What would you call someone who has trouble relating to and recognizing other people's emotions? [on hold]





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}







-1















I prefer to say not that he's apathetic, rather he's just not good at dealing with other people's emotions and has trouble relating to them and recognizing them.



Possibly it doesn't help that my character is actually blind, and he can't rely on facial expressions or body language.



What would you call someone who has trouble relating to and recognizing other people's emotions?










share|improve this question















put on hold as off-topic by tchrist 2 days ago


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "Please include the research you’ve done, or consider if your question suits our English Language Learners site better. Questions that can be answered using commonly-available references are off-topic." – tchrist

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.












  • 2





    He might just be a bit autistic (on the scale, as they say).

    – FumbleFingers
    2 days ago






  • 1





    @FumbleFingers I think the phrase is "on the spectrum", but it is often used incorrectly and recently as a kind of slur. However, there is a 5-point scale.

    – Cascabel
    2 days ago








  • 1





    @HotLicks ...Asperger's, not Asperger.

    – Cascabel
    2 days ago






  • 1





    @HotLicks You only read about it; I deal with it every day. Anyway, the recent trend is away from using the term for ASD (Autism Spectrum Disorder). (at least clinically) Ironically, many persons with this disorder cling to the the word, often calling themselves "aspies"

    – Cascabel
    2 days ago








  • 1





    apathetic means "not showing feelings" What you are talking about is lack of empathy. Also you need to provide a sample sentence with a blank in it to insert the target language per the SWR tag.

    – Cascabel
    2 days ago




















-1















I prefer to say not that he's apathetic, rather he's just not good at dealing with other people's emotions and has trouble relating to them and recognizing them.



Possibly it doesn't help that my character is actually blind, and he can't rely on facial expressions or body language.



What would you call someone who has trouble relating to and recognizing other people's emotions?










share|improve this question















put on hold as off-topic by tchrist 2 days ago


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "Please include the research you’ve done, or consider if your question suits our English Language Learners site better. Questions that can be answered using commonly-available references are off-topic." – tchrist

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.












  • 2





    He might just be a bit autistic (on the scale, as they say).

    – FumbleFingers
    2 days ago






  • 1





    @FumbleFingers I think the phrase is "on the spectrum", but it is often used incorrectly and recently as a kind of slur. However, there is a 5-point scale.

    – Cascabel
    2 days ago








  • 1





    @HotLicks ...Asperger's, not Asperger.

    – Cascabel
    2 days ago






  • 1





    @HotLicks You only read about it; I deal with it every day. Anyway, the recent trend is away from using the term for ASD (Autism Spectrum Disorder). (at least clinically) Ironically, many persons with this disorder cling to the the word, often calling themselves "aspies"

    – Cascabel
    2 days ago








  • 1





    apathetic means "not showing feelings" What you are talking about is lack of empathy. Also you need to provide a sample sentence with a blank in it to insert the target language per the SWR tag.

    – Cascabel
    2 days ago
















-1












-1








-1


1






I prefer to say not that he's apathetic, rather he's just not good at dealing with other people's emotions and has trouble relating to them and recognizing them.



Possibly it doesn't help that my character is actually blind, and he can't rely on facial expressions or body language.



What would you call someone who has trouble relating to and recognizing other people's emotions?










share|improve this question
















I prefer to say not that he's apathetic, rather he's just not good at dealing with other people's emotions and has trouble relating to them and recognizing them.



Possibly it doesn't help that my character is actually blind, and he can't rely on facial expressions or body language.



What would you call someone who has trouble relating to and recognizing other people's emotions?







single-word-requests phrases






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 2 days ago









Cascabel

8,14562856




8,14562856










asked 2 days ago









NylaTheWolfNylaTheWolf

121




121




put on hold as off-topic by tchrist 2 days ago


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "Please include the research you’ve done, or consider if your question suits our English Language Learners site better. Questions that can be answered using commonly-available references are off-topic." – tchrist

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.







put on hold as off-topic by tchrist 2 days ago


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "Please include the research you’ve done, or consider if your question suits our English Language Learners site better. Questions that can be answered using commonly-available references are off-topic." – tchrist

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.








  • 2





    He might just be a bit autistic (on the scale, as they say).

    – FumbleFingers
    2 days ago






  • 1





    @FumbleFingers I think the phrase is "on the spectrum", but it is often used incorrectly and recently as a kind of slur. However, there is a 5-point scale.

    – Cascabel
    2 days ago








  • 1





    @HotLicks ...Asperger's, not Asperger.

