Is it ever correct to use “on” after “continue”?
Is it ever grammatically correct to use the word "on" after the word "continue"?
as in:
"After this break, we will continue on with the broadcast."
grammaticality prepositions phrasal-verbs
edited yesterday
JJJ
6,21392646
asked yesterday
JimJim
161
New contributor
Jim is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
Is it ever grammatically correct to use the word "on" after the word "continue"?
as in:
"After this break, we will continue on with the broadcast."
grammaticality prepositions phrasal-verbs
edited yesterday
JJJ
6,21392646
asked yesterday
JimJim
161
New contributor
Jim is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
1
Yes, it is sometimes correct. The line you quote seems syntactically valid and reasonably idiomatic.
– Hot Licks
yesterday
You could just say “continue the broadcast”, and there’s a case to be made for stripping out unnecessary verbal scaffolding. But in spoken English, with no explicit punctuation, adding in redundant connecting words often makes sentences clearer.
– bobtato
yesterday
add a comment |
Is it ever grammatically correct to use the word "on" after the word "continue"?
as in:
"After this break, we will continue on with the broadcast."
grammaticality prepositions phrasal-verbs
edited yesterday
JJJ
6,21392646
asked yesterday
JimJim
161
New contributor
Jim is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Is it ever grammatically correct to use the word "on" after the word "continue"?
as in:
"After this break, we will continue on with the broadcast."
grammaticality prepositions phrasal-verbs
grammaticality prepositions phrasal-verbs
edited yesterday
JJJ
6,21392646
asked yesterday
JimJim
161
New contributor
Jim is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
edited yesterday
JJJ
6,21392646
asked yesterday
JimJim
161
New contributor
Jim is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
edited yesterday
JJJ
6,21392646
edited yesterday
JJJ
6,21392646
edited yesterday
JJJ
6,21392646
6,21392646
asked yesterday
JimJim
161
New contributor
Jim is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked yesterday
JimJim
161
asked yesterday
JimJim
161
161
New contributor
Jim is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Jim is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Jim is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
1
Yes, it is sometimes correct. The line you quote seems syntactically valid and reasonably idiomatic.
– Hot Licks
yesterday
You could just say “continue the broadcast”, and there’s a case to be made for stripping out unnecessary verbal scaffolding. But in spoken English, with no explicit punctuation, adding in redundant connecting words often makes sentences clearer.
– bobtato
yesterday
add a comment |
1
Yes, it is sometimes correct. The line you quote seems syntactically valid and reasonably idiomatic.
– Hot Licks
yesterday
You could just say “continue the broadcast”, and there’s a case to be made for stripping out unnecessary verbal scaffolding. But in spoken English, with no explicit punctuation, adding in redundant connecting words often makes sentences clearer.
– bobtato
yesterday
1
1
Yes, it is sometimes correct. The line you quote seems syntactically valid and reasonably idiomatic.
– Hot Licks
yesterday
Yes, it is sometimes correct. The line you quote seems syntactically valid and reasonably idiomatic.
– Hot Licks
yesterday
You could just say “continue the broadcast”, and there’s a case to be made for stripping out unnecessary verbal scaffolding. But in spoken English, with no explicit punctuation, adding in redundant connecting words often makes sentences clearer.
– bobtato
yesterday
You could just say “continue the broadcast”, and there’s a case to be made for stripping out unnecessary verbal scaffolding. But in spoken English, with no explicit punctuation, adding in redundant connecting words often makes sentences clearer.
– bobtato
yesterday
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
Though, to many, it is idiomatically redundant, it is not incorrect.
Here is a corroborating source:
https://www.dailywritingtips.com/continue-and-continue-on/
answered yesterday
user1949723user1949723
11
New contributor
user1949723 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
You mean it's redundant to continue on and on and on about something?
– Hot Licks
yesterday
add a comment |
It is certainly OK. There are many other examples of this kind of construction (see below). The word "on" is an adverbial particle and in this case and others remains fixed; it cannot move. For example it wouldn't be OK to say "After this break we will continue with the broadcast on." In many cases, the particle can move, as in "Please, take off your shoes," or "Please, take your shoes off."
Here are two examples similar to yours:
I hope she moves on with her life
We need to continue on with the mission.
After he caught his breath, he continued on with the race.
Your question asks about "continue" and whether or not it can be paired with "on." This is a matter of taste and a person's ideas about the verb continue. In my opinion "on" can be. This page had numerous examples which seemed fine to me. Can you leave out "on?" Sure. Adverbial particles give extra information about the verb. For example "up" indicates a completion of something: "finish up," "zip up," mess up," and "pack up." "On" as a particle indicates many things. In your example, it indicates the furtherance of an activity and helps the verb "continue" which means to keep doing something.
