Necessity of External Watchdog Timer











up vote
9
down vote

favorite












what is the need for External watchdog timer for a Microcontroller?.



Most of the micro controllers designed with internal watchdog timer however in some of the circuits they are using external watchdog timer (Such as PIC16F1824)










share|improve this question


























    up vote
    9
    down vote

    favorite












    what is the need for External watchdog timer for a Microcontroller?.



    Most of the micro controllers designed with internal watchdog timer however in some of the circuits they are using external watchdog timer (Such as PIC16F1824)










    share|improve this question
























      up vote
      9
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      9
      down vote

      favorite











      what is the need for External watchdog timer for a Microcontroller?.



      Most of the micro controllers designed with internal watchdog timer however in some of the circuits they are using external watchdog timer (Such as PIC16F1824)










      share|improve this question













      what is the need for External watchdog timer for a Microcontroller?.



      Most of the micro controllers designed with internal watchdog timer however in some of the circuits they are using external watchdog timer (Such as PIC16F1824)







      microcontroller embedded reset watchdog






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked yesterday









      Photon001

      577313




      577313






















          5 Answers
          5






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          22
          down vote













          A watchdog timer can guard against hardware bugs in buggy piece of ... cutting edge microcontrollers. One that we recently used, from a famous brand, had I/O pins that occasionally missed their interrupts, sometimes did not start up correctly, and where the integrated watchdog sometimes failed to reset the system in a known-good state.



          This did not show up until we started with long time reliability testing, and it was easier to add an external watchdog than to change the microcontroller.



          If you have more than one IC on the PCB you may also need an external reset-IC or voltage monitor to make everything boot up reliably. Many of these can also serve as a watchdog.






          share|improve this answer

















          • 2




            "integrated watchdog sometimes failed to reset the system in a known-good state" - this is functionally equivalent to "there is no internal watchdog".
            – Dmitry Grigoryev
            3 hours ago


















          up vote
          18
          down vote













          It is hard to argue, that the internal clock of the internal watchdog is actually independent of all the other clocks and always running like it should.



          So for certification it is usually much easier to place an external watchdog on the board and say: look there is our watchdog, it must be triggered by the MCU at that interval, which is shorter than our time to failure, so our device is safe as we defined it.






          share|improve this answer

















          • 2




            "and always running like it should" - Good point. It may be harder to prove that your software correctly initializes the internal watchdog under all circumstances than just employing a watchdog chip and refer to its datasheet.
            – JimmyB
            yesterday






          • 2




            @JimmyB Or to prove that your code doesn't contain a bug that accidentally disables the internal watchdog.
            – TripeHound
            22 hours ago






          • 1




            @TripeHound Or to prove that your code doesn't run wild continuously resetting the external watchdog as fast as it can. Problem solved. ;-)
            – JimmyB
            22 hours ago










          • Or that some genius doesn't put the watchdog service routine inside a timer ISR, so the main code can crash but the interrupt keeps firing & servicing the watchdog perfectly...
            – John U
            21 hours ago










          • @JohnU, that, however, would not seem like something an external IC would help with.
            – ilkkachu
            18 hours ago


















          up vote
          4
          down vote













          The watchdogs built in to mictrocontrollers have particular properties that mean they themselves can fail in ways that a different external watchdog might not.



          For example, a common design is to use a watchdog timer running from a low power RC oscillator. That oscillator can fail. An external watchdog based on capacitor discharge rather than an oscillator could still reset the micro in many cases.



          Another reason is that the external watchdog can be more robust. A microcontroller might only operate reliably over a certain voltage range, and being a complex device may be subject to latching up in a way that makes its own internal watchdog ineffective. An external watchdog may have a wider acceptable supply range and be less prone to problems when subjected to electrical noise.



          External watchdogs often offer a much wider range of time-out values too. A microcontroller I use often, the XMEGA, has a maximum time-out of around 7 seconds. For one product I added an additional external watchdog with time-out of 2 hours. That allowed me to wake the microcontroller once an hour rather than once every few seconds, reducing power consumption in a battery powered device.



