Pronunciation of 'Arguable'





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}






up vote
1
down vote

favorite
1












I know that the proper pronunciation of 'arguable' is /ɑr gju ə bəl/. I do not doubt.



But it often bothers me when reading this word, that it somehow sounds like 'argu r able'.



While not sure, I think I have heard people pronouncing this word that way.



Is this also an accepted alternative pronunciation of this word? I'm asking this question as a non-native English speaker.










share|improve this question


















  • 10




    I've never heard it pronounced that way.
    – Blessed Geek
    Oct 9 '14 at 6:09










  • Perhaps your mind is trying to over apply an intrusive r, or, alternatively someone you know has the somewhat common (for kids, anyways) R-W speech impediment. I think most people probably have an ever-so-slight W on the syllable with the unstressed a.
    – guifa
    Nov 8 '14 at 16:05










  • I've always pronounced it roughly "arg-ya-uh-bull". (Though "ya" isn't quite right -- somewhere between "you" and "ya". And, of course, it's all run together fairly tightly -- there's just a barely detectable transition between the "a" and the "u".)
    – Hot Licks
    Mar 8 '15 at 13:16










  • I would not be surprised to hear it with the injected "R" sound, from someone from the northeast US, or rural mideast US.
    – Hot Licks
    Mar 8 '15 at 13:20






  • 1




    On a related, though reversed, note, I have spent most of tonight watching semi-bad crime shows on TV, and I have heard twice in one night the word barbiturate pronounced without the second /r/, as ‘barbituate’. Perhaps there's some emerging change of the sequence /u(r)ə/ going on…
    – Janus Bahs Jacquet
    Mar 12 '15 at 2:57

















up vote
1
down vote

favorite
1












I know that the proper pronunciation of 'arguable' is /ɑr gju ə bəl/. I do not doubt.



But it often bothers me when reading this word, that it somehow sounds like 'argu r able'.



While not sure, I think I have heard people pronouncing this word that way.



Is this also an accepted alternative pronunciation of this word? I'm asking this question as a non-native English speaker.










share|improve this question


















  • 10




    I've never heard it pronounced that way.
    – Blessed Geek
    Oct 9 '14 at 6:09










  • Perhaps your mind is trying to over apply an intrusive r, or, alternatively someone you know has the somewhat common (for kids, anyways) R-W speech impediment. I think most people probably have an ever-so-slight W on the syllable with the unstressed a.
    – guifa
    Nov 8 '14 at 16:05










  • I've always pronounced it roughly "arg-ya-uh-bull". (Though "ya" isn't quite right -- somewhere between "you" and "ya". And, of course, it's all run together fairly tightly -- there's just a barely detectable transition between the "a" and the "u".)
    – Hot Licks
    Mar 8 '15 at 13:16










  • I would not be surprised to hear it with the injected "R" sound, from someone from the northeast US, or rural mideast US.
    – Hot Licks
    Mar 8 '15 at 13:20






  • 1




    On a related, though reversed, note, I have spent most of tonight watching semi-bad crime shows on TV, and I have heard twice in one night the word barbiturate pronounced without the second /r/, as ‘barbituate’. Perhaps there's some emerging change of the sequence /u(r)ə/ going on…
    – Janus Bahs Jacquet
    Mar 12 '15 at 2:57













up vote
1
down vote

favorite
1









up vote
1
down vote

favorite
1






1





I know that the proper pronunciation of 'arguable' is /ɑr gju ə bəl/. I do not doubt.



But it often bothers me when reading this word, that it somehow sounds like 'argu r able'.



While not sure, I think I have heard people pronouncing this word that way.



Is this also an accepted alternative pronunciation of this word? I'm asking this question as a non-native English speaker.










share|improve this question













I know that the proper pronunciation of 'arguable' is /ɑr gju ə bəl/. I do not doubt.



But it often bothers me when reading this word, that it somehow sounds like 'argu r able'.



While not sure, I think I have heard people pronouncing this word that way.



Is this also an accepted alternative pronunciation of this word? I'm asking this question as a non-native English speaker.







pronunciation phonology






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Oct 9 '14 at 5:47









xiver77

3122613




3122613








  • 10




    I've never heard it pronounced that way.
    – Blessed Geek
    Oct 9 '14 at 6:09










  • Perhaps your mind is trying to over apply an intrusive r, or, alternatively someone you know has the somewhat common (for kids, anyways) R-W speech impediment. I think most people probably have an ever-so-slight W on the syllable with the unstressed a.
    – guifa
    Nov 8 '14 at 16:05










  • I've always pronounced it roughly "arg-ya-uh-bull". (Though "ya" isn't quite right -- somewhere between "you" and "ya". And, of course, it's all run together fairly tightly -- there's just a barely detectable transition between the "a" and the "u".)
    – Hot Licks
    Mar 8 '15 at 13:16










