Why partial fraction decomposition of $frac{1}{s^2(s+2)}$ is $frac{A}{s}+frac{B}{s^2}+frac{C}{(s+2)}$?
$begingroup$
Can someone please explain why: $$frac{1}{s^2(s+2)}=frac{A}{s}+frac{B}{s^2}+frac{C}{(s+2)}$$
And not:$$frac{1}{s^2(s+2)}=frac{A}{s^2}+frac{B}{(s+2)}$$
I'm a bit confused where the extra s term comes from in the first equation.
algebra-precalculus partial-fractions
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Can someone please explain why: $$frac{1}{s^2(s+2)}=frac{A}{s}+frac{B}{s^2}+frac{C}{(s+2)}$$
And not:$$frac{1}{s^2(s+2)}=frac{A}{s^2}+frac{B}{(s+2)}$$
I'm a bit confused where the extra s term comes from in the first equation.
algebra-precalculus partial-fractions
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
There are many answers available on MSE, i.e. here and here
$endgroup$
– callculus
Apr 3 at 1:09
$begingroup$
More answers here too
$endgroup$
– David K
Apr 3 at 2:43
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Can someone please explain why: $$frac{1}{s^2(s+2)}=frac{A}{s}+frac{B}{s^2}+frac{C}{(s+2)}$$
And not:$$frac{1}{s^2(s+2)}=frac{A}{s^2}+frac{B}{(s+2)}$$
I'm a bit confused where the extra s term comes from in the first equation.
algebra-precalculus partial-fractions
$endgroup$
Can someone please explain why: $$frac{1}{s^2(s+2)}=frac{A}{s}+frac{B}{s^2}+frac{C}{(s+2)}$$
And not:$$frac{1}{s^2(s+2)}=frac{A}{s^2}+frac{B}{(s+2)}$$
I'm a bit confused where the extra s term comes from in the first equation.
algebra-precalculus partial-fractions
algebra-precalculus partial-fractions
edited Apr 3 at 3:15
user21820
40.1k544161
40.1k544161
asked Apr 3 at 0:58
stuartstuart
1968
1968
$begingroup$
There are many answers available on MSE, i.e. here and here
$endgroup$
– callculus
Apr 3 at 1:09
$begingroup$
More answers here too
$endgroup$
– David K
Apr 3 at 2:43
add a comment |
$begingroup$
There are many answers available on MSE, i.e. here and here
$endgroup$
– callculus
Apr 3 at 1:09
$begingroup$
More answers here too
$endgroup$
– David K
Apr 3 at 2:43
$begingroup$
There are many answers available on MSE, i.e. here and here
$endgroup$
– callculus
Apr 3 at 1:09
$begingroup$
There are many answers available on MSE, i.e. here and here
$endgroup$
– callculus
Apr 3 at 1:09
$begingroup$
More answers here too
$endgroup$
– David K
Apr 3 at 2:43
$begingroup$
More answers here too
$endgroup$
– David K
Apr 3 at 2:43
add a comment |
6 Answers
6
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The general result is the following.
Suppose that the degree of $p(s)$ is less than the degree of $q(s)$, and that $q(s)=q_1(s)q_2(s)$ where $q_1(s)$ and $q_2(s)$ have no common factor. Then there exist polynomials $r_1(s)$ and $r_2(s)$, with degrees less than $q_1(s)$ and $q_2(s)$ respectively, such that
$$frac{p(s)}{q(s)}=frac{r_1(s)}{q_1(s)}+frac{r_2(s)}{q_2(s)} .$$
In your case the denominator factorises as $s^2$ times $s+2$ so you have
$$frac1{s^2(s+2)}=frac{As+B}{s^2}+frac{C}{s+2} .$$
It is then usually more convenient (though not obligatory) to split up the first fraction, which gives your answer.
Note that you cannot, for the purposes of the above result, regard the denominator as $s$ times $s(s+2)$, because these polynomials do have a common factor.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
That is because for
$$frac{as^2+bs+c}{s^2(s+2)}=frac{A}{s^2}+frac{B}{(s+2)},$$
the left hand side has three parameters $a,b,c$, but the right hand side only has two parameters $a,b$. And if you try to solve TWO values from THREE equations, it will usually lead to a contradiction. So a third term of the right is needed. Even though this is not obvious in your question, you should think 1 as a degree 2 polynomial.
Or more simply, consider the example
$$
frac{s+1}{s^2}=frac{1}{s^2}+frac{1}{s}
$$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If your denominator has a factor of the form $(as+b)^n$ then to write partial fractions you should write all the powers up to $n$, i.e. $frac{A}{as+b}+frac{B}{(as+b)^2}+cdots+frac{Z}{(as+b)^n}$. In the case you showed, you have that $s^2$ is a factor of the denominator and that's why in partial fractions you should write the terms $frac{A}{s}+frac{B}{s^2}$.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
That's the rule, but I think the question was asking why is that the rule.
$endgroup$
– David K
Apr 3 at 2:45
$begingroup$
@user21820 I didn't answer this question. What are you referring to?
$endgroup$
– David K
Apr 3 at 3:21
$begingroup$
@DavidK: Oops sorry I thought you were the other David. Lol.
$endgroup$
– user21820
Apr 3 at 3:50
add a comment |
$begingroup$
One can immediately see why in this case the partial fraction expansion will lead to a nonzero coefficient for the $1/s$ term. The asymptotic behavior of the fraction for large $s$ is $sim 1/s^3$. The singularity at $s = -2$ contributes a term proportional to $1/(s+2)$ to the partial fraction expansion, which for large $s$ behaves like $sim 1/s$. This $sim 1/s$ must be canceled out by the partial fraction expansion terms coming from the singularity at $s = 0$, this requires the presence of a contribution proportional to $1/s$.
By making this reasoning more precise we can get to the complete partial fraction expansion using only the contribution from the singularity at $s = -2$. The amplitude of the $1/(s+2)$ term in the partial fraction expansion is given by the factor that multiplies it in the fraction evaluated at $s = -2$, this is therefore equal to $1/4$. So the contribution to the partial fraction expansion coming from the singularity at $s = -2$ is:
$$frac{1}{4(s+2)}$$
For large $s$ we can expand this in powers of $1/s$:
$$frac{1}{4(s+2)} = frac{1}{4 s}frac{1}{1+frac{2}{s}} = frac{1}{4s} - frac{1}{2 s^2} + mathcal{O}left(frac{1}{s^3}right)$$
The singularity at $s = 0$ will contribute terms to the partial fraction expansion whose large $s$ behavior will have to cancel out these first two terms, this means that this contribution to the partial fraction expansion is:
$$frac{1}{2 s^2}-frac{1}{4s} $$
The complete partial fraction expansion is thus given by:
$$frac{1}{2 s^2}-frac{1}{4s} + frac{1}{4(s+2)} $$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Suppose we multiplied both sides of the second equation by $s^2(s-2)$, giving us the equivalent equation:
$$1 = 0s^2 + 0s + 1= A(s+2) + Bs^2 = Bs^2 + As + 2A$$
Notice that on the RHS of this equation, that the constant term is not independent of the coefficient of the $s$ term. This dependency, in turn, causes a contradiction.
Now let's try the same thing with your first equation. This generates the equivalent equation, whose coefficients can be uniquely determined:
$$begin{align}
1 &= As(s+2) + B(s+2)+Cs^2\
0s^2+0s+1 &= (A+C)s^2+(2A+B)s+2B\
end{align}$$
The reason, of course, is because ${{1,s,s^2 }}$ represents an independent set that spans the set of all polynomials up to degree two, requiring three parameters to determine its coefficients uniquely.
I hope this helps.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You can do it step-by-step:
$$begin{align}frac{1}{s^2(s+2)}&=frac1scdot frac{1}{scdot (s+2)}=\
&=frac1scdot left(frac As+frac{B}{s+2}right)=\
&=frac A{s^2}+frac1scdot frac B{s+2}=\
&=frac{A}{s^2}+frac{C}{s}+frac{D}{s+2}.end{align}$$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3172683%2fwhy-partial-fraction-decomposition-of-frac1s2s2-is-fracas-frac%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
6 Answers
6
active
oldest
votes
6 Answers
6
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The general result is the following.
Suppose that the degree of $p(s)$ is less than the degree of $q(s)$, and that $q(s)=q_1(s)q_2(s)$ where $q_1(s)$ and $q_2(s)$ have no common factor. Then there exist polynomials $r_1(s)$ and $r_2(s)$, with degrees less than $q_1(s)$ and $q_2(s)$ respectively, such that
$$frac{p(s)}{q(s)}=frac{r_1(s)}{q_1(s)}+frac{r_2(s)}{q_2(s)} .$$
In your case the denominator factorises as $s^2$ times $s+2$ so you have
$$frac1{s^2(s+2)}=frac{As+B}{s^2}+frac{C}{s+2} .$$
It is then usually more convenient (though not obligatory) to split up the first fraction, which gives your answer.