          External watchdogs sometimes multiple functions, such as a timer and a voltage monitor/reset control. Again, these can be lower power than a micro's built in system too.



          One other interesting advantage of an external watchdog is that it can be used to reset devices other than the microcontroller. For example it might control the enable pin of a voltage regulator, de-powering an entire circuit to reset multiple devices at once. Using some simple logic the watchdog reset signal from multiple sources can be combined, allowing the watchdog to require several devices to be continually resetting it.






          share|improve this answer




























            up vote
            0
            down vote













            A watchdog is a timer and activates its output when the IC lost an input pulse for a period.



            It is a building block and can use for any application.



            So, they can use in any application, for example, change data routing in fail-safe mode. When the MCU clock fails, we can't disable some critical outputs.



            external watchdog not related to the complex clock domain of MCU, some of them has their analog RC charge timing or internal clock.



            Digital circuits in radiation may trigger the outputs when charge hits its flip-flops. But some analog circuit is safer because they integrate charge in a capacitor and it is safe when we integrating it.






            share|improve this answer




























              up vote
              0
              down vote













              A watchdog is really no different in this regard from any other built-in peripheral you find in an MCU. MCUs come with timers, RTCs, ADCs, EEPROM and reset controllers, yet all these functions also exist as separate ICs. If available built-in blocks don't meet your requirements, you have to use external ones. Or you can try to find an MCU with all the right blocks, which may not exist or be too expensive or hard to port your code to.






              share|improve this answer





















                Your Answer





                StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
                return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
                StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
                StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
                });
                });
                }, "mathjax-editing");

                StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
                return StackExchange.using("schematics", function () {
                StackExchange.schematics.init();
                });
                }, "cicuitlab");

                StackExchange.ready(function() {
                var channelOptions = {
                tags: "".split(" "),
                id: "135"
                };
                initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

                StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
                // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
                if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
                StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
                createEditor();
                });
                }
                else {
                createEditor();
                }
                });

                function createEditor() {
                StackExchange.prepareEditor({
                heartbeatType: 'answer',
                convertImagesToLinks: false,
                noModals: true,
                showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
                reputationToPostImages: null,
                bindNavPrevention: true,
                postfix: "",
                imageUploader: {
                brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
                contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
                allowUrls: true
                },
                onDemand: true,
                discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
                ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
                });


                }
                });














                 

                draft saved


                draft discarded


















                StackExchange.ready(
                function () {
                StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2felectronics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f406925%2fnecessity-of-external-watchdog-timer%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                }
                );

                Post as a guest















                Required, but never shown

























                5 Answers
                5






                active

                oldest

                votes








                5 Answers
                5






                active

                oldest

                votes









                active

                oldest

                votes






                active

                oldest

                votes








                up vote
                22
                down vote













                A watchdog timer can guard against hardware bugs in buggy piece of ... cutting edge microcontrollers. One that we recently used, from a famous brand, had I/O pins that occasionally missed their interrupts, sometimes did not start up correctly, and where the integrated watchdog sometimes failed to reset the system in a known-good state.



                This did not show up until we started with long time reliability testing, and it was easier to add an external watchdog than to change the microcontroller.



                If you have more than one IC on the PCB you may also need an external reset-IC or voltage monitor to make everything boot up reliably. Many of these can also serve as a watchdog.






                share|improve this answer

















                • 2




                  "integrated watchdog sometimes failed to reset the system in a known-good state" - this is functionally equivalent to "there is no internal watchdog".
                  – Dmitry Grigoryev
                  3 hours ago















                up vote
                22
                down vote













                A watchdog timer can guard against hardware bugs in buggy piece of ... cutting edge microcontrollers. One that we recently used, from a famous brand, had I/O pins that occasionally missed their interrupts, sometimes did not start up correctly, and where the integrated watchdog sometimes failed to reset the system in a known-good state.



                This did not show up until we started with long time reliability testing, and it was easier to add an external watchdog than to change the microcontroller.



