What is a more techy Technical Writer job title that isn't cutesy or confusing?
I have been hired as a Technical Writer at a firm who needed multiple types of writers: A few people were hired to write content for the average website reader interested in our product, such as a Product Manager, and user documentation, such as user guides. However, I was hired to dig down into the code and actually write sample code to explain how to use the company's SDK (software development kit). I interface with the development team on a daily basis and actually test their code, analyze it, and give them suggestions for improvement.
I would like to add another descriptive term in my job title on my email signature and resume to show that I have in-depth software engineering knowledge. For anyone who thinks this is to puff myself up or to downplay normal Technical Writers, you are wrong. The primary reason I want to do this is so my resume doesn't look like I switched careers. The secondary reason is so that people who receive my emails and read my resume can tell by my title that I have extensive software engineering experience inside software development.
I read this, but it didn't help. Of course, I searched the internet, too. I found articles about my current role, but nothing about job titles.
I thought perhaps:
- Technical Writer (Sr. Software Engineer)
- Technical Writer as Sr. Software Engineer
- Technical Writer specializing in the full SDLC
technical-writing career
New contributor
add a comment |
I have been hired as a Technical Writer at a firm who needed multiple types of writers: A few people were hired to write content for the average website reader interested in our product, such as a Product Manager, and user documentation, such as user guides. However, I was hired to dig down into the code and actually write sample code to explain how to use the company's SDK (software development kit). I interface with the development team on a daily basis and actually test their code, analyze it, and give them suggestions for improvement.
I would like to add another descriptive term in my job title on my email signature and resume to show that I have in-depth software engineering knowledge. For anyone who thinks this is to puff myself up or to downplay normal Technical Writers, you are wrong. The primary reason I want to do this is so my resume doesn't look like I switched careers. The secondary reason is so that people who receive my emails and read my resume can tell by my title that I have extensive software engineering experience inside software development.
I read this, but it didn't help. Of course, I searched the internet, too. I found articles about my current role, but nothing about job titles.
I thought perhaps:
- Technical Writer (Sr. Software Engineer)
- Technical Writer as Sr. Software Engineer
- Technical Writer specializing in the full SDLC
technical-writing career
New contributor
1
Welcome to Writing.SE. We love questions about technical writing here and we hope you'll stick around (and pick a name of your choice so we can remember who you are). I'm not sure this question is on topic though. The one you link to is 7 years old and a lot of old posts here would be off topic now, as I think that one would be without question. I'm not voting to close because I'd like to hear from others here about whether or not your question is on topic. Either way, please do post other questions as desired and answer what you like.
– Cyn
7 hours ago
add a comment |
I have been hired as a Technical Writer at a firm who needed multiple types of writers: A few people were hired to write content for the average website reader interested in our product, such as a Product Manager, and user documentation, such as user guides. However, I was hired to dig down into the code and actually write sample code to explain how to use the company's SDK (software development kit). I interface with the development team on a daily basis and actually test their code, analyze it, and give them suggestions for improvement.
I would like to add another descriptive term in my job title on my email signature and resume to show that I have in-depth software engineering knowledge. For anyone who thinks this is to puff myself up or to downplay normal Technical Writers, you are wrong. The primary reason I want to do this is so my resume doesn't look like I switched careers. The secondary reason is so that people who receive my emails and read my resume can tell by my title that I have extensive software engineering experience inside software development.
I read this, but it didn't help. Of course, I searched the internet, too. I found articles about my current role, but nothing about job titles.
I thought perhaps:
- Technical Writer (Sr. Software Engineer)
- Technical Writer as Sr. Software Engineer
- Technical Writer specializing in the full SDLC
technical-writing career
New contributor
I have been hired as a Technical Writer at a firm who needed multiple types of writers: A few people were hired to write content for the average website reader interested in our product, such as a Product Manager, and user documentation, such as user guides. However, I was hired to dig down into the code and actually write sample code to explain how to use the company's SDK (software development kit). I interface with the development team on a daily basis and actually test their code, analyze it, and give them suggestions for improvement.
I would like to add another descriptive term in my job title on my email signature and resume to show that I have in-depth software engineering knowledge. For anyone who thinks this is to puff myself up or to downplay normal Technical Writers, you are wrong. The primary reason I want to do this is so my resume doesn't look like I switched careers. The secondary reason is so that people who receive my emails and read my resume can tell by my title that I have extensive software engineering experience inside software development.
I read this, but it didn't help. Of course, I searched the internet, too. I found articles about my current role, but nothing about job titles.
I thought perhaps:
- Technical Writer (Sr. Software Engineer)
- Technical Writer as Sr. Software Engineer
- Technical Writer specializing in the full SDLC
technical-writing career
technical-writing career
New contributor
New contributor
edited 7 hours ago
Cyn
18.2k13985
18.2k13985
New contributor
asked 9 hours ago
user2263986user2263986
111
111
New contributor
New contributor
1
Welcome to Writing.SE. We love questions about technical writing here and we hope you'll stick around (and pick a name of your choice so we can remember who you are). I'm not sure this question is on topic though. The one you link to is 7 years old and a lot of old posts here would be off topic now, as I think that one would be without question. I'm not voting to close because I'd like to hear from others here about whether or not your question is on topic. Either way, please do post other questions as desired and answer what you like.
