Speeding up object name check by record ID
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
I have been able to piece together some code that determines object name based on record ID without any hard-coding or SOQL. It works with both custom and standard objects but it is very slow, I'm guessing due to loading so much schema data and a lot of looping.
I am looking for a way to speed this function up, potentially by limiting the object names searched or the amount of data being sorted through.
Here is the entire (working, but slow) function:
// Get sObject type by record ID
public static String getObjName(String recordId) {
// Get record prefix
String recordPrefix = recordId.substring(0, 3);
// Get global "describe"
Map<String, Schema.SObjectType> gd = Schema.getGlobalDescribe();
// Loop through all objects to find match for record ID prefix
for (Schema.SObjectType otype : gd.values()) {
Schema.DescribeSObjectResult r = otype.getDescribe();
String prefix = r.getKeyPrefix();
// Found match!
if (prefix != null && prefix.equals(recordPrefix)) return r.getName();
}
return '';
}
Any ideas?
apex
New contributor
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
I have been able to piece together some code that determines object name based on record ID without any hard-coding or SOQL. It works with both custom and standard objects but it is very slow, I'm guessing due to loading so much schema data and a lot of looping.
I am looking for a way to speed this function up, potentially by limiting the object names searched or the amount of data being sorted through.
Here is the entire (working, but slow) function:
// Get sObject type by record ID
public static String getObjName(String recordId) {
// Get record prefix
String recordPrefix = recordId.substring(0, 3);
// Get global "describe"
Map<String, Schema.SObjectType> gd = Schema.getGlobalDescribe();
// Loop through all objects to find match for record ID prefix
for (Schema.SObjectType otype : gd.values()) {
Schema.DescribeSObjectResult r = otype.getDescribe();
String prefix = r.getKeyPrefix();
// Found match!
if (prefix != null && prefix.equals(recordPrefix)) return r.getName();
}
return '';
}
Any ideas?
apex
New contributor
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
I have been able to piece together some code that determines object name based on record ID without any hard-coding or SOQL. It works with both custom and standard objects but it is very slow, I'm guessing due to loading so much schema data and a lot of looping.
I am looking for a way to speed this function up, potentially by limiting the object names searched or the amount of data being sorted through.
Here is the entire (working, but slow) function:
// Get sObject type by record ID
public static String getObjName(String recordId) {
// Get record prefix
String recordPrefix = recordId.substring(0, 3);
// Get global "describe"
Map<String, Schema.SObjectType> gd = Schema.getGlobalDescribe();
// Loop through all objects to find match for record ID prefix
for (Schema.SObjectType otype : gd.values()) {
Schema.DescribeSObjectResult r = otype.getDescribe();
String prefix = r.getKeyPrefix();
// Found match!
if (prefix != null && prefix.equals(recordPrefix)) return r.getName();
}
return '';
}
Any ideas?
apex
New contributor
I have been able to piece together some code that determines object name based on record ID without any hard-coding or SOQL. It works with both custom and standard objects but it is very slow, I'm guessing due to loading so much schema data and a lot of looping.
I am looking for a way to speed this function up, potentially by limiting the object names searched or the amount of data being sorted through.
Here is the entire (working, but slow) function:
// Get sObject type by record ID
public static String getObjName(String recordId) {
// Get record prefix
String recordPrefix = recordId.substring(0, 3);
// Get global "describe"
Map<String, Schema.SObjectType> gd = Schema.getGlobalDescribe();
// Loop through all objects to find match for record ID prefix
for (Schema.SObjectType otype : gd.values()) {
Schema.DescribeSObjectResult r = otype.getDescribe();
String prefix = r.getKeyPrefix();
// Found match!
if (prefix != null && prefix.equals(recordPrefix)) return r.getName();
}
return '';
}
Any ideas?
apex
apex
New contributor
New contributor
New contributor
asked Dec 3 at 21:55
Ixalmida
1184
1184
New contributor
New contributor
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
8
down vote
accepted
The Id
class already contains an instance method to do exactly what you wish, named getSObjectType
. The entire body of your method can be simplified to the below:
return (recordId == null) ? '' : String.valueOf(recordId.getSObjectType());
Better than returning the name of the SObjectType
as a string would be to use static typing and directly return the result:
public static SObjectType getSObjectType(Id recordId)
{
return (recordId == null) ? null : recordId.getSObjectType();
}
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
8
down vote
accepted
The Id
class already contains an instance method to do exactly what you wish, named getSObjectType
. The entire body of your method can be simplified to the below:
return (recordId == null) ? '' : String.valueOf(recordId.getSObjectType());
Better than returning the name of the SObjectType
as a string would be to use static typing and directly return the result:
public static SObjectType getSObjectType(Id recordId)
{
return (recordId == null) ? null : recordId.getSObjectType();
}
add a comment |
up vote
8
down vote
accepted
The Id
class already contains an instance method to do exactly what you wish, named getSObjectType
. The entire body of your method can be simplified to the below:
return (recordId == null) ? '' : String.valueOf(recordId.getSObjectType());
Better than returning the name of the SObjectType
as a string would be to use static typing and directly return the result:
public static SObjectType getSObjectType(Id recordId)
{
return (recordId == null) ? null : recordId.getSObjectType();
}
add a comment |
up vote
8
down vote
accepted
up vote
8
down vote
accepted
The Id
class already contains an instance method to do exactly what you wish, named getSObjectType
. The entire body of your method can be simplified to the below:
return (recordId == null) ? '' : String.valueOf(recordId.getSObjectType());
Better than returning the name of the SObjectType
as a string would be to use static typing and directly return the result:
public static SObjectType getSObjectType(Id recordId)
{
return (recordId == null) ? null : recordId.getSObjectType();
}
The Id
class already contains an instance method to do exactly what you wish, named getSObjectType
. The entire body of your method can be simplified to the below:
return (recordId == null) ? '' : String.valueOf(recordId.getSObjectType());
Better than returning the name of the SObjectType
as a string would be to use static typing and directly return the result:
public static SObjectType getSObjectType(Id recordId)
{
return (recordId == null) ? null : recordId.getSObjectType();
}
edited Dec 4 at 14:49
answered Dec 3 at 21:57
Adrian Larson♦
104k19111233
104k19111233
add a comment |
add a comment |
Ixalmida is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Ixalmida is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Ixalmida is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Ixalmida is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Salesforce Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsalesforce.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f241285%2fspeeding-up-object-name-check-by-record-id%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown