Can I omit the comma in the sentence “This prompted many to go by road, where they were harder to track.”





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}






up vote
0
down vote

favorite












And Can I omit the comma in another sentence below?




  • It is not yet clear how well ring vaccination will contain the early stages of an outbreak, when chains of transmission are less certain.

  • This prompted many to go by road, where they were harder to track.


The sentences are compound ones with two independent simple sentences respectively. I interpret them as adjective clause, and they all do not lack the subject and object, therefor using relative adverb to complement the sentenc. What make me confuced exactly is the comma, does it have something to do with the word "track"? Actually, I have no idea whether I can omit the commas in this kind of sentence with "where" and "when".










share|improve this question
























  • I edited the question to replace the markup for bold (**) with its HTML code (<b>text</b>). Using markup around punctuation doesn't produce the intended result. (But note that you can't use HTML in comments, only in actual posts.) If you actually had intended to show two asterisks, accept my apologies and feel free to roll back my change.
    – Jason Bassford
    54 mins ago












  • With the comma, the sentence means this prompted many to go by road—a place that made them harder to track. Without the comma, the sentence means this prompted many to go by road because it was a place that made them harder to track. (Not exactly, but essentially.)
    – Jason Bassford
    47 mins ago










  • @JasonBassford Thank you. I want to make the word bold, but I fail to do it. What you did is the result I pursue.
    – cenwun
    45 mins ago












  • @JasonBassford The sentences are compound ones with two independent simple sentences respectively. I interpret them as adjective clause, and they all do not lack the subject and object, therefor using relative adverb to complement the sentenc. What make me confuced exactly is the comma, does it have something to do with the word "track"?
    – cenwun
    29 mins ago










  • The use of the comma indicates a dependent clause—or nonrestrictive additional information. It's not related to any of the particular words used.
    – Jason Bassford
    26 mins ago

















up vote
0
down vote

favorite












And Can I omit the comma in another sentence below?




  • It is not yet clear how well ring vaccination will contain the early stages of an outbreak, when chains of transmission are less certain.

  • This prompted many to go by road, where they were harder to track.


The sentences are compound ones with two independent simple sentences respectively. I interpret them as adjective clause, and they all do not lack the subject and object, therefor using relative adverb to complement the sentenc. What make me confuced exactly is the comma, does it have something to do with the word "track"? Actually, I have no idea whether I can omit the commas in this kind of sentence with "where" and "when".










share|improve this question
























  • I edited the question to replace the markup for bold (**) with its HTML code (<b>text</b>). Using markup around punctuation doesn't produce the intended result. (But note that you can't use HTML in comments, only in actual posts.) If you actually had intended to show two asterisks, accept my apologies and feel free to roll back my change.
    – Jason Bassford
    54 mins ago












  • With the comma, the sentence means this prompted many to go by road—a place that made them harder to track. Without the comma, the sentence means this prompted many to go by road because it was a place that made them harder to track. (Not exactly, but essentially.)
    – Jason Bassford
    47 mins ago










  • @JasonBassford Thank you. I want to make the word bold, but I fail to do it. What you did is the result I pursue.
    – cenwun
    45 mins ago












  • @JasonBassford The sentences are compound ones with two independent simple sentences respectively. I interpret them as adjective clause, and they all do not lack the subject and object, therefor using relative adverb to complement the sentenc. What make me confuced exactly is the comma, does it have something to do with the word "track"?
    – cenwun
    29 mins ago










  • The use of the comma indicates a dependent clause—or nonrestrictive additional information. It's not related to any of the particular words used.
    – Jason Bassford
    26 mins ago













up vote
0
down vote

favorite









up vote
0
down vote

favorite











And Can I omit the comma in another sentence below?




  • It is not yet clear how well ring vaccination will contain the early stages of an outbreak, when chains of transmission are less certain.

  • This prompted many to go by road, where they were harder to track.


The sentences are compound ones with two independent simple sentences respectively. I interpret them as adjective clause, and they all do not lack the subject and object, therefor using relative adverb to complement the sentenc. What make me confuced exactly is the comma, does it have something to do with the word "track"? Actually, I have no idea whether I can omit the commas in this kind of sentence with "where" and "when".










share|improve this question















And Can I omit the comma in another sentence below?




  • It is not yet clear how well ring vaccination will contain the early stages of an outbreak, when chains of transmission are less certain.

  • This prompted many to go by road, where they were harder to track.