  • I would not be surprised to hear it with the injected "R" sound, from someone from the northeast US, or rural mideast US.
    – Hot Licks
    Mar 8 '15 at 13:20






  • 1




    On a related, though reversed, note, I have spent most of tonight watching semi-bad crime shows on TV, and I have heard twice in one night the word barbiturate pronounced without the second /r/, as ‘barbituate’. Perhaps there's some emerging change of the sequence /u(r)ə/ going on…
    – Janus Bahs Jacquet
    Mar 12 '15 at 2:57














  • 10




    I've never heard it pronounced that way.
    – Blessed Geek
    Oct 9 '14 at 6:09










  • Perhaps your mind is trying to over apply an intrusive r, or, alternatively someone you know has the somewhat common (for kids, anyways) R-W speech impediment. I think most people probably have an ever-so-slight W on the syllable with the unstressed a.
    – guifa
    Nov 8 '14 at 16:05










  • I've always pronounced it roughly "arg-ya-uh-bull". (Though "ya" isn't quite right -- somewhere between "you" and "ya". And, of course, it's all run together fairly tightly -- there's just a barely detectable transition between the "a" and the "u".)
    – Hot Licks
    Mar 8 '15 at 13:16










  • I would not be surprised to hear it with the injected "R" sound, from someone from the northeast US, or rural mideast US.
    – Hot Licks
    Mar 8 '15 at 13:20






  • 1




    On a related, though reversed, note, I have spent most of tonight watching semi-bad crime shows on TV, and I have heard twice in one night the word barbiturate pronounced without the second /r/, as ‘barbituate’. Perhaps there's some emerging change of the sequence /u(r)ə/ going on…
    – Janus Bahs Jacquet
    Mar 12 '15 at 2:57








10




10




I've never heard it pronounced that way.
– Blessed Geek
Oct 9 '14 at 6:09




I've never heard it pronounced that way.
– Blessed Geek
Oct 9 '14 at 6:09












Perhaps your mind is trying to over apply an intrusive r, or, alternatively someone you know has the somewhat common (for kids, anyways) R-W speech impediment. I think most people probably have an ever-so-slight W on the syllable with the unstressed a.
– guifa
Nov 8 '14 at 16:05




Perhaps your mind is trying to over apply an intrusive r, or, alternatively someone you know has the somewhat common (for kids, anyways) R-W speech impediment. I think most people probably have an ever-so-slight W on the syllable with the unstressed a.
– guifa
Nov 8 '14 at 16:05












I've always pronounced it roughly "arg-ya-uh-bull". (Though "ya" isn't quite right -- somewhere between "you" and "ya". And, of course, it's all run together fairly tightly -- there's just a barely detectable transition between the "a" and the "u".)
– Hot Licks
Mar 8 '15 at 13:16




I've always pronounced it roughly "arg-ya-uh-bull". (Though "ya" isn't quite right -- somewhere between "you" and "ya". And, of course, it's all run together fairly tightly -- there's just a barely detectable transition between the "a" and the "u".)
– Hot Licks
Mar 8 '15 at 13:16












I would not be surprised to hear it with the injected "R" sound, from someone from the northeast US, or rural mideast US.
– Hot Licks
Mar 8 '15 at 13:20




I would not be surprised to hear it with the injected "R" sound, from someone from the northeast US, or rural mideast US.
– Hot Licks
Mar 8 '15 at 13:20




1




1




On a related, though reversed, note, I have spent most of tonight watching semi-bad crime shows on TV, and I have heard twice in one night the word barbiturate pronounced without the second /r/, as ‘barbituate’. Perhaps there's some emerging change of the sequence /u(r)ə/ going on…
– Janus Bahs Jacquet
Mar 12 '15 at 2:57




On a related, though reversed, note, I have spent most of tonight watching semi-bad crime shows on TV, and I have heard twice in one night the word barbiturate pronounced without the second /r/, as ‘barbituate’. Perhaps there's some emerging change of the sequence /u(r)ə/ going on…
– Janus Bahs Jacquet
Mar 12 '15 at 2:57










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
1
down vote













I think I've heard that. Maybe it's the intrusive r that turns up after schwa and before a vowel in the eastern US dialect that John Kennedy spoke. If the vowels of the second and third syllables are both reduced, you get [ɑɹgjəəbl] with two schwas next to each other, and that is a favorable place for a glide to be inserted. A similar word is "arduous" which could get to [ɑɹdjəəs] -- I wonder if you ever get an r there, too.






share|improve this answer






























    up vote
    1
    down vote













    I've never heard "argu r able", and I would not describe it as an "accepted alternative pronunciation".