If you'd like to learn more, this is an article to explore.
answered yesterday
michael_timofeevmichael_timofeev
5,66542147
Just a quibble about continuing "with the broadcast on" - it's fine if what's being continued isn't the broadcast. You could continue a painting lesson with the broadcast on or off, for example.
– Lawrence
yesterday
1
@Lawrence Yes, but the words "on" or "off" in your example have a different function...they're not adverbial particles, but adjective adjuncts.
– michael_timofeev
yesterday
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "97"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Jim is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f490821%2fis-it-ever-correct-to-use-on-after-continue%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Though, to many, it is idiomatically redundant, it is not incorrect.
Here is a corroborating source:
https://www.dailywritingtips.com/continue-and-continue-on/
answered yesterday
user1949723user1949723
11
New contributor
user1949723 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
You mean it's redundant to continue on and on and on about something?
– Hot Licks
yesterday
add a comment |
Though, to many, it is idiomatically redundant, it is not incorrect.
Here is a corroborating source:
https://www.dailywritingtips.com/continue-and-continue-on/
answered yesterday
user1949723user1949723
11
New contributor
user1949723 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
You mean it's redundant to continue on and on and on about something?
– Hot Licks
yesterday
add a comment |
Though, to many, it is idiomatically redundant, it is not incorrect.
Here is a corroborating source:
https://www.dailywritingtips.com/continue-and-continue-on/
answered yesterday
user1949723user1949723
11
New contributor
user1949723 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Though, to many, it is idiomatically redundant, it is not incorrect.
Here is a corroborating source:
https://www.dailywritingtips.com/continue-and-continue-on/
answered yesterday
user1949723user1949723
11
New contributor
user1949723 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
answered yesterday
user1949723user1949723
11
New contributor
user1949723 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
answered yesterday
user1949723user1949723
11
answered yesterday
user1949723user1949723
11
11
New contributor
user1949723 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
user1949723 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
user1949723 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
You mean it's redundant to continue on and on and on about something?
– Hot Licks
yesterday
add a comment |
You mean it's redundant to continue on and on and on about something?
– Hot Licks
yesterday
You mean it's redundant to continue on and on and on about something?
– Hot Licks
yesterday
You mean it's redundant to continue on and on and on about something?
– Hot Licks
yesterday
add a comment |
It is certainly OK. There are many other examples of this kind of construction (see below). The word "on" is an adverbial particle and in this case and others remains fixed; it cannot move. For example it wouldn't be OK to say "After this break we will continue with the broadcast on." In many cases, the particle can move, as in "Please, take off your shoes," or "Please, take your shoes off."
Here are two examples similar to yours:
I hope she moves on with her life
We need to continue on with the mission.
After he caught his breath, he continued on with the race.
Your question asks about "continue" and whether or not it can be paired with "on." This is a matter of taste and a person's ideas about the verb continue. In my opinion "on" can be. This page had numerous examples which seemed fine to me. Can you leave out "on?" Sure. Adverbial particles give extra information about the verb. For example "up" indicates a completion of something: "finish up," "zip up," mess up," and "pack up." "On" as a particle indicates many things. In your example, it indicates the furtherance of an activity and helps the verb "continue" which means to keep doing something.
If you'd like to learn more, this is an article to explore.
answered yesterday
michael_timofeevmichael_timofeev
5,66542147
Just a quibble about continuing "with the broadcast on" - it's fine if what's being continued isn't the broadcast. You could continue a painting lesson with the broadcast on or off, for example.
– Lawrence
yesterday
1
@Lawrence Yes, but the words "on" or "off" in your example have a different function...they're not adverbial particles, but adjective adjuncts.
– michael_timofeev
yesterday
add a comment |
It is certainly OK. There are many other examples of this kind of construction (see below). The word "on" is an adverbial particle and in this case and others remains fixed; it cannot move. For example it wouldn't be OK to say "After this break we will continue with the broadcast on." In many cases, the particle can move, as in "Please, take off your shoes," or "Please, take your shoes off."
Here are two examples similar to yours:
I hope she moves on with her life
We need to continue on with the mission.
After he caught his breath, he continued on with the race.
Your question asks about "continue" and whether or not it can be paired with "on." This is a matter of taste and a person's ideas about the verb continue. In my opinion "on" can be. This page had numerous examples which seemed fine to me. Can you leave out "on?" Sure. Adverbial particles give extra information about the verb. For example "up" indicates a completion of something: "finish up," "zip up," mess up," and "pack up." "On" as a particle indicates many things. In your example, it indicates the furtherance of an activity and helps the verb "continue" which means to keep doing something.