Note that you cannot, for the purposes of the above result, regard the denominator as $s$ times $s(s+2)$, because these polynomials do have a common factor.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The general result is the following.
Suppose that the degree of $p(s)$ is less than the degree of $q(s)$, and that $q(s)=q_1(s)q_2(s)$ where $q_1(s)$ and $q_2(s)$ have no common factor. Then there exist polynomials $r_1(s)$ and $r_2(s)$, with degrees less than $q_1(s)$ and $q_2(s)$ respectively, such that
$$frac{p(s)}{q(s)}=frac{r_1(s)}{q_1(s)}+frac{r_2(s)}{q_2(s)} .$$
In your case the denominator factorises as $s^2$ times $s+2$ so you have
$$frac1{s^2(s+2)}=frac{As+B}{s^2}+frac{C}{s+2} .$$
It is then usually more convenient (though not obligatory) to split up the first fraction, which gives your answer.
Note that you cannot, for the purposes of the above result, regard the denominator as $s$ times $s(s+2)$, because these polynomials do have a common factor.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The general result is the following.
Suppose that the degree of $p(s)$ is less than the degree of $q(s)$, and that $q(s)=q_1(s)q_2(s)$ where $q_1(s)$ and $q_2(s)$ have no common factor. Then there exist polynomials $r_1(s)$ and $r_2(s)$, with degrees less than $q_1(s)$ and $q_2(s)$ respectively, such that
$$frac{p(s)}{q(s)}=frac{r_1(s)}{q_1(s)}+frac{r_2(s)}{q_2(s)} .$$
In your case the denominator factorises as $s^2$ times $s+2$ so you have
$$frac1{s^2(s+2)}=frac{As+B}{s^2}+frac{C}{s+2} .$$
It is then usually more convenient (though not obligatory) to split up the first fraction, which gives your answer.
Note that you cannot, for the purposes of the above result, regard the denominator as $s$ times $s(s+2)$, because these polynomials do have a common factor.
$endgroup$
The general result is the following.
Suppose that the degree of $p(s)$ is less than the degree of $q(s)$, and that $q(s)=q_1(s)q_2(s)$ where $q_1(s)$ and $q_2(s)$ have no common factor. Then there exist polynomials $r_1(s)$ and $r_2(s)$, with degrees less than $q_1(s)$ and $q_2(s)$ respectively, such that
$$frac{p(s)}{q(s)}=frac{r_1(s)}{q_1(s)}+frac{r_2(s)}{q_2(s)} .$$
In your case the denominator factorises as $s^2$ times $s+2$ so you have
$$frac1{s^2(s+2)}=frac{As+B}{s^2}+frac{C}{s+2} .$$
It is then usually more convenient (though not obligatory) to split up the first fraction, which gives your answer.
Note that you cannot, for the purposes of the above result, regard the denominator as $s$ times $s(s+2)$, because these polynomials do have a common factor.
answered Apr 3 at 1:17
DavidDavid
69.7k668131
69.7k668131
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
That is because for
$$frac{as^2+bs+c}{s^2(s+2)}=frac{A}{s^2}+frac{B}{(s+2)},$$
the left hand side has three parameters $a,b,c$, but the right hand side only has two parameters $a,b$. And if you try to solve TWO values from THREE equations, it will usually lead to a contradiction. So a third term of the right is needed. Even though this is not obvious in your question, you should think 1 as a degree 2 polynomial.
Or more simply, consider the example
$$
frac{s+1}{s^2}=frac{1}{s^2}+frac{1}{s}
$$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
That is because for
$$frac{as^2+bs+c}{s^2(s+2)}=frac{A}{s^2}+frac{B}{(s+2)},$$
the left hand side has three parameters $a,b,c$, but the right hand side only has two parameters $a,b$. And if you try to solve TWO values from THREE equations, it will usually lead to a contradiction. So a third term of the right is needed. Even though this is not obvious in your question, you should think 1 as a degree 2 polynomial.
