Cfxtrjtrk

Please consider the following sentences:

Jane Smith has said her son cries when she comes back home.

Jane Smith said her son cries when she comes back home.

Dave Bloggs has told me what we can expect of the show.

Dave Bloggs told me what we can expect of the show.

Now I'm aware of backshift and that you don't have to do so if what has been said is still relevant or refers to a future event.

So does it matter if I use has said/said in each case? Is it just a matter of me deciding whether I want to distance the reader in each case, or is there a more concrete rule? Basically, is using has said/said an option and it's up to the writer which one they want to use?

Would be great if someone could clarify this.

Thanks

(I'm probably thinking in the context of journalism here.) I don't know of any concrete rule. To me, "has said", with its implied connection to the present and/or future (as you mentioned), suggests that Jane Smith could say again (especially "on the record") that her son cries. Or it might even suggest that her statement could change in the future. Consider the following:

• Jane Smith said her son cries when she comes back home. The son, named John[...] [The next sentence doesn't have a strong connection.]




• Jane Smith has said her son cries when she comes back home, so we expect that it will happen again tomorrow.




• Jane Smith has said her son cries when she comes back home, but it remains to be seen whether this will happen again tomorrow.

Perhaps it comes down to how much prediction you're trying to do, or perhaps I'm trying too hard to make a distinction.

A lot depends on the specific context, but, roughly speaking, "has said" implies at some unspecified time in the past, while "said" refers to a specific occurrence. For instance:

I ran into Steve yesterday and he said that he just got back from vacation at Big Sur. But the odd thing is that, in earlier conversations, Steve has said that he hates the ocean and hates California.

(A little contrived, but it should give you the basic idea.)

Jane Smith has said her son cries when she comes back home.

Jane Smith said her son cries when she comes back home.

Both can be used here. They are equal enough that you can pick whichever you prefer.

But there are minute distinctions between these two sentences, based on what you're trying to convey.

An easier example can be shown with stressing the a specific word in the sentence.

I did not to that.

I did something, but not the thing we're talking about now.

I did not do that.

It was done by someone, but not me.

I did not do that.

This carries the implication that you didn't do it, and that you specifically choose to not do it (i.e. you actively decided to not do it).

A similar distinction can be made in your example:

Jane Smith has said her son cries when she comes back home.

We are focusing on the fact that she said [it]. This is more common in cases where we are discussing what Jane has and has not said. The focus is on making the statement, rather than the statement itself.

Jane Smith said her son cries when she comes back home.

We are focusing on what Jane said, not the fact that she said it. This is more common when the statement (that her son cries when she comes back home) is new information; and our current focus is on this new information, rather than who said it.

But I want to repeat here that the difference is very minute; and you can still use "has said" and "said" interchangeably.