    It seems fairly plausible to me that some people might use this pronunciation, because there is an /r/, or an R-colored vowel, earlier in the word. Words with multiple R sounds are somewhat prone to losing one (via "dissimilation"), and somewhat less commonly, words with a single R sound may have variant pronunciations with more than one due to "assimilation" (as with sherbet, which has a variant pronunciation "sherbert"). See my answer to 'Forward' pronounced more often as 'foward'? for some more information about this phenomenon.



    Variation between /ju/ and /jər/ before a vowel is known to occur in at least one other word, barbiturate (which has the stigmatized variant barbituate, as mentioned in a comment by Janus Bahs Jacquet).






    share|improve this answer























    • Wouldn’t it be more likely to be variation between /ju/ and /jʊr/? Probably /ʊ/ and /ə/ are merged between /j/ and /r/ for most people, but where they are kept separate, I would imagine the variation here would favour /ʊ/. At least that’s I have /-ˡbɪtʃʊrət/ in words like barbiturate, forming an almost minimal pair with a bitcher had… with /-ˡbɪtʃərəd/.
      – Janus Bahs Jacquet
      2 days ago













    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "97"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














     

    draft saved


    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f200573%2fpronunciation-of-arguable%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    1
    down vote













    I think I've heard that. Maybe it's the intrusive r that turns up after schwa and before a vowel in the eastern US dialect that John Kennedy spoke. If the vowels of the second and third syllables are both reduced, you get [ɑɹgjəəbl] with two schwas next to each other, and that is a favorable place for a glide to be inserted. A similar word is "arduous" which could get to [ɑɹdjəəs] -- I wonder if you ever get an r there, too.






    share|improve this answer



























      up vote
      1
      down vote













      I think I've heard that. Maybe it's the intrusive r that turns up after schwa and before a vowel in the eastern US dialect that John Kennedy spoke. If the vowels of the second and third syllables are both reduced, you get [ɑɹgjəəbl] with two schwas next to each other, and that is a favorable place for a glide to be inserted. A similar word is "arduous" which could get to [ɑɹdjəəs] -- I wonder if you ever get an r there, too.






      share|improve this answer

























        up vote
        1
        down vote










        up vote
        1
        down vote









        I think I've heard that. Maybe it's the intrusive r that turns up after schwa and before a vowel in the eastern US dialect that John Kennedy spoke. If the vowels of the second and third syllables are both reduced, you get [ɑɹgjəəbl] with two schwas next to each other, and that is a favorable place for a glide to be inserted. A similar word is "arduous" which could get to [ɑɹdjəəs] -- I wonder if you ever get an r there, too.






        share|improve this answer














        I think I've heard that. Maybe it's the intrusive r that turns up after schwa and before a vowel in the eastern US dialect that John Kennedy spoke. If the vowels of the second and third syllables are both reduced, you get [ɑɹgjəəbl] with two schwas next to each other, and that is a favorable place for a glide to be inserted. A similar word is "arduous" which could get to [ɑɹdjəəs] -- I wonder if you ever get an r there, too.







        share|improve this answer














        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer








        edited Mar 8 '15 at 12:40

























        answered Mar 8 '15 at 12:30









        Greg Lee

        14.1k2829




        14.1k2829
























            up vote
            1
            down vote













            I've never heard "argu r able", and I would not describe it as an "accepted alternative pronunciation".



            It seems fairly plausible to me that some people might use this pronunciation, because there is an /r/, or an R-colored vowel, earlier in the word. Words with multiple R sounds are somewhat prone to losing one (via "dissimilation"), and somewhat less commonly, words with a single R sound may have variant pronunciations with more than one due to "assimilation" (as with sherbet, which has a variant pronunciation "sherbert"). See my answer to 'Forward' pronounced more often as 'foward'? for some more information about this phenomenon.



            Variation between /ju/ and /jər/ before a vowel is known to occur in at least one other word, barbiturate (which has the stigmatized variant barbituate, as mentioned in a comment by Janus Bahs Jacquet).






            share|improve this answer























            • Wouldn’t it be more likely to be variation between /ju/ and /jʊr/? Probably /ʊ/ and /ə/ are merged between /j/ and /r/ for most people, but where they are kept separate, I would imagine the variation here would favour /ʊ/. At least that’s I have /-ˡbɪtʃʊrət/ in words like barbiturate, forming an almost minimal pair with a bitcher had… with /-ˡbɪtʃərəd/.
              – Janus Bahs Jacquet
              2 days ago

















            up vote
            1
            down vote













            I've never heard "argu r able", and I would not describe it as an "accepted alternative pronunciation".



