Is “would” the past future tense of “will” or just a modal verb?





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}






up vote
6
down vote

favorite
4












What's the difference between the following sentences?





  1. Would you give me some advice?


  2. Will you give me some advices?












share|improve this question




















  • 2




    What is the past future tense?
    – kiamlaluno
    Feb 13 '11 at 13:18






  • 1




    My textbook just tell me there are 16 kinds of tenses in English. see: louhau.edu.mo/www/discol/english/past/past_future_tense.htm
    – lovespring
    Feb 14 '11 at 2:00










  • I am not mother-tongue, but I believe that an example of past future tense could be: "Next year, I shall send you a letter indicating where I shall have gone on holiday"
    – Sklivvz
    Apr 22 '11 at 22:13










  • @Sklivvz Nope. What they mean by past future, I think, is the result of English sequence of tense for subordinate clauses. For instance, a main clause in the future “I will go to see the mayor” will become the following when used a subordinate clause in secondary sequence: “I said I would see the mayor”.
    – user3217
    Apr 23 '11 at 16:55






  • 1




    @kiamlaluno, The future of the past.
    – Pacerier
    yesterday

















up vote
6
down vote

favorite
4












What's the difference between the following sentences?





  1. Would you give me some advice?


  2. Will you give me some advices?












share|improve this question




















  • 2




    What is the past future tense?
    – kiamlaluno
    Feb 13 '11 at 13:18






  • 1




    My textbook just tell me there are 16 kinds of tenses in English. see: louhau.edu.mo/www/discol/english/past/past_future_tense.htm
    – lovespring
    Feb 14 '11 at 2:00










  • I am not mother-tongue, but I believe that an example of past future tense could be: "Next year, I shall send you a letter indicating where I shall have gone on holiday"
    – Sklivvz
    Apr 22 '11 at 22:13










  • @Sklivvz Nope. What they mean by past future, I think, is the result of English sequence of tense for subordinate clauses. For instance, a main clause in the future “I will go to see the mayor” will become the following when used a subordinate clause in secondary sequence: “I said I would see the mayor”.
    – user3217
    Apr 23 '11 at 16:55






  • 1




    @kiamlaluno, The future of the past.
    – Pacerier
    yesterday













up vote
6
down vote

favorite
4









up vote
6
down vote

favorite
4






4





What's the difference between the following sentences?





  1. Would you give me some advice?


  2. Will you give me some advices?












share|improve this question















What's the difference between the following sentences?





  1. Would you give me some advice?


  2. Will you give me some advices?









differences past-tense modal-verbs






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 15 hours ago









Mari-Lou A

61k54213445




61k54213445










asked Jan 19 '11 at 13:39









lovespring

1,853185177




1,853185177








  • 2




    What is the past future tense?
    – kiamlaluno
    Feb 13 '11 at 13:18






  • 1




    My textbook just tell me there are 16 kinds of tenses in English. see: louhau.edu.mo/www/discol/english/past/past_future_tense.htm
    – lovespring
    Feb 14 '11 at 2:00










  • I am not mother-tongue, but I believe that an example of past future tense could be: "Next year, I shall send you a letter indicating where I shall have gone on holiday"
    – Sklivvz
    Apr 22 '11 at 22:13










  • @Sklivvz Nope. What they mean by past future, I think, is the result of English sequence of tense for subordinate clauses. For instance, a main clause in the future “I will go to see the mayor” will become the following when used a subordinate clause in secondary sequence: “I said I would see the mayor”.
    – user3217
    Apr 23 '11 at 16:55






  • 1




    @kiamlaluno, The future of the past.
    – Pacerier
    yesterday














  • 2




    What is the past future tense?
    – kiamlaluno
    Feb 13 '11 at 13:18






  • 1




    My textbook just tell me there are 16 kinds of tenses in English. see: louhau.edu.mo/www/discol/english/past/past_future_tense.htm
    – lovespring
    Feb 14 '11 at 2:00










  • I am not mother-tongue, but I believe that an example of past future tense could be: "Next year, I shall send you a letter indicating where I shall have gone on holiday"
    – Sklivvz
    Apr 22 '11 at 22:13










  • @Sklivvz Nope. What they mean by past future, I think, is the result of English sequence of tense for subordinate clauses. For instance, a main clause in the future “I will go to see the mayor” will become the following when used a subordinate clause in secondary sequence: “I said I would see the mayor”.
    – user3217
    Apr 23 '11 at 16:55






  • 1




    @kiamlaluno, The future of the past.
    – Pacerier
    yesterday








2




2




What is the past future tense?
– kiamlaluno
Feb 13 '11 at 13:18




What is the past future tense?
– kiamlaluno
Feb 13 '11 at 13:18




1




1




My textbook just tell me there are 16 kinds of tenses in English. see: louhau.edu.mo/www/discol/english/past/past_future_tense.htm
– lovespring
Feb 14 '11 at 2:00




My textbook just tell me there are 16 kinds of tenses in English. see: louhau.edu.mo/www/discol/english/past/past_future_tense.htm
– lovespring
Feb 14 '11 at 2:00












I am not mother-tongue, but I believe that an example of past future tense could be: "Next year, I shall send you a letter indicating where I shall have gone on holiday"
– Sklivvz
Apr 22 '11 at 22:13




I am not mother-tongue, but I believe that an example of past future tense could be: "Next year, I shall send you a letter indicating where I shall have gone on holiday"
– Sklivvz
Apr 22 '11 at 22:13












@Sklivvz Nope. What they mean by past future, I think, is the result of English sequence of tense for subordinate clauses. For instance, a main clause in the future “I will go to see the mayor” will become the following when used a subordinate clause in secondary sequence: “I said I would see the mayor”.
– user3217
Apr 23 '11 at 16:55




@Sklivvz Nope. What they mean by past future, I think, is the result of English sequence of tense for subordinate clauses. For instance, a main clause in the future “I will go to see the mayor” will become the following when used a subordinate clause in secondary sequence: “I said I would see the mayor”.
– user3217
Apr 23 '11 at 16:55




1




1




@kiamlaluno, The future of the past.
– Pacerier
yesterday




@kiamlaluno, The future of the past.
– Pacerier
yesterday










6 Answers
6






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
5
down vote



accepted










Would can be either conditional or subjunctive, but it is often used (as your examples demonstrate) interchangeably with will.



Will is an inquiry after the consent of the respondent, whose inclinations comprise the sole issue at hand. "Will you give me some advice?" literally means it is up to "your" discretion either to give or withhold the advice.



"Would you give me some advice?" on the other hand implies some other conditions may affect your decision. Unstated but implied in this sentence may be some other information. Or there may be a contextual linkage or even a direct statement. I think of Dr. Seuss's Green Eggs and Ham:




Would you eat them in a box?
Would you eat them with a fox?




The terms of the conditional are clearly set forth. The questioner is proffering various inducements to sweeten the deal for the recalcitrant hater of "Sam-I-Am".



In any case, asking either question in conversation will, in the vast majority of cases, be understood simply as a request for advice, without all the grammatical analysis.






share|improve this answer





















  • Does the "would" mean a past future tense? PS:Your logo means "dream" in CJK(Chinese/Japanese/Korean) :)
    – lovespring
    Jan 19 '11 at 14:47












  • @lovespring: No, the "would" does not mean a "past future tense"; it can help in such constructions as "would have been" or "would have done" and so on. And yes, I'm aware what my avatar means. In Japanese it's yume, pronounced "yu-meh".
    – Robusto
    Jan 19 '11 at 14:54










  • How could I different it from the past tense of "will"? because they two share the some form.
    – lovespring
    Jan 19 '11 at 15:17










  • @lovespring: I'm not sure what you're asking me? Where are you having problems with differentiating the various uses of would?
    – Robusto
    Jan 20 '11 at 18:50










  • Yes, How could i know the 'would' is used as an modal auxiliary or just the past tense form of the 'will'?
    – lovespring
    Jan 20 '11 at 19:13


















up vote
4
down vote













Conventionally, would can be either the past simple or the past subjunctive of will. To put it very simply, it is best considered past simple if you are looking forward from a past perspective in a story. In that case, it is used in the middle of a narrative that is in the past tense. Both the narrative and would are then simply a description of the past; what would be will in a narrative in the present tense becomes would:





  • She said she would succeed. (In direct speech it would be: She said: "I will succeed".)


  • He knew they would find him eventually. (In direct speech it would be: He thought: "I know they will find me eventually".)





In most other cases, it is past subjunctive. This tense can be used in several ways, of which the conditional is the most frequent:





  • If he were rich, he would still be a
    bastard. (The conditional is used to express that "he will still be a bastard" is only true if the "if" condition is fulfilled.)


  • She would like some more tea. (Here
    there is some implied condition, such
    as "if you asked her", "if it were
    possible", "if she were permitted to
    speak", "if it weren't rude", etc.;
    that is why conditional past
    subjunctives are often used to express
    politeness.)





All the above generally applies equally to the other modal verbs, can, shall, and may.



If you say "will you give me some advice?", this is a perfectly fine and polite request, though perhaps a tiny bit old fashioned. It could theoretically be a question about the other person's desire, but context makes it clear that this is not what is intended.



"Would you give me some advice?" is an attempt at even greater politeness, because the conditional makes the request even more tentative, as explained above. Take your pick.






share|improve this answer





















  • There's a thread elaborating on the politeness level of each construction: englishtips.quora.com/If-+-Would-vs-Will-vs-Would-Have
    – Pacerier
    Apr 19 '16 at 15:21












  • @Cerberus "what would be will in a narrative in the present tense becomes would" beautifully put! thanks
    – ehsan88
    Jul 25 '17 at 9:28










  • @ehsan88: Good!
    – Cerberus
    Jul 25 '17 at 16:14


















up vote
1
down vote













Either would or will work, but you wouldn't change the noun:




Would you give me some advice?




and




Will you give me some advice?







share|improve this answer




























    up vote
    1
    down vote














    Is “would” the past future tense of “will” or just a modal verb?




    Would is the past tense of will in sentences like




    He said he would be away for a couple of days.

    He wanted out, but she wouldn't leave.




    The difference between Would you give me some advice? and Will you give me some advice? is that the first is considered a polite way to ask help, while the second (depending on the context) could be also understood as expressing desire, consent, or willingness.




    Will you have a cognac?







    share|improve this answer





















    • Your answer has "advice" yet in the edit you performed on the OP both sentences were changed to "advises" which is the 3rd person singular of the verb "to advise."
      – Mari-Lou A
      15 hours ago












    • @Mari-LouA That was the automatic corrector I triggered by mistake.
      – kiamlaluno
      15 hours ago










    • So the grammarchecker or the spellchecker corrected something that was correct in the first place? I'm talking about the first sentence.
      – Mari-Lou A
      15 hours ago












    • Yes, I didn't notice that word was changed.
      – kiamlaluno
      14 hours ago


















    up vote
    1
    down vote














    Kosmonaut:I don't know where you are
    getting these ideas. "I told him that
    I would meet him in the city on
    Tuesday." — This is a past tense usage
    of will. "I couldn't watch my favorite
    show yesterday." — This is a past
    tense usage of can.




    These ideas come from long years of teaching ESL/EFL and from those same long years spent studying the English language. I simply made note that when students followed the rules they produced unnatural English. I made note when students said to me, "why are you saying, "we might [do something] tomorrow" when 'might' is the past tense of may and you're talking about tomorrow"?




    Kosmonaut: "I told him that I would meet him in
    the city on Tuesday." — This is a past
    tense usage of will.




    No, it isn't. I certainly agree with you that that's long been what people have been told, but it's simply not true. But I don't suspect that me telling you that, even twice, is going to convince you.



    I won't try to give you an example of 'would' as a past tense usage of 'will' because I can't. No English speaker can. It can't be done.



    The only part of your quote above that is past/finished is 'told'. I'm making the assumption for the purposes of my argument that we haven't yet come to Tuesday, so the event isn't finished, which is another great indicator that what 'would' is doing here is not describing a past time event which would, of course, then have to trigger a true past tense use.



    Another equally valid and grammatical response to what you suggest is 'would' as a "past tense usage of will", could be,



    2) I told him, "I will meet you in the city on Tuesday".



    Do you agree?



    Now, how would 'would' be the past tense of an action that has not yet occurred. Do we ever use a past tense for the purpose of describing an action that hasn't happened?



    Moreover, if it was a true past tense, why are we able to use 'will' in 2), above.



    In fact, why can we continue to use 'will' for all time, even when and if the action IS ever completed, to describe the direct quote? The reason for that is a simple one; the actions that we take with respect to direct versus indirect speech are done to mark them, not as past or present tense, but as direct [quoted accurately] or indirect [not quoted accurately].



    Think of all the times that we [newspapers, people] use these grammatical patterns and we never seek to find out if the action commented on has ever come to pass.



    Now, let's say that we have reached Tuesday, and the "I" has met the "you/him". We now have a completed action.



    Would any native speaker ever say in order to describe that that action of meeting has been completed,



    We would meet on Tuesday. ?



    [I'm referring to a usual past tense, not to 'would used in the past for a future'.]



    Why does 'would' fail when it comes time to the central purpose of past tense, describing a finished action?



    [I'm not ignoring you, Cerebus.]






    share|improve this answer





















    • Hi Dan, please try to keep your posts short and to the point. This site is different from a traditional forum. Answers should be reserved for actual answers. Comments should be replied to in comments. Lengthy discussions should be taken to chat.
      – RegDwigнt
      Apr 22 '11 at 22:16










    • @RegDwight: Is there no other venue here to discuss these issues, Reg?
      – Dan
      Apr 23 '11 at 4:53










    • (This seems to be a reply for comments left in the other answer.)
      – kiamlaluno
      23 hours ago


















    up vote
    -2
    down vote














    Yes, How could i know the 'would' is
    used as an modal auxiliary or just the
    past tense form of the 'will'?




    There is a very easy way to tell. Modal verbs have no tense. In modern English, all modal verbs are tenseless. There are no past tense forms or present tense forms. In older forms of English, modals did have tense, so we can accurately refer to modern modals as "historical past tense forms" or "historical present tense forms".



    It's easy to prove this because no one can make a sentence in English where any one of the purported past tense modals acts as a real past tense.



    Where modals seem like they are being used as a past tense, in reporting speech, they aren't really acting as past tense. They are simply being used the same as the past tense FORM of lexical verbs in a process called backshifting, to signal that the speech is not direct/quoted but rather it is indirect/reported.



    The difference between "Would you give me some advice?" and "Will you give me some advice?"
    is only one of level of politeness/deference. As the historical past tense forms, in their epistemic [level of certainty] meanings show a greater sense of doubt/certainty, that same doubt/uncertainty carries over to modal deontic [social] meaning so they are considered more polite/more deferential/softer/less direct.






    share|improve this answer

















    • 6




      I don't know where you are getting these ideas. "I told him that I would meet him in the city on Tuesday." — This is a past tense usage of will. "I couldn't watch my favorite show yesterday." — This is a past tense usage of can.
      – Kosmonaut
      Apr 19 '11 at 23:25












    • "They are simply being used the same as the past tense FORM of lexical verbs in a process called backshifting, to signal that the speech is not direct/quoted but rather it is indirect/reported." — Then why do we say I am telling her that he will never leave his wife? It is indirect speech, and yet I see "will", not "would". Transposing this sentence to the past may give "would": I was telling her that he would never leave his wife. Of course it turned out I was right.
      – Cerberus
      Apr 20 '11 at 0:01












    protected by tchrist Feb 22 '15 at 0:15



    Thank you for your interest in this question.
    Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).



    Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?














    6 Answers
    6






    active

    oldest

    votes








    6 Answers
    6






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    5
    down vote



    accepted










    Would can be either conditional or subjunctive, but it is often used (as your examples demonstrate) interchangeably with will.



    Will is an inquiry after the consent of the respondent, whose inclinations comprise the sole issue at hand. "Will you give me some advice?" literally means it is up to "your" discretion either to give or withhold the advice.



    "Would you give me some advice?" on the other hand implies some other conditions may affect your decision. Unstated but implied in this sentence may be some other information. Or there may be a contextual linkage or even a direct statement. I think of Dr. Seuss's Green Eggs and Ham:




    Would you eat them in a box?
    Would you eat them with a fox?




    The terms of the conditional are clearly set forth. The questioner is proffering various inducements to sweeten the deal for the recalcitrant hater of "Sam-I-Am".



    In any case, asking either question in conversation will, in the vast majority of cases, be understood simply as a request for advice, without all the grammatical analysis.






    share|improve this answer





















    • Does the "would" mean a past future tense? PS:Your logo means "dream" in CJK(Chinese/Japanese/Korean) :)
      – lovespring
      Jan 19 '11 at 14:47












    • @lovespring: No, the "would" does not mean a "past future tense"; it can help in such constructions as "would have been" or "would have done" and so on. And yes, I'm aware what my avatar means. In Japanese it's yume, pronounced "yu-meh".
      – Robusto
      Jan 19 '11 at 14:54










    • How could I different it from the past tense of "will"? because they two share the some form.
      – lovespring
      Jan 19 '11 at 15:17










    • @lovespring: I'm not sure what you're asking me? Where are you having problems with differentiating the various uses of would?
      – Robusto
      Jan 20 '11 at 18:50










    • Yes, How could i know the 'would' is used as an modal auxiliary or just the past tense form of the 'will'?
      – lovespring
      Jan 20 '11 at 19:13















    up vote
    5
    down vote



    accepted










    Would can be either conditional or subjunctive, but it is often used (as your examples demonstrate) interchangeably with will.



    Will is an inquiry after the consent of the respondent, whose inclinations comprise the sole issue at hand. "Will you give me some advice?" literally means it is up to "your" discretion either to give or withhold the advice.



    "Would you give me some advice?" on the other hand implies some other conditions may affect your decision. Unstated but implied in this sentence may be some other information. Or there may be a contextual linkage or even a direct statement. I think of Dr. Seuss's Green Eggs and Ham:




    Would you eat them in a box?
    Would you eat them with a fox?




    The terms of the conditional are clearly set forth. The questioner is proffering various inducements to sweeten the deal for the recalcitrant hater of "Sam-I-Am".



    In any case, asking either question in conversation will, in the vast majority of cases, be understood simply as a request for advice, without all the grammatical analysis.






    share|improve this answer





















    • Does the "would" mean a past future tense? PS:Your logo means "dream" in CJK(Chinese/Japanese/Korean) :)
      – lovespring
      Jan 19 '11 at 14:47












    • @lovespring: No, the "would" does not mean a "past future tense"; it can help in such constructions as "would have been" or "would have done" and so on. And yes, I'm aware what my avatar means. In Japanese it's yume, pronounced "yu-meh".
      – Robusto
      Jan 19 '11 at 14:54










    • How could I different it from the past tense of "will"? because they two share the some form.
      – lovespring
      Jan 19 '11 at 15:17










    • @lovespring: I'm not sure what you're asking me? Where are you having problems with differentiating the various uses of would?
      – Robusto
      Jan 20 '11 at 18:50










    • Yes, How could i know the 'would' is used as an modal auxiliary or just the past tense form of the 'will'?
      – lovespring
      Jan 20 '11 at 19:13













    up vote
    5
    down vote



    accepted







    up vote
    5
    down vote



    accepted






    Would can be either conditional or subjunctive, but it is often used (as your examples demonstrate) interchangeably with will.



    Will is an inquiry after the consent of the respondent, whose inclinations comprise the sole issue at hand. "Will you give me some advice?" literally means it is up to "your" discretion either to give or withhold the advice.



    "Would you give me some advice?" on the other hand implies some other conditions may affect your decision. Unstated but implied in this sentence may be some other information. Or there may be a contextual linkage or even a direct statement. I think of Dr. Seuss's Green Eggs and Ham:




    Would you eat them in a box?
    Would you eat them with a fox?




    The terms of the conditional are clearly set forth. The questioner is proffering various inducements to sweeten the deal for the recalcitrant hater of "Sam-I-Am".



    In any case, asking either question in conversation will, in the vast majority of cases, be understood simply as a request for advice, without all the grammatical analysis.






    share|improve this answer












    Would can be either conditional or subjunctive, but it is often used (as your examples demonstrate) interchangeably with will.



    Will is an inquiry after the consent of the respondent, whose inclinations comprise the sole issue at hand. "Will you give me some advice?" literally means it is up to "your" discretion either to give or withhold the advice.



    "Would you give me some advice?" on the other hand implies some other conditions may affect your decision. Unstated but implied in this sentence may be some other information. Or there may be a contextual linkage or even a direct statement. I think of Dr. Seuss's Green Eggs and Ham:




    Would you eat them in a box?
    Would you eat them with a fox?




    The terms of the conditional are clearly set forth. The questioner is proffering various inducements to sweeten the deal for the recalcitrant hater of "Sam-I-Am".



    In any case, asking either question in conversation will, in the vast majority of cases, be understood simply as a request for advice, without all the grammatical analysis.







    share|improve this answer












    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer










    answered Jan 19 '11 at 14:00









    Robusto

    127k27302512




    127k27302512












    • Does the "would" mean a past future tense? PS:Your logo means "dream" in CJK(Chinese/Japanese/Korean) :)
      – lovespring
      Jan 19 '11 at 14:47












    • @lovespring: No, the "would" does not mean a "past future tense"; it can help in such constructions as "would have been" or "would have done" and so on. And yes, I'm aware what my avatar means. In Japanese it's yume, pronounced "yu-meh".
      – Robusto
      Jan 19 '11 at 14:54










    • How could I different it from the past tense of "will"? because they two share the some form.
      – lovespring
      Jan 19 '11 at 15:17










    • @lovespring: I'm not sure what you're asking me? Where are you having problems with differentiating the various uses of would?
      – Robusto
      Jan 20 '11 at 18:50










    • Yes, How could i know the 'would' is used as an modal auxiliary or just the past tense form of the 'will'?
      – lovespring
      Jan 20 '11 at 19:13


















    • Does the "would" mean a past future tense? PS:Your logo means "dream" in CJK(Chinese/Japanese/Korean) :)
      – lovespring
      Jan 19 '11 at 14:47












    • @lovespring: No, the "would" does not mean a "past future tense"; it can help in such constructions as "would have been" or "would have done" and so on. And yes, I'm aware what my avatar means. In Japanese it's yume, pronounced "yu-meh".
      – Robusto
      Jan 19 '11 at 14:54










    • How could I different it from the past tense of "will"? because they two share the some form.
      – lovespring
      Jan 19 '11 at 15:17










    • @lovespring: I'm not sure what you're asking me? Where are you having problems with differentiating the various uses of would?
      – Robusto
      Jan 20 '11 at 18:50










    • Yes, How could i know the 'would' is used as an modal auxiliary or just the past tense form of the 'will'?
      – lovespring
      Jan 20 '11 at 19:13
















    Does the "would" mean a past future tense? PS:Your logo means "dream" in CJK(Chinese/Japanese/Korean) :)
    – lovespring
    Jan 19 '11 at 14:47






    Does the "would" mean a past future tense? PS:Your logo means "dream" in CJK(Chinese/Japanese/Korean) :)
    – lovespring
    Jan 19 '11 at 14:47














    @lovespring: No, the "would" does not mean a "past future tense"; it can help in such constructions as "would have been" or "would have done" and so on. And yes, I'm aware what my avatar means. In Japanese it's yume, pronounced "yu-meh".
    – Robusto
    Jan 19 '11 at 14:54




    @lovespring: No, the "would" does not mean a "past future tense"; it can help in such constructions as "would have been" or "would have done" and so on. And yes, I'm aware what my avatar means. In Japanese it's yume, pronounced "yu-meh".
    – Robusto
    Jan 19 '11 at 14:54












    How could I different it from the past tense of "will"? because they two share the some form.
    – lovespring
    Jan 19 '11 at 15:17




    How could I different it from the past tense of "will"? because they two share the some form.
    – lovespring
    Jan 19 '11 at 15:17












    @lovespring: I'm not sure what you're asking me? Where are you having problems with differentiating the various uses of would?
    – Robusto
    Jan 20 '11 at 18:50




    @lovespring: I'm not sure what you're asking me? Where are you having problems with differentiating the various uses of would?
    – Robusto
    Jan 20 '11 at 18:50












    Yes, How could i know the 'would' is used as an modal auxiliary or just the past tense form of the 'will'?
    – lovespring
    Jan 20 '11 at 19:13




    Yes, How could i know the 'would' is used as an modal auxiliary or just the past tense form of the 'will'?
    – lovespring
    Jan 20 '11 at 19:13












    up vote
    4
    down vote













    Conventionally, would can be either the past simple or the past subjunctive of will. To put it very simply, it is best considered past simple if you are looking forward from a past perspective in a story. In that case, it is used in the middle of a narrative that is in the past tense. Both the narrative and would are then simply a description of the past; what would be will in a narrative in the present tense becomes would:





    • She said she would succeed. (In direct speech it would be: She said: "I will succeed".)


    • He knew they would find him eventually. (In direct speech it would be: He thought: "I know they will find me eventually".)





    In most other cases, it is past subjunctive. This tense can be used in several ways, of which the conditional is the most frequent:





    • If he were rich, he would still be a
      bastard. (The conditional is used to express that "he will still be a bastard" is only true if the "if" condition is fulfilled.)


    • She would like some more tea. (Here
      there is some implied condition, such
      as "if you asked her", "if it were
      possible", "if she were permitted to
      speak", "if it weren't rude", etc.;
      that is why conditional past
      subjunctives are often used to express
      politeness.)





    All the above generally applies equally to the other modal verbs, can, shall, and may.



    If you say "will you give me some advice?", this is a perfectly fine and polite request, though perhaps a tiny bit old fashioned. It could theoretically be a question about the other person's desire, but context makes it clear that this is not what is intended.



    "Would you give me some advice?" is an attempt at even greater politeness, because the conditional makes the request even more tentative, as explained above. Take your pick.






    share|improve this answer





















    • There's a thread elaborating on the politeness level of each construction: englishtips.quora.com/If-+-Would-vs-Will-vs-Would-Have
      – Pacerier
      Apr 19 '16 at 15:21












    • @Cerberus "what would be will in a narrative in the present tense becomes would" beautifully put! thanks
      – ehsan88
      Jul 25 '17 at 9:28










    • @ehsan88: Good!
      – Cerberus
      Jul 25 '17 at 16:14















    up vote
    4
    down vote













    Conventionally, would can be either the past simple or the past subjunctive of will. To put it very simply, it is best considered past simple if you are looking forward from a past perspective in a story. In that case, it is used in the middle of a narrative that is in the past tense. Both the narrative and would are then simply a description of the past; what would be will in a narrative in the present tense becomes would:





    • She said she would succeed. (In direct speech it would be: She said: "I will succeed".)


    • He knew they would find him eventually. (In direct speech it would be: He thought: "I know they will find me eventually".)





    In most other cases, it is past subjunctive. This tense can be used in several ways, of which the conditional is the most frequent:





    • If he were rich, he would still be a
      bastard. (The conditional is used to express that "he will still be a bastard" is only true if the "if" condition is fulfilled.)


    • She would like some more tea. (Here
      there is some implied condition, such
      as "if you asked her", "if it were
      possible", "if she were permitted to
      speak", "if it weren't rude", etc.;
      that is why conditional past
      subjunctives are often used to express
      politeness.)





    All the above generally applies equally to the other modal verbs, can, shall, and may.



    If you say "will you give me some advice?", this is a perfectly fine and polite request, though perhaps a tiny bit old fashioned. It could theoretically be a question about the other person's desire, but context makes it clear that this is not what is intended.



    "Would you give me some advice?" is an attempt at even greater politeness, because the conditional makes the request even more tentative, as explained above. Take your pick.






    share|improve this answer





















    • There's a thread elaborating on the politeness level of each construction: englishtips.quora.com/If-+-Would-vs-Will-vs-Would-Have
      – Pacerier
      Apr 19 '16 at 15:21












    • @Cerberus "what would be will in a narrative in the present tense becomes would" beautifully put! thanks
      – ehsan88
      Jul 25 '17 at 9:28










    • @ehsan88: Good!
      – Cerberus
      Jul 25 '17 at 16:14













    up vote
    4
    down vote










    up vote
    4
    down vote









    Conventionally, would can be either the past simple or the past subjunctive of will. To put it very simply, it is best considered past simple if you are looking forward from a past perspective in a story. In that case, it is used in the middle of a narrative that is in the past tense. Both the narrative and would are then simply a description of the past; what would be will in a narrative in the present tense becomes would:





    • She said she would succeed. (In direct speech it would be: She said: "I will succeed".)


    • He knew they would find him eventually. (In direct speech it would be: He thought: "I know they will find me eventually".)





    In most other cases, it is past subjunctive. This tense can be used in several ways, of which the conditional is the most frequent:





    • If he were rich, he would still be a
      bastard. (The conditional is used to express that "he will still be a bastard" is only true if the "if" condition is fulfilled.)


    • She would like some more tea. (Here
      there is some implied condition, such
      as "if you asked her", "if it were
      possible", "if she were permitted to
      speak", "if it weren't rude", etc.;
      that is why conditional past
      subjunctives are often used to express
      politeness.)





    All the above generally applies equally to the other modal verbs, can, shall, and may.



    If you say "will you give me some advice?", this is a perfectly fine and polite request, though perhaps a tiny bit old fashioned. It could theoretically be a question about the other person's desire, but context makes it clear that this is not what is intended.



    "Would you give me some advice?" is an attempt at even greater politeness, because the conditional makes the request even more tentative, as explained above. Take your pick.






    share|improve this answer












    Conventionally, would can be either the past simple or the past subjunctive of will. To put it very simply, it is best considered past simple if you are looking forward from a past perspective in a story. In that case, it is used in the middle of a narrative that is in the past tense. Both the narrative and would are then simply a description of the past; what would be will in a narrative in the present tense becomes would:





    • She said she would succeed. (In direct speech it would be: She said: "I will succeed".)


    • He knew they would find him eventually. (In direct speech it would be: He thought: "I know they will find me eventually".)





    In most other cases, it is past subjunctive. This tense can be used in several ways, of which the conditional is the most frequent:





    • If he were rich, he would still be a
      bastard. (The conditional is used to express that "he will still be a bastard" is only true if the "if" condition is fulfilled.)


    • She would like some more tea. (Here
      there is some implied condition, such
      as "if you asked her", "if it were
      possible", "if she were permitted to
      speak", "if it weren't rude", etc.;
      that is why conditional past
      subjunctives are often used to express
      politeness.)





    All the above generally applies equally to the other modal verbs, can, shall, and may.



    If you say "will you give me some advice?", this is a perfectly fine and polite request, though perhaps a tiny bit old fashioned. It could theoretically be a question about the other person's desire, but context makes it clear that this is not what is intended.



    "Would you give me some advice?" is an attempt at even greater politeness, because the conditional makes the request even more tentative, as explained above. Take your pick.







    share|improve this answer












    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer










    answered Apr 19 '11 at 23:57









    Cerberus

    53.6k2118205




    53.6k2118205












    • There's a thread elaborating on the politeness level of each construction: englishtips.quora.com/If-+-Would-vs-Will-vs-Would-Have
      – Pacerier
      Apr 19 '16 at 15:21












    • @Cerberus "what would be will in a narrative in the present tense becomes would" beautifully put! thanks
      – ehsan88
      Jul 25 '17 at 9:28










    • @ehsan88: Good!
      – Cerberus
      Jul 25 '17 at 16:14


















    • There's a thread elaborating on the politeness level of each construction: englishtips.quora.com/If-+-Would-vs-Will-vs-Would-Have
      – Pacerier
      Apr 19 '16 at 15:21












    • @Cerberus "what would be will in a narrative in the present tense becomes would" beautifully put! thanks
      – ehsan88
      Jul 25 '17 at 9:28










    • @ehsan88: Good!
      – Cerberus
      Jul 25 '17 at 16:14
















    There's a thread elaborating on the politeness level of each construction: englishtips.quora.com/If-+-Would-vs-Will-vs-Would-Have
    – Pacerier
    Apr 19 '16 at 15:21






    There's a thread elaborating on the politeness level of each construction: englishtips.quora.com/If-+-Would-vs-Will-vs-Would-Have
    – Pacerier
    Apr 19 '16 at 15:21














    @Cerberus "what would be will in a narrative in the present tense becomes would" beautifully put! thanks
    – ehsan88
    Jul 25 '17 at 9:28




    @Cerberus "what would be will in a narrative in the present tense becomes would" beautifully put! thanks
    – ehsan88
    Jul 25 '17 at 9:28












    @ehsan88: Good!
    – Cerberus
    Jul 25 '17 at 16:14




    @ehsan88: Good!
    – Cerberus
    Jul 25 '17 at 16:14










    up vote
    1
    down vote













    Either would or will work, but you wouldn't change the noun:




    Would you give me some advice?




    and




    Will you give me some advice?







    share|improve this answer

























      up vote
      1
      down vote













      Either would or will work, but you wouldn't change the noun:




      Would you give me some advice?




      and




      Will you give me some advice?







      share|improve this answer























        up vote
        1
        down vote










        up vote
        1
        down vote









        Either would or will work, but you wouldn't change the noun:




        Would you give me some advice?




        and




        Will you give me some advice?







        share|improve this answer












        Either would or will work, but you wouldn't change the noun:




        Would you give me some advice?




        and




        Will you give me some advice?








        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered Jan 19 '11 at 13:44







        user3444





























            up vote
            1
            down vote














            Is “would” the past future tense of “will” or just a modal verb?




            Would is the past tense of will in sentences like




            He said he would be away for a couple of days.

            He wanted out, but she wouldn't leave.




            The difference between Would you give me some advice? and Will you give me some advice? is that the first is considered a polite way to ask help, while the second (depending on the context) could be also understood as expressing desire, consent, or willingness.




            Will you have a cognac?







            share|improve this answer





















            • Your answer has "advice" yet in the edit you performed on the OP both sentences were changed to "advises" which is the 3rd person singular of the verb "to advise."
              – Mari-Lou A
              15 hours ago












            • @Mari-LouA That was the automatic corrector I triggered by mistake.
              – kiamlaluno
              15 hours ago










            • So the grammarchecker or the spellchecker corrected something that was correct in the first place? I'm talking about the first sentence.
              – Mari-Lou A
              15 hours ago












            • Yes, I didn't notice that word was changed.
              – kiamlaluno
              14 hours ago















            up vote
            1
            down vote














            Is “would” the past future tense of “will” or just a modal verb?




            Would is the past tense of will in sentences like




            He said he would be away for a couple of days.

            He wanted out, but she wouldn't leave.




            The difference between Would you give me some advice? and Will you give me some advice? is that the first is considered a polite way to ask help, while the second (depending on the context) could be also understood as expressing desire, consent, or willingness.




            Will you have a cognac?







            share|improve this answer





















            • Your answer has "advice" yet in the edit you performed on the OP both sentences were changed to "advises" which is the 3rd person singular of the verb "to advise."
              – Mari-Lou A
              15 hours ago












            • @Mari-LouA That was the automatic corrector I triggered by mistake.
              – kiamlaluno
              15 hours ago










            • So the grammarchecker or the spellchecker corrected something that was correct in the first place? I'm talking about the first sentence.
              – Mari-Lou A
              15 hours ago












            • Yes, I didn't notice that word was changed.
              – kiamlaluno
              14 hours ago













            up vote
            1
            down vote










            up vote
            1
            down vote










            Is “would” the past future tense of “will” or just a modal verb?




            Would is the past tense of will in sentences like




            He said he would be away for a couple of days.

            He wanted out, but she wouldn't leave.




            The difference between Would you give me some advice? and Will you give me some advice? is that the first is considered a polite way to ask help, while the second (depending on the context) could be also understood as expressing desire, consent, or willingness.




            Will you have a cognac?







            share|improve this answer













            Is “would” the past future tense of “will” or just a modal verb?




            Would is the past tense of will in sentences like




            He said he would be away for a couple of days.

            He wanted out, but she wouldn't leave.




            The difference between Would you give me some advice? and Will you give me some advice? is that the first is considered a polite way to ask help, while the second (depending on the context) could be also understood as expressing desire, consent, or willingness.




            Will you have a cognac?








            share|improve this answer












            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer










            answered Feb 13 '11 at 14:28









            kiamlaluno

            43.3k56180294




            43.3k56180294












            • Your answer has "advice" yet in the edit you performed on the OP both sentences were changed to "advises" which is the 3rd person singular of the verb "to advise."
              – Mari-Lou A
              15 hours ago












            • @Mari-LouA That was the automatic corrector I triggered by mistake.
              – kiamlaluno
              15 hours ago










            • So the grammarchecker or the spellchecker corrected something that was correct in the first place? I'm talking about the first sentence.
              – Mari-Lou A
              15 hours ago












            • Yes, I didn't notice that word was changed.
              – kiamlaluno
              14 hours ago


















            • Your answer has "advice" yet in the edit you performed on the OP both sentences were changed to "advises" which is the 3rd person singular of the verb "to advise."
              – Mari-Lou A
              15 hours ago












            • @Mari-LouA That was the automatic corrector I triggered by mistake.
              – kiamlaluno
              15 hours ago










            • So the grammarchecker or the spellchecker corrected something that was correct in the first place? I'm talking about the first sentence.
              – Mari-Lou A
              15 hours ago