– Cyn
7 hours ago
add a comment |
1
Welcome to Writing.SE. We love questions about technical writing here and we hope you'll stick around (and pick a name of your choice so we can remember who you are). I'm not sure this question is on topic though. The one you link to is 7 years old and a lot of old posts here would be off topic now, as I think that one would be without question. I'm not voting to close because I'd like to hear from others here about whether or not your question is on topic. Either way, please do post other questions as desired and answer what you like.
– Cyn
7 hours ago
1
1
Welcome to Writing.SE. We love questions about technical writing here and we hope you'll stick around (and pick a name of your choice so we can remember who you are). I'm not sure this question is on topic though. The one you link to is 7 years old and a lot of old posts here would be off topic now, as I think that one would be without question. I'm not voting to close because I'd like to hear from others here about whether or not your question is on topic. Either way, please do post other questions as desired and answer what you like.
– Cyn
7 hours ago
Welcome to Writing.SE. We love questions about technical writing here and we hope you'll stick around (and pick a name of your choice so we can remember who you are). I'm not sure this question is on topic though. The one you link to is 7 years old and a lot of old posts here would be off topic now, as I think that one would be without question. I'm not voting to close because I'd like to hear from others here about whether or not your question is on topic. Either way, please do post other questions as desired and answer what you like.
– Cyn
7 hours ago
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
The conventional term is "programmer writer" or, sometimes, "programming writer". It is generally used to describe someone whose training and focus is programming rather than technical writing, but who is currently performing a technical communication function specifically aimed at documenting things for programmers. I did most of my tech writing for developers as well, but because my career focus was technical writing, I stuck to the term "technical writer". Same job, more or less. The difference in titles is more to cover differences in career track, which seems to be what you are concerned about.
add a comment |
This is a challenging specialization to capture in a job title, which is why my LinkedIn tagline says "speaker to programmers". But that doesn't work as a job title at any but the edgiest startups.
As suggested in this answer, some use Programming Writer. At a previous company I was documenting but also improving (and writing examples against) our SDK, and where we wanted to make it more clear to upper management and our new corporate overloads that I'm an engineering-grade technical writer, they gave me the title (Senior) SDK Developer. Depending on how involved you are in defining your SDK, that could work for you too.
At my current company I'm an Information Developer because that's the title they use; internally people know that I have programming cred, and if I need to communicate it externally, I'll probably have more than a title available to do it with. On a resume, for example, there are a couple ways to convey important information not covered in a job title. On LinkedIn (and in a cover letter) you can write a summary that people will see before they get to the job history. If I'm handing somebody a business card (I guess that could happen), we'll have the context of whatever conversation led to me doing so.
In my career I've found that the adjective (senior, principal, lead...) carries more weight than the specific tech-writer-ish title. If you get to principal/lead level, people who know anything at all about the field are going to expect you to have some real technical depth.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "166"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
user2263986 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fwriting.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f44693%2fwhat-is-a-more-techy-technical-writer-job-title-that-isnt-cutesy-or-confusing%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
The conventional term is "programmer writer" or, sometimes, "programming writer". It is generally used to describe someone whose training and focus is programming rather than technical writing, but who is currently performing a technical communication function specifically aimed at documenting things for programmers. I did most of my tech writing for developers as well, but because my career focus was technical writing, I stuck to the term "technical writer". Same job, more or less. The difference in titles is more to cover differences in career track, which seems to be what you are concerned about.
add a comment |
The conventional term is "programmer writer" or, sometimes, "programming writer". It is generally used to describe someone whose training and focus is programming rather than technical writing, but who is currently performing a technical communication function specifically aimed at documenting things for programmers. I did most of my tech writing for developers as well, but because my career focus was technical writing, I stuck to the term "technical writer". Same job, more or less. The difference in titles is more to cover differences in career track, which seems to be what you are concerned about.
add a comment |
The conventional term is "programmer writer" or, sometimes, "programming writer". It is generally used to describe someone whose training and focus is programming rather than technical writing, but who is currently performing a technical communication function specifically aimed at documenting things for programmers. I did most of my tech writing for developers as well, but because my career focus was technical writing, I stuck to the term "technical writer". Same job, more or less. The difference in titles is more to cover differences in career track, which seems to be what you are concerned about.
The conventional term is "programmer writer" or, sometimes, "programming writer". It is generally used to describe someone whose training and focus is programming rather than technical writing, but who is currently performing a technical communication function specifically aimed at documenting things for programmers. I did most of my tech writing for developers as well, but because my career focus was technical writing, I stuck to the term "technical writer". Same job, more or less. The difference in titles is more to cover differences in career track, which seems to be what you are concerned about.
answered 5 hours ago
Mark BakerMark Baker
56.9k496206
56.9k496206
add a comment |
add a comment |
This is a challenging specialization to capture in a job title, which is why my LinkedIn tagline says "speaker to programmers". But that doesn't work as a job title at any but the edgiest startups.