Or more simply, consider the example
$$
frac{s+1}{s^2}=frac{1}{s^2}+frac{1}{s}
$$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
That is because for
$$frac{as^2+bs+c}{s^2(s+2)}=frac{A}{s^2}+frac{B}{(s+2)},$$
the left hand side has three parameters $a,b,c$, but the right hand side only has two parameters $a,b$. And if you try to solve TWO values from THREE equations, it will usually lead to a contradiction. So a third term of the right is needed. Even though this is not obvious in your question, you should think 1 as a degree 2 polynomial.
Or more simply, consider the example
$$
frac{s+1}{s^2}=frac{1}{s^2}+frac{1}{s}
$$
$endgroup$
That is because for
$$frac{as^2+bs+c}{s^2(s+2)}=frac{A}{s^2}+frac{B}{(s+2)},$$
the left hand side has three parameters $a,b,c$, but the right hand side only has two parameters $a,b$. And if you try to solve TWO values from THREE equations, it will usually lead to a contradiction. So a third term of the right is needed. Even though this is not obvious in your question, you should think 1 as a degree 2 polynomial.
Or more simply, consider the example
$$
frac{s+1}{s^2}=frac{1}{s^2}+frac{1}{s}
$$
answered Apr 3 at 1:10
Holding ArthurHolding Arthur
1,441417
1,441417
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If your denominator has a factor of the form $(as+b)^n$ then to write partial fractions you should write all the powers up to $n$, i.e. $frac{A}{as+b}+frac{B}{(as+b)^2}+cdots+frac{Z}{(as+b)^n}$. In the case you showed, you have that $s^2$ is a factor of the denominator and that's why in partial fractions you should write the terms $frac{A}{s}+frac{B}{s^2}$.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
That's the rule, but I think the question was asking why is that the rule.
$endgroup$
– David K
Apr 3 at 2:45
$begingroup$
@user21820 I didn't answer this question. What are you referring to?
$endgroup$
– David K
Apr 3 at 3:21
$begingroup$
@DavidK: Oops sorry I thought you were the other David. Lol.
$endgroup$
– user21820
Apr 3 at 3:50
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If your denominator has a factor of the form $(as+b)^n$ then to write partial fractions you should write all the powers up to $n$, i.e. $frac{A}{as+b}+frac{B}{(as+b)^2}+cdots+frac{Z}{(as+b)^n}$. In the case you showed, you have that $s^2$ is a factor of the denominator and that's why in partial fractions you should write the terms $frac{A}{s}+frac{B}{s^2}$.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
That's the rule, but I think the question was asking why is that the rule.
$endgroup$
– David K
Apr 3 at 2:45
$begingroup$
@user21820 I didn't answer this question. What are you referring to?
$endgroup$
– David K
Apr 3 at 3:21
$begingroup$
@DavidK: Oops sorry I thought you were the other David. Lol.
$endgroup$
– user21820
Apr 3 at 3:50
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If your denominator has a factor of the form $(as+b)^n$ then to write partial fractions you should write all the powers up to $n$, i.e. $frac{A}{as+b}+frac{B}{(as+b)^2}+cdots+frac{Z}{(as+b)^n}$. In the case you showed, you have that $s^2$ is a factor of the denominator and that's why in partial fractions you should write the terms $frac{A}{s}+frac{B}{s^2}$.
$endgroup$
If your denominator has a factor of the form $(as+b)^n$ then to write partial fractions you should write all the powers up to $n$, i.e. $frac{A}{as+b}+frac{B}{(as+b)^2}+cdots+frac{Z}{(as+b)^n}$. In the case you showed, you have that $s^2$ is a factor of the denominator and that's why in partial fractions you should write the terms $frac{A}{s}+frac{B}{s^2}$.
answered Apr 3 at 1:10
Julian MejiaJulian Mejia
46729
46729
1
$begingroup$
That's the rule, but I think the question was asking why is that the rule.
$endgroup$
– David K
Apr 3 at 2:45
$begingroup$
@user21820 I didn't answer this question. What are you referring to?
$endgroup$
– David K
Apr 3 at 3:21
$begingroup$
@DavidK: Oops sorry I thought you were the other David. Lol.
$endgroup$
– user21820
Apr 3 at 3:50
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
That's the rule, but I think the question was asking why is that the rule.
$endgroup$
– David K
Apr 3 at 2:45
$begingroup$
@user21820 I didn't answer this question. What are you referring to?