            It seems fairly plausible to me that some people might use this pronunciation, because there is an /r/, or an R-colored vowel, earlier in the word. Words with multiple R sounds are somewhat prone to losing one (via "dissimilation"), and somewhat less commonly, words with a single R sound may have variant pronunciations with more than one due to "assimilation" (as with sherbet, which has a variant pronunciation "sherbert"). See my answer to 'Forward' pronounced more often as 'foward'? for some more information about this phenomenon.



            Variation between /ju/ and /jər/ before a vowel is known to occur in at least one other word, barbiturate (which has the stigmatized variant barbituate, as mentioned in a comment by Janus Bahs Jacquet).






            share|improve this answer























            • Wouldn’t it be more likely to be variation between /ju/ and /jʊr/? Probably /ʊ/ and /ə/ are merged between /j/ and /r/ for most people, but where they are kept separate, I would imagine the variation here would favour /ʊ/. At least that’s I have /-ˡbɪtʃʊrət/ in words like barbiturate, forming an almost minimal pair with a bitcher had… with /-ˡbɪtʃərəd/.
              – Janus Bahs Jacquet
              2 days ago















            up vote
            1
            down vote










            up vote
            1
            down vote









            I've never heard "argu r able", and I would not describe it as an "accepted alternative pronunciation".



            It seems fairly plausible to me that some people might use this pronunciation, because there is an /r/, or an R-colored vowel, earlier in the word. Words with multiple R sounds are somewhat prone to losing one (via "dissimilation"), and somewhat less commonly, words with a single R sound may have variant pronunciations with more than one due to "assimilation" (as with sherbet, which has a variant pronunciation "sherbert"). See my answer to 'Forward' pronounced more often as 'foward'? for some more information about this phenomenon.



            Variation between /ju/ and /jər/ before a vowel is known to occur in at least one other word, barbiturate (which has the stigmatized variant barbituate, as mentioned in a comment by Janus Bahs Jacquet).






            share|improve this answer














            I've never heard "argu r able", and I would not describe it as an "accepted alternative pronunciation".



            It seems fairly plausible to me that some people might use this pronunciation, because there is an /r/, or an R-colored vowel, earlier in the word. Words with multiple R sounds are somewhat prone to losing one (via "dissimilation"), and somewhat less commonly, words with a single R sound may have variant pronunciations with more than one due to "assimilation" (as with sherbet, which has a variant pronunciation "sherbert"). See my answer to 'Forward' pronounced more often as 'foward'? for some more information about this phenomenon.



            Variation between /ju/ and /jər/ before a vowel is known to occur in at least one other word, barbiturate (which has the stigmatized variant barbituate, as mentioned in a comment by Janus Bahs Jacquet).







            share|improve this answer














            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer








            edited 2 days ago

























            answered 2 days ago









            sumelic

            44.3k7105206




            44.3k7105206












            • Wouldn’t it be more likely to be variation between /ju/ and /jʊr/? Probably /ʊ/ and /ə/ are merged between /j/ and /r/ for most people, but where they are kept separate, I would imagine the variation here would favour /ʊ/. At least that’s I have /-ˡbɪtʃʊrət/ in words like barbiturate, forming an almost minimal pair with a bitcher had… with /-ˡbɪtʃərəd/.
              – Janus Bahs Jacquet
              2 days ago




















            • Wouldn’t it be more likely to be variation between /ju/ and /jʊr/? Probably /ʊ/ and /ə/ are merged between /j/ and /r/ for most people, but where they are kept separate, I would imagine the variation here would favour /ʊ/. At least that’s I have /-ˡbɪtʃʊrət/ in words like barbiturate, forming an almost minimal pair with a bitcher had… with /-ˡbɪtʃərəd/.
              – Janus Bahs Jacquet
              2 days ago


















            Wouldn’t it be more likely to be variation between /ju/ and /jʊr/? Probably /ʊ/ and /ə/ are merged between /j/ and /r/ for most people, but where they are kept separate, I would imagine the variation here would favour /ʊ/. At least that’s I have /-ˡbɪtʃʊrət/ in words like barbiturate, forming an almost minimal pair with a bitcher had… with /-ˡbɪtʃərəd/.
            – Janus Bahs Jacquet
            2 days ago






            Wouldn’t it be more likely to be variation between /ju/ and /jʊr/? Probably /ʊ/ and /ə/ are merged between /j/ and /r/ for most people, but where they are kept separate, I would imagine the variation here would favour /ʊ/. At least that’s I have /-ˡbɪtʃʊrət/ in words like barbiturate, forming an almost minimal pair with a bitcher had… with /-ˡbɪtʃərəd/.
            – Janus Bahs Jacquet
            2 days ago




















             

            draft saved


            draft discarded



















































             


            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f200573%2fpronunciation-of-arguable%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            數位音樂下載

            When can things happen in Etherscan, such as the picture below?

            格利澤436b