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f493851%2fis-this-sentence-grammatically-correct%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
k9p h,bZGy wX,fPGTp5g VOwPAOX