    – Cascabel
    2 days ago






  • 1





    @HotLicks You only read about it; I deal with it every day. Anyway, the recent trend is away from using the term for ASD (Autism Spectrum Disorder). (at least clinically) Ironically, many persons with this disorder cling to the the word, often calling themselves "aspies"

    – Cascabel
    2 days ago








  • 1





    apathetic means "not showing feelings" What you are talking about is lack of empathy. Also you need to provide a sample sentence with a blank in it to insert the target language per the SWR tag.

    – Cascabel
    2 days ago
















  • 2





    He might just be a bit autistic (on the scale, as they say).

    – FumbleFingers
    2 days ago






  • 1





    @FumbleFingers I think the phrase is "on the spectrum", but it is often used incorrectly and recently as a kind of slur. However, there is a 5-point scale.

    – Cascabel
    2 days ago








  • 1





    @HotLicks ...Asperger's, not Asperger.

    – Cascabel
    2 days ago






  • 1





    @HotLicks You only read about it; I deal with it every day. Anyway, the recent trend is away from using the term for ASD (Autism Spectrum Disorder). (at least clinically) Ironically, many persons with this disorder cling to the the word, often calling themselves "aspies"

    – Cascabel
    2 days ago








  • 1





    apathetic means "not showing feelings" What you are talking about is lack of empathy. Also you need to provide a sample sentence with a blank in it to insert the target language per the SWR tag.

    – Cascabel
    2 days ago










2




2





He might just be a bit autistic (on the scale, as they say).

– FumbleFingers
2 days ago





He might just be a bit autistic (on the scale, as they say).

– FumbleFingers
2 days ago




1




1





@FumbleFingers I think the phrase is "on the spectrum", but it is often used incorrectly and recently as a kind of slur. However, there is a 5-point scale.

– Cascabel
2 days ago







@FumbleFingers I think the phrase is "on the spectrum", but it is often used incorrectly and recently as a kind of slur. However, there is a 5-point scale.

– Cascabel
2 days ago






1




1





@HotLicks ...Asperger's, not Asperger.

– Cascabel
2 days ago





@HotLicks ...Asperger's, not Asperger.

– Cascabel
2 days ago




1




1





@HotLicks You only read about it; I deal with it every day. Anyway, the recent trend is away from using the term for ASD (Autism Spectrum Disorder). (at least clinically) Ironically, many persons with this disorder cling to the the word, often calling themselves "aspies"

– Cascabel
2 days ago







@HotLicks You only read about it; I deal with it every day. Anyway, the recent trend is away from using the term for ASD (Autism Spectrum Disorder). (at least clinically) Ironically, many persons with this disorder cling to the the word, often calling themselves "aspies"

– Cascabel
2 days ago






1




1





apathetic means "not showing feelings" What you are talking about is lack of empathy. Also you need to provide a sample sentence with a blank in it to insert the target language per the SWR tag.

– Cascabel
2 days ago







apathetic means "not showing feelings" What you are talking about is lack of empathy. Also you need to provide a sample sentence with a blank in it to insert the target language per the SWR tag.

– Cascabel
2 days ago












2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















1














I would call that person oblivious to others' emotions. Merriam-Webster defines the word generally as a lack of awareness, and then gives this explanation of how to use it in a sentence:




Oblivious usually has to do with not being conscious or aware of someone or something.




The focus on both the sensory and memory seems pertinent to the situation you're describing.



The problem with many similar words is that they conflate a literal hindrance against noticing others' emotions with more negative stigma. Someone who is inattentive, inobservant, or unmindful will suffer from the negative in- or un-: they are not attentive, not observant, and not mindful. For unmindful, Merriam-Webster lists "careless" as a close word, which may suggest personal responsibility for not taking necessary care to be mindful. "Oblivious" can be negative too, but the negative is not baked into the word.






share|improve this answer































    0














    Clueless = having no knowledge, understanding, or ability.






    share|improve this answer



















    • 1





      Please provide a source and explain why it fits the question.

      – JJJ
      2 days ago











    • There is also a post I believe similar to this one english.stackexchange.com/questions/324767/…

      – Rushn
      yesterday











    • The question calls for a psychiatric label. Research needs to be done.

      – Rushn
      yesterday


















    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    1














    I would call that person oblivious to others' emotions. Merriam-Webster defines the word generally as a lack of awareness, and then gives this explanation of how to use it in a sentence:




    Oblivious usually has to do with not being conscious or aware of someone or something.




    The focus on both the sensory and memory seems pertinent to the situation you're describing.



    The problem with many similar words is that they conflate a literal hindrance against noticing others' emotions with more negative stigma. Someone who is inattentive, inobservant, or unmindful will suffer from the negative in- or un-: they are not attentive, not observant, and not mindful. For unmindful, Merriam-Webster lists "careless" as a close word, which may suggest personal responsibility for not taking necessary care to be mindful. "Oblivious" can be negative too, but the negative is not baked into the word.






    share|improve this answer




























      1














      I would call that person oblivious to others' emotions. Merriam-Webster defines the word generally as a lack of awareness, and then gives this explanation of how to use it in a sentence:




      Oblivious usually has to do with not being conscious or aware of someone or something.