                If you have more than one IC on the PCB you may also need an external reset-IC or voltage monitor to make everything boot up reliably. Many of these can also serve as a watchdog.






                share|improve this answer

















                • 2




                  "integrated watchdog sometimes failed to reset the system in a known-good state" - this is functionally equivalent to "there is no internal watchdog".
                  – Dmitry Grigoryev
                  3 hours ago













                up vote
                22
                down vote










                up vote
                22
                down vote









                A watchdog timer can guard against hardware bugs in buggy piece of ... cutting edge microcontrollers. One that we recently used, from a famous brand, had I/O pins that occasionally missed their interrupts, sometimes did not start up correctly, and where the integrated watchdog sometimes failed to reset the system in a known-good state.



                This did not show up until we started with long time reliability testing, and it was easier to add an external watchdog than to change the microcontroller.



                If you have more than one IC on the PCB you may also need an external reset-IC or voltage monitor to make everything boot up reliably. Many of these can also serve as a watchdog.






                share|improve this answer












                A watchdog timer can guard against hardware bugs in buggy piece of ... cutting edge microcontrollers. One that we recently used, from a famous brand, had I/O pins that occasionally missed their interrupts, sometimes did not start up correctly, and where the integrated watchdog sometimes failed to reset the system in a known-good state.



                This did not show up until we started with long time reliability testing, and it was easier to add an external watchdog than to change the microcontroller.



                If you have more than one IC on the PCB you may also need an external reset-IC or voltage monitor to make everything boot up reliably. Many of these can also serve as a watchdog.







                share|improve this answer












                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer










                answered yesterday









                pipe

                9,64742152




                9,64742152








                • 2




                  "integrated watchdog sometimes failed to reset the system in a known-good state" - this is functionally equivalent to "there is no internal watchdog".
                  – Dmitry Grigoryev
                  3 hours ago














                • 2




                  "integrated watchdog sometimes failed to reset the system in a known-good state" - this is functionally equivalent to "there is no internal watchdog".
                  – Dmitry Grigoryev
                  3 hours ago








                2




                2




                "integrated watchdog sometimes failed to reset the system in a known-good state" - this is functionally equivalent to "there is no internal watchdog".
                – Dmitry Grigoryev
                3 hours ago




                "integrated watchdog sometimes failed to reset the system in a known-good state" - this is functionally equivalent to "there is no internal watchdog".
                – Dmitry Grigoryev
                3 hours ago












                up vote
                18
                down vote













                It is hard to argue, that the internal clock of the internal watchdog is actually independent of all the other clocks and always running like it should.



                So for certification it is usually much easier to place an external watchdog on the board and say: look there is our watchdog, it must be triggered by the MCU at that interval, which is shorter than our time to failure, so our device is safe as we defined it.






                share|improve this answer

















                • 2




                  "and always running like it should" - Good point. It may be harder to prove that your software correctly initializes the internal watchdog under all circumstances than just employing a watchdog chip and refer to its datasheet.
                  – JimmyB
                  yesterday






                • 2




                  @JimmyB Or to prove that your code doesn't contain a bug that accidentally disables the internal watchdog.
                  – TripeHound
                  22 hours ago






                • 1




                  @TripeHound Or to prove that your code doesn't run wild continuously resetting the external watchdog as fast as it can. Problem solved. ;-)
                  – JimmyB
                  22 hours ago










                • Or that some genius doesn't put the watchdog service routine inside a timer ISR, so the main code can crash but the interrupt keeps firing & servicing the watchdog perfectly...
                  – John U
                  21 hours ago










                • @JohnU, that, however, would not seem like something an external IC would help with.
                  – ilkkachu
                  18 hours ago















                up vote
                18
                down vote













                It is hard to argue, that the internal clock of the internal watchdog is actually independent of all the other clocks and always running like it should.



