what does “killed and went away” mean?





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}







0















I am learning this course Stanford CS224N: natural language processing with Deep Learning.



The professor is saying




on the one hand, whenever you see these pictures you should hold onto
your wallet. Because there's a huge amount of detail on the original
vector space that got completely killed and went away.




is it the vector space got completely killed?



what does the phrase "killed and went away" mean in this context?










share|improve this question







New contributor




shi95 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
















  • 1





    It is quite common in programming to refer to the removal of unnecessary data as "killing". So he is saying that the detail was "killed" and is no longer available (it "went away").

    – James Random
    yesterday






  • 2





    No, the detail got killed and went away. The author removed detail (killed it) and you can no longer see evidence of it (it went away) by doing whatever was done to paint the pretty picture.

    – HBruijn
    yesterday













  • Please do not answer questions in comments. If you know the answer, please write it as an answer.

    – DJClayworth
    yesterday











  • It's all in the details!

    – Hot Licks
    yesterday


















0















I am learning this course Stanford CS224N: natural language processing with Deep Learning.



The professor is saying




on the one hand, whenever you see these pictures you should hold onto
your wallet. Because there's a huge amount of detail on the original
vector space that got completely killed and went away.




is it the vector space got completely killed?



what does the phrase "killed and went away" mean in this context?










share|improve this question







New contributor




shi95 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
















  • 1





    It is quite common in programming to refer to the removal of unnecessary data as "killing". So he is saying that the detail was "killed" and is no longer available (it "went away").

    – James Random
    yesterday






  • 2





    No, the detail got killed and went away. The author removed detail (killed it) and you can no longer see evidence of it (it went away) by doing whatever was done to paint the pretty picture.

    – HBruijn
    yesterday













  • Please do not answer questions in comments. If you know the answer, please write it as an answer.

    – DJClayworth
    yesterday











  • It's all in the details!

    – Hot Licks
    yesterday














0












0








0








I am learning this course Stanford CS224N: natural language processing with Deep Learning.



The professor is saying




on the one hand, whenever you see these pictures you should hold onto
your wallet. Because there's a huge amount of detail on the original
vector space that got completely killed and went away.




is it the vector space got completely killed?



what does the phrase "killed and went away" mean in this context?










share|improve this question







New contributor




shi95 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












I am learning this course Stanford CS224N: natural language processing with Deep Learning.



The professor is saying




on the one hand, whenever you see these pictures you should hold onto
your wallet. Because there's a huge amount of detail on the original
vector space that got completely killed and went away.




is it the vector space got completely killed?



what does the phrase "killed and went away" mean in this context?







meaning






share|improve this question







New contributor




shi95 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question







New contributor




shi95 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question






New contributor




shi95 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked yesterday









shi95shi95

52




52




New contributor




shi95 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





shi95 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






shi95 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








  • 1





    It is quite common in programming to refer to the removal of unnecessary data as "killing". So he is saying that the detail was "killed" and is no longer available (it "went away").

    – James Random
    yesterday






  • 2





    No, the detail got killed and went away. The author removed detail (killed it) and you can no longer see evidence of it (it went away) by doing whatever was done to paint the pretty picture.

    – HBruijn
    yesterday













  • Please do not answer questions in comments. If you know the answer, please write it as an answer.

    – DJClayworth
    yesterday











  • It's all in the details!

    – Hot Licks
    yesterday














  • 1





    It is quite common in programming to refer to the removal of unnecessary data as "killing". So he is saying that the detail was "killed" and is no longer available (it "went away").

    – James Random
    yesterday






  • 2





    No, the detail got killed and went away. The author removed detail (killed it) and you can no longer see evidence of it (it went away) by doing whatever was done to paint the pretty picture.

    – HBruijn
    yesterday













  • Please do not answer questions in comments. If you know the answer, please write it as an answer.

    – DJClayworth
    yesterday











  • It's all in the details!

    – Hot Licks
    yesterday








1




1





It is quite common in programming to refer to the removal of unnecessary data as "killing". So he is saying that the detail was "killed" and is no longer available (it "went away").

