Confused about both singular and plural [on hold]





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}







0















Which one is correct:



1)
Our initial plan was to retrain all the models on both the training and validation sets once we know...



2)
Our initial plan was to retrain all the models on both the training and validation set once we know...










share|improve this question







New contributor




lalalinga is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











put on hold as off-topic by tchrist yesterday


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "Please include the research you’ve done, or consider if your question suits our English Language Learners site better. Questions that can be answered using commonly-available references are off-topic." – tchrist

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

















  • Are there one or more (1) training sets and (2) validation sets—or is there only (1) training and (2) a single validation set? Without knowing that, either version could be correct.

    – Jason Bassford
    yesterday











  • I don't see how the second could be correct: 'both' requires a reference to precisely two things, 'the training and validation set' is just one thing.

    – JeremyC
    yesterday


















0















Which one is correct:



1)
Our initial plan was to retrain all the models on both the training and validation sets once we know...



2)
Our initial plan was to retrain all the models on both the training and validation set once we know...










share|improve this question







New contributor




lalalinga is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











put on hold as off-topic by tchrist yesterday


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "Please include the research you’ve done, or consider if your question suits our English Language Learners site better. Questions that can be answered using commonly-available references are off-topic." – tchrist

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

















  • Are there one or more (1) training sets and (2) validation sets—or is there only (1) training and (2) a single validation set? Without knowing that, either version could be correct.

    – Jason Bassford
    yesterday











  • I don't see how the second could be correct: 'both' requires a reference to precisely two things, 'the training and validation set' is just one thing.

    – JeremyC
    yesterday














0












0








0


1






Which one is correct:



1)
Our initial plan was to retrain all the models on both the training and validation sets once we know...



2)
Our initial plan was to retrain all the models on both the training and validation set once we know...










share|improve this question







New contributor




lalalinga is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












Which one is correct:



1)
Our initial plan was to retrain all the models on both the training and validation sets once we know...



2)
Our initial plan was to retrain all the models on both the training and validation set once we know...







grammatical-number verb-agreement determiners quantifiers






share|improve this question







New contributor




lalalinga is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question







New contributor




lalalinga is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question






New contributor




lalalinga is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked yesterday









lalalingalalalinga

1




1




New contributor




lalalinga is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





lalalinga is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






lalalinga is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




put on hold as off-topic by tchrist yesterday


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "Please include the research you’ve done, or consider if your question suits our English Language Learners site better. Questions that can be answered using commonly-available references are off-topic." – tchrist

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.







put on hold as off-topic by tchrist yesterday


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "Please include the research you’ve done, or consider if your question suits our English Language Learners site better. Questions that can be answered using commonly-available references are off-topic." – tchrist

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.













  • Are there one or more (1) training sets and (2) validation sets—or is there only (1) training and (2) a single validation set? Without knowing that, either version could be correct.

    – Jason Bassford
    yesterday











  • I don't see how the second could be correct: 'both' requires a reference to precisely two things, 'the training and validation set' is just one thing.

    – JeremyC
    yesterday



















  • Are there one or more (1) training sets and (2) validation sets—or is there only (1) training and (2) a single validation set? Without knowing that, either version could be correct.

    – Jason Bassford
    yesterday











  • I don't see how the second could be correct: 'both' requires a reference to precisely two things, 'the training and validation set' is just one thing.

    – JeremyC
    yesterday

















Are there one or more (1) training sets and (2) validation sets—or is there only (1) training and (2) a single validation set? Without knowing that, either version could be correct.

– Jason Bassford
yesterday





Are there one or more (1) training sets and (2) validation sets—or is there only (1) training and (2) a single validation set? Without knowing that, either version could be correct.

– Jason Bassford
yesterday













I don't see how the second could be correct: 'both' requires a reference to precisely two things, 'the training and validation set' is just one thing.

– JeremyC
yesterday





I don't see how the second could be correct: 'both' requires a reference to precisely two things, 'the training and validation set' is just one thing.

– JeremyC
yesterday










0






active

oldest

votes

















0






active

oldest

votes








0






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes

Popular posts from this blog

數位音樂下載

When can things happen in Etherscan, such as the picture below?

格利澤436b