What is the interpretation of the p-value of 2.2e-16? [duplicate]





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}







0












$begingroup$



This question already has an answer here:




  • How should tiny $p$-values be reported? (and why does R put a minimum on 2.22e-16?)

    4 answers




I am a beginner in using Wilcoxon test to get the p-value. After applying the test to my data, I got the p-value < 2.2e-16. Does that mean that the samples I have are significantly different from each other? I am suspicious of such a result. I have looked at other related questions (such as this question) but I didn't really understand what this value means.



Can someone please explain?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$



marked as duplicate by amoeba, Michael Chernick, mkt, Frans Rodenburg, Jarle Tufto 18 hours ago


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.














  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Depending on your field, this might commonly be reported as p < 0.001.
    $endgroup$
    – APH
    yesterday


















0












$begingroup$



This question already has an answer here:




  • How should tiny $p$-values be reported? (and why does R put a minimum on 2.22e-16?)

    4 answers




I am a beginner in using Wilcoxon test to get the p-value. After applying the test to my data, I got the p-value < 2.2e-16. Does that mean that the samples I have are significantly different from each other? I am suspicious of such a result. I have looked at other related questions (such as this question) but I didn't really understand what this value means.



Can someone please explain?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$



marked as duplicate by amoeba, Michael Chernick, mkt, Frans Rodenburg, Jarle Tufto 18 hours ago


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.














  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Depending on your field, this might commonly be reported as p < 0.001.
    $endgroup$
    – APH
    yesterday














0












0








0





$begingroup$



This question already has an answer here:




  • How should tiny $p$-values be reported? (and why does R put a minimum on 2.22e-16?)

    4 answers




I am a beginner in using Wilcoxon test to get the p-value. After applying the test to my data, I got the p-value < 2.2e-16. Does that mean that the samples I have are significantly different from each other? I am suspicious of such a result. I have looked at other related questions (such as this question) but I didn't really understand what this value means.



Can someone please explain?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$





This question already has an answer here:




  • How should tiny $p$-values be reported? (and why does R put a minimum on 2.22e-16?)

    4 answers




I am a beginner in using Wilcoxon test to get the p-value. After applying the test to my data, I got the p-value < 2.2e-16. Does that mean that the samples I have are significantly different from each other? I am suspicious of such a result. I have looked at other related questions (such as this question) but I didn't really understand what this value means.



Can someone please explain?





This question already has an answer here:




  • How should tiny $p$-values be reported? (and why does R put a minimum on 2.22e-16?)

    4 answers








r p-value wilcoxon-mann-whitney






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited yesterday









Nick Cox

39.4k588132




39.4k588132










asked yesterday









Adam AminAdam Amin

1263




1263




marked as duplicate by amoeba, Michael Chernick, mkt, Frans Rodenburg, Jarle Tufto 18 hours ago


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.









marked as duplicate by amoeba, Michael Chernick, mkt, Frans Rodenburg, Jarle Tufto 18 hours ago


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.










  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Depending on your field, this might commonly be reported as p < 0.001.
    $endgroup$
    – APH
    yesterday














  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Depending on your field, this might commonly be reported as p < 0.001.
    $endgroup$
    – APH
    yesterday








1




1




$begingroup$
Depending on your field, this might commonly be reported as p < 0.001.
$endgroup$
– APH
yesterday




$begingroup$
Depending on your field, this might commonly be reported as p < 0.001.
$endgroup$
– APH
yesterday










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















8












$begingroup$

2.2e-16 is the scientific notation of 0.00000000000000022, meaning it is very close to zero. Your statistical software probably uses this notation automatically for very small numbers. You may be able to change this in the settings.



The notation alone is no reason to be suspicious. The result itself might be, but you will have to be the judge of that.



< 2.2e-16 as the p value would indicate a significant result, meaning that the actual p value is even smaller than 2.2e-16 (a typical threshold is 0.05, anything smaller counts as statistically significant).






share|cite|improve this answer








New contributor




morphist is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






$endgroup$





















    0












    $begingroup$

    Adding to Morphist's answer (+1 to Morphist), I would be suspicious of this if:




    • N was small


    • The difference was expected to be small


    • Other studies find small differences.



    and so on.



    I would make a density plot of the values in each of the groups and see if they look really different.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$





















      0












      $begingroup$

      You will reject your null hypothesis in this situation as the p < 0.01. If you are comparing difference with respect to some variable in two groups, then it means both groups have significance differences in the mean values of that variable.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$




















        3 Answers
        3






        active

        oldest

        votes








        3 Answers
        3






        active

        oldest

        votes









        active

        oldest

        votes






        active

        oldest

        votes









        8












        $begingroup$

        2.2e-16 is the scientific notation of 0.00000000000000022, meaning it is very close to zero. Your statistical software probably uses this notation automatically for very small numbers. You may be able to change this in the settings.



        The notation alone is no reason to be suspicious. The result itself might be, but you will have to be the judge of that.