$endgroup$
– David K
Apr 3 at 3:21
$begingroup$
@DavidK: Oops sorry I thought you were the other David. Lol.
$endgroup$
– user21820
Apr 3 at 3:50
1
1
$begingroup$
That's the rule, but I think the question was asking why is that the rule.
$endgroup$
– David K
Apr 3 at 2:45
$begingroup$
That's the rule, but I think the question was asking why is that the rule.
$endgroup$
– David K
Apr 3 at 2:45
$begingroup$
@user21820 I didn't answer this question. What are you referring to?
$endgroup$
– David K
Apr 3 at 3:21
$begingroup$
@user21820 I didn't answer this question. What are you referring to?
$endgroup$
– David K
Apr 3 at 3:21
$begingroup$
@DavidK: Oops sorry I thought you were the other David. Lol.
$endgroup$
– user21820
Apr 3 at 3:50
$begingroup$
@DavidK: Oops sorry I thought you were the other David. Lol.
$endgroup$
– user21820
Apr 3 at 3:50
add a comment |
$begingroup$
One can immediately see why in this case the partial fraction expansion will lead to a nonzero coefficient for the $1/s$ term. The asymptotic behavior of the fraction for large $s$ is $sim 1/s^3$. The singularity at $s = -2$ contributes a term proportional to $1/(s+2)$ to the partial fraction expansion, which for large $s$ behaves like $sim 1/s$. This $sim 1/s$ must be canceled out by the partial fraction expansion terms coming from the singularity at $s = 0$, this requires the presence of a contribution proportional to $1/s$.
By making this reasoning more precise we can get to the complete partial fraction expansion using only the contribution from the singularity at $s = -2$. The amplitude of the $1/(s+2)$ term in the partial fraction expansion is given by the factor that multiplies it in the fraction evaluated at $s = -2$, this is therefore equal to $1/4$. So the contribution to the partial fraction expansion coming from the singularity at $s = -2$ is:
$$frac{1}{4(s+2)}$$
For large $s$ we can expand this in powers of $1/s$:
$$frac{1}{4(s+2)} = frac{1}{4 s}frac{1}{1+frac{2}{s}} = frac{1}{4s} - frac{1}{2 s^2} + mathcal{O}left(frac{1}{s^3}right)$$
The singularity at $s = 0$ will contribute terms to the partial fraction expansion whose large $s$ behavior will have to cancel out these first two terms, this means that this contribution to the partial fraction expansion is:
$$frac{1}{2 s^2}-frac{1}{4s} $$
The complete partial fraction expansion is thus given by:
$$frac{1}{2 s^2}-frac{1}{4s} + frac{1}{4(s+2)} $$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
One can immediately see why in this case the partial fraction expansion will lead to a nonzero coefficient for the $1/s$ term. The asymptotic behavior of the fraction for large $s$ is $sim 1/s^3$. The singularity at $s = -2$ contributes a term proportional to $1/(s+2)$ to the partial fraction expansion, which for large $s$ behaves like $sim 1/s$. This $sim 1/s$ must be canceled out by the partial fraction expansion terms coming from the singularity at $s = 0$, this requires the presence of a contribution proportional to $1/s$.
By making this reasoning more precise we can get to the complete partial fraction expansion using only the contribution from the singularity at $s = -2$. The amplitude of the $1/(s+2)$ term in the partial fraction expansion is given by the factor that multiplies it in the fraction evaluated at $s = -2$, this is therefore equal to $1/4$. So the contribution to the partial fraction expansion coming from the singularity at $s = -2$ is:
$$frac{1}{4(s+2)}$$
For large $s$ we can expand this in powers of $1/s$:
$$frac{1}{4(s+2)} = frac{1}{4 s}frac{1}{1+frac{2}{s}} = frac{1}{4s} - frac{1}{2 s^2} + mathcal{O}left(frac{1}{s^3}right)$$
The singularity at $s = 0$ will contribute terms to the partial fraction expansion whose large $s$ behavior will have to cancel out these first two terms, this means that this contribution to the partial fraction expansion is:
$$frac{1}{2 s^2}-frac{1}{4s} $$
The complete partial fraction expansion is thus given by:
$$frac{1}{2 s^2}-frac{1}{4s} + frac{1}{4(s+2)} $$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
One can immediately see why in this case the partial fraction expansion will lead to a nonzero coefficient for the $1/s$ term. The asymptotic behavior of the fraction for large $s$ is $sim 1/s^3$. The singularity at $s = -2$ contributes a term proportional to $1/(s+2)$ to the partial fraction expansion, which for large $s$ behaves like $sim 1/s$. This $sim 1/s$ must be canceled out by the partial fraction expansion terms coming from the singularity at $s = 0$, this requires the presence of a contribution proportional to $1/s$.