            • Yes, I didn't notice that word was changed.
              – kiamlaluno
              14 hours ago
















            Your answer has "advice" yet in the edit you performed on the OP both sentences were changed to "advises" which is the 3rd person singular of the verb "to advise."
            – Mari-Lou A
            15 hours ago






            Your answer has "advice" yet in the edit you performed on the OP both sentences were changed to "advises" which is the 3rd person singular of the verb "to advise."
            – Mari-Lou A
            15 hours ago














            @Mari-LouA That was the automatic corrector I triggered by mistake.
            – kiamlaluno
            15 hours ago




            @Mari-LouA That was the automatic corrector I triggered by mistake.
            – kiamlaluno
            15 hours ago












            So the grammarchecker or the spellchecker corrected something that was correct in the first place? I'm talking about the first sentence.
            – Mari-Lou A
            15 hours ago






            So the grammarchecker or the spellchecker corrected something that was correct in the first place? I'm talking about the first sentence.
            – Mari-Lou A
            15 hours ago














            Yes, I didn't notice that word was changed.
            – kiamlaluno
            14 hours ago




            Yes, I didn't notice that word was changed.
            – kiamlaluno
            14 hours ago










            up vote
            1
            down vote














            Kosmonaut:I don't know where you are
            getting these ideas. "I told him that
            I would meet him in the city on
            Tuesday." — This is a past tense usage
            of will. "I couldn't watch my favorite
            show yesterday." — This is a past
            tense usage of can.




            These ideas come from long years of teaching ESL/EFL and from those same long years spent studying the English language. I simply made note that when students followed the rules they produced unnatural English. I made note when students said to me, "why are you saying, "we might [do something] tomorrow" when 'might' is the past tense of may and you're talking about tomorrow"?




            Kosmonaut: "I told him that I would meet him in
            the city on Tuesday." — This is a past
            tense usage of will.




            No, it isn't. I certainly agree with you that that's long been what people have been told, but it's simply not true. But I don't suspect that me telling you that, even twice, is going to convince you.



            I won't try to give you an example of 'would' as a past tense usage of 'will' because I can't. No English speaker can. It can't be done.



            The only part of your quote above that is past/finished is 'told'. I'm making the assumption for the purposes of my argument that we haven't yet come to Tuesday, so the event isn't finished, which is another great indicator that what 'would' is doing here is not describing a past time event which would, of course, then have to trigger a true past tense use.



            Another equally valid and grammatical response to what you suggest is 'would' as a "past tense usage of will", could be,



            2) I told him, "I will meet you in the city on Tuesday".



            Do you agree?



            Now, how would 'would' be the past tense of an action that has not yet occurred. Do we ever use a past tense for the purpose of describing an action that hasn't happened?



            Moreover, if it was a true past tense, why are we able to use 'will' in 2), above.



            In fact, why can we continue to use 'will' for all time, even when and if the action IS ever completed, to describe the direct quote? The reason for that is a simple one; the actions that we take with respect to direct versus indirect speech are done to mark them, not as past or present tense, but as direct [quoted accurately] or indirect [not quoted accurately].



            Think of all the times that we [newspapers, people] use these grammatical patterns and we never seek to find out if the action commented on has ever come to pass.



            Now, let's say that we have reached Tuesday, and the "I" has met the "you/him". We now have a completed action.



            Would any native speaker ever say in order to describe that that action of meeting has been completed,



            We would meet on Tuesday. ?



            [I'm referring to a usual past tense, not to 'would used in the past for a future'.]



            Why does 'would' fail when it comes time to the central purpose of past tense, describing a finished action?



            [I'm not ignoring you, Cerebus.]






            share|improve this answer





















            • Hi Dan, please try to keep your posts short and to the point. This site is different from a traditional forum. Answers should be reserved for actual answers. Comments should be replied to in comments. Lengthy discussions should be taken to chat.
              – RegDwigнt
              Apr 22 '11 at 22:16










            • @RegDwight: Is there no other venue here to discuss these issues, Reg?
              – Dan
              Apr 23 '11 at 4:53










            • (This seems to be a reply for comments left in the other answer.)
              – kiamlaluno
              23 hours ago















            up vote
            1
            down vote














            Kosmonaut:I don't know where you are
            getting these ideas. "I told him that
            I would meet him in the city on
            Tuesday." — This is a past tense usage
            of will. "I couldn't watch my favorite
            show yesterday." — This is a past
            tense usage of can.




            These ideas come from long years of teaching ESL/EFL and from those same long years spent studying the English language. I simply made note that when students followed the rules they produced unnatural English. I made note when students said to me, "why are you saying, "we might [do something] tomorrow" when 'might' is the past tense of may and you're talking about tomorrow"?




            Kosmonaut: "I told him that I would meet him in
            the city on Tuesday." — This is a past
            tense usage of will.




            No, it isn't. I certainly agree with you that that's long been what people have been told, but it's simply not true. But I don't suspect that me telling you that, even twice, is going to convince you.



            I won't try to give you an example of 'would' as a past tense usage of 'will' because I can't. No English speaker can. It can't be done.



            The only part of your quote above that is past/finished is 'told'. I'm making the assumption for the purposes of my argument that we haven't yet come to Tuesday, so the event isn't finished, which is another great indicator that what 'would' is doing here is not describing a past time event which would, of course, then have to trigger a true past tense use.



            Another equally valid and grammatical response to what you suggest is 'would' as a "past tense usage of will", could be,



            2) I told him, "I will meet you in the city on Tuesday".



            Do you agree?



            Now, how would 'would' be the past tense of an action that has not yet occurred. Do we ever use a past tense for the purpose of describing an action that hasn't happened?



            Moreover, if it was a true past tense, why are we able to use 'will' in 2), above.



            In fact, why can we continue to use 'will' for all time, even when and if the action IS ever completed, to describe the direct quote? The reason for that is a simple one; the actions that we take with respect to direct versus indirect speech are done to mark them, not as past or present tense, but as direct [quoted accurately] or indirect [not quoted accurately].



            Think of all the times that we [newspapers, people] use these grammatical patterns and we never seek to find out if the action commented on has ever come to pass.



            Now, let's say that we have reached Tuesday, and the "I" has met the "you/him". We now have a completed action.



            Would any native speaker ever say in order to describe that that action of meeting has been completed,



            We would meet on Tuesday. ?



            [I'm referring to a usual past tense, not to 'would used in the past for a future'.]



            Why does 'would' fail when it comes time to the central purpose of past tense, describing a finished action?



            [I'm not ignoring you, Cerebus.]






            share|improve this answer





















            • Hi Dan, please try to keep your posts short and to the point. This site is different from a traditional forum. Answers should be reserved for actual answers. Comments should be replied to in comments. Lengthy discussions should be taken to chat.
              – RegDwigнt
              Apr 22 '11 at 22:16










            • @RegDwight: Is there no other venue here to discuss these issues, Reg?
              – Dan
              Apr 23 '11 at 4:53










            • (This seems to be a reply for comments left in the other answer.)
              – kiamlaluno
              23 hours ago













            up vote
            1
            down vote










            up vote
            1
            down vote










            Kosmonaut:I don't know where you are
            getting these ideas. "I told him that
            I would meet him in the city on
            Tuesday." — This is a past tense usage
            of will. "I couldn't watch my favorite
            show yesterday." — This is a past
            tense usage of can.




            These ideas come from long years of teaching ESL/EFL and from those same long years spent studying the English language. I simply made note that when students followed the rules they produced unnatural English. I made note when students said to me, "why are you saying, "we might [do something] tomorrow" when 'might' is the past tense of may and you're talking about tomorrow"?