                So for certification it is usually much easier to place an external watchdog on the board and say: look there is our watchdog, it must be triggered by the MCU at that interval, which is shorter than our time to failure, so our device is safe as we defined it.






                share|improve this answer

















                • 2




                  "and always running like it should" - Good point. It may be harder to prove that your software correctly initializes the internal watchdog under all circumstances than just employing a watchdog chip and refer to its datasheet.
                  – JimmyB
                  yesterday






                • 2




                  @JimmyB Or to prove that your code doesn't contain a bug that accidentally disables the internal watchdog.
                  – TripeHound
                  22 hours ago






                • 1




                  @TripeHound Or to prove that your code doesn't run wild continuously resetting the external watchdog as fast as it can. Problem solved. ;-)
                  – JimmyB
                  22 hours ago










                • Or that some genius doesn't put the watchdog service routine inside a timer ISR, so the main code can crash but the interrupt keeps firing & servicing the watchdog perfectly...
                  – John U
                  21 hours ago










                • @JohnU, that, however, would not seem like something an external IC would help with.
                  – ilkkachu
                  18 hours ago













                up vote
                18
                down vote










                up vote
                18
                down vote









                It is hard to argue, that the internal clock of the internal watchdog is actually independent of all the other clocks and always running like it should.



                So for certification it is usually much easier to place an external watchdog on the board and say: look there is our watchdog, it must be triggered by the MCU at that interval, which is shorter than our time to failure, so our device is safe as we defined it.






                share|improve this answer












                It is hard to argue, that the internal clock of the internal watchdog is actually independent of all the other clocks and always running like it should.



                So for certification it is usually much easier to place an external watchdog on the board and say: look there is our watchdog, it must be triggered by the MCU at that interval, which is shorter than our time to failure, so our device is safe as we defined it.







                share|improve this answer












                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer










                answered yesterday









                Arsenal

                12.2k11242




                12.2k11242








                • 2




                  "and always running like it should" - Good point. It may be harder to prove that your software correctly initializes the internal watchdog under all circumstances than just employing a watchdog chip and refer to its datasheet.
                  – JimmyB
                  yesterday






                • 2




                  @JimmyB Or to prove that your code doesn't contain a bug that accidentally disables the internal watchdog.
                  – TripeHound
                  22 hours ago






                • 1




                  @TripeHound Or to prove that your code doesn't run wild continuously resetting the external watchdog as fast as it can. Problem solved. ;-)
                  – JimmyB
                  22 hours ago










                • Or that some genius doesn't put the watchdog service routine inside a timer ISR, so the main code can crash but the interrupt keeps firing & servicing the watchdog perfectly...
                  – John U
                  21 hours ago










                • @JohnU, that, however, would not seem like something an external IC would help with.
                  – ilkkachu
                  18 hours ago














                • 2




                  "and always running like it should" - Good point. It may be harder to prove that your software correctly initializes the internal watchdog under all circumstances than just employing a watchdog chip and refer to its datasheet.
                  – JimmyB
                  yesterday






                • 2




                  @JimmyB Or to prove that your code doesn't contain a bug that accidentally disables the internal watchdog.
                  – TripeHound
                  22 hours ago






                • 1




                  @TripeHound Or to prove that your code doesn't run wild continuously resetting the external watchdog as fast as it can. Problem solved. ;-)
                  – JimmyB
                  22 hours ago










                • Or that some genius doesn't put the watchdog service routine inside a timer ISR, so the main code can crash but the interrupt keeps firing & servicing the watchdog perfectly...
                  – John U
                  21 hours ago










                • @JohnU, that, however, would not seem like something an external IC would help with.
                  – ilkkachu
                  18 hours ago








                2




                2




                "and always running like it should" - Good point. It may be harder to prove that your software correctly initializes the internal watchdog under all circumstances than just employing a watchdog chip and refer to its datasheet.
                – JimmyB
                yesterday




                "and always running like it should" - Good point. It may be harder to prove that your software correctly initializes the internal watchdog under all circumstances than just employing a watchdog chip and refer to its datasheet.
                – JimmyB
                yesterday




                2




                2




                @JimmyB Or to prove that your code doesn't contain a bug that accidentally disables the internal watchdog.
                – TripeHound
                22 hours ago