By making this reasoning more precise we can get to the complete partial fraction expansion using only the contribution from the singularity at $s = -2$. The amplitude of the $1/(s+2)$ term in the partial fraction expansion is given by the factor that multiplies it in the fraction evaluated at $s = -2$, this is therefore equal to $1/4$. So the contribution to the partial fraction expansion coming from the singularity at $s = -2$ is:
$$frac{1}{4(s+2)}$$
For large $s$ we can expand this in powers of $1/s$:
$$frac{1}{4(s+2)} = frac{1}{4 s}frac{1}{1+frac{2}{s}} = frac{1}{4s} - frac{1}{2 s^2} + mathcal{O}left(frac{1}{s^3}right)$$
The singularity at $s = 0$ will contribute terms to the partial fraction expansion whose large $s$ behavior will have to cancel out these first two terms, this means that this contribution to the partial fraction expansion is:
$$frac{1}{2 s^2}-frac{1}{4s} $$
The complete partial fraction expansion is thus given by:
$$frac{1}{2 s^2}-frac{1}{4s} + frac{1}{4(s+2)} $$
$endgroup$
One can immediately see why in this case the partial fraction expansion will lead to a nonzero coefficient for the $1/s$ term. The asymptotic behavior of the fraction for large $s$ is $sim 1/s^3$. The singularity at $s = -2$ contributes a term proportional to $1/(s+2)$ to the partial fraction expansion, which for large $s$ behaves like $sim 1/s$. This $sim 1/s$ must be canceled out by the partial fraction expansion terms coming from the singularity at $s = 0$, this requires the presence of a contribution proportional to $1/s$.
By making this reasoning more precise we can get to the complete partial fraction expansion using only the contribution from the singularity at $s = -2$. The amplitude of the $1/(s+2)$ term in the partial fraction expansion is given by the factor that multiplies it in the fraction evaluated at $s = -2$, this is therefore equal to $1/4$. So the contribution to the partial fraction expansion coming from the singularity at $s = -2$ is:
$$frac{1}{4(s+2)}$$
For large $s$ we can expand this in powers of $1/s$:
$$frac{1}{4(s+2)} = frac{1}{4 s}frac{1}{1+frac{2}{s}} = frac{1}{4s} - frac{1}{2 s^2} + mathcal{O}left(frac{1}{s^3}right)$$
The singularity at $s = 0$ will contribute terms to the partial fraction expansion whose large $s$ behavior will have to cancel out these first two terms, this means that this contribution to the partial fraction expansion is:
$$frac{1}{2 s^2}-frac{1}{4s} $$
The complete partial fraction expansion is thus given by:
$$frac{1}{2 s^2}-frac{1}{4s} + frac{1}{4(s+2)} $$
answered Apr 3 at 1:54
Count IblisCount Iblis
8,53221534
8,53221534
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Suppose we multiplied both sides of the second equation by $s^2(s-2)$, giving us the equivalent equation:
$$1 = 0s^2 + 0s + 1= A(s+2) + Bs^2 = Bs^2 + As + 2A$$
Notice that on the RHS of this equation, that the constant term is not independent of the coefficient of the $s$ term. This dependency, in turn, causes a contradiction.
Now let's try the same thing with your first equation. This generates the equivalent equation, whose coefficients can be uniquely determined:
$$begin{align}
1 &= As(s+2) + B(s+2)+Cs^2\
0s^2+0s+1 &= (A+C)s^2+(2A+B)s+2B\
end{align}$$
The reason, of course, is because ${{1,s,s^2 }}$ represents an independent set that spans the set of all polynomials up to degree two, requiring three parameters to determine its coefficients uniquely.
I hope this helps.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Suppose we multiplied both sides of the second equation by $s^2(s-2)$, giving us the equivalent equation:
$$1 = 0s^2 + 0s + 1= A(s+2) + Bs^2 = Bs^2 + As + 2A$$
Notice that on the RHS of this equation, that the constant term is not independent of the coefficient of the $s$ term. This dependency, in turn, causes a contradiction.