– James Random
yesterday





It is quite common in programming to refer to the removal of unnecessary data as "killing". So he is saying that the detail was "killed" and is no longer available (it "went away").

– James Random
yesterday




2




2





No, the detail got killed and went away. The author removed detail (killed it) and you can no longer see evidence of it (it went away) by doing whatever was done to paint the pretty picture.

– HBruijn
yesterday







No, the detail got killed and went away. The author removed detail (killed it) and you can no longer see evidence of it (it went away) by doing whatever was done to paint the pretty picture.

– HBruijn
yesterday















Please do not answer questions in comments. If you know the answer, please write it as an answer.

– DJClayworth
yesterday





Please do not answer questions in comments. If you know the answer, please write it as an answer.

– DJClayworth
yesterday













It's all in the details!

– Hot Licks
yesterday





It's all in the details!

– Hot Licks
yesterday










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















1














In the professor's example, there are 2 following vector spaces,



VS1: original vector space, which is a 100-dimensional space;



VS2: a 2-dimensional space, into which original information are being projected down.



During the projection, some information in original vector space(i.e. VS1) would be lost.



Phrase "killed and went away" here means "lost".



Some knowledge about linear algebra is needed to under this.






share|improve this answer










New contributor




Yong is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





















  • Or you could change the 100 to 3 and think of it as the sun and an object (sun+object are in 3D) casting a shadow on the floor (in 2D). You can recreate the shadow if you know all the 3D information but you cannot construct the object and the sun (taking into account size and location) from the shadow alone.

    – JJJ
    yesterday



















0














This means it was omitted and therefore not recorded






share|improve this answer








New contributor




Addison Richard is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
















  • 1





    Welcome to EL&U. It is not enough to state an answer on Stack Exchange, which is designed to elicit definitive answers. The answer would be strengthened with a detailed explanation with appropriate support. I strongly encourage you to take the site tour and review the help center.

    – choster
    12 hours ago












Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "97"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});






shi95 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f493975%2fwhat-does-killed-and-went-away-mean%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes








2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









1














In the professor's example, there are 2 following vector spaces,



VS1: original vector space, which is a 100-dimensional space;



VS2: a 2-dimensional space, into which original information are being projected down.



During the projection, some information in original vector space(i.e. VS1) would be lost.



Phrase "killed and went away" here means "lost".



Some knowledge about linear algebra is needed to under this.






share|improve this answer










New contributor




Yong is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





















  • Or you could change the 100 to 3 and think of it as the sun and an object (sun+object are in 3D) casting a shadow on the floor (in 2D). You can recreate the shadow if you know all the 3D information but you cannot construct the object and the sun (taking into account size and location) from the shadow alone.

    – JJJ
    yesterday
















1














In the professor's example, there are 2 following vector spaces,



VS1: original vector space, which is a 100-dimensional space;



VS2: a 2-dimensional space, into which original information are being projected down.



During the projection, some information in original vector space(i.e. VS1) would be lost.



Phrase "killed and went away" here means "lost".



Some knowledge about linear algebra is needed to under this.






share|improve this answer










New contributor




Yong is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





















  • Or you could change the 100 to 3 and think of it as the sun and an object (sun+object are in 3D) casting a shadow on the floor (in 2D). You can recreate the shadow if you know all the 3D information but you cannot construct the object and the sun (taking into account size and location) from the shadow alone.

    – JJJ
    yesterday














1












1








1







In the professor's example, there are 2 following vector spaces,



VS1: original vector space, which is a 100-dimensional space;



VS2: a 2-dimensional space, into which original information are being projected down.



During the projection, some information in original vector space(i.e. VS1) would be lost.



Phrase "killed and went away" here means "lost".



Some knowledge about linear algebra is needed to under this.






share|improve this answer










New contributor




Yong is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.










In the professor's example, there are 2 following vector spaces,



VS1: original vector space, which is a 100-dimensional space;



VS2: a 2-dimensional space, into which original information are being projected down.