        < 2.2e-16 as the p value would indicate a significant result, meaning that the actual p value is even smaller than 2.2e-16 (a typical threshold is 0.05, anything smaller counts as statistically significant).






        share|cite|improve this answer








        New contributor




        morphist is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.






        $endgroup$


















          8












          $begingroup$

          2.2e-16 is the scientific notation of 0.00000000000000022, meaning it is very close to zero. Your statistical software probably uses this notation automatically for very small numbers. You may be able to change this in the settings.



          The notation alone is no reason to be suspicious. The result itself might be, but you will have to be the judge of that.



          < 2.2e-16 as the p value would indicate a significant result, meaning that the actual p value is even smaller than 2.2e-16 (a typical threshold is 0.05, anything smaller counts as statistically significant).






          share|cite|improve this answer








          New contributor




          morphist is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.






          $endgroup$
















            8












            8








            8





            $begingroup$

            2.2e-16 is the scientific notation of 0.00000000000000022, meaning it is very close to zero. Your statistical software probably uses this notation automatically for very small numbers. You may be able to change this in the settings.



            The notation alone is no reason to be suspicious. The result itself might be, but you will have to be the judge of that.



            < 2.2e-16 as the p value would indicate a significant result, meaning that the actual p value is even smaller than 2.2e-16 (a typical threshold is 0.05, anything smaller counts as statistically significant).






            share|cite|improve this answer








            New contributor




            morphist is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.






            $endgroup$



            2.2e-16 is the scientific notation of 0.00000000000000022, meaning it is very close to zero. Your statistical software probably uses this notation automatically for very small numbers. You may be able to change this in the settings.



            The notation alone is no reason to be suspicious. The result itself might be, but you will have to be the judge of that.



            < 2.2e-16 as the p value would indicate a significant result, meaning that the actual p value is even smaller than 2.2e-16 (a typical threshold is 0.05, anything smaller counts as statistically significant).







            share|cite|improve this answer








            New contributor




            morphist is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.









            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer






            New contributor




            morphist is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.









            answered yesterday









            morphistmorphist

            1163




            1163




            New contributor




            morphist is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.





            New contributor





            morphist is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.






            morphist is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.

























                0












                $begingroup$

                Adding to Morphist's answer (+1 to Morphist), I would be suspicious of this if:




                • N was small


                • The difference was expected to be small


                • Other studies find small differences.



                and so on.



                I would make a density plot of the values in each of the groups and see if they look really different.






                share|cite|improve this answer











                $endgroup$


















                  0












                  $begingroup$

                  Adding to Morphist's answer (+1 to Morphist), I would be suspicious of this if:




                  • N was small


                  • The difference was expected to be small


                  • Other studies find small differences.



                  and so on.



                  I would make a density plot of the values in each of the groups and see if they look really different.






                  share|cite|improve this answer











                  $endgroup$
















                    0












                    0








                    0





                    $begingroup$

                    Adding to Morphist's answer (+1 to Morphist), I would be suspicious of this if:




                    • N was small


                    • The difference was expected to be small


                    • Other studies find small differences.



                    and so on.



                    I would make a density plot of the values in each of the groups and see if they look really different.






                    share|cite|improve this answer











                    $endgroup$



                    Adding to Morphist's answer (+1 to Morphist), I would be suspicious of this if:




                    • N was small


                    • The difference was expected to be small


                    • Other studies find small differences.



                    and so on.



                    I would make a density plot of the values in each of the groups and see if they look really different.







                    share|cite|improve this answer














                    share|cite|improve this answer



                    share|cite|improve this answer








                    edited yesterday









                    Sycorax

                    42.7k12112207




                    42.7k12112207










                    answered yesterday









                    Peter FlomPeter Flom

                    77.6k12110219




                    77.6k12110219























                        0












                        $begingroup$

                        You will reject your null hypothesis in this situation as the p < 0.01. If you are comparing difference with respect to some variable in two groups, then it means both groups have significance differences in the mean values of that variable.






                        share|cite|improve this answer









                        $endgroup$


















                          0












                          $begingroup$

                          You will reject your null hypothesis in this situation as the p < 0.01. If you are comparing difference with respect to some variable in two groups, then it means both groups have significance differences in the mean values of that variable.






                          share|cite|improve this answer









                          $endgroup$
















                            0












                            0








                            0





                            $begingroup$

                            You will reject your null hypothesis in this situation as the p < 0.01. If you are comparing difference with respect to some variable in two groups, then it means both groups have significance differences in the mean values of that variable.






                            share|cite|improve this answer









                            $endgroup$



                            You will reject your null hypothesis in this situation as the p < 0.01. If you are comparing difference with respect to some variable in two groups, then it means both groups have significance differences in the mean values of that variable.







                            share|cite|improve this answer












                            share|cite|improve this answer



                            share|cite|improve this answer










                            answered yesterday









                            Ahmed ArifAhmed Arif

                            1415




                            1415















                                Popular posts from this blog

                                數位音樂下載

                                格利澤436b

                                When can things happen in Etherscan, such as the picture below?