                @JimmyB Or to prove that your code doesn't contain a bug that accidentally disables the internal watchdog.
                – TripeHound
                22 hours ago




                1




                1




                @TripeHound Or to prove that your code doesn't run wild continuously resetting the external watchdog as fast as it can. Problem solved. ;-)
                – JimmyB
                22 hours ago




                @TripeHound Or to prove that your code doesn't run wild continuously resetting the external watchdog as fast as it can. Problem solved. ;-)
                – JimmyB
                22 hours ago












                Or that some genius doesn't put the watchdog service routine inside a timer ISR, so the main code can crash but the interrupt keeps firing & servicing the watchdog perfectly...
                – John U
                21 hours ago




                Or that some genius doesn't put the watchdog service routine inside a timer ISR, so the main code can crash but the interrupt keeps firing & servicing the watchdog perfectly...
                – John U
                21 hours ago












                @JohnU, that, however, would not seem like something an external IC would help with.
                – ilkkachu
                18 hours ago




                @JohnU, that, however, would not seem like something an external IC would help with.
                – ilkkachu
                18 hours ago










                up vote
                4
                down vote













                The watchdogs built in to mictrocontrollers have particular properties that mean they themselves can fail in ways that a different external watchdog might not.



                For example, a common design is to use a watchdog timer running from a low power RC oscillator. That oscillator can fail. An external watchdog based on capacitor discharge rather than an oscillator could still reset the micro in many cases.



                Another reason is that the external watchdog can be more robust. A microcontroller might only operate reliably over a certain voltage range, and being a complex device may be subject to latching up in a way that makes its own internal watchdog ineffective. An external watchdog may have a wider acceptable supply range and be less prone to problems when subjected to electrical noise.



                External watchdogs often offer a much wider range of time-out values too. A microcontroller I use often, the XMEGA, has a maximum time-out of around 7 seconds. For one product I added an additional external watchdog with time-out of 2 hours. That allowed me to wake the microcontroller once an hour rather than once every few seconds, reducing power consumption in a battery powered device.



                External watchdogs sometimes multiple functions, such as a timer and a voltage monitor/reset control. Again, these can be lower power than a micro's built in system too.



                One other interesting advantage of an external watchdog is that it can be used to reset devices other than the microcontroller. For example it might control the enable pin of a voltage regulator, de-powering an entire circuit to reset multiple devices at once. Using some simple logic the watchdog reset signal from multiple sources can be combined, allowing the watchdog to require several devices to be continually resetting it.






                share|improve this answer

























                  up vote
                  4
                  down vote













                  The watchdogs built in to mictrocontrollers have particular properties that mean they themselves can fail in ways that a different external watchdog might not.



                  For example, a common design is to use a watchdog timer running from a low power RC oscillator. That oscillator can fail. An external watchdog based on capacitor discharge rather than an oscillator could still reset the micro in many cases.



                  Another reason is that the external watchdog can be more robust. A microcontroller might only operate reliably over a certain voltage range, and being a complex device may be subject to latching up in a way that makes its own internal watchdog ineffective. An external watchdog may have a wider acceptable supply range and be less prone to problems when subjected to electrical noise.



                  External watchdogs often offer a much wider range of time-out values too. A microcontroller I use often, the XMEGA, has a maximum time-out of around 7 seconds. For one product I added an additional external watchdog with time-out of 2 hours. That allowed me to wake the microcontroller once an hour rather than once every few seconds, reducing power consumption in a battery powered device.



                  External watchdogs sometimes multiple functions, such as a timer and a voltage monitor/reset control. Again, these can be lower power than a micro's built in system too.



                  One other interesting advantage of an external watchdog is that it can be used to reset devices other than the microcontroller. For example it might control the enable pin of a voltage regulator, de-powering an entire circuit to reset multiple devices at once. Using some simple logic the watchdog reset signal from multiple sources can be combined, allowing the watchdog to require several devices to be continually resetting it.






                  share|improve this answer























                    up vote
                    4
                    down vote










                    up vote
                    4
                    down vote









                    The watchdogs built in to mictrocontrollers have particular properties that mean they themselves can fail in ways that a different external watchdog might not.