            Kosmonaut: "I told him that I would meet him in
            the city on Tuesday." — This is a past
            tense usage of will.




            No, it isn't. I certainly agree with you that that's long been what people have been told, but it's simply not true. But I don't suspect that me telling you that, even twice, is going to convince you.



            I won't try to give you an example of 'would' as a past tense usage of 'will' because I can't. No English speaker can. It can't be done.



            The only part of your quote above that is past/finished is 'told'. I'm making the assumption for the purposes of my argument that we haven't yet come to Tuesday, so the event isn't finished, which is another great indicator that what 'would' is doing here is not describing a past time event which would, of course, then have to trigger a true past tense use.



            Another equally valid and grammatical response to what you suggest is 'would' as a "past tense usage of will", could be,



            2) I told him, "I will meet you in the city on Tuesday".



            Do you agree?



            Now, how would 'would' be the past tense of an action that has not yet occurred. Do we ever use a past tense for the purpose of describing an action that hasn't happened?



            Moreover, if it was a true past tense, why are we able to use 'will' in 2), above.



            In fact, why can we continue to use 'will' for all time, even when and if the action IS ever completed, to describe the direct quote? The reason for that is a simple one; the actions that we take with respect to direct versus indirect speech are done to mark them, not as past or present tense, but as direct [quoted accurately] or indirect [not quoted accurately].



            Think of all the times that we [newspapers, people] use these grammatical patterns and we never seek to find out if the action commented on has ever come to pass.



            Now, let's say that we have reached Tuesday, and the "I" has met the "you/him". We now have a completed action.



            Would any native speaker ever say in order to describe that that action of meeting has been completed,



            We would meet on Tuesday. ?



            [I'm referring to a usual past tense, not to 'would used in the past for a future'.]



            Why does 'would' fail when it comes time to the central purpose of past tense, describing a finished action?



            [I'm not ignoring you, Cerebus.]






            share|improve this answer













            Kosmonaut:I don't know where you are
            getting these ideas. "I told him that
            I would meet him in the city on
            Tuesday." — This is a past tense usage
            of will. "I couldn't watch my favorite
            show yesterday." — This is a past
            tense usage of can.




            These ideas come from long years of teaching ESL/EFL and from those same long years spent studying the English language. I simply made note that when students followed the rules they produced unnatural English. I made note when students said to me, "why are you saying, "we might [do something] tomorrow" when 'might' is the past tense of may and you're talking about tomorrow"?




            Kosmonaut: "I told him that I would meet him in
            the city on Tuesday." — This is a past
            tense usage of will.




            No, it isn't. I certainly agree with you that that's long been what people have been told, but it's simply not true. But I don't suspect that me telling you that, even twice, is going to convince you.



            I won't try to give you an example of 'would' as a past tense usage of 'will' because I can't. No English speaker can. It can't be done.



            The only part of your quote above that is past/finished is 'told'. I'm making the assumption for the purposes of my argument that we haven't yet come to Tuesday, so the event isn't finished, which is another great indicator that what 'would' is doing here is not describing a past time event which would, of course, then have to trigger a true past tense use.



            Another equally valid and grammatical response to what you suggest is 'would' as a "past tense usage of will", could be,



            2) I told him, "I will meet you in the city on Tuesday".



            Do you agree?



            Now, how would 'would' be the past tense of an action that has not yet occurred. Do we ever use a past tense for the purpose of describing an action that hasn't happened?



            Moreover, if it was a true past tense, why are we able to use 'will' in 2), above.



            In fact, why can we continue to use 'will' for all time, even when and if the action IS ever completed, to describe the direct quote? The reason for that is a simple one; the actions that we take with respect to direct versus indirect speech are done to mark them, not as past or present tense, but as direct [quoted accurately] or indirect [not quoted accurately].



            Think of all the times that we [newspapers, people] use these grammatical patterns and we never seek to find out if the action commented on has ever come to pass.



            Now, let's say that we have reached Tuesday, and the "I" has met the "you/him". We now have a completed action.



            Would any native speaker ever say in order to describe that that action of meeting has been completed,



            We would meet on Tuesday. ?



            [I'm referring to a usual past tense, not to 'would used in the past for a future'.]



            Why does 'would' fail when it comes time to the central purpose of past tense, describing a finished action?



            [I'm not ignoring you, Cerebus.]







            share|improve this answer












            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer










            answered Apr 22 '11 at 20:58









            Dan

            74654




            74654












            • Hi Dan, please try to keep your posts short and to the point. This site is different from a traditional forum. Answers should be reserved for actual answers. Comments should be replied to in comments. Lengthy discussions should be taken to chat.
              – RegDwigнt
              Apr 22 '11 at 22:16










            • @RegDwight: Is there no other venue here to discuss these issues, Reg?
              – Dan
              Apr 23 '11 at 4:53










            • (This seems to be a reply for comments left in the other answer.)
              – kiamlaluno
              23 hours ago


















            • Hi Dan, please try to keep your posts short and to the point. This site is different from a traditional forum. Answers should be reserved for actual answers. Comments should be replied to in comments. Lengthy discussions should be taken to chat.
              – RegDwigнt
              Apr 22 '11 at 22:16










            • @RegDwight: Is there no other venue here to discuss these issues, Reg?
              – Dan
              Apr 23 '11 at 4:53










            • (This seems to be a reply for comments left in the other answer.)
              – kiamlaluno
              23 hours ago
















            Hi Dan, please try to keep your posts short and to the point. This site is different from a traditional forum. Answers should be reserved for actual answers. Comments should be replied to in comments. Lengthy discussions should be taken to chat.
            – RegDwigнt
            Apr 22 '11 at 22:16




            Hi Dan, please try to keep your posts short and to the point. This site is different from a traditional forum. Answers should be reserved for actual answers. Comments should be replied to in comments. Lengthy discussions should be taken to chat.
            – RegDwigнt
            Apr 22 '11 at 22:16












            @RegDwight: Is there no other venue here to discuss these issues, Reg?
            – Dan
            Apr 23 '11 at 4:53




            @RegDwight: Is there no other venue here to discuss these issues, Reg?
            – Dan
            Apr 23 '11 at 4:53












            (This seems to be a reply for comments left in the other answer.)
            – kiamlaluno
            23 hours ago




            (This seems to be a reply for comments left in the other answer.)
            – kiamlaluno
            23 hours ago










            up vote
            -2
            down vote














            Yes, How could i know the 'would' is
            used as an modal auxiliary or just the
            past tense form of the 'will'?




            There is a very easy way to tell. Modal verbs have no tense. In modern English, all modal verbs are tenseless. There are no past tense forms or present tense forms. In older forms of English, modals did have tense, so we can accurately refer to modern modals as "historical past tense forms" or "historical present tense forms".



            It's easy to prove this because no one can make a sentence in English where any one of the purported past tense modals acts as a real past tense.



            Where modals seem like they are being used as a past tense, in reporting speech, they aren't really acting as past tense. They are simply being used the same as the past tense FORM of lexical verbs in a process called backshifting, to signal that the speech is not direct/quoted but rather it is indirect/reported.