As suggested in this answer, some use Programming Writer. At a previous company I was documenting but also improving (and writing examples against) our SDK, and where we wanted to make it more clear to upper management and our new corporate overloads that I'm an engineering-grade technical writer, they gave me the title (Senior) SDK Developer. Depending on how involved you are in defining your SDK, that could work for you too.
At my current company I'm an Information Developer because that's the title they use; internally people know that I have programming cred, and if I need to communicate it externally, I'll probably have more than a title available to do it with. On a resume, for example, there are a couple ways to convey important information not covered in a job title. On LinkedIn (and in a cover letter) you can write a summary that people will see before they get to the job history. If I'm handing somebody a business card (I guess that could happen), we'll have the context of whatever conversation led to me doing so.
In my career I've found that the adjective (senior, principal, lead...) carries more weight than the specific tech-writer-ish title. If you get to principal/lead level, people who know anything at all about the field are going to expect you to have some real technical depth.
add a comment |
This is a challenging specialization to capture in a job title, which is why my LinkedIn tagline says "speaker to programmers". But that doesn't work as a job title at any but the edgiest startups.
As suggested in this answer, some use Programming Writer. At a previous company I was documenting but also improving (and writing examples against) our SDK, and where we wanted to make it more clear to upper management and our new corporate overloads that I'm an engineering-grade technical writer, they gave me the title (Senior) SDK Developer. Depending on how involved you are in defining your SDK, that could work for you too.
At my current company I'm an Information Developer because that's the title they use; internally people know that I have programming cred, and if I need to communicate it externally, I'll probably have more than a title available to do it with. On a resume, for example, there are a couple ways to convey important information not covered in a job title. On LinkedIn (and in a cover letter) you can write a summary that people will see before they get to the job history. If I'm handing somebody a business card (I guess that could happen), we'll have the context of whatever conversation led to me doing so.
In my career I've found that the adjective (senior, principal, lead...) carries more weight than the specific tech-writer-ish title. If you get to principal/lead level, people who know anything at all about the field are going to expect you to have some real technical depth.
add a comment |
This is a challenging specialization to capture in a job title, which is why my LinkedIn tagline says "speaker to programmers". But that doesn't work as a job title at any but the edgiest startups.
As suggested in this answer, some use Programming Writer. At a previous company I was documenting but also improving (and writing examples against) our SDK, and where we wanted to make it more clear to upper management and our new corporate overloads that I'm an engineering-grade technical writer, they gave me the title (Senior) SDK Developer. Depending on how involved you are in defining your SDK, that could work for you too.
At my current company I'm an Information Developer because that's the title they use; internally people know that I have programming cred, and if I need to communicate it externally, I'll probably have more than a title available to do it with. On a resume, for example, there are a couple ways to convey important information not covered in a job title. On LinkedIn (and in a cover letter) you can write a summary that people will see before they get to the job history. If I'm handing somebody a business card (I guess that could happen), we'll have the context of whatever conversation led to me doing so.
In my career I've found that the adjective (senior, principal, lead...) carries more weight than the specific tech-writer-ish title. If you get to principal/lead level, people who know anything at all about the field are going to expect you to have some real technical depth.
This is a challenging specialization to capture in a job title, which is why my LinkedIn tagline says "speaker to programmers". But that doesn't work as a job title at any but the edgiest startups.
As suggested in this answer, some use Programming Writer. At a previous company I was documenting but also improving (and writing examples against) our SDK, and where we wanted to make it more clear to upper management and our new corporate overloads that I'm an engineering-grade technical writer, they gave me the title (Senior) SDK Developer. Depending on how involved you are in defining your SDK, that could work for you too.
At my current company I'm an Information Developer because that's the title they use; internally people know that I have programming cred, and if I need to communicate it externally, I'll probably have more than a title available to do it with. On a resume, for example, there are a couple ways to convey important information not covered in a job title. On LinkedIn (and in a cover letter) you can write a summary that people will see before they get to the job history. If I'm handing somebody a business card (I guess that could happen), we'll have the context of whatever conversation led to me doing so.
In my career I've found that the adjective (senior, principal, lead...) carries more weight than the specific tech-writer-ish title. If you get to principal/lead level, people who know anything at all about the field are going to expect you to have some real technical depth.
answered 20 mins ago
Monica Cellio♦Monica Cellio
17.2k23993
17.2k23993
add a comment |
add a comment |
user2263986 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
user2263986 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
user2263986 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
user2263986 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Writing Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fwriting.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f44693%2fwhat-is-a-more-techy-technical-writer-job-title-that-isnt-cutesy-or-confusing%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
Welcome to Writing.SE. We love questions about technical writing here and we hope you'll stick around (and pick a name of your choice so we can remember who you are). I'm not sure this question is on topic though. The one you link to is 7 years old and a lot of old posts here would be off topic now, as I think that one would be without question. I'm not voting to close because I'd like to hear from others here about whether or not your question is on topic. Either way, please do post other questions as desired and answer what you like.
– Cyn
7 hours ago