Now let's try the same thing with your first equation. This generates the equivalent equation, whose coefficients can be uniquely determined:
$$begin{align}
1 &= As(s+2) + B(s+2)+Cs^2\
0s^2+0s+1 &= (A+C)s^2+(2A+B)s+2B\
end{align}$$
The reason, of course, is because ${{1,s,s^2 }}$ represents an independent set that spans the set of all polynomials up to degree two, requiring three parameters to determine its coefficients uniquely.
I hope this helps.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Suppose we multiplied both sides of the second equation by $s^2(s-2)$, giving us the equivalent equation:
$$1 = 0s^2 + 0s + 1= A(s+2) + Bs^2 = Bs^2 + As + 2A$$
Notice that on the RHS of this equation, that the constant term is not independent of the coefficient of the $s$ term. This dependency, in turn, causes a contradiction.
Now let's try the same thing with your first equation. This generates the equivalent equation, whose coefficients can be uniquely determined:
$$begin{align}
1 &= As(s+2) + B(s+2)+Cs^2\
0s^2+0s+1 &= (A+C)s^2+(2A+B)s+2B\
end{align}$$
The reason, of course, is because ${{1,s,s^2 }}$ represents an independent set that spans the set of all polynomials up to degree two, requiring three parameters to determine its coefficients uniquely.
I hope this helps.
$endgroup$
Suppose we multiplied both sides of the second equation by $s^2(s-2)$, giving us the equivalent equation:
$$1 = 0s^2 + 0s + 1= A(s+2) + Bs^2 = Bs^2 + As + 2A$$
Notice that on the RHS of this equation, that the constant term is not independent of the coefficient of the $s$ term. This dependency, in turn, causes a contradiction.
Now let's try the same thing with your first equation. This generates the equivalent equation, whose coefficients can be uniquely determined:
$$begin{align}
1 &= As(s+2) + B(s+2)+Cs^2\
0s^2+0s+1 &= (A+C)s^2+(2A+B)s+2B\
end{align}$$
The reason, of course, is because ${{1,s,s^2 }}$ represents an independent set that spans the set of all polynomials up to degree two, requiring three parameters to determine its coefficients uniquely.
I hope this helps.
answered 13 hours ago
John JoyJohn Joy
6,29911827
6,29911827
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You can do it step-by-step:
$$begin{align}frac{1}{s^2(s+2)}&=frac1scdot frac{1}{scdot (s+2)}=\
&=frac1scdot left(frac As+frac{B}{s+2}right)=\
&=frac A{s^2}+frac1scdot frac B{s+2}=\
&=frac{A}{s^2}+frac{C}{s}+frac{D}{s+2}.end{align}$$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You can do it step-by-step:
$$begin{align}frac{1}{s^2(s+2)}&=frac1scdot frac{1}{scdot (s+2)}=\
&=frac1scdot left(frac As+frac{B}{s+2}right)=\
&=frac A{s^2}+frac1scdot frac B{s+2}=\
&=frac{A}{s^2}+frac{C}{s}+frac{D}{s+2}.end{align}$$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You can do it step-by-step:
$$begin{align}frac{1}{s^2(s+2)}&=frac1scdot frac{1}{scdot (s+2)}=\
&=frac1scdot left(frac As+frac{B}{s+2}right)=\
&=frac A{s^2}+frac1scdot frac B{s+2}=\
&=frac{A}{s^2}+frac{C}{s}+frac{D}{s+2}.end{align}$$
$endgroup$
You can do it step-by-step:
$$begin{align}frac{1}{s^2(s+2)}&=frac1scdot frac{1}{scdot (s+2)}=\
&=frac1scdot left(frac As+frac{B}{s+2}right)=\
&=frac A{s^2}+frac1scdot frac B{s+2}=\
&=frac{A}{s^2}+frac{C}{s}+frac{D}{s+2}.end{align}$$
answered 13 hours ago
farruhotafarruhota
21.8k2842
21.8k2842
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3172683%2fwhy-partial-fraction-decomposition-of-frac1s2s2-is-fracas-frac%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
There are many answers available on MSE, i.e. here and here
$endgroup$
– callculus
Apr 3 at 1:09
$begingroup$
More answers here too
$endgroup$
– David K
Apr 3 at 2:43