            The difference between "Would you give me some advice?" and "Will you give me some advice?"
            is only one of level of politeness/deference. As the historical past tense forms, in their epistemic [level of certainty] meanings show a greater sense of doubt/certainty, that same doubt/uncertainty carries over to modal deontic [social] meaning so they are considered more polite/more deferential/softer/less direct.






            share|improve this answer

















            • 6




              I don't know where you are getting these ideas. "I told him that I would meet him in the city on Tuesday." — This is a past tense usage of will. "I couldn't watch my favorite show yesterday." — This is a past tense usage of can.
              – Kosmonaut
              Apr 19 '11 at 23:25












            • "They are simply being used the same as the past tense FORM of lexical verbs in a process called backshifting, to signal that the speech is not direct/quoted but rather it is indirect/reported." — Then why do we say I am telling her that he will never leave his wife? It is indirect speech, and yet I see "will", not "would". Transposing this sentence to the past may give "would": I was telling her that he would never leave his wife. Of course it turned out I was right.
              – Cerberus
              Apr 20 '11 at 0:01

















            up vote
            -2
            down vote














            Yes, How could i know the 'would' is
            used as an modal auxiliary or just the
            past tense form of the 'will'?




            There is a very easy way to tell. Modal verbs have no tense. In modern English, all modal verbs are tenseless. There are no past tense forms or present tense forms. In older forms of English, modals did have tense, so we can accurately refer to modern modals as "historical past tense forms" or "historical present tense forms".



            It's easy to prove this because no one can make a sentence in English where any one of the purported past tense modals acts as a real past tense.



            Where modals seem like they are being used as a past tense, in reporting speech, they aren't really acting as past tense. They are simply being used the same as the past tense FORM of lexical verbs in a process called backshifting, to signal that the speech is not direct/quoted but rather it is indirect/reported.



            The difference between "Would you give me some advice?" and "Will you give me some advice?"
            is only one of level of politeness/deference. As the historical past tense forms, in their epistemic [level of certainty] meanings show a greater sense of doubt/certainty, that same doubt/uncertainty carries over to modal deontic [social] meaning so they are considered more polite/more deferential/softer/less direct.






            share|improve this answer

















            • 6




              I don't know where you are getting these ideas. "I told him that I would meet him in the city on Tuesday." — This is a past tense usage of will. "I couldn't watch my favorite show yesterday." — This is a past tense usage of can.
              – Kosmonaut
              Apr 19 '11 at 23:25












            • "They are simply being used the same as the past tense FORM of lexical verbs in a process called backshifting, to signal that the speech is not direct/quoted but rather it is indirect/reported." — Then why do we say I am telling her that he will never leave his wife? It is indirect speech, and yet I see "will", not "would". Transposing this sentence to the past may give "would": I was telling her that he would never leave his wife. Of course it turned out I was right.
              – Cerberus
              Apr 20 '11 at 0:01















            up vote
            -2
            down vote










            up vote
            -2
            down vote










            Yes, How could i know the 'would' is
            used as an modal auxiliary or just the
            past tense form of the 'will'?




            There is a very easy way to tell. Modal verbs have no tense. In modern English, all modal verbs are tenseless. There are no past tense forms or present tense forms. In older forms of English, modals did have tense, so we can accurately refer to modern modals as "historical past tense forms" or "historical present tense forms".



            It's easy to prove this because no one can make a sentence in English where any one of the purported past tense modals acts as a real past tense.



            Where modals seem like they are being used as a past tense, in reporting speech, they aren't really acting as past tense. They are simply being used the same as the past tense FORM of lexical verbs in a process called backshifting, to signal that the speech is not direct/quoted but rather it is indirect/reported.



            The difference between "Would you give me some advice?" and "Will you give me some advice?"
            is only one of level of politeness/deference. As the historical past tense forms, in their epistemic [level of certainty] meanings show a greater sense of doubt/certainty, that same doubt/uncertainty carries over to modal deontic [social] meaning so they are considered more polite/more deferential/softer/less direct.






            share|improve this answer













            Yes, How could i know the 'would' is
            used as an modal auxiliary or just the
            past tense form of the 'will'?




            There is a very easy way to tell. Modal verbs have no tense. In modern English, all modal verbs are tenseless. There are no past tense forms or present tense forms. In older forms of English, modals did have tense, so we can accurately refer to modern modals as "historical past tense forms" or "historical present tense forms".



            It's easy to prove this because no one can make a sentence in English where any one of the purported past tense modals acts as a real past tense.



            Where modals seem like they are being used as a past tense, in reporting speech, they aren't really acting as past tense. They are simply being used the same as the past tense FORM of lexical verbs in a process called backshifting, to signal that the speech is not direct/quoted but rather it is indirect/reported.



            The difference between "Would you give me some advice?" and "Will you give me some advice?"
            is only one of level of politeness/deference. As the historical past tense forms, in their epistemic [level of certainty] meanings show a greater sense of doubt/certainty, that same doubt/uncertainty carries over to modal deontic [social] meaning so they are considered more polite/more deferential/softer/less direct.







            share|improve this answer












            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer










            answered Apr 17 '11 at 5:25









            Dan

            74654




            74654








            • 6




              I don't know where you are getting these ideas. "I told him that I would meet him in the city on Tuesday." — This is a past tense usage of will. "I couldn't watch my favorite show yesterday." — This is a past tense usage of can.
              – Kosmonaut
              Apr 19 '11 at 23:25












            • "They are simply being used the same as the past tense FORM of lexical verbs in a process called backshifting, to signal that the speech is not direct/quoted but rather it is indirect/reported." — Then why do we say I am telling her that he will never leave his wife? It is indirect speech, and yet I see "will", not "would". Transposing this sentence to the past may give "would": I was telling her that he would never leave his wife. Of course it turned out I was right.
              – Cerberus
              Apr 20 '11 at 0:01
















            • 6




              I don't know where you are getting these ideas. "I told him that I would meet him in the city on Tuesday." — This is a past tense usage of will. "I couldn't watch my favorite show yesterday." — This is a past tense usage of can.
              – Kosmonaut
              Apr 19 '11 at 23:25












            • "They are simply being used the same as the past tense FORM of lexical verbs in a process called backshifting, to signal that the speech is not direct/quoted but rather it is indirect/reported." — Then why do we say I am telling her that he will never leave his wife? It is indirect speech, and yet I see "will", not "would". Transposing this sentence to the past may give "would": I was telling her that he would never leave his wife. Of course it turned out I was right.
              – Cerberus
              Apr 20 '11 at 0:01










            6




            6




            I don't know where you are getting these ideas. "I told him that I would meet him in the city on Tuesday." — This is a past tense usage of will. "I couldn't watch my favorite show yesterday." — This is a past tense usage of can.
            – Kosmonaut
            Apr 19 '11 at 23:25






            I don't know where you are getting these ideas. "I told him that I would meet him in the city on Tuesday." — This is a past tense usage of will. "I couldn't watch my favorite show yesterday." — This is a past tense usage of can.
            – Kosmonaut
            Apr 19 '11 at 23:25














            "They are simply being used the same as the past tense FORM of lexical verbs in a process called backshifting, to signal that the speech is not direct/quoted but rather it is indirect/reported." — Then why do we say I am telling her that he will never leave his wife? It is indirect speech, and yet I see "will", not "would". Transposing this sentence to the past may give "would": I was telling her that he would never leave his wife. Of course it turned out I was right.
            – Cerberus
            Apr 20 '11 at 0:01






            "They are simply being used the same as the past tense FORM of lexical verbs in a process called backshifting, to signal that the speech is not direct/quoted but rather it is indirect/reported." — Then why do we say I am telling her that he will never leave his wife? It is indirect speech, and yet I see "will", not "would". Transposing this sentence to the past may give "would": I was telling her that he would never leave his wife. Of course it turned out I was right.
            – Cerberus
            Apr 20 '11 at 0:01







            protected by tchrist Feb 22 '15 at 0:15



            Thank you for your interest in this question.
            Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).



            Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?



            Popular posts from this blog

            數位音樂下載

            When can things happen in Etherscan, such as the picture below?

            格利澤436b