                    For example, a common design is to use a watchdog timer running from a low power RC oscillator. That oscillator can fail. An external watchdog based on capacitor discharge rather than an oscillator could still reset the micro in many cases.



                    Another reason is that the external watchdog can be more robust. A microcontroller might only operate reliably over a certain voltage range, and being a complex device may be subject to latching up in a way that makes its own internal watchdog ineffective. An external watchdog may have a wider acceptable supply range and be less prone to problems when subjected to electrical noise.



                    External watchdogs often offer a much wider range of time-out values too. A microcontroller I use often, the XMEGA, has a maximum time-out of around 7 seconds. For one product I added an additional external watchdog with time-out of 2 hours. That allowed me to wake the microcontroller once an hour rather than once every few seconds, reducing power consumption in a battery powered device.



                    External watchdogs sometimes multiple functions, such as a timer and a voltage monitor/reset control. Again, these can be lower power than a micro's built in system too.



                    One other interesting advantage of an external watchdog is that it can be used to reset devices other than the microcontroller. For example it might control the enable pin of a voltage regulator, de-powering an entire circuit to reset multiple devices at once. Using some simple logic the watchdog reset signal from multiple sources can be combined, allowing the watchdog to require several devices to be continually resetting it.






                    share|improve this answer












                    The watchdogs built in to mictrocontrollers have particular properties that mean they themselves can fail in ways that a different external watchdog might not.



                    For example, a common design is to use a watchdog timer running from a low power RC oscillator. That oscillator can fail. An external watchdog based on capacitor discharge rather than an oscillator could still reset the micro in many cases.



                    Another reason is that the external watchdog can be more robust. A microcontroller might only operate reliably over a certain voltage range, and being a complex device may be subject to latching up in a way that makes its own internal watchdog ineffective. An external watchdog may have a wider acceptable supply range and be less prone to problems when subjected to electrical noise.



                    External watchdogs often offer a much wider range of time-out values too. A microcontroller I use often, the XMEGA, has a maximum time-out of around 7 seconds. For one product I added an additional external watchdog with time-out of 2 hours. That allowed me to wake the microcontroller once an hour rather than once every few seconds, reducing power consumption in a battery powered device.



                    External watchdogs sometimes multiple functions, such as a timer and a voltage monitor/reset control. Again, these can be lower power than a micro's built in system too.



                    One other interesting advantage of an external watchdog is that it can be used to reset devices other than the microcontroller. For example it might control the enable pin of a voltage regulator, de-powering an entire circuit to reset multiple devices at once. Using some simple logic the watchdog reset signal from multiple sources can be combined, allowing the watchdog to require several devices to be continually resetting it.







                    share|improve this answer












                    share|improve this answer



                    share|improve this answer










                    answered 23 hours ago









                    user

                    1,134614




                    1,134614






















                        up vote
                        0
                        down vote













                        A watchdog is a timer and activates its output when the IC lost an input pulse for a period.



                        It is a building block and can use for any application.



                        So, they can use in any application, for example, change data routing in fail-safe mode. When the MCU clock fails, we can't disable some critical outputs.



                        external watchdog not related to the complex clock domain of MCU, some of them has their analog RC charge timing or internal clock.



                        Digital circuits in radiation may trigger the outputs when charge hits its flip-flops. But some analog circuit is safer because they integrate charge in a capacitor and it is safe when we integrating it.






                        share|improve this answer

























                          up vote
                          0
                          down vote













                          A watchdog is a timer and activates its output when the IC lost an input pulse for a period.



                          It is a building block and can use for any application.



                          So, they can use in any application, for example, change data routing in fail-safe mode. When the MCU clock fails, we can't disable some critical outputs.



                          external watchdog not related to the complex clock domain of MCU, some of them has their analog RC charge timing or internal clock.



                          Digital circuits in radiation may trigger the outputs when charge hits its flip-flops. But some analog circuit is safer because they integrate charge in a capacitor and it is safe when we integrating it.