      The focus on both the sensory and memory seems pertinent to the situation you're describing.



      The problem with many similar words is that they conflate a literal hindrance against noticing others' emotions with more negative stigma. Someone who is inattentive, inobservant, or unmindful will suffer from the negative in- or un-: they are not attentive, not observant, and not mindful. For unmindful, Merriam-Webster lists "careless" as a close word, which may suggest personal responsibility for not taking necessary care to be mindful. "Oblivious" can be negative too, but the negative is not baked into the word.






      share|improve this answer


























        1












        1








        1







        I would call that person oblivious to others' emotions. Merriam-Webster defines the word generally as a lack of awareness, and then gives this explanation of how to use it in a sentence:




        Oblivious usually has to do with not being conscious or aware of someone or something.




        The focus on both the sensory and memory seems pertinent to the situation you're describing.



        The problem with many similar words is that they conflate a literal hindrance against noticing others' emotions with more negative stigma. Someone who is inattentive, inobservant, or unmindful will suffer from the negative in- or un-: they are not attentive, not observant, and not mindful. For unmindful, Merriam-Webster lists "careless" as a close word, which may suggest personal responsibility for not taking necessary care to be mindful. "Oblivious" can be negative too, but the negative is not baked into the word.






        share|improve this answer













        I would call that person oblivious to others' emotions. Merriam-Webster defines the word generally as a lack of awareness, and then gives this explanation of how to use it in a sentence:




        Oblivious usually has to do with not being conscious or aware of someone or something.




        The focus on both the sensory and memory seems pertinent to the situation you're describing.



        The problem with many similar words is that they conflate a literal hindrance against noticing others' emotions with more negative stigma. Someone who is inattentive, inobservant, or unmindful will suffer from the negative in- or un-: they are not attentive, not observant, and not mindful. For unmindful, Merriam-Webster lists "careless" as a close word, which may suggest personal responsibility for not taking necessary care to be mindful. "Oblivious" can be negative too, but the negative is not baked into the word.







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered 2 days ago









        TaliesinMerlinTaliesinMerlin

        7,3411430




        7,3411430

























            0














            Clueless = having no knowledge, understanding, or ability.






            share|improve this answer



















            • 1





              Please provide a source and explain why it fits the question.

              – JJJ
              2 days ago











            • There is also a post I believe similar to this one english.stackexchange.com/questions/324767/…

              – Rushn
              yesterday











            • The question calls for a psychiatric label. Research needs to be done.

              – Rushn
              yesterday
















            0














            Clueless = having no knowledge, understanding, or ability.






            share|improve this answer



















            • 1





              Please provide a source and explain why it fits the question.

              – JJJ
              2 days ago











            • There is also a post I believe similar to this one english.stackexchange.com/questions/324767/…

              – Rushn
              yesterday











            • The question calls for a psychiatric label. Research needs to be done.

              – Rushn
              yesterday














            0












            0








            0







            Clueless = having no knowledge, understanding, or ability.






            share|improve this answer













            Clueless = having no knowledge, understanding, or ability.







            share|improve this answer












            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer










            answered 2 days ago









            RushnRushn

            61117




            61117








            • 1





              Please provide a source and explain why it fits the question.

              – JJJ
              2 days ago











            • There is also a post I believe similar to this one english.stackexchange.com/questions/324767/…

              – Rushn
              yesterday











            • The question calls for a psychiatric label. Research needs to be done.

              – Rushn
              yesterday














            • 1





              Please provide a source and explain why it fits the question.

              – JJJ
              2 days ago











            • There is also a post I believe similar to this one english.stackexchange.com/questions/324767/…

              – Rushn
              yesterday











            • The question calls for a psychiatric label. Research needs to be done.

              – Rushn
              yesterday








            1




            1





            Please provide a source and explain why it fits the question.

            – JJJ
            2 days ago





            Please provide a source and explain why it fits the question.

            – JJJ
            2 days ago













            There is also a post I believe similar to this one english.stackexchange.com/questions/324767/…

            – Rushn
            yesterday





            There is also a post I believe similar to this one english.stackexchange.com/questions/324767/…

            – Rushn
            yesterday













            The question calls for a psychiatric label. Research needs to be done.

            – Rushn
            yesterday





            The question calls for a psychiatric label. Research needs to be done.

            – Rushn
            yesterday



            Popular posts from this blog

            數位音樂下載

            格利澤436b

            When can things happen in Etherscan, such as the picture below?