If you'd like to learn more, this is an article to explore.
answered yesterday
michael_timofeevmichael_timofeev
5,66542147
Just a quibble about continuing "with the broadcast on" - it's fine if what's being continued isn't the broadcast. You could continue a painting lesson with the broadcast on or off, for example.
– Lawrence
yesterday
1
@Lawrence Yes, but the words "on" or "off" in your example have a different function...they're not adverbial particles, but adjective adjuncts.
– michael_timofeev
yesterday
add a comment |
It is certainly OK. There are many other examples of this kind of construction (see below). The word "on" is an adverbial particle and in this case and others remains fixed; it cannot move. For example it wouldn't be OK to say "After this break we will continue with the broadcast on." In many cases, the particle can move, as in "Please, take off your shoes," or "Please, take your shoes off."
Here are two examples similar to yours:
I hope she moves on with her life
We need to continue on with the mission.
After he caught his breath, he continued on with the race.
Your question asks about "continue" and whether or not it can be paired with "on." This is a matter of taste and a person's ideas about the verb continue. In my opinion "on" can be. This page had numerous examples which seemed fine to me. Can you leave out "on?" Sure. Adverbial particles give extra information about the verb. For example "up" indicates a completion of something: "finish up," "zip up," mess up," and "pack up." "On" as a particle indicates many things. In your example, it indicates the furtherance of an activity and helps the verb "continue" which means to keep doing something.
If you'd like to learn more, this is an article to explore.
answered yesterday
michael_timofeevmichael_timofeev
5,66542147
It is certainly OK. There are many other examples of this kind of construction (see below). The word "on" is an adverbial particle and in this case and others remains fixed; it cannot move. For example it wouldn't be OK to say "After this break we will continue with the broadcast on." In many cases, the particle can move, as in "Please, take off your shoes," or "Please, take your shoes off."
Here are two examples similar to yours:
I hope she moves on with her life
We need to continue on with the mission.
After he caught his breath, he continued on with the race.
Your question asks about "continue" and whether or not it can be paired with "on." This is a matter of taste and a person's ideas about the verb continue. In my opinion "on" can be. This page had numerous examples which seemed fine to me. Can you leave out "on?" Sure. Adverbial particles give extra information about the verb. For example "up" indicates a completion of something: "finish up," "zip up," mess up," and "pack up." "On" as a particle indicates many things. In your example, it indicates the furtherance of an activity and helps the verb "continue" which means to keep doing something.
If you'd like to learn more, this is an article to explore.
answered yesterday
michael_timofeevmichael_timofeev
5,66542147
edited yesterday
answered yesterday
michael_timofeevmichael_timofeev
5,66542147
answered yesterday
michael_timofeevmichael_timofeev
5,66542147
answered yesterday
michael_timofeevmichael_timofeev
5,66542147
5,66542147
Just a quibble about continuing "with the broadcast on" - it's fine if what's being continued isn't the broadcast. You could continue a painting lesson with the broadcast on or off, for example.
– Lawrence
yesterday
1
@Lawrence Yes, but the words "on" or "off" in your example have a different function...they're not adverbial particles, but adjective adjuncts.
– michael_timofeev
yesterday
add a comment |
Just a quibble about continuing "with the broadcast on" - it's fine if what's being continued isn't the broadcast. You could continue a painting lesson with the broadcast on or off, for example.
– Lawrence
yesterday
1
@Lawrence Yes, but the words "on" or "off" in your example have a different function...they're not adverbial particles, but adjective adjuncts.
– michael_timofeev
yesterday
Just a quibble about continuing "with the broadcast on" - it's fine if what's being continued isn't the broadcast. You could continue a painting lesson with the broadcast on or off, for example.
– Lawrence
yesterday
Just a quibble about continuing "with the broadcast on" - it's fine if what's being continued isn't the broadcast. You could continue a painting lesson with the broadcast on or off, for example.
– Lawrence
yesterday
1
1
@Lawrence Yes, but the words "on" or "off" in your example have a different function...they're not adverbial particles, but adjective adjuncts.
– michael_timofeev
yesterday
@Lawrence Yes, but the words "on" or "off" in your example have a different function...they're not adverbial particles, but adjective adjuncts.
– michael_timofeev
yesterday
add a comment |
Jim is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Jim is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Jim is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Jim is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language & Usage Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f490821%2fis-it-ever-correct-to-use-on-after-continue%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
Yes, it is sometimes correct. The line you quote seems syntactically valid and reasonably idiomatic.
– Hot Licks
yesterday
You could just say “continue the broadcast”, and there’s a case to be made for stripping out unnecessary verbal scaffolding. But in spoken English, with no explicit punctuation, adding in redundant connecting words often makes sentences clearer.
– bobtato
yesterday