                          share|improve this answer























                            up vote
                            0
                            down vote










                            up vote
                            0
                            down vote









                            A watchdog is a timer and activates its output when the IC lost an input pulse for a period.



                            It is a building block and can use for any application.



                            So, they can use in any application, for example, change data routing in fail-safe mode. When the MCU clock fails, we can't disable some critical outputs.



                            external watchdog not related to the complex clock domain of MCU, some of them has their analog RC charge timing or internal clock.



                            Digital circuits in radiation may trigger the outputs when charge hits its flip-flops. But some analog circuit is safer because they integrate charge in a capacitor and it is safe when we integrating it.






                            share|improve this answer












                            A watchdog is a timer and activates its output when the IC lost an input pulse for a period.



                            It is a building block and can use for any application.



                            So, they can use in any application, for example, change data routing in fail-safe mode. When the MCU clock fails, we can't disable some critical outputs.



                            external watchdog not related to the complex clock domain of MCU, some of them has their analog RC charge timing or internal clock.



                            Digital circuits in radiation may trigger the outputs when charge hits its flip-flops. But some analog circuit is safer because they integrate charge in a capacitor and it is safe when we integrating it.







                            share|improve this answer












                            share|improve this answer



                            share|improve this answer










                            answered 23 hours ago









                            M KS

                            667




                            667






















                                up vote
                                0
                                down vote













                                A watchdog is really no different in this regard from any other built-in peripheral you find in an MCU. MCUs come with timers, RTCs, ADCs, EEPROM and reset controllers, yet all these functions also exist as separate ICs. If available built-in blocks don't meet your requirements, you have to use external ones. Or you can try to find an MCU with all the right blocks, which may not exist or be too expensive or hard to port your code to.






                                share|improve this answer

























                                  up vote
                                  0
                                  down vote













                                  A watchdog is really no different in this regard from any other built-in peripheral you find in an MCU. MCUs come with timers, RTCs, ADCs, EEPROM and reset controllers, yet all these functions also exist as separate ICs. If available built-in blocks don't meet your requirements, you have to use external ones. Or you can try to find an MCU with all the right blocks, which may not exist or be too expensive or hard to port your code to.






                                  share|improve this answer























                                    up vote
                                    0
                                    down vote










                                    up vote
                                    0
                                    down vote









                                    A watchdog is really no different in this regard from any other built-in peripheral you find in an MCU. MCUs come with timers, RTCs, ADCs, EEPROM and reset controllers, yet all these functions also exist as separate ICs. If available built-in blocks don't meet your requirements, you have to use external ones. Or you can try to find an MCU with all the right blocks, which may not exist or be too expensive or hard to port your code to.






                                    share|improve this answer












                                    A watchdog is really no different in this regard from any other built-in peripheral you find in an MCU. MCUs come with timers, RTCs, ADCs, EEPROM and reset controllers, yet all these functions also exist as separate ICs. If available built-in blocks don't meet your requirements, you have to use external ones. Or you can try to find an MCU with all the right blocks, which may not exist or be too expensive or hard to port your code to.







                                    share|improve this answer












                                    share|improve this answer



                                    share|improve this answer










                                    answered 3 hours ago









                                    Dmitry Grigoryev

                                    17.3k22772




                                    17.3k22772






























                                         

                                        draft saved


                                        draft discarded



















































                                         


                                        draft saved


                                        draft discarded














                                        StackExchange.ready(
                                        function () {
                                        StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2felectronics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f406925%2fnecessity-of-external-watchdog-timer%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                                        }
                                        );

                                        Post as a guest















                                        Required, but never shown





















































                                        Required, but never shown














                                        Required, but never shown












                                        Required, but never shown







                                        Required, but never shown

































                                        Required, but never shown














                                        Required, but never shown












                                        Required, but never shown







                                        Required, but never shown







                                        Popular posts from this blog

                                        數位音樂下載

                                        When can things happen in Etherscan, such as the picture below?

                                        格利澤436b