During the projection, some information in original vector space(i.e. VS1) would be lost.



Phrase "killed and went away" here means "lost".



Some knowledge about linear algebra is needed to under this.







share|improve this answer










New contributor




Yong is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited yesterday









JJJ

6,221102846




6,221102846






New contributor




Yong is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









answered yesterday









YongYong

261




261




New contributor




Yong is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Yong is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Yong is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.













  • Or you could change the 100 to 3 and think of it as the sun and an object (sun+object are in 3D) casting a shadow on the floor (in 2D). You can recreate the shadow if you know all the 3D information but you cannot construct the object and the sun (taking into account size and location) from the shadow alone.

    – JJJ
    yesterday



















  • Or you could change the 100 to 3 and think of it as the sun and an object (sun+object are in 3D) casting a shadow on the floor (in 2D). You can recreate the shadow if you know all the 3D information but you cannot construct the object and the sun (taking into account size and location) from the shadow alone.

    – JJJ
    yesterday

















Or you could change the 100 to 3 and think of it as the sun and an object (sun+object are in 3D) casting a shadow on the floor (in 2D). You can recreate the shadow if you know all the 3D information but you cannot construct the object and the sun (taking into account size and location) from the shadow alone.

– JJJ
yesterday





Or you could change the 100 to 3 and think of it as the sun and an object (sun+object are in 3D) casting a shadow on the floor (in 2D). You can recreate the shadow if you know all the 3D information but you cannot construct the object and the sun (taking into account size and location) from the shadow alone.

– JJJ
yesterday













0














This means it was omitted and therefore not recorded






share|improve this answer








New contributor




Addison Richard is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
















  • 1





    Welcome to EL&U. It is not enough to state an answer on Stack Exchange, which is designed to elicit definitive answers. The answer would be strengthened with a detailed explanation with appropriate support. I strongly encourage you to take the site tour and review the help center.

    – choster
    12 hours ago
















0














This means it was omitted and therefore not recorded






share|improve this answer








New contributor




Addison Richard is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
















  • 1





    Welcome to EL&U. It is not enough to state an answer on Stack Exchange, which is designed to elicit definitive answers. The answer would be strengthened with a detailed explanation with appropriate support. I strongly encourage you to take the site tour and review the help center.

    – choster
    12 hours ago














0












0








0







This means it was omitted and therefore not recorded






share|improve this answer








New contributor




Addison Richard is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.










This means it was omitted and therefore not recorded







share|improve this answer








New contributor




Addison Richard is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer






New contributor




Addison Richard is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









answered yesterday









Addison RichardAddison Richard

11




11




New contributor




Addison Richard is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Addison Richard is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Addison Richard is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








  • 1





    Welcome to EL&U. It is not enough to state an answer on Stack Exchange, which is designed to elicit definitive answers. The answer would be strengthened with a detailed explanation with appropriate support. I strongly encourage you to take the site tour and review the help center.

    – choster
    12 hours ago














  • 1





    Welcome to EL&U. It is not enough to state an answer on Stack Exchange, which is designed to elicit definitive answers. The answer would be strengthened with a detailed explanation with appropriate support. I strongly encourage you to take the site tour and review the help center.

    – choster
    12 hours ago








1




1





Welcome to EL&U. It is not enough to state an answer on Stack Exchange, which is designed to elicit definitive answers. The answer would be strengthened with a detailed explanation with appropriate support. I strongly encourage you to take the site tour and review the help center.

– choster
12 hours ago





Welcome to EL&U. It is not enough to state an answer on Stack Exchange, which is designed to elicit definitive answers. The answer would be strengthened with a detailed explanation with appropriate support. I strongly encourage you to take the site tour and review the help center.

– choster
12 hours ago










shi95 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










draft saved

draft discarded


















shi95 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













shi95 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












shi95 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
















Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language & Usage Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f493975%2fwhat-does-killed-and-went-away-mean%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

數位音樂下載

When can things happen in Etherscan, such as the picture below?

格利澤436b