The sentences are compound ones with two independent simple sentences respectively. I interpret them as adjective clause, and they all do not lack the subject and object, therefor using relative adverb to complement the sentenc. What make me confuced exactly is the comma, does it have something to do with the word "track"? Actually, I have no idea whether I can omit the commas in this kind of sentence with "where" and "when".







commas compound-adjectives compound-sentences






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 28 mins ago

























asked 1 hour ago









cenwun

695




695












  • I edited the question to replace the markup for bold (**) with its HTML code (<b>text</b>). Using markup around punctuation doesn't produce the intended result. (But note that you can't use HTML in comments, only in actual posts.) If you actually had intended to show two asterisks, accept my apologies and feel free to roll back my change.
    – Jason Bassford
    54 mins ago












  • With the comma, the sentence means this prompted many to go by road—a place that made them harder to track. Without the comma, the sentence means this prompted many to go by road because it was a place that made them harder to track. (Not exactly, but essentially.)
    – Jason Bassford
    47 mins ago










  • @JasonBassford Thank you. I want to make the word bold, but I fail to do it. What you did is the result I pursue.
    – cenwun
    45 mins ago












  • @JasonBassford The sentences are compound ones with two independent simple sentences respectively. I interpret them as adjective clause, and they all do not lack the subject and object, therefor using relative adverb to complement the sentenc. What make me confuced exactly is the comma, does it have something to do with the word "track"?
    – cenwun
    29 mins ago










  • The use of the comma indicates a dependent clause—or nonrestrictive additional information. It's not related to any of the particular words used.
    – Jason Bassford
    26 mins ago


















  • I edited the question to replace the markup for bold (**) with its HTML code (<b>text</b>). Using markup around punctuation doesn't produce the intended result. (But note that you can't use HTML in comments, only in actual posts.) If you actually had intended to show two asterisks, accept my apologies and feel free to roll back my change.
    – Jason Bassford
    54 mins ago












  • With the comma, the sentence means this prompted many to go by road—a place that made them harder to track. Without the comma, the sentence means this prompted many to go by road because it was a place that made them harder to track. (Not exactly, but essentially.)
    – Jason Bassford
    47 mins ago










  • @JasonBassford Thank you. I want to make the word bold, but I fail to do it. What you did is the result I pursue.
    – cenwun
    45 mins ago












  • @JasonBassford The sentences are compound ones with two independent simple sentences respectively. I interpret them as adjective clause, and they all do not lack the subject and object, therefor using relative adverb to complement the sentenc. What make me confuced exactly is the comma, does it have something to do with the word "track"?
    – cenwun
    29 mins ago










  • The use of the comma indicates a dependent clause—or nonrestrictive additional information. It's not related to any of the particular words used.
    – Jason Bassford
    26 mins ago
















I edited the question to replace the markup for bold (**) with its HTML code (<b>text</b>). Using markup around punctuation doesn't produce the intended result. (But note that you can't use HTML in comments, only in actual posts.) If you actually had intended to show two asterisks, accept my apologies and feel free to roll back my change.
– Jason Bassford
54 mins ago






I edited the question to replace the markup for bold (**) with its HTML code (<b>text</b>). Using markup around punctuation doesn't produce the intended result. (But note that you can't use HTML in comments, only in actual posts.) If you actually had intended to show two asterisks, accept my apologies and feel free to roll back my change.
– Jason Bassford
54 mins ago














With the comma, the sentence means this prompted many to go by road—a place that made them harder to track. Without the comma, the sentence means this prompted many to go by road because it was a place that made them harder to track. (Not exactly, but essentially.)
– Jason Bassford
47 mins ago




With the comma, the sentence means this prompted many to go by road—a place that made them harder to track. Without the comma, the sentence means this prompted many to go by road because it was a place that made them harder to track. (Not exactly, but essentially.)
– Jason Bassford
47 mins ago












@JasonBassford Thank you. I want to make the word bold, but I fail to do it. What you did is the result I pursue.
– cenwun
45 mins ago






@JasonBassford Thank you. I want to make the word bold, but I fail to do it. What you did is the result I pursue.
– cenwun
45 mins ago














@JasonBassford The sentences are compound ones with two independent simple sentences respectively. I interpret them as adjective clause, and they all do not lack the subject and object, therefor using relative adverb to complement the sentenc. What make me confuced exactly is the comma, does it have something to do with the word "track"?
– cenwun
29 mins ago




@JasonBassford The sentences are compound ones with two independent simple sentences respectively. I interpret them as adjective clause, and they all do not lack the subject and object, therefor using relative adverb to complement the sentenc. What make me confuced exactly is the comma, does it have something to do with the word "track"?
– cenwun
29 mins ago












The use of the comma indicates a dependent clause—or nonrestrictive additional information. It's not related to any of the particular words used.
– Jason Bassford
26 mins ago




The use of the comma indicates a dependent clause—or nonrestrictive additional information. It's not related to any of the particular words used.
– Jason Bassford
26 mins ago















active

oldest

votes











Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "97"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f475931%2fcan-i-omit-the-comma-in-the-sentence-this-prompted-many-to-go-by-road-where-th%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown






























active

oldest

votes













active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language & Usage Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f475931%2fcan-i-omit-the-comma-in-the-sentence-this-prompted-many-to-go-by-road-where-th%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

How did Captain America manage to do this?

迪纳利

南